Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes good idea, anyone can sound very nice, on the phone." We've spoke to people on the phone in the past they can sound nice but really be weird | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe they should do a fuck in public and only the atchers can verify you. Maybe like points out of 10 on performance etc etc etc ?? haha" Some would have you do that too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can they now also ban photoshopped photos from being Fabbed? Theres one lady that keeps getting fabbed, but seems to vary between 5ft 2 and 6ft 4, 36B and 56DD boob s, normal waist, wasp waist. That to me is as much (if not more) of a con than phone verifications!! xx" .... and the guys who's cocks are showers AND growers .... some should be in The Guinness Book of Records! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam" .Think you're underestimating the customising skills of the members..lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People can get verified simply by attending one of the regular social events " Only if people they meet are prepared to do it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People can get verified simply by attending one of the regular social events " its not easy for everyone to get to these i would need a babysitter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"but something to show how they are verified if hidden or lost is a good way i think to stop people getting phone/cam verified and hiding it and pretending they meet!" The advanced search option will find meet verified users if thats what you're looking for | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam" +1 Seems reasonable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm.. It's all very "chicken or egg". If they only had verifications from meets then at some point someone's going to have to take a chance and meet someone with no verifications otherwise anyone new wouldn't get anywhere. I prefered it when we were given the chance to make our own conclusions as to whether a phone validation was worth taking a chance or not.." A phone validation is still only that..only until a face to face occurs is a validation worth anything! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam" So true mate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"but something to show how they are verified if hidden or lost is a good way i think to stop people getting phone/cam verified and hiding it and pretending they meet!" Does it really matter what other people do though? We don't take a lot of notice of verifications and would rather have early phone conversations and then decide to meet rather than rely on what others have said in the past. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" webcam could be setup yeah, but how many women are going to knowingly get involved on cam to aid a guy tricking couples or women into sex if they are not a part of it. not many i dont think!" I can explain how this is done very easily..... but I don't want to help any thickos out there to do it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam" I thought that's what web cam sex was. That explains why everytime I try it the viewers all scream and switch off. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam I thought that's what web cam sex was. That explains why everytime I try it the viewers all scream and switch off. " It's the Nemicolopterus which freaks them out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go further and make verifications only valid by meeting in person. You can't fuck a web cam I thought that's what web cam sex was. That explains why everytime I try it the viewers all scream and switch off. It's the Nemicolopterus which freaks them out." Are you suggesting my cock is small???... again. WHYIORTA! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" WHYIORTA!" Is that a Japanese car made in Newcastle? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" WHYIORTA! Is that a Japanese car made in Newcastle?" Pah! Nissan is based in Sunderland!!! But yes that's what I meant. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm.. It's all very "chicken or egg". If they only had verifications from meets then at some point someone's going to have to take a chance and meet someone with no verifications otherwise anyone new wouldn't get anywhere. I prefered it when we were given the chance to make our own conclusions as to whether a phone validation was worth taking a chance or not.. A phone validation is still only that..only until a face to face occurs is a validation worth anything!" Not really. If you are looking for a couple you could have a fem to fem phone chat, verifying that the other couple is indeed just that, a couple, and not a lonely sad man pretending to be a couple. It is up to you if you wanted to arrange something based on a Phone call, using your own judgement. After all, we're talking about verifications for genuine people here, not rating them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lots of good points on here, many I agree with, but here's a few points to consider... Many say something along the lines of "a phone veri means nothing"... really? So if you talk to a female, surely it proves the profile is accurate in that its a single fem / cpl? Some say "a phone veri can be faked easily"... really? There arent many guys who can pull off a false female voice for long, and as for getting a female to answer the phone for them..... WTF? I feel a cam show can be much more easily faked. "They sounded so nice on the phone, but we didnt like them in person". You will always have a better "feel" about a person when you see them face to face anyway, unless you spend weeks chatting on the phone!!! We always chat on the phone first anyway before setting up a meet of any kind. Having said all the above, we have never really put much faith in phone or cam veris, prefering to see actual meet veris as a more reliable guage of people, its the getting rid of just phone veris that makes us a bit confused, why not get rid of cam ones too? The other issue I noticed was the relatively short period of consultation about the removal of phone veris, it was put up around 6pm one day, and the option for phone veris was gone 15 hours later!!! So, a few nods during a very quiet period of site use.... and BANG, it was done? Not very democratic, made me feel that the decision had already been made, this process was just lip service being paid? " Totally agree with everything you say. We didn't log in for a short while and then all of a sudden it was gone?! And we don't put much faith in phone verifications either, but it was better to have the option and use it as we deemed fit than no option at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lots of good points on here, many I agree with, but here's a few points to consider... Many say something along the lines of "a phone veri means nothing"... really? So if you talk to a female, surely it proves the profile is accurate in that its a single fem / cpl? Some say "a phone veri can be faked easily"... really? There arent many guys who can pull off a false female voice for long, and as for getting a female to answer the phone for them..... WTF? I feel a cam show can be much more easily faked. "They sounded so nice on the phone, but we didnt like them in person". You will always have a better "feel" about a person when you see them face to face anyway, unless you spend weeks chatting on the phone!!! We always chat on the phone first anyway before setting up a meet of any kind. Having said all the above, we have never really put much faith in phone or cam veris, prefering to see actual meet veris as a more reliable guage of people, its the getting rid of just phone veris that makes us a bit confused, why not get rid of cam ones too? The other issue I noticed was the relatively short period of consultation about the removal of phone veris, it was put up around 6pm one day, and the option for phone veris was gone 15 hours later!!! So, a few nods during a very quiet period of site use.... and BANG, it was done? Not very democratic, made me feel that the decision had already been made, this process was just lip service being paid? Totally agree with everything you say. We didn't log in for a short while and then all of a sudden it was gone?! And we don't put much faith in phone verifications either, but it was better to have the option and use it as we deemed fit than no option at all." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Only in person is the way,all mine are in person." All ours are in person too, and we prefer to see potential playmares have them also, but even that doesnt mean that you will like them or vice versa. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"prefer and only do veri's by in person meets too, I think it's much more reliable. Good move by the site to stop the phone veris. Totally agree....I even had a cheeky bugger message me twice last week, the first message was an introductory one and asked me if I would verify him after the second one!! " ive had the same,wasnt a couple from rhyl was it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Completely agree, as i had someone text me and mail via fab, then after a couple of days, she asked that i verify her to make her 'look more authentic' to couples, when she had actually let me down twice?? so no i only verify 'real' meets" how can you verify anyone your not verified to do so lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |