FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Porn ban

Jump to newest
 

By *oungnhung69 OP   Man
over a year ago

crewe

Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilk_TreMan
over a year ago

Wherever the party is!


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th "

No it doesn't. Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *essle_guyMan
over a year ago

hull


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th "

There's not a ban, just need to prove you're 18 or over, in the same way as if you entered a sex shop to buy a DVD

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oungnhung69 OP   Man
over a year ago

crewe

Ye sorry lol.i meant the age thing will come into effect from july 15th

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ye sorry lol.i meant the age thing will come into effect from july 15th"

And why is that something to be sad about?

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oolstewieMan
over a year ago

Southampton

Just downloaded a free VPN app from Apples App Store.

So far appears to work fine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Free VPNs are ok for general browsing but useless for streaming. The paid for ones are not expensive and provide an extra layer of security.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iliciousCouple
over a year ago

South East


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up! "

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh. "

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Chudleigh

Seems like a good idea really, why shouldn’t we have to prove our age to access these site? It might mean we have a lot less UNLOS and perhaps a bit less sensationalism. & an upside of course is that it will be easier to trace trolls if it is ever needed...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district

The optimistic view is that it's another aspect of the nanny state. The pessimistic view is that it's another aspect of control by the state and our liberties are being gradually eroded.

How will the UK government enforce this on foreign-controlled porn sites?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Good idea proving age as have a 10 year old lol.

But surely perents should moniter that shit.

Is there a decent vpn on play store

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *kfitt1Man
over a year ago

sheffield

How will you verify your age? will you have to do so every time you access the site ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Will it affect us access to Fab forum?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oungnhung69 OP   Man
over a year ago

crewe


"Will it affect us access to Fab forum?"

I think it will miss ladyk x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *am4CamWoman
over a year ago

Fairy Land

I don’t see a problem with the concept of an age verification for porn sites at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not a ban.

It's an attempt at restricting who can access it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?"

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t see a problem with the concept of an age verification for porn sites at all. "

True but its being financed by a porn company so they will hold your data and credit card deets. No secure connection encryption requirements and vpn can be used to bypass anyhow.

No one is opposing publically except Myles Jackson Obscenity Lawyer as far as i know, if laws are being written without full consultation which concerns free speech this isnt progress

Any ideas what would work as opposed to the current setup?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"I don’t see a problem with the concept of an age verification for porn sites at all.

True but its being financed by a porn company so they will hold your data and credit card deets. No secure connection encryption requirements and vpn can be used to bypass anyhow.

No one is opposing publically except Myles Jackson Obscenity Lawyer as far as i know, if laws are being written without full consultation which concerns free speech this isnt progress

Any ideas what would work as opposed to the current setup? "

I think the onus needs to be on service providers. Vodafone already run something similar for their mobile data service - you have to prove you are over 18 to switch it off.

Atleast a service provider is someone you already trust (well relatively so!) to hold your personal details as opposed to a porn site!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t see a problem with the concept of an age verification for porn sites at all.

True but its being financed by a porn company so they will hold your data and credit card deets. No secure connection encryption requirements and vpn can be used to bypass anyhow.

No one is opposing publically except Myles Jackson Obscenity Lawyer as far as i know, if laws are being written without full consultation which concerns free speech this isnt progress

Any ideas what would work as opposed to the current setup?

I think the onus needs to be on service providers. Vodafone already run something similar for their mobile data service - you have to prove you are over 18 to switch it off.

Atleast a service provider is someone you already trust (well relatively so!) to hold your personal details as opposed to a porn site!"

Yes Talk mobile also ask you to unblock porn, Tesco Mobile dont

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine."

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oolstewieMan
over a year ago

Southampton


"Good idea proving age as have a 10 year old lol.

But surely perents should moniter that shit.

Is there a decent vpn on play store"

As long as they do not get hold of your driving licence, passport or credit card.

I downloaded Hotspot VPN lite app. So far so good.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mstillere2Man
over a year ago

middleport

Cyberghost is a good one or Tor and orbot should work too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th "

Technically I'm a teenager, I was born on the 29th of February.

What's stopping a child using their parents or another adults ID. Credit card even driving licence. What happens if your purse or wallet is lost and stolen, found by or nicked by a kid.

Plus they must have everyone's details already to verify you're who you say you are. Question is how did they get those details in the first place?

For example if the police stop and check your car insurance they rely on a database to check it.

Now that an independent company has your details what's stopping Ying Tang in Taiwan hacking that company and getting your details?

Sounds a dodgy setup. My advice is don't sign up for anything on line and go back to buying DVDs or make your own porn.

Maybe forget porn at get on fabswingers

and have real sex. You can still be a voyuer, it'll be better than 3d TV.

The off shoot it should boost swinger club attendance, ding, start your own club.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illen5Man
over a year ago

Bath

Wouldnt it be easier just to ban young people? I know it may" be unpopular so just dont allow them internet access until they're 18.

I didnt have internet access until i was 30 and it was dog slow. It didnt affect me unduly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't care I don't watch porn or participate in any of that messy sexy stuff

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th

Technically I'm a teenager, I was born on the 29th of February.

What's stopping a child using their parents or another adults ID. Credit card even driving licence. What happens if your purse or wallet is lost and stolen, found by or nicked by a kid.

Plus they must have everyone's details already to verify you're who you say you are. Question is how did they get those details in the first place?

For example if the police stop and check your car insurance they rely on a database to check it.

Now that an independent company has your details what's stopping Ying Tang in Taiwan hacking that company and getting your details?

Sounds a dodgy setup. My advice is don't sign up for anything on line and go back to buying DVDs or make your own porn.

Maybe forget porn at get on fabswingers

and have real sex. You can still be a voyuer, it'll be better than 3d TV.

The off shoot it should boost swinger club attendance, ding, start your own club.

"

Now we'll get a rash of under4ge sex because kids can't see the forbidden fruit, they gonna be doing it for real still. Will be interesting seeing the stats after this pans out over a few years. With shit sex education in schools loads of underage pregnancies. Not that porn deterrs that. But a wank a day keeps the stork away, just saying.

Also some adults reluctant to give details will now get sexually frustrated and r4pe , sex attacks will go up.

It won't stop kids watching DVDs getting magazines from various sources or doing it for real.

Whoever thought this one up is living in cloud cookoo land. Or a schemer..... They're all schemers with a dodgy plan like Harvey Dent. Do I look like a person with a plan. I just let things happen it's more fun.

Ha ha ha ....ha ha....ha.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us. "

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ncutgemMan
over a year ago

Bath ish

Cant wait to give out my passport and credit card might as well attach my pin and bank account

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iliciousCouple
over a year ago

South East


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?"

————————-

If you think porn is seriously a useful tool for sex education for children then there is something wrong with you.

I also wonder why you think sex education in schools is “shit”. Are you in the education profession or are you just talking about your own experiences?. Actually I read this week that it is getting a review. But to say porn is a substitute is frankly laughable.

Yes I have heard of Mindgeek, but as far as I am aware that is not the only way planned for ID proof. But to say it is just something to “make the rich richer” or whatever nonsense you did say, simply exposes your prejudices and the fact that you haven’t thought the whole thing through. If there is to be a registration system then somehow it has to be paid for.

Whatever the flaws I think this is a step in the right direction if it stops, as intended, my young children accidentally stumbling across porn. Of course it can be circumvented, but I don’t know why people have to be negative about something which will do, at lest, SOME good.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iliciousCouple
over a year ago

South East


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us. "

———/———-

“Sure they can get unrealistic expectations”

And THAT is the whole point which you blithely shrug off.

Truly frightening. Do you have children?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eorge n DragonCouple
over a year ago

Cheshire

Shouldnt sex ed be taught by parents?

And as parents to a teenager. Are most not as capable of using TOR and vpns bypassing this?

Think it just a moneymaking idea.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley

Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked? "

Yes kids will still be able to access it via a backdoor route. But it makes it MUCH harder for most underage kids - right now you can pick up just about any phone or tablet and access hardcore pornography with a couple of clicks.

I really don’t understand why people are against making it harder for kids to access pornography?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urreypair1Couple
over a year ago

Shrewsbury

As the above says surely it's a good step.

And those claiming that they wont be affected as you don't watch porn have clearly overlooked the obvious

Your posting on a site which surely will be deemed to need an age restriction.

Despite some beliefs fab isn't considered social media yet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Shouldnt sex ed be taught by parents?

And as parents to a teenager. Are most not as capable of using TOR and vpns bypassing this?

Think it just a moneymaking idea."

I agree, internet accounts have filter blocks for stopping this very thing.

It's a ploy to spy on people,info gathering and erosion of civil liberties.

So open to abuse too, if the pentagon can get hacked so can Mindgeek the company administrating it. You can just visualise the headlines. "Porn administrator hacked thousands of people's details abused"

I don't trust it.

As for kids there's always a few artful dodgers who get round these systems just needs one to get a few downloads and send them to mates.

The scheme won't have a positive effect.

Baron Bomburst had the right idea take the toys from the kids. Bring back the workhouse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked?

Yes kids will still be able to access it via a backdoor route. But it makes it MUCH harder for most underage kids - right now you can pick up just about any phone or tablet and access hardcore pornography with a couple of clicks.

I really don’t understand why people are against making it harder for kids to access pornography?! "

Yes its easy to see porn. As a dad, i spoke to my child and said it was there and that a lot of people look at it. I also said its not real sex, just like "die hard with bruce willis is not real. I explained it was there just to titalate and shock. I personally don't like porn but people want to see it. Have you seen whats app, it's how kids swap porn. How would me proving I'm half a century old stop that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pmsldCouple
over a year ago

kettering

I think the main issue is that the ability to block kids from adult material has been available to parents for years, your ISP and mobile network providers can block / password protect content, it only takes a phone call or a trip to the shop to do, if all parents took responsibility and used the tools available already this wouldn't be required. The other reason is people don't want to hand details over to companies to store. especially when it comes to porn habits, how long until a data leak happens and somebody is held to ransom with that data ? There are also deeper concerns with governments and companies slowly taking control of what is available on the web to the public.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eorge n DragonCouple
over a year ago

Cheshire


"Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked?

Yes kids will still be able to access it via a backdoor route. But it makes it MUCH harder for most underage kids - right now you can pick up just about any phone or tablet and access hardcore pornography with a couple of clicks.

I really don’t understand why people are against making it harder for kids to access pornography?! "

Is clicking a few buttons that much harder?

Only got to download things to get past. Take about a minute.

Believe as a parent it ours and every others to monitor what our children do online. Not the government.

Using basic filters stops them accessing.

Our youngest 11. Educate computer skills since younger to help later on in life and to improve over the years. More than capable of bypassing the need for porn pass. Our responsibility to monitor and talk about what children do and see.

So what will the porn pass do? Make people money and monitor them maybe.

It will educate children more in good and bad ways.

Good in that it will improve basic computer skills of children as they adapt.

Bad in it will expose children to places where porn sites are not regulated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're 18+ you have nothing to worry about, if you can prove it.

You can always go to your local sex shop and by DVDs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No but I'm also young enough to have had access to porn before i had sex. That hasnt skewed my expectations, so thats why i shrug it off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzz And WoodyCouple
over a year ago

Maidstone


"Will it affect us access to Fab forum?

I think it will miss ladyk x"

Only for those who can’t prove they’re over 18 though, surely? And if that’s the case then I can’t see a problem unless people want to chat with children on here.

Lou

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You have to use your name, an email account as well as either a bank details, passport no or driving license number.

Easy enough to enter. It does mean that now your details are linked with all porn websites you've visited. A data breach would be awful.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inamicMan
over a year ago

Blackpool

Just use a vpn and select a different country to get around it. If like me you don't really want to either buy that weird card there bringing out, or understandably don't want to put your card info into said website

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roubleInMindCouple
over a year ago

Greater Manchester

I don’t think anyone has a problem with the concept of restricting access, it’s more of an issue with the implementation. It’s a system that presumes that as soon as under 18’s can’t access porn the ‘old fashioned way’ they’ll just give up, whereas the more likely result is they’ll access the dark web.

There’s also the issue of providing your details and passport info to online companies, which will leave us all open to data breaches. Would you want everyone to know what type of porn you’re in to?

The education issue is more around providing better education in schools (and outside) to say not everything you see online is realistic or practical, and that it’s like video games or movies, totally exaggerated and not reflective of real life. Gagging may look good on a screen but is less so when someone pukes on you.

But we all seem collectively prudish when it comes to improving sex ed or having ‘the talk’ because it’s embarrassing and we worry that it’ll somehow sexualise kids, but the horse has very much bolted on that.

If we were all really serious about cracking down on the underage using online porn, then parents should better monitor their kids use of their phones and tablets

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inamicMan
over a year ago

Blackpool

Think you're right kids will still access it no matter what, when they get to that stage. For me it's a stage in life we all go through and should be upto parents to monitor or at least talk about it. I'ts a natural thing and should not be scared to be brought forward as a subject, and explained what porn is there for and the differences between that and real life intereaction, just the same as education on contraceptive and as important. Especially when i'ts now so easily available. You can't stop it but can educate on it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?"

Porn social media sites won't appear. The rule that says twitter, Facebook, reddit etc are not covered because less than a third of the content is porn. By creating a porn social media site then you woukd expect the amount of content to be mostly porn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

Porn social media sites won't appear. The rule that says twitter, Facebook, reddit etc are not covered because less than a third of the content is porn. By creating a porn social media site then you woukd expect the amount of content to be mostly porn. "

Yeah been reading up on it more since the thread started

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley

I don't think it'll make a bit of difference to minors access to porn. Anyway at 18 does porn stop harming people. I was proud having a relationship with my child where we could talk about things like this. I kept track of the Internet access. Did once find "big boobed girls" in Google once...... Normal young guy growing up. Education not legislation is a better route. A parent's responsibility

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"I don't think it'll make a bit of difference to minors access to porn. Anyway at 18 does porn stop harming people. I was proud having a relationship with my child where we could talk about things like this. I kept track of the Internet access. Did once find "big boobed girls" in Google once...... Normal young guy growing up. Education not legislation is a better route. A parent's responsibility "

Government aswell, they'r get taught how to use computer's in school, what are they telling them or not telling them regarding this subject.

It's smacks a great opportunity for them to spy on people's viewing habits apart from the obvious personal detail info gathering.

Watch how many people stop using the internet when vpn's get hacked. The paranoia will extend into all peoples internet viewing habits, buying habits.

I'm finding it hilarious the government think it will work positively. Their perception of the workings of the internet are incredibly antiquated and underestimate kids ability to bypass blocked access.

Me? I just won't watch porn. Like I don't go to London city any more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *RnMrsFreakCouple
over a year ago

Hull,England

Studies have shown that kids are more at risk (80%+) of exposure (especially unsolicited) on social media sites like facebook/snap/insta, yet these sites are exempt from age verification, how many times have you heard of kids being targeted on facebook by nonces. It deosn't take long to find porn groups on there either.

All this will do is drive porn deeper underground and trigger the next wave of encryption as the new generation of youngters deftly circumvent restrictions, leaving the gullible adult users on databases all over the world to be used against them at a later date. I recently re-watched 1984, looking at the comparisons of this prophetic 1956 film it's not unthinkable that your online use at some point will make you eligible for 'reconditioning' in the future.

And then they give the keys to this gateway of porn to the biggest porn site owners mindgeek... the mind boggles

Next will be social indexing like they're trialling in China

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"Studies have shown that kids are more at risk (80%+) of exposure (especially unsolicited) on social media sites like facebook/snap/insta, yet these sites are exempt from age verification, how many times have you heard of kids being targeted on facebook by nonces. It deosn't take long to find porn groups on there either.

All this will do is drive porn deeper underground and trigger the next wave of encryption as the new generation of youngters deftly circumvent restrictions, leaving the gullible adult users on databases all over the world to be used against them at a later date. I recently re-watched 1984, looking at the comparisons of this prophetic 1956 film it's not unthinkable that your online use at some point will make you eligible for 'reconditioning' in the future.

And then they give the keys to this gateway of porn to the biggest porn site owners mindgeek... the mind boggles

Next will be social indexing like they're trialling in China"

Very true. My son was learning coding at school at 10yrs old. At 8yrs he was more computer literate than me. Whilst I was growing up, porn was totally illegal (page 3 only) we used to share hardcore magazines at school. Never stopped us... so..this won't work.Don't underestimate a horny teenager. Wonder when the "admin charge" is gonna start?.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *punkymonkey40Man
over a year ago

derby

I will always use VPN my mum used it for year in Bulgaria to watch English TV and now I use it for torrents of my favourite American TV shows. So I probably just carry on with that.

Porn on mobile phone now this is interesting unless things have changed. When I took out new contracts in the old days I had to call three in India and ask the nice Indian lady that I would like to be able to access adult material.

So mobile phones should be almost impossible for kids to access porn unless they install a VPN or parents are stupid enough to unlock the porn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"I will always use VPN my mum used it for year in Bulgaria to watch English TV and now I use it for torrents of my favourite American TV shows. So I probably just carry on with that.

Porn on mobile phone now this is interesting unless things have changed. When I took out new contracts in the old days I had to call three in India and ask the nice Indian lady that I would like to be able to access adult material.

So mobile phones should be almost impossible for kids to access porn unless they install a VPN or parents are stupid enough to unlock the porn.

"

Or go on Snapchat or what's app or Facebook or get films on phones passed round at school or make their own. Speak to a child and ask them, how easy it is going to be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rontier PsychiatristMan
over a year ago

Coventry

This couldn't work for me. My imagination is my biggest source of porn and I am unable to switch it off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us. "

Yes, maybe they do already,as they need a data base already to check against, like the police checking car insurance they work off a pre made data base.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Studies have shown that kids are more at risk (80%+) of exposure (especially unsolicited) on social media sites like facebook/snap/insta, yet these sites are exempt from age verification, how many times have you heard of kids being targeted on facebook by nonces. It deosn't take long to find porn groups on there either.

All this will do is drive porn deeper underground and trigger the next wave of encryption as the new generation of youngters deftly circumvent restrictions, leaving the gullible adult users on databases all over the world to be used against them at a later date. I recently re-watched 1984, looking at the comparisons of this prophetic 1956 film it's not unthinkable that your online use at some point will make you eligible for 'reconditioning' in the future.

And then they give the keys to this gateway of porn to the biggest porn site owners mindgeek... the mind boggles

Next will be social indexing like they're trialling in China

Very true. My son was learning coding at school at 10yrs old. At 8yrs he was more computer literate than me. Whilst I was growing up, porn was totally illegal (page 3 only) we used to share hardcore magazines at school. Never stopped us... so..this won't work.Don't underestimate a horny teenager. Wonder when the "admin charge" is gonna start?.....

"

Totally agree, they'll find a way. It start 15th July

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Good idea proving age as have a 10 year old lol.

But surely perents should moniter that shit.

Is there a decent vpn on play store"

I've used Turbo VPN. For a few years and never had any issues. I travel and so needed it for uk Netflix and other uk based subscriptions etc when away. I watched the rugby on it and had no lag issues.

There is a built in VPN in Opera. This is handy too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked?

Yes kids will still be able to access it via a backdoor route. But it makes it MUCH harder for most underage kids - right now you can pick up just about any phone or tablet and access hardcore pornography with a couple of clicks.

I really don’t understand why people are against making it harder for kids to access pornography?!

Is clicking a few buttons that much harder?

Only got to download things to get past. Take about a minute.

Believe as a parent it ours and every others to monitor what our children do online. Not the government.

Using basic filters stops them accessing.

Our youngest 11. Educate computer skills since younger to help later on in life and to improve over the years. More than capable of bypassing the need for porn pass. Our responsibility to monitor and talk about what children do and see.

So what will the porn pass do? Make people money and monitor them maybe.

It will educate children more in good and bad ways.

Good in that it will improve basic computer skills of children as they adapt.

Bad in it will expose children to places where porn sites are not regulated."

It's not the stopping kids viewing bit the problem, it's the handing over your personal details to someone you don't know in the process.

I don't know anyone in the VPN companies so why should I give em my credit card details.

I just won't watch porn online.

I was trying to watch a YouTube music video and VPN advert popped up first that pissed me right off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *AABMan
over a year ago

Not far

When I was in China last I used a VPN to access blocked sites such as the BBC to tunnel through the Great Firewall and appear to the BBC I was dialing in from the UK. So a good reputable VPN will allow people too access porn without giving any personal or bank details by allowing them to appear to be dialing in from Europe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging."

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"When I was in China last I used a VPN to access blocked sites such as the BBC to tunnel through the Great Firewall and appear to the BBC I was dialing in from the UK. So a good reputable VPN will allow people too access porn without giving any personal or bank details by allowing them to appear to be dialing in from Europe."

I wouldn't trust a reputable VPN either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *RnMrsFreakCouple
over a year ago

Hull,England


"Studies have shown that kids are more at risk (80%+) of exposure (especially unsolicited) on social media sites like facebook/snap/insta, yet these sites are exempt from age verification, how many times have you heard of kids being targeted on facebook by nonces. It deosn't take long to find porn groups on there either.

All this will do is drive porn deeper underground and trigger the next wave of encryption as the new generation of youngters deftly circumvent restrictions, leaving the gullible adult users on databases all over the world to be used against them at a later date. I recently re-watched 1984, looking at the comparisons of this prophetic 1956 film it's not unthinkable that your online use at some point will make you eligible for 'reconditioning' in the future.

And then they give the keys to this gateway of porn to the biggest porn site owners mindgeek... the mind boggles

Next will be social indexing like they're trialling in China

Very true. My son was learning coding at school at 10yrs old. At 8yrs he was more computer literate than me. Whilst I was growing up, porn was totally illegal (page 3 only) we used to share hardcore magazines at school. Never stopped us... so..this won't work.Don't underestimate a horny teenager. Wonder when the "admin charge" is gonna start?.....

"

I read there WILL be a charge for this registration and that there are plans to make it like pay-per-view.

It's going to kill the genuine online porn industry and We hope you all realise it's going to kill Fabswingers as we know it.

The aim was to protect kids but it will have the opposite effect and put them in even more danger as alternative routes emerge, probably on the exempt social media sites.

We have the 2nd most heavily censored internet in the world and the 8th most corrupt government.

What a shame

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *punkymonkey40Man
over a year ago

derby

Friends thought I was crazy for saving all my porn DVDs and clips I downloaded over the years..you won't see me paying for the id anytime soon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *G CoupleCouple
over a year ago

kent


"Why does anyone think it might work?. One kid at school who has access, sends to all the others. Can anybody think of a time, where restricted access or prohibition have ever worked?

Yes kids will still be able to access it via a backdoor route. But it makes it MUCH harder for most underage kids - right now you can pick up just about any phone or tablet and access hardcore pornography with a couple of clicks.

I really don’t understand why people are against making it harder for kids to access pornography?!

Is clicking a few buttons that much harder?

Only got to download things to get past. Take about a minute.

Believe as a parent it ours and every others to monitor what our children do online. Not the government.

Using basic filters stops them accessing.

Our youngest 11. Educate computer skills since younger to help later on in life and to improve over the years. More than capable of bypassing the need for porn pass. Our responsibility to monitor and talk about what children do and see.

So what will the porn pass do? Make people money and monitor them maybe.

It will educate children more in good and bad ways.

Good in that it will improve basic computer skills of children as they adapt.

Bad in it will expose children to places where porn sites are not regulated.

It's not the stopping kids viewing bit the problem, it's the handing over your personal details to someone you don't know in the process.

I don't know anyone in the VPN companies so why should I give em my credit card details.

I just won't watch porn online.

I was trying to watch a YouTube music video and VPN advert popped up first that pissed me right off."

I pay my vpn with PayPal. £2 a month. It works well too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I bet it's all Playboy's doing to increase magazine sales

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Might be the dawn of a new era for fab if they have to comply with it. Currently there is no check re persins age other than ticking a box. If users have to prive it via a credit card etc its a step in the riight direction re reducing the false profiles etc.

Currently some spotty teenager or younger can tick that box, create a convincing profile of any variety and proceed to lead folks on and wind them up for as long as they fancy. In adfition to getting access to some of the best free amateur porn on the web courtesy of the genuine folks on fab.

Bring it on i say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It'll stop kids from accidentally accessing the sites. That's got to be a good thing. The more determined will find a way round but it'll deter the more casually inquisitive kid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab "

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule! "

Errrr... An#%Al farm was always doing the rounds. I kinda understood, not to treat farmyard stock like that.... And if I was the exception, I'd be the kid at school who send to a couple of mates who would send to a couple of mates... As you probably guessed, I am very wary of censorship. In an ideal world, porn wouldn't exist..but since a man drew a dick on a cave wall, and discovered people liked looking at it, it's always been there and always will. Educate kids and explain about sex and porn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *winkleFairyCouple
over a year ago

UK


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule!

Errrr... An#%Al farm was always doing the rounds. I kinda understood, not to treat farmyard stock like that.... And if I was the exception, I'd be the kid at school who send to a couple of mates who would send to a couple of mates... As you probably guessed, I am very wary of censorship. In an ideal world, porn wouldn't exist..but since a man drew a dick on a cave wall, and discovered people liked looking at it, it's always been there and always will. Educate kids and explain about sex and porn. "

Beastiality isn’t hardcore, it’s illegal. It’s not comparable

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule!

Errrr... An#%Al farm was always doing the rounds. I kinda understood, not to treat farmyard stock like that.... And if I was the exception, I'd be the kid at school who send to a couple of mates who would send to a couple of mates... As you probably guessed, I am very wary of censorship. In an ideal world, porn wouldn't exist..but since a man drew a dick on a cave wall, and discovered people liked looking at it, it's always been there and always will. Educate kids and explain about sex and porn. "

I agree educate the kids, they don't teach about the emotional aspect either.

Or having a proper relationship.

When I was at school it was like a science project, without the practical homework I may add, the disecting a frog bit gross and legendary feered by all.

I had a crush on my female English teacher, oh and Anita Harris. Saw Women in Love on TV and a lads porn mag at school and that was it.

The frog disecting turned out to be hilarious when we found out they can change sex. Kind of got of the point of it all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th "

It is not a ban,

"Age checks will be introduced in an attempt to protect kids from discovering hardcore pornography websites." It is there is stop kids watching porn and becoming brainwashed that all women are cock sucking sluts. I think it is a great idea.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford

[Removed by poster at 22/04/19 10:47:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"Porn ban is to come into effect on july 15th

It is not a ban,

"Age checks will be introduced in an attempt to protect kids from discovering hardcore pornography websites." It is there is stop kids watching porn and becoming brainwashed that all women are cock sucking sluts. I think it is a great idea."

I wouldn't trust a VPN , they can be hacked too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ab jamesMan
over a year ago

ribble valley


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule!

Errrr... An#%Al farm was always doing the rounds. I kinda understood, not to treat farmyard stock like that.... And if I was the exception, I'd be the kid at school who send to a couple of mates who would send to a couple of mates... As you probably guessed, I am very wary of censorship. In an ideal world, porn wouldn't exist..but since a man drew a dick on a cave wall, and discovered people liked looking at it, it's always been there and always will. Educate kids and explain about sex and porn.

Beastiality isn’t hardcore, it’s illegal. It’s not comparable "

Rightfully so... But its legal in several us states and many countries in Europe, most of Asia and Africa.....that is why it is online...(worldwide web). As for not classing this as ultra hardcore..???? Its swapped on many social media sites in this country. Me paying to register won't stop this. Lots of beheading are on them too. Personally Im not keen on porn(boring) but you gotta stop and think.. Not kneejerk reactions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
over a year ago

Bedford


"kids will just use vpns to watch porn, its a source of education, albeit distorted due to the shit sex ed we have in schools.

Its just another money grabbing scheme by the rich, The company that control ageID (the age verifaction site being used) also controls the biggest porn websites, pornhub etc and will just charge crazy figures to competitors.

This doesn't apply to social media sites so who knows maybe there will be a bunch of porn social media sites popping up!

——————————

Goodness me what a load of tosh.

What parts exactly? Porn being a source of education for teens growing up?

Or perhaps AgeID

Who has been paid by the government to setup and implement this ageID? It's a company called MindGeek.

Mindgeek is the owner of a large number of porn sites.

this doesnt apply to social media sites? Yeah porn on twitter is still allowed.

Could you elaborate on which you think is tosh?

How on Earth is it a form of education? Education into unrealistic expectations of what real sex and real bodies look like?

This is the first generation growing up with this level of access to free pornography. The rest of us before managed to figure it out just fine.

It's a form of education, Sure they can get unrealistic expectations. but they can still learn positions, more about their sexuality. What stimulates them visually.

older generations talk about dirty magazines. It's a similar principle!

Either way the block wont be effective for minors but the sites will now have alot more data on us.

It’s entirely different. Dirty magazines are basically softcore. A few saucy pictures of someone with no clothes on.

These days young kids have free access to the most extreme hardcore pornographers imaginable. It’s not an education, it’s damaging.

As for softcore magazines, back in the seventies, I remember seeing ultra hardcore pics in smuggled in magazines. As for being damaging, you could be right.... I ended up joining fab

Ultra hardcore? Really? Like the kind of abusive porn that’s readily accessible on the internet? I very much doubt it

And if you did it was very much the exception not the rule!

Errrr... An#%Al farm was always doing the rounds. I kinda understood, not to treat farmyard stock like that.... And if I was the exception, I'd be the kid at school who send to a couple of mates who would send to a couple of mates... As you probably guessed, I am very wary of censorship. In an ideal world, porn wouldn't exist..but since a man drew a dick on a cave wall, and discovered people liked looking at it, it's always been there and always will. Educate kids and explain about sex and porn.

Beastiality isn’t hardcore, it’s illegal. It’s not comparable

Rightfully so... But its legal in several us states and many countries in Europe, most of Asia and Africa.....that is why it is online...(worldwide web). As for not classing this as ultra hardcore..???? Its swapped on many social media sites in this country. Me paying to register won't stop this. Lots of beheading are on them too. Personally Im not keen on porn(boring) but you gotta stop and think.. Not kneejerk reactions. "

I totally agree. I'd rather sacrifice watching porn and not give my details to a protection raquet.

It smacks of carrot n donkey syndrome.

People are probably being setup for a fall by registering.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top