FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

If we were going to make a binomial distribution bell chart of your experience on fab..

Jump to newest
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Say, zero was crap, one hundred was stunning, where would your score be?

Us about eighty three point seven percent.

You?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

13% at best, but it's like fishing, there's a lot of sitting about on the bank playing with your tackle before the payoff

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm an outlier ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"13% at best, but it's like fishing, there's a lot of sitting about on the bank playing with your tackle before the payoff "

I know people carp on, is it there are a load of old trout on here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well a year ago it would be 85-90 this year less than 10 it’s changed in so many ways

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"Well a year ago it would be 85-90 this year less than 10 it’s changed in so many ways "

Can you expand?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ain n MableWoman
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

What a fantastic post.

We would probably be in the 80+% bracket as well, had mostly amazing times, 1 or 2 didn't fulfill but when you haven't been told in the chat beforehand that the hubby only has one leg then it could never be a 100%.

We will endeavour however to bring it into the 90+%

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Probably about 50. Had some unbelievable experiences, amazing fun, made some great friends and I'm changed for the better. But the abuse and other shit I have to sift through is monumental.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Thank you...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

60-65%? There are a few spikes and troughs that cause anomalies...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Measure it however you like, I'm still pegged at zero.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Actually Make it -13 after the pegging thread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mines about 75%...mostly there’s been good times but there’s been a few set backs that have made me weary.

Some people should not be on FAB...I don’t think this site suits some people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester

Up until this year we would put ourselves in the 90% plus bracket .

Then in January I was poorly and we lost our mojo for swinging . Saw the reality of it all , the shallowness , and realised we weren’t really into it any longer . So now we are less than 10% .

I guess we are a bit like ex smokers now we are ex swingers . Nothing good to say about it now .

Sorry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"Up until this year we would put ourselves in the 90% plus bracket .

Then in January I was poorly and we lost our mojo for swinging . Saw the reality of it all , the shallowness , and realised we weren’t really into it any longer . So now we are less than 10% .

I guess we are a bit like ex smokers now we are ex swingers . Nothing good to say about it now .

Sorry "

Different values kick in, fully understand.

Perhaps a little balance?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *queekyCheesyCouple
over a year ago

newark

If there wasnt the odd entertaining nessage, hot pics and some of the forum stuff, it would be less than 10.. so 10 it is, and thats generous

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

Once I've found out what a binomial thingamajig is I'll let you know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%"

Piosson better?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Piosson better?"

I’m not that interested in a long tail

Multi-variate analysis might be more insightful

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/12/18 23:57:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Once I've found out what a binomial thingamajig is I'll let you know"

It’s a distribution with two limiting boundaries eg. 0 - 100%

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Piosson better?

I’m not that interested in a long tail

Multi-variate analysis might be more insightful "

Do you think so? I beg to differ. Still each to their own.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Piosson better?

I’m not that interested in a long tail

Multi-variate analysis might be more insightful

Do you think so? I beg to differ. Still each to their own."

Probably not but a I have had three cocktails so my capacity for typing bollocks is much enhanced

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"Once I've found out what a binomial thingamajig is I'll let you know

It’s a distribution with two limiting boundaries eg. 0 - 100%"

Ok, I'd say we're about 20. Our success rate is abysmal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Piosson better?

I’m not that interested in a long tail

Multi-variate analysis might be more insightful

Do you think so? I beg to differ. Still each to their own.

Probably not but a I have had three cocktails so my capacity for typing bollocks is much enhanced "

Along with anal autistic binomial spectrum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A simple binomial function doesn’t work for me as their are multiple criteria. But on balance I’m more satisfied than not. So 51%

Piosson better?

I’m not that interested in a long tail

Multi-variate analysis might be more insightful

Do you think so? I beg to differ. Still each to their own.

Probably not but a I have had three cocktails so my capacity for typing bollocks is much enhanced

Along with anal autistic binomial spectrum."

I’m not sure what you mean

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Once I've found out what a binomial thingamajig is I'll let you know

It’s a distribution with two limiting boundaries eg. 0 - 100%

Ok, I'd say we're about 20. Our success rate is abysmal."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *HX6969Man
over a year ago

St Albans

My guess is that success rate is lower than 3%....

What alternatives are there?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckbuddies321Couple
over a year ago

Leeds

If the measure is the number of successful meetings I think Poisson with a mean of about 0.5 would be about right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ribsaMan
over a year ago

A box at end of your bed

5% just for viewing the cam rooms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If i was that bored that I considered making bell charts I would wander up the fells with my dogs....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

5 years ago and it would have been about 35 per cent but now it’s probably more like 5 per cent. I’m not sure if its me or fab but its just not as much fun being on here as it used to be. I’m probably past my prime fab days though do its off to the golden springs retirement home for me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"If i was that bored that I considered making bell charts I would wander up the fells with my dogs...."

Gosh I’ve only one dog, need to get another dog, only got one.

Oh and stop having fab fun.

The end is in sight.... not!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"13% at best, but it's like fishing, there's a lot of sitting about on the bank playing with your tackle before the payoff

I know people carp on, is it there are a load of old trout on here?"

You're just fishing for compliments.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"13% at best, but it's like fishing, there's a lot of sitting about on the bank playing with your tackle before the payoff

I know people carp on, is it there are a load of old trout on here?

You're just fishing for compliments. "

No just baring my sole, no net gain...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fat tails

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"Fat tails "

Is that reel?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

japanese trawler.

racking them all in

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My guess is that success rate is lower than 3%....

What alternatives are there? "

To bed women?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"japanese trawler.

racking them all in "

It’s a tuna I don’t know (okay tenuous).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"japanese trawler.

racking them all in

It’s a tuna I don’t know (okay tenuous)."

cant beat a tuna sandwich

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"japanese trawler.

racking them all in

It’s a tuna I don’t know (okay tenuous).

cant beat a tuna sandwich "

Is this the thyme or plaice to talk about food?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"japanese trawler.

racking them all in

It’s a tuna I don’t know (okay tenuous).

cant beat a tuna sandwich

Is this the thyme or plaice to talk about food?"

Great thread OP!

It depends on what you're looking for. Last time I was about 80% this time is too early to tell yet so will wait to see till end of 2019.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icentious OP   Couple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills


"japanese trawler.

racking them all in

It’s a tuna I don’t know (okay tenuous).

cant beat a tuna sandwich

Is this the thyme or plaice to talk about food?

Great thread OP!

It depends on what you're looking for. Last time I was about 80% this time is too early to tell yet so will wait to see till end of 2019."

Hey, quality always floats!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

On the single male curve, I'd be at about 70-75% - doing better than most, overall.

On a global curve, that would equate to about 30%!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would say 95% but that’s because we have made some incredible friends and had some amazing experiences so far.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would say 95% but that’s because we have made some incredible friends and had some amazing experiences so far. "

Your percentage is probably 98% even though our paths never crossed when I used to live in London, but we share mutual friends.

Heard good things. Fabulous fabbers!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *radleywigginsMan
over a year ago

northwest

I’m aiming for slightly less than average.

Just below the bean

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

On the low side, at least two standard deviations off the mean.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top