Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel the point is moot. Disclosing HIV status, undetectable or otherwise, changes nothing. It’s up to you to protect yourself in whatever way you see fit, the onus is on you not them. There’s no difference between sleeping with someone with HIV vs some random who doesn’t know their status or assumes they are negative, it’s your responsibility to take measures. " Totally agree with this  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel the point is moot. Disclosing HIV status, undetectable or otherwise, changes nothing. It’s up to you to protect yourself in whatever way you see fit, the onus is on you not them. There’s no difference between sleeping with someone with HIV vs some random who doesn’t know their status or assumes they are negative, it’s your responsibility to take measures. Totally agree with this "It's impossible to agree. It's just a truism that sleeping with someone who definately has HIV is different to someone who might  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m presuming those who preach safe sex also practice safe oral sex" Why - is HIV as risky from oral transmission as anal? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? " No we haven’t , but I guess we are unlikely to as if they aren’t telling anyone , how would we know ? I thought people with hiv had to tell prospective sexual partners they were hiv pos first ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m presuming those who preach safe sex also practice safe oral sex Why - is HIV as risky from oral transmission as anal? " A negligible risk | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? " I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? " Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on." Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. " Glad to hear you are now more aware that U=U (Undetectable =Untransmittable) People adherent to medication are not infectious whatsoever. Resistance to medication is caused by non-adherence, giving the virus chance to mutate. There is no legal requirement in England to disclose an HIV+ status as long as a) a condom is used, b) the person is undetectable. The people spreading HIV are either those not on medication or more importantly those who don't know they have it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. Glad to hear you are now more aware that U=U (Undetectable =Untransmittable) People adherent to medication are not infectious whatsoever. Resistance to medication is caused by non-adherence, giving the virus chance to mutate. There is no legal requirement in England to disclose an HIV+ status as long as a) a condom is used, b) the person is undetectable. The people spreading HIV are either those not on medication or more importantly those who don't know they have it." After reading this, you do seem very knowledgeable with great understanding of this subject, wouldn’t safer sex just be a logical option for all | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. Glad to hear you are now more aware that U=U (Undetectable =Untransmittable) People adherent to medication are not infectious whatsoever. Resistance to medication is caused by non-adherence, giving the virus chance to mutate. There is no legal requirement in England to disclose an HIV+ status as long as a) a condom is used, b) the person is undetectable. The people spreading HIV are either those not on medication or more importantly those who don't know they have it. After reading this, you do seem very knowledgeable with great understanding of this subject, wouldn’t safer sex just be a logical option for all" Yes, I do have a great understanding of the subject, stigma is still rife mainly due to peoples misunderstanding of HIV with mindsets stuck in the 1980's I agree the logical option would be for all to practice safer sex, but human nature means people will have unprotected sex, the primary route of infection.... the virus is non discriminatory, it can affect anyone regardless of gender, race or sexual orientation | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. Glad to hear you are now more aware that U=U (Undetectable =Untransmittable) People adherent to medication are not infectious whatsoever. Resistance to medication is caused by non-adherence, giving the virus chance to mutate. There is no legal requirement in England to disclose an HIV+ status as long as a) a condom is used, b) the person is undetectable. The people spreading HIV are either those not on medication or more importantly those who don't know they have it." Yes apologies for going off slightly half cocked. Interestingly the THT still advices that a person checks that viral load is still undetectable before they switch from protected to unprotected sex. I think there might be an issue that people are more reckless nowadays as HIV isn’t the killer it used to be - I’m sure I’ve read that new infections are increasing amongst heterosexual people now as they are less likely to be regularly tested etc. (the LGBT community is much more clued up). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I think there might be an issue that people are more reckless nowadays as HIV isn’t the killer it used to be - I’m sure I’ve read that new infections are increasing amongst heterosexual people now as they are less likely to be regularly tested etc. (the LGBT community is much more clued up). " One thing I've learnt from fab is that if a woman is up for bareback, then regardless of how attractive she is, there are more than 500 men who'll fuck her bareback. It's not like HIV is the only concern. Apparently that many guys don't care about knob rot. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel as though some members aren’t as open with being hiv positive as they used to be. Being pos undetectable is still pos and I feel as though some people aren’t as honest these days Has anybody come across this? I did see a worrying post on here the other day where someone said that having unprotected sex with a HIV+ person who had an undetectable viral load was perfectly safe - it isn’t. It’s everyones’ individual responsibility to protect themselves as they see fit but, nevertheless, I would *hope* anyone who is HIV+ would disclose that fact to anyone they intended to have sex with. Perhaps as HIV is seen as more of a chronic condition like diabetes rather than a death sentence these days people are getting more careless? Actually you are wrong.... an HIV + person who is undetectable on meds cannot pass the virus on. Ok, I must admit the advice seems to have changed recently (I looked into this in detail a few years ago for reasons I won’t go into and the advice back then was that undetectable didn’t equal untransmittable). It appears there has been further research done since. Nevertheless, it’s possible for someone to become detectable again if meds aren’t taken as directed etc. Or their virus has become resistant to their meds. Unless they’ve literally had a test immediately before having intercourse how would they know? Overall if someone has HIV surely they should still be telling the person they are sleeping with so that they can make an informed decision. The best way to guard against it (and other STIs of course) is clearly to use appropriate protection. Especially when sleeping with multiple partners. Glad to hear you are now more aware that U=U (Undetectable =Untransmittable) People adherent to medication are not infectious whatsoever. Resistance to medication is caused by non-adherence, giving the virus chance to mutate. There is no legal requirement in England to disclose an HIV+ status as long as a) a condom is used, b) the person is undetectable. The people spreading HIV are either those not on medication or more importantly those who don't know they have it. After reading this, you do seem very knowledgeable with great understanding of this subject, wouldn’t safer sex just be a logical option for all" Safer sex is all that anyone can have, through their choice of partners, specific sexual behavioural practices and sexual health testing and treatment adherence. Stigmatising certain types of people that some do is inappropriate - it is better to stigmatize just ourselves, the only person that we have 100% responsibility and control for - then pursue our own personal choices. There is nothing that's risk free in life but thankfully most of us in this community are more aware and undergoing sexual health testing regimes that are better than the national average Imo. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I think there might be an issue that people are more reckless nowadays as HIV isn’t the killer it used to be - I’m sure I’ve read that new infections are increasing amongst heterosexual people now as they are less likely to be regularly tested etc. (the LGBT community is much more clued up). One thing I've learnt from fab is that if a woman is up for bareback, then regardless of how attractive she is, there are more than 500 men who'll fuck her bareback. It's not like HIV is the only concern. Apparently that many guys don't care about knob rot. " Fuck that shit. Or perhaps not...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
