FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Should single pregnant women sleep with men from fab

Jump to newest
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilth500Man
over a year ago

Merseyside

if they want too

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

I don’t think it’s controversial at all.

It’s no one’s business but their own

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/10/18 09:52:38]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes. Why not.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

I think that should be for them to decide themselves. As long as they practice safe sex to protect themselves and the baby I personally don't see a problem with it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"I don’t think it’s controversial at all.

It’s no one’s business but their own "

so was that a yes or no or a sit on the fence comment

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its down to the people involved

Id quite happily play with a pregnant woman

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *innie The MinxWoman
over a year ago

Under the Duvet

Entirely up to them.

Why do you ask the question OP?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"Yes. Why not. "
say if your ex was sleeping wit a pregnant woman you found out he'd met on fab wud u be happy

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sure why not.

I wouldn't personally keet knowing that they are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Yes. Why not. say if your ex was sleeping wit a pregnant woman you found out he'd met on fab wud u be happy "

If it's my ex, why would I care?

It's up to the people in question.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If they want to, yes

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can’t see any reason why a woman can’t enjoy herself just because she’s pregnant.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *exyajmalMan
over a year ago

oxford

I think if they are fine with what they are doing

Then perfectly fine

There is no controversy here

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Single pregnant women should do whatever the fuck they like

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *innie The MinxWoman
over a year ago

Under the Duvet


"Yes. Why not. say if your ex was sleeping wit a pregnant woman you found out he'd met on fab wud u be happy "

He's an ex, they're both grown ups, entirely up to them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

It's up to women what they want,but I personally can't get my head around women that do. I would have thought it was a very intimate time between a man and a woman and their precious cargo.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It’s no ones business but their own

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *innie The MinxWoman
over a year ago

Under the Duvet


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

Why is this bothering you OP?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's up to women what they want,but I personally can't get my head around women that do. I would have thought it was a very intimate time between a man and a woman and their precious cargo. "

She doesn't have a man.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"It's up to women what they want,but I personally can't get my head around women that do. I would have thought it was a very intimate time between a man and a woman and their precious cargo.

She doesn't have a man."

Yeah sorry just re-read it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any woman having sex with strangers while they are pregnant are within their rights.

My opinion is they have a duty of care towards the child they are carrying and should have the safest sex they can.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heblackmacMan
over a year ago

Ladywell, Lewisham.

Done it 3 weeks ago.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Ok reviewed answer. If she's having random sex with lots of different people then no,if it's one regular man then that's ok. That may not make sense to myself also,but there you go.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

Op, how would you know if you were having sex with a woman who was say, eight weeks pregnant? Is there a difference if the pregnancy is actually showing, do you feel there should be a cut off before which it's acceptable and after which it isn't? What's the difference between having sex with a woman before the baby is born and after?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"Op, how would you know if you were having sex with a woman who was say, eight weeks pregnant? Is there a difference if the pregnancy is actually showing, do you feel there should be a cut off before which it's acceptable and after which it isn't? What's the difference between having sex with a woman before the baby is born and after?"

Flatter belly?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

No they shouldn’t.

They should sleep only with me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

Yes they should, me specifically.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If she wants to.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tirluvMan
over a year ago

the right frame of mind -London

Only if they are expecting triplets

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes. Why not. "
love your eyes

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Any woman having sex with strangers while they are pregnant are within their rights.

My opinion is they have a duty of care towards the child they are carrying and should have the safest sex they can.

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mp411Man
over a year ago

chester

Personally I don’t find “showing” pregnant women attractive so I wouldn’t but each to their own

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *est Wales WifeCouple
over a year ago

Near Carmarthen

Didn't we have a mysteriously deleted thread on this earlier?

Pregnancy is not an illnesss - thus surely it is for individuals to do as they wish?

From the NHS website

"It's perfectly safe to have sex during pregnancy unless your doctor or midwife has told you not to.

Having sex will not hurt your baby. Your partner's penis can't penetrate beyond your vagina, and the baby cannot tell what's going on.

Some couples find having sex very enjoyable during pregnancy, while others simply feel they don't want to. You can find other ways of being loving or making love. The most important thing is to talk about your feelings with each other.

If your pregnancy is normal and you have no complications, having sex and orgasms won't increase your risk of going into labour early or cause a miscarriage.

Later in pregnancy, an orgasm or even sex itself can set off mild contractions. If this happens, you'll feel the muscles of your womb go hard. These are known as Braxton Hicks contractions and can be uncomfortable, but they're perfectly normal and there's no need for alarm. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think the more pertinent question is do women sleep with men on fab

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Up the bum, no harm done

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't think its for us to pontificate on what other peoples life choices are in this case its pretty sad some people think we should.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ilth500Man
over a year ago

Merseyside


"I don't think its for us to pontificate on what other peoples life choices are in this case its pretty sad some people think we should. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral


"I don’t think it’s controversial at all.

It’s no one’s business but their own so was that a yes or no or a sit on the fence comment"

Yes if they want to, no if they don’t want to.

It’s their business. Being pregnant doesn’t take away a woman’s right to make a decision about her own body.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

If they want to

Personally I never could took a break in all my pregnancies

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackDMissMorganCouple
over a year ago

Halifax

Up to the lady ,personally I wouldn't

Miss

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

That is up to the woman to decide. It's not up to anyone else to decide. If a guy or couple do not want to meet a pregnant woman that is their choice.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Any woman having sex with strangers while they are pregnant are within their rights.

My opinion is they have a duty of care towards the child they are carrying and should have the safest sex they can.

"

Agreed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone should be able to sleep with anyone if they want to and it’s safe to do so.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The question says more about the OP than it does about pregnant women. Not doing yourself any favours there mate!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I don't think its for us to pontificate on what other peoples life choices are in this case its pretty sad some people think we should. "

What a ridiculous point of view. As if the only morals we need to worry about are our own.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't think its for us to pontificate on what other peoples life choices are in this case its pretty sad some people think we should. "
pontificate love that word but in regard to subject the potentially pregnant woman has to think about two people now she has a moral obligation to her unborn child to do everything in her power to make her body the healthiest she can in order to nurture the growth of her child or children, their is always a risk be it a small one that you could affect the pregnancy, it's a small part of your life and hopefully a happy point in your life, do your best for you pregnancy but having said that some people like to risk things and as long as they are happy with the outcome then as an adult that's the choice they make.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Op, didn't you find your answer on the other thread earlier today?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *parkleandfluffCouple
over a year ago

Nottingham

Sounds like this is a personal situation? Are you the ex sleeping with a pregnant woman OP?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes. Why not. say if your ex was sleeping wit a pregnant woman you found out he'd met on fab wud u be happy

If it's my ex, why would I care?

It's up to the people in question. "

Maybe it’s the op baby

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Personally I wouldn’t but that’s my personal preference.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

What’s it got to do with you or anybody else for that matter. Worry about your own life and let others worry about theirs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however."

yes and stay together as a family unit and weather the storms of life

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wingin CatMan
over a year ago

London


"I don't think its for us to pontificate on what other peoples life choices are in this case its pretty sad some people think we should. "

Totally agree - why is it such a big deal?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wingin CatMan
over a year ago

London


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter

What’s it got to do with you or anybody else for that matter. Worry about your own life and let others worry about theirs. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire

They can do what they want. Pregnant women have needs and aren't just ovens for baking babies.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

I was pregnant and I'm single. No way would I of met for sex with anyone from here. I offered socials only to help those without an in person verification.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ommyxyzMan
over a year ago

Harlow

I think I’ve read in the latest giudence from the association of midwives that they positively recommend it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think I’ve read in the latest giudence from the association of midwives that they positively recommend it."

Not with random strangers! They base that statement as if mum is still in a relationship with babys dad.

During pregnancy the mother has lots of blood and urine tests. To ensure her health and that of the baby. If all clear then obviously mum and dad are healthy. So no reason for baby's parents to stop having sex.

Randoms from a sex site are unpredictable. You don't know what anyone has. Even a simple cold sore can pose serious health risks to an unborn child and a new born. In fact a new born died from being kissed by a relative with a cold sore! True story!

Condoms break. Condoms slip off. Some guys take them off when the woman is unaware. You just don't know where that person has been before sleeping with a pregnant woman. You don't know where his sexual ex partner had been before sleeping with him. So bad health can and does pass along like a chain effect.

The risk May be small but it's still a risk. So no it's not just down to pregnant woman to take extra care in her condition, it's up to you men too.

I'm amazed some find sustaining from sex with randoms for 9 months, so difficult!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think I’ve read in the latest giudence from the association of midwives that they positively recommend it.

Not with random strangers! They base that statement as if mum is still in a relationship with babys dad.

During pregnancy the mother has lots of blood and urine tests. To ensure her health and that of the baby. If all clear then obviously mum and dad are healthy. So no reason for baby's parents to stop having sex.

Randoms from a sex site are unpredictable. You don't know what anyone has. Even a simple cold sore can pose serious health risks to an unborn child and a new born. In fact a new born died from being kissed by a relative with a cold sore! True story!

Condoms break. Condoms slip off. Some guys take them off when the woman is unaware. You just don't know where that person has been before sleeping with a pregnant woman. You don't know where his sexual ex partner had been before sleeping with him. So bad health can and does pass along like a chain effect.

The risk May be small but it's still a risk. So no it's not just down to pregnant woman to take extra care in her condition, it's up to you men too.

I'm amazed some find sustaining from sex with randoms for 9 months, so difficult! "

But risk is there regardless.

The unborn child’s father could easily be a member of Fab and be sleeping with every Sue, Susie & Susan so he could be passing on god knows what to the pregnant woman also.

Strangers are a risk yes, but the child’s father could also be a risk if he is sleeping around behind the mothers back.

Nothing comes without risks.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think I’ve read in the latest giudence from the association of midwives that they positively recommend it.

Not with random strangers! They base that statement as if mum is still in a relationship with babys dad.

During pregnancy the mother has lots of blood and urine tests. To ensure her health and that of the baby. If all clear then obviously mum and dad are healthy. So no reason for baby's parents to stop having sex.

Randoms from a sex site are unpredictable. You don't know what anyone has. Even a simple cold sore can pose serious health risks to an unborn child and a new born. In fact a new born died from being kissed by a relative with a cold sore! True story!

Condoms break. Condoms slip off. Some guys take them off when the woman is unaware. You just don't know where that person has been before sleeping with a pregnant woman. You don't know where his sexual ex partner had been before sleeping with him. So bad health can and does pass along like a chain effect.

The risk May be small but it's still a risk. So no it's not just down to pregnant woman to take extra care in her condition, it's up to you men too.

I'm amazed some find sustaining from sex with randoms for 9 months, so difficult!

But risk is there regardless.

The unborn child’s father could easily be a member of Fab and be sleeping with every Sue, Susie & Susan so he could be passing on god knows what to the pregnant woman also.

Strangers are a risk yes, but the child’s father could also be a risk if he is sleeping around behind the mothers back.

Nothing comes without risks. "

Also the child that died after being kissed by a relative with a cold sore... that was a family member not some random stanger.

That alone shows risks aren’t just with random unknowns on a swingers site.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

woman can do what she likes with her body.me personaly i wouldnt have any problem meeting with a pregnant woman

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"woman can do what she likes with her body.me personaly i wouldnt have any problem meeting with a pregnant woman"

"Her body"

Yeah because she chooses to kick herself hundreds of times a day

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"woman can do what she likes with her body.me personaly i wouldnt have any problem meeting with a pregnant woman"
dicks thinking again though, squeeze it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"Op, didn't you find your answer on the other thread earlier today?"
no I was about to post a comment and got told by fab that I wasn't invited bk on to the thread it wasn't a bad comment I was just expressing my personal opinion

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire

People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women. "
don't you think some people need help

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women. "

It is. The risk of having protected sex is very small and that's not the decision I inherently have a problem with. But earlier this year there was a pregnant woman on fab racking up triple digit verifications, all bareback. Anyone who doesn't understand why that's immoral is simply lacking a moral compass all together.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orticiaWoman
over a year ago

Wirral


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however.yes and stay together as a family unit and weather the storms of life "

Apparently I’ve stepped through a time portal to the mid-60’s

What if a happily married expecting couple are Swingers & choose to continue meeting during the pregnancy?

No one is saying that this pregnant woman has walked out on the father to pursue a life of hedonism

Swinging & being a loving family unit are not mutually exclusive.

A woman - any woman - has the right to decide what she should or shouldn’t do with her body, regardless of pregnancy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however.yes and stay together as a family unit and weather the storms of life

Apparently I’ve stepped through a time portal to the mid-60’s

What if a happily married expecting couple are Swingers & choose to continue meeting during the pregnancy?

No one is saying that this pregnant woman has walked out on the father to pursue a life of hedonism

Swinging & being a loving family unit are not mutually exclusive.

A woman - any woman - has the right to decide what she should or shouldn’t do with her body, regardless of pregnancy."

true but it is a little irresponsible

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

This is my personnel view me personally I think its quite freaky that a man wud knowingly sleep with a a woman bearing the unborn child of another man and and here's a thought and its only a thought how do you think the farther of that child would feel if he found out that his ex the mother of his unborn child was sleeping with a man shed met on fab mmm now theyres food is it a case of a lack of empathy for the farther look I'm not having a go at anybody I'm just asking for peoples opinions on the subject and this is my final comment on the subject to the men out they're who wud sleep wit a woman who was pregnant how wud u feel if it was your pregnant ex just place yourself in to that situation cause as the farther of a beautiful eighteen yr old girl I'd be far from happy and so they're you have it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help"

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is my personnel view me personally I think its quite freaky that a man wud knowingly sleep with a a woman bearing the unborn child of another man and and here's a thought and its only a thought how do you think the farther of that child would feel if he found out that his ex the mother of his unborn child was sleeping with a man shed met on fab mmm now theyres food is it a case of a lack of empathy for the farther look I'm not having a go at anybody I'm just asking for peoples opinions on the subject and this is my final comment on the subject to the men out they're who wud sleep wit a woman who was pregnant how wud u feel if it was your pregnant ex just place yourself in to that situation cause as the farther of a beautiful eighteen yr old girl I'd be far from happy and so they're you have it "
the farther the better

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make."

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem. "

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter"

No controversy whatsoever. They’re having a baby, not taking a vow of celibacy. Good on anyone who still feels horny enough to do it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however."

What are you talking about? She's already pregnant; should she still meet men from here while she is pregnant?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous."

What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is my personnel view me personally I think its quite freaky that a man wud knowingly sleep with a a woman bearing the unborn child of another man and and here's a thought and its only a thought how do you think the farther of that child would feel if he found out that his ex the mother of his unborn child was sleeping with a man shed met on fab mmm now theyres food is it a case of a lack of empathy for the farther look I'm not having a go at anybody I'm just asking for peoples opinions on the subject and this is my final comment on the subject to the men out they're who wud sleep wit a woman who was pregnant how wud u feel if it was your pregnant ex just place yourself in to that situation cause as the farther of a beautiful eighteen yr old girl I'd be far from happy and so they're you have it "

Says a man...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails "

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I personally never ever would because of the risk to the baby from stds

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

It is. The risk of having protected sex is very small and that's not the decision I inherently have a problem with. But earlier this year there was a pregnant woman on fab racking up triple digit verifications, all bareback. Anyone who doesn't understand why that's immoral is simply lacking a moral compass all together. "

Really?! Jesus that isn't good.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society."

I'm sorry in this instance if you regard that baby or babies with any sense of priority and as a father I would then sense has to be paramount

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society."

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

It is. The risk of having protected sex is very small and that's not the decision I inherently have a problem with. But earlier this year there was a pregnant woman on fab racking up triple digit verifications, all bareback. Anyone who doesn't understand why that's immoral is simply lacking a moral compass all together.

Really?! Jesus that isn't good."

Yes, I stuck them on our hotlist just to make sure we blocked all their verifications. To be honest, it was all the usual suspects and mostly people we had already blocked for similar behaviour with other infected people. I tell myself that they were probably HIV positive before they got pregnant and that helps me feel a bit less upset about it all.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers. "

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically."

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism. "

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy."

think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple


"I know this could be a controversial subject but I'm just interested in what peoples points of view please keep comments to the subject matter

No controversy whatsoever. They’re having a baby, not taking a vow of celibacy. Good on anyone who still feels horny enough to do it. "

I was super horny

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy."

Again, law and morals are seperate things. We don't drive on the right because it's the moral thing to do, it's just the law. Your lack of compassion for the most vulnerable people is outstanding. To pretend that casual unprotected sex is more important than human life is really the bottom of the barrel as far as morals go.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire

They don't even force pregnant women to give up drinking, drugs, smoking, poor diet, or anything else because ultimately it is the womans choice to do what she wants while pregnant.

There are maternity services out there that encourage pregnant women to make the best choices during pregnancy but they don' even force anything onto any woman who uses them.

Autonomy is not radical...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever "

And that has never stopped some women doing things that could harm their unborn child, or neglecting their child after they are born.

So what is your point?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.

Again, law and morals are seperate things. We don't drive on the right because it's the moral thing to do, it's just the law. Your lack of compassion for the most vulnerable people is outstanding. To pretend that casual unprotected sex is more important than human life is really the bottom of the barrel as far as morals go. "

The OP doesn’t mention unprotected sex in his post.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever "

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire

And no, a mini human being that you don't actually give a shit about is not any excuse for you to push your morals onto women.

*looks for up middle finger smiley*

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.

Again, law and morals are seperate things. We don't drive on the right because it's the moral thing to do, it's just the law. Your lack of compassion for the most vulnerable people is outstanding. To pretend that casual unprotected sex is more important than human life is really the bottom of the barrel as far as morals go.

The OP doesn’t mention unprotected sex in his post. "

I gave it as an example right before, we've got a further clarification from our resident radical feminist that drugs and smoking are also more important than the health of a baby.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. "

Ha see that's your weakness

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness "

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.

Again, law and morals are seperate things. We don't drive on the right because it's the moral thing to do, it's just the law. Your lack of compassion for the most vulnerable people is outstanding. To pretend that casual unprotected sex is more important than human life is really the bottom of the barrel as far as morals go.

The OP doesn’t mention unprotected sex in his post.

I gave it as an example right before, we've got a further clarification from our resident radical feminist that drugs and smoking are also more important than the health of a baby. "

I've actually kep my own personal opinion out of it because it's irrelevant to the argument.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orny PTMan
over a year ago

Peterborough

The only issue that I can see, are the physical barriers, constant morning sickness and a non existent libido. They being the passion killers that they are, can take away the woman's choice.

When I'm ill: sex is the last thing on my mind too, but bed, hugs and having some TLC are top of my list.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... "

I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here "

emotions don't make good arguments.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here

emotions don't make good arguments. "

Neither does fundamentalism

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here

emotions don't make good arguments. "

in my mind they do in this instance I'm spot on no argument

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here

emotions don't make good arguments.

Neither does fundamentalism "

Autonomy isn't fundamentalism, women have had it taken away do many times you dunno how you come to that conclusion?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Op are u fucking a pregnant woman off fab and getting grieve of your ex for it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy.

Ha see that's your weakness

They actually can kill someone if they want. They know they will get taken to court for it though because society doesn't approve. But hey laws don't support morals or anything... I don't give a crap about the law governing it it's about a child that ultimately is your daughter or son that hopefully the parent will love and nurture for the rest of its life, common sense and a sense of proprietary are needed here

emotions don't make good arguments.

Neither does fundamentalism

Autonomy isn't fundamentalism, women have had it taken away do many times you dunno how you come to that conclusion?"

Fundamentalism, noun

strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline.

You've got once principle, autonomy, and you're basing everything off that. The Catholic Church has more nuance around abortion than you've shown about the basic responsibility of a mother to take care of her baby. I'm embarassed for you, but glad people can see your feminist views for what they are. Devoid of any moral value.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire

No. You base your morals on what does not exist, i base mine on what does. That's it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well op u opened a can of worms , personally I can't see a problem with a a pregnant lady enjoying sex with a fella off fab if she chooses so ,it's her choice of she decides he should glove up or not,as quoted above technically any child in the womb shouldn't be in physical danger but not sure if could be harmed by an sti ,so can't condemn her for having sex but would urge her to have safer sex

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"This is my personnel view me personally I think its quite freaky that a man wud knowingly sleep with a a woman bearing the unborn child of another man and and here's a thought and its only a thought how do you think the farther of that child would feel if he found out that his ex the mother of his unborn child was sleeping with a man shed met on fab mmm now theyres food is it a case of a lack of empathy for the farther look I'm not having a go at anybody I'm just asking for peoples opinions on the subject and this is my final comment on the subject to the men out they're who wud sleep wit a woman who was pregnant how wud u feel if it was your pregnant ex just place yourself in to that situation cause as the farther of a beautiful eighteen yr old girl I'd be far from happy and so they're you have it the farther the better "
lol that made me chuckle nice to see people still have a sence of humer

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. "

one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol"

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

Just want to say a big thankyou to all the people who have put input into this topic long live free speech and freedom of choice weather we agree with them choices or not cauas at the end of the day we live and die by the choices we make

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just want to say a big thankyou to all the people who have put input into this topic long live free speech and freedom of choice weather we agree with them choices or not cauas at the end of the day we live and die by the choices we make "
Weather was great today

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndecidedMan
over a year ago

London

Why not?

As long as she's playing safe and she wants to.

Pregnant women can get very horny!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby. "

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tbh i dont see any problem with it after all its there choice

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"Just want to say a big thankyou to all the people who have put input into this topic long live free speech and freedom of choice weather we agree with them choices or not cauas at the end of the day we live and die by the choices we make Weather was great today "
lol sure was

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

Just a thought on morals and morality I agree morals shouldn't be shoved in peoples faces but as a society are we on a very slippery slope with a society with out morals or any sense of morality

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just a thought on morals and morality I agree morals shouldn't be shoved in peoples faces but as a society are we on a very slippery slope with a society with out morals or any sense of morality"
welcome to fab

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I don’t see why they shouldn’t. I wouldn’t though but it’s not my body.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago

Hillside desolate

Men that they know well and have met before for safe sex, yes why not? Random bareback gang bang meets? No probably not.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Somebody should...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I agree morals shouldn't be shoved in peoples faces"

Nobody really believes that. We celebrate morals being shoved in people's faces, albeit after the victory.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For a society, swingers, that would be judged by many to have low morals, it is extremely moralistic on many subjects.

Rightly or wrongly.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iliciousCouple
over a year ago

Sussex/Surrey


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument."

No obligation to the foetus? There is something seriously wrong with you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"For a society, swingers, that would be judged by many to have low morals, it is extremely moralistic on many subjects.

Rightly or wrongly."

That's irrelevant though. A person exercising their logic and rational mind to determine that good of an action is not making a claim that all their actions are good. A murderer can still objectivly claim it's wrong to steal.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"For a society, swingers, that would be judged by many to have low morals, it is extremely moralistic on many subjects.

Rightly or wrongly.

That's irrelevant though. A person exercising their logic and rational mind to determine that good of an action is not making a claim that all their actions are good. A murderer can still objectivly claim it's wrong to steal. "

But it could be said that a murderer has stolen someones life.

Rightly or wrongly.

One person's moral.....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I find it a bit weird to think a man would want to sleep with a lady who wasn't pregnant by them. I don't know why.

Im not sure I would be able to personally, sort of feels like a time to close ranks.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What a load of bollocks you lot chat, bemuses me

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"For a society, swingers, that would be judged by many to have low morals, it is extremely moralistic on many subjects.

Rightly or wrongly.

That's irrelevant though. A person exercising their logic and rational mind to determine that good of an action is not making a claim that all their actions are good. A murderer can still objectivly claim it's wrong to steal.

But it could be said that a murderer has stolen someones life.

Rightly or wrongly.

One person's moral....."

No that's just semantic bullshit. Not to mention the fact that a thief can still objectively determine that stealing is wrong. People can and do, commit acts they rationally know to be immoral.

Morals are not random. There are really only a handful of consistent moral frameworks. None of which would say a mothers instant gratification is more important than a babies health.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It may be semantic bullshit. But it's also moralistic bullshit.

The original question was hungover from another thread this morning which was closed because it became a personal vendetta.

The question is whether a pregnant woman should have sex with a man from fab. Initially I'd assumed the woman in question was in a relationship, married and it was a straightforward question on being pregnant and swinging or if there were dangers of. Since then the woman, rightly or wrongly, has become single and fucks everything and anything, usually bareback, judging by many of the quotes on this thread. Obviously there would be a danger to the baby and mother, if this were true. Which I think everyone would agree on. But this is far from what was originally quoted. Everyone is trying to reach their own moral high ground before others get there first. Which is why I made the quip about those that would be judged in having no morals, blah, blah.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I personally think a woman should be able to put her sexual urges aside and concentrate on her unborn baby.

If she's that horny she can self satisfy with toys. That's what I did through my pregnancy as I was single for the last 7 months of it.

Sleeping with multiple random men whilst pregnant just doesn't sit right with me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I find it a bit weird to think a man would want to sleep with a lady who wasn't pregnant by them. I don't know why.

Im not sure I would be able to personally, sort of feels like a time to close ranks.

"

Agree

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I personally think a woman should be able to put her sexual urges aside and concentrate on her unborn baby.

If she's that horny she can self satisfy with toys. That's what I did through my pregnancy as I was single for the last 7 months of it.

Sleeping with multiple random men whilst pregnant just doesn't sit right with me. "

It doesn’t with me either. Interesting reading. Same old each to their own applies but was surprised at most of the comments here to be honest.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument.

No obligation to the foetus? There is something seriously wrong with you."

You just don't think the pregnant woman is important and should lose her autonomy by force and not by choice.

Do you have any idea why women stayed in abusive relationships because society told them they should do that? Bring up their kids in that environment? Yeah they we're forced to lose their autonomy.

Just coz one pregnant woman is fucking the whole site all pregnant women should lose their autonomy? Lol. Nobody even puts these arguments into a realistic frame, you all think emotionally and that is why the argument is invalid.

And no, no woman has to give up anything just because she is carrying a foetus. You can't force people to do things against their will and you have to leave people to do the lame shit that they do coz it's their life.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iliciousCouple
over a year ago

Sussex/Surrey


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument.

No obligation to the foetus? There is something seriously wrong with you.

You just don't think the pregnant woman is important and should lose her autonomy by force and not by choice.

Do you have any idea why women stayed in abusive relationships because society told them they should do that? Bring up their kids in that environment? Yeah they we're forced to lose their autonomy.

Just coz one pregnant woman is fucking the whole site all pregnant women should lose their autonomy? Lol. Nobody even puts these arguments into a realistic frame, you all think emotionally and that is why the argument is invalid.

And no, no woman has to give up anything just because she is carrying a foetus. You can't force people to do things against their will and you have to leave people to do the lame shit that they do coz it's their life.

"

You clearly have an axe to grind and are unwilling, or incapable, or both, of stringing together any kind of coherent argument without randomly ascribing views to others .

But just to repeat - if you think that an expectant mother bears no responsibility to her unborn child as a given - then there is something fundamentally missing from your value system and I feel sorry for you. Even animals don’t act in that way.

That is solely in answer to that specific point made by you.

As to the original question, my view is that whilst of course the woman can do as she pleases, I don’t think it is a good idea for the very many good reasons expressed by by others above.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *.H.SMan
over a year ago

London

hey preggers have urges too i say crack on....drop me a message too hehehe

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

Long ass thread. I say, if they want, and the man also wants to. Then go ahead.

Personally, not really for me though.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *xMFM3sumsxxWoman
over a year ago

SouthWest Lancashire


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument.

No obligation to the foetus? There is something seriously wrong with you.

You just don't think the pregnant woman is important and should lose her autonomy by force and not by choice.

Do you have any idea why women stayed in abusive relationships because society told them they should do that? Bring up their kids in that environment? Yeah they we're forced to lose their autonomy.

Just coz one pregnant woman is fucking the whole site all pregnant women should lose their autonomy? Lol. Nobody even puts these arguments into a realistic frame, you all think emotionally and that is why the argument is invalid.

And no, no woman has to give up anything just because she is carrying a foetus. You can't force people to do things against their will and you have to leave people to do the lame shit that they do coz it's their life.

You clearly have an axe to grind and are unwilling, or incapable, or both, of stringing together any kind of coherent argument without randomly ascribing views to others .

But just to repeat - if you think that an expectant mother bears no responsibility to her unborn child as a given - then there is something fundamentally missing from your value system and I feel sorry for you. Even animals don’t act in that way.

That is solely in answer to that specific point made by you.

As to the original question, my view is that whilst of course the woman can do as she pleases, I don’t think it is a good idea for the very many good reasons expressed by by others above.

"

I've left my personal morals put of the argument because they are irrelevant to it, my personal morals are not being forced onto anyone so why bring them up? But thanks for agreeing that she has autonomy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

even if she is barebacking syphilis riddled rugby teams in one sitting, then it is still no one elses business.

She should take care of herself and her child, thats a given.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"even if she is barebacking syphilis riddled rugby teams in one sitting, then it is still no one elses business.

She should take care of herself and her child, thats a given.

"

Yeah of course because she is autonomous and should be able to do what she wants I suppose! Of course it’s someone else’s business. What about the father? This isn’t a question of autonomy this is a question of morals. Sorry but any woman who would do what you just said (although I hope this would be highly unlikely!) doesn’t deserve children in my book.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"even if she is barebacking syphilis riddled rugby teams in one sitting, then it is still no one elses business.

She should take care of herself and her child, thats a given.

Yeah of course because she is autonomous and should be able to do what she wants I suppose! Of course it’s someone else’s business. What about the father? This isn’t a question of autonomy this is a question of morals. Sorry but any woman who would do what you just said (although I hope this would be highly unlikely!) doesn’t deserve children in my book. "

As i said, I saw one this year on fab and those guys had worse than syphilis.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"even if she is barebacking syphilis riddled rugby teams in one sitting, then it is still no one elses business.

She should take care of herself and her child, thats a given.

Yeah of course because she is autonomous and should be able to do what she wants I suppose! Of course it’s someone else’s business. What about the father? This isn’t a question of autonomy this is a question of morals. Sorry but any woman who would do what you just said (although I hope this would be highly unlikely!) doesn’t deserve children in my book.

As i said, I saw one this year on fab and those guys had worse than syphilis. "

Yeah I saw that. Disgusting. Never thought these words would ever come out of my mouth but I’ve actually agreed with most of what you’ve said after reading through this

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"even if she is barebacking syphilis riddled rugby teams in one sitting, then it is still no one elses business.

She should take care of herself and her child, thats a given.

Yeah of course because she is autonomous and should be able to do what she wants I suppose! Of course it’s someone else’s business. What about the father? This isn’t a question of autonomy this is a question of morals. Sorry but any woman who would do what you just said (although I hope this would be highly unlikely!) doesn’t deserve children in my book.

As i said, I saw one this year on fab and those guys had worse than syphilis.

Yeah I saw that. Disgusting. Never thought these words would ever come out of my mouth but I’ve actually agreed with most of what you’ve said after reading through this "

Broken clocks

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that.."

I know and that’s wrong too in my opinion. Having sex with different men whilst pregnant is fine. Not something I’d do though. Putting the life of your unborn child at risk in any shape or form is not fine.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that.."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that..

"

To be fair though this thread has veered away from the original question long ago. In answer to the ops question it’s not something I’d do but I don’t see why not if it’s safe.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that.."
yes we all know some women smoke and drink and we all should that they shouldn't but as smoking is an addiction I can really understand why its hard to stop smoking whist pregnant by what you've said correct me if I'm wrong your looking at the health risks and not at the moral issues can i safely say they're are health and moral sides to this I suppose as the mother of an unborn child you have to way things up and make what hopefully will be a sensible decision and not a selfish one

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is it worse than smoking and drinking while pregnant? Plenty do that..

To be fair though this thread has veered away from the original question long ago. In answer to the ops question it’s not something I’d do but I don’t see why not if it’s safe. "

True. And I agree.

If I were pregnant I personally don’t think I would be having casual sex strangers, but I can’t see why others shouldn’t!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddonistikMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"Yes. Why not. say if your ex was sleeping wit a pregnant woman you found out he'd met on fab wud u be happy "

Sorry but he's your ex, what has it got to do with you?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People still think in this day and age it's ok to remove autonomy from pregnant women.

don't you think some people need help

Maybe some do if they want to change, but otherwise women are allowed autonomy, pregnant or not.

It's her body, her pregnancy, and she has to deal with the consequences of anything that arises due to her choices, but they're her choices to make.

No, the baby deals with the consequences. That's the moral problem.

There is no moral problem. right now the law supports her pregnant body being autonomous.What's the law got to do with it common sense prevails

Laws tend to support the morals of the majority of a society.

Absolute nonsense. There is no moral code that would prioritise unprotect casual sex over the health risks to the baby, it's simply people acting immorally. Law and moral are different, that's kind of like what most people learn as teenagers.

There's no law saying it's illegal. If it was of such moral outrage there would be one by now, but there isn't.

Btw in case you didn't realise i support autonomy and the non-pushing of ideals onto others so you're arguing with a brick wall basically.

Sorry but your logic is embarassing. The truly hideous face of radical feminism.

You being pushy is hideous. The logic is that women have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.

Her body is still hers even when she is pregnant. She has no obligation to the foetus growing inside whatsoever,and that's the law. Once a baby is born then others can intervene because it isn't dependent on her but until then no you can't in any way, shape or form because she (pregnant woman) has autonomy.think about what you are saying " she has no obligation to that baby" she's that babies mother forever

Pushing morals on other people is inherently wrong too. Apparently. If I feel like murdering someone then I fucking well will thank you, don't need anyone limiting my autonomy. one more on the list of traits on how to spot a Psychopath number 8 if a person says if I feel like I want to kill sumone I fucking will lol

Given that a psychopath is someone with impaired or zero empathy or remorse. Then I'd say that you need look no further than people who say unprotected sex, drugs and smoking are more important than the health of a baby.

Don't bother dragging me into your fallacious argument.

No obligation to the foetus? There is something seriously wrong with you.

You just don't think the pregnant woman is important and should lose her autonomy by force and not by choice.

Do you have any idea why women stayed in abusive relationships because society told them they should do that? Bring up their kids in that environment? Yeah they we're forced to lose their autonomy.

Just coz one pregnant woman is fucking the whole site all pregnant women should lose their autonomy? Lol. Nobody even puts these arguments into a realistic frame, you all think emotionally and that is why the argument is invalid.

And no, no woman has to give up anything just because she is carrying a foetus. You can't force people to do things against their will and you have to leave people to do the lame shit that they do coz it's their life.

You clearly have an axe to grind and are unwilling, or incapable, or both, of stringing together any kind of coherent argument without randomly ascribing views to others .

But just to repeat - if you think that an expectant mother bears no responsibility to her unborn child as a given - then there is something fundamentally missing from your value system and I feel sorry for you. Even animals don’t act in that way.

That is solely in answer to that specific point made by you.

As to the original question, my view is that whilst of course the woman can do as she pleases, I don’t think it is a good idea for the very many good reasons expressed by by others above.

I've left my personal morals put of the argument because they are irrelevant to it, my personal morals are not being forced onto anyone so why bring them up? But thanks for agreeing that she has autonomy.

"

Ok answer me this then if you would on the whole “her autonomy” subject. If it’s her choice should she be able to do whatever she wants and go with as many guys as she wants bareback or not? Also do you think the father of that unborn child should accept this and have no say in the matter if he’s not happy for her to do so?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icentiousCouple
over a year ago

Up on them there hills

Have you ever slept with a pregnant woman, they take most of the bed up and snore!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

After all I've read today my personnel opinion and its just my opinion so whether u agree or not that's your choice personally I don't agree that pregnant women should sleep wit men from fab or any were else for that matter I think they're is health and moral grounds as well as the feelings of the unborn babies farther which I think should be taken into consideration but to keep things balanced I believe that its the women's choice like I've said before hopefully she,ll way everythink up and make what Eva she feels right for her and the unborn child but when she makes that decision it won't be a selfish one love sent to you all stay strong stay safe

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"The question says more about the OP than it does about pregnant women. Not doing yourself any favours there mate! "
just want to say a big ty for your contribution they're u have it people subject sorted lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If they choose to...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Definitely if that's what they want to do each to their own

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *FFB69Woman
over a year ago

Torfaen/Gwent


"Ok reviewed answer. If she's having random sex with lots of different people then no,if it's one regular man then that's ok. That may not make sense to myself also,but there you go."

Why? What difference does it make?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *FFB69Woman
over a year ago

Torfaen/Gwent


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however."

Did you read the question right?

So if a woman get a pregnant by a long term partner and is left, for whatever reason. She shouldn't be allowed to go out and have sex?

Not sure where the "sperm donor" bit comes into it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Entirely up to a Pregnant girl / couple.

Personally I find it VERY arousing and would never say no to a lady with a Bump.

Hard to find, though.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t understand all of the ‘it’s none of our business’ replies?

We have been asked our opinions and I’m happy to give mine. I’m not directly interfering in a persons life!

My opinion is that it’s wrong because in MY world, children should be raised in a stable relationship and not use somebody as a sperm donor. This is a simplistic opinion however.yes and stay together as a family unit and weather the storms of life

Apparently I’ve stepped through a time portal to the mid-60’s

What if a happily married expecting couple are Swingers & choose to continue meeting during the pregnancy?

No one is saying that this pregnant woman has walked out on the father to pursue a life of hedonism

Swinging & being a loving family unit are not mutually exclusive.

A woman - any woman - has the right to decide what she should or shouldn’t do with her body, regardless of pregnancy."

You should know by now, there is only one way to do swinging. And that's the way of the person making a post. There is very little leeway in this. Do it any other way than theirs and your morals, judgment and mental health are all, questioned

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ave explorerMan
over a year ago

Portsmouth

should people comment on weather pregnant or bi or gay etc... have sex with others , unless it effects them personally? just debating if it comes across aggressive., it's not ment to. x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"should people comment on weather pregnant or bi or gay etc... have sex with others , unless it effects them personally? just debating if it comes across aggressive., it's not ment to. x"

What would be the logic of not commenting on things that don't directly effect you personally? I mean am i rationally incapable at looking at the north Korean government and saying I think they are morally reprehensible, just because it doesn't effect me? Our whole legal system is based on the idea that people not directly effected, make better judgements.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

Isn't it up to the single pregnant woman who she should sleep with

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"Ok reviewed answer. If she's having random sex with lots of different people then no,if it's one regular man then that's ok. That may not make sense to myself also,but there you go.

Why? What difference does it make? "

I think she means the less men she sleeps with the less danger to the pregnant woman and her unborn child

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

To the people who are just to comment on this subject may I suggest u go right bk to the very top of this very long thread and read what has been a lot of good constructive adult comments and then make a constructive comment and not a spur of the hip one if you have read the entire thread gawd u deserve a meadle hats of to ya and loads of respect sent

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"To the people who are just to comment on this subject may I suggest u go right bk to the very top of this very long thread and read what has been a lot of good constructive adult comments and then make a constructive comment and not a spur of the hip one if you have read the entire thread gawd u deserve a meadle hats of to ya and loads of respect sent"
ment medal

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eddonistikMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"Isn't it up to the single pregnant woman who she should sleep with"

Exactly, I have always viewed this lifestyle as being about you have sex with whoever you want to in whatever way you want as long as all of you are consenting adults.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Damn, it’s been a long time since I fucked a pregnant woman. It can be extremely erotic.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough

[Removed by poster at 15/10/18 00:25:17]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"This is my personnel view me personally I think its quite freaky that a man wud knowingly sleep with a a woman bearing the unborn child of another man and and here's a thought and its only a thought how do you think the farther of that child would feel if he found out that his ex the mother of his unborn child was sleeping with a man shed met on fab mmm now theyres food is it a case of a lack of empathy for the farther look I'm not having a go at anybody I'm just asking for peoples opinions on the subject and this is my final comment on the subject to the men out they're who wud sleep wit a woman who was pregnant how wud u feel if it was your pregnant ex just place yourself in to that situation cause as the farther of a beautiful eighteen yr old girl I'd be far from happy and so they're you have it "
once again

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *rs99 OP   Man
over a year ago

Scarborough


"After all I've read today my personnel opinion and its just my opinion so whether u agree or not that's your choice personally I don't agree that pregnant women should sleep wit men from fab or any were else for that matter I think they're is health and moral grounds as well as the feelings of the unborn babies farther which I think should be taken into consideration but to keep things balanced I believe that its the women's choice like I've said before hopefully she,ll way everythink up and make what Eva she feels right for her and the unborn child but when she makes that decision it won't be a selfish one love sent to you all stay strong stay safe"
once again

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top