FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Debate time

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

What are people’s thoughts??

So should ppl be allowed to msg others without 1 either joining the site I am mean it’s not expensive.

2 without being photo verified by admin? To stop all the times wasters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aven RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool

I'm not photo verified but I've met in clubs and had solo meets, proves I'm genuine x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes and yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yep

Yep

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

We all have the choice to set filters to exclude non site supporters and those without verifications from messaging us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rlo67Man
over a year ago

Dumfries

Is this just going to be a debate amongst a few of us or shall we mass-debate?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

My point is too many fake profiles and how should it be handled pretty much.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why not just make it a paid site. Its really not expensive as you say.

If more people paid there might be more investment in development.

Verifications aren't as clear a sign of validity as a photo verification.

Particularly for couples.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why not just make it a paid site. Its really not expensive as you say.

If more people paid there might be more investment in development.

Verifications aren't as clear a sign of validity as a photo verification.

Particularly for couples."

Photo veri would be far easier to fake than a meet veri.

This subject has been debated to death of late.

If people think with their brains rather than their sex organs it is very, very easy to avoid anyone who may or may not be a fake.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ymaleMan
over a year ago

nr Bradford

Is this a mass-debate by any chance? Think it could be right up my street

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd definitely suggest paying monthly to be on fab. That would stop half of the fakes and time wasters, dates and none players. Then that would leave us genuine ones to enjoy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un Mike 2019Man
over a year ago

Bristol

Meet veris are easier to fake, you just need a second account and a second device to log in to with the second account.

As much as I don’t like the idea of it being a paid only site, I do see that there’s very little other way to find genuine people on here.

Having said that, using your smarts with photo searches on google etc or to see someone who’s been here for six months to a year with no circle tickmark is an easy way to spot someone who isn’t genuine or is catfishing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I think people should be photo verified and pay a fee but after its run out should be able to still be able to stop on might get rid of some fakes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What are people’s thoughts??

So should ppl be allowed to msg others without 1 either joining the site I am mean it’s not expensive.

2 without being photo verified by admin? To stop all the times wasters

"

photo veris mean very little really, this life has many forms of time-wasting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We’re not photo verified but got plenty meet verification to show we are real and genuine,but don’t stop us from getting the time wasters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top