Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I also meant to add in addition to oral with men..playing with tv/cd/pre-op TS.. or an exclusive attraction to TS. I argue you are definitely on the spectrum." I agree with Kinsey’s ‘spectrum’ theory but some people are 100% straight and others 100% gay. Straight guys don’t have sex with people with a cock, no matter what they look or dress like. Maybe that’s a narrow view but it’s mine. Blinkered. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Straight should and in my mind is just that..straight i.e straight down the line as it where. Whatever people do is up to them and more power too them but why hide or diminsh being bi or gay? Sure you could argue that it hinders the chance of meets but if you aim to get meets through deception then perhaps sit yourself down and give yourself a good talking too. " I’m bisexual and it doesn’t hinder my meets. I’ve chatted to men who say it does though but it’s not the only reason, I’d wager. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Straight should and in my mind is just that..straight i.e straight down the line as it where. Whatever people do is up to them and more power too them but why hide or diminsh being bi or gay? Sure you could argue that it hinders the chance of meets but if you aim to get meets through deception then perhaps sit yourself down and give yourself a good talking too. I’m bisexual and it doesn’t hinder my meets. I’ve chatted to men who say it does though but it’s not the only reason, I’d wager. " No i would tend to agree, i threw it out there to stop someone throwing it at me haha;) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Kinsey’s ‘spectrum’ theory but some people are 100% straight and others 100% gay. Straight guys don’t have sex with people with a cock, no matter what they look or dress like. Maybe that’s a narrow view but it’s mine. Blinkered. " Yep, I agree with you 100% A LOT of people, more than we assume are somewhere between the two. But there are still LOTS more people are definitely 100% straight/gay. We know it's more socially acceptable for women to publicly blur the sexuality lines and state they are on the spectrum. It's not for men so much--hence we see so many in denial about not being straight and CLINGING FOR DEAR LIFE to the 'straight' label.... or claiming labels don't matter.. because they want to pass as straight but fancy sucking cocks in the closet? Funny, I don't see women using the labels don't matter line as much. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 " The term for men who only f**k women is STRAIGHT! Why isn’t it obvious? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 The term for men who only f**k women is STRAIGHT! Why isn’t it obvious?" lol, girl, you tell me. Also, tell these dudes out here who thinking sucking cock and repeated sexual activity with men/tvs still makes them straight? I guess it's just a catch-all term now! Hence MEN who actually only fuck women need their own term now. The world is funny. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 The term for men who only f**k women is STRAIGHT! Why isn’t it obvious? lol, girl, you tell me. Also, tell these dudes out here who thinking sucking cock and repeated sexual activity with men/tvs still makes them straight? I guess it's just a catch-all term now! Hence MEN who actually only fuck women need their own term now. The world is funny." The MEN who suck cock and have activity with men/TVs is not straight, it’s bi but defo not gay. I see what you mean though.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Happy with the gold star, can't go wrong with one of them" Makes me think of ‘gold top’ the creamy milk | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem comes down to not enough people realising that bisexual isn't biromantic. Also alot of people who are between 80 to 99% on the straight or gay end of the spectrum struggle to admit to themselves that they are bisexual." I think you're spot on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't mean to butt in but if you are straight you shouldn't be bending over backwards to be called so. I know its frustrating but you just got to suck it up and accept people have always got labels and that's something you will just have to swallow. To be honest, all these words... bi, gay, straight, pan.. they are all such a mouthful, i wouldn't bother." Sooo... why do you chose to label yourself straight on here instead of something else when you like to suck cocks? Just a curious question. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'll be honest, the only reason i joined this thread was to try and make puns, but i think i have ran out. In answer to your question i'll get straight and to the point... I have no idea what you are talking about. " Are you serious? lol This thread is basically based off the one you started saying you get off on straight guys sucking cocks? Or are you saying you don't suck them-- you just like the idea of straight guys sucking cock in group sex? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Could be - Could not be , maybe I am just being provocative Got you all going though in any case" Oh okay, got it. SO you are a bisexual troll in denial. Another one on fab who lists himself as 'straight' though. Look, it's 2018. The closet is so passe. The phrase, " A straight guy sucking cock" is mostly an oxymoron-- unless more specific context is given. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There isn't any blurring the lines straight is straight " Got it in one. Why the hell do people feel the need to blur/mangle the English language in these matters? If you're in a category that plays in other bits of the spectrum as well as "straight" as in 100% heterosexual then go get your own label! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In all honesty I think a lot of bisexual guys hide their bisexuality for a variety of reasons, including shame and fear which personally I find quite sad in today's so called liberated world - especially on a site/in a lifestyle like this where we are supposedly more open minded. Unfortunately those feelings are promoted from both sides - too many people are still judgemental of bisexual guys which in turn drives them to lie about their sexuality. Then you have the whole delusion some bisexual guys have on here that by stating they are straight they increase their chances of a meet with people that otherwise wouldn't meet them, without realising they're actually closing the door on just as many people that actively look for them Personally I'm openly and proudly bisexual and it's not been a hindrance to me, in fact in some cases quite the opposite " Gemini man-- thanks for that reply. It's also great that you're an out and proud bisexual man. I can't help but also feel that a lot of these guys don't want to give up their perceived 'straight privilege'. They want ALL the gay man sex and none of the struggles. *SHRUGS* | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Any man who is 100% straight wouldn't even be reading this thread as he would have zero interest in it. Just my opinion " Yeah, just an opinion and an attempt to equate false logic. I know tons about Nazi history...doesn't make me a Nazi. I read up on the horrors they perpetrated..doesn't make me a wannabe or a fellow-traveller. I know lots about the various labels people wave about on here..doesn't mean I attach myself to any/all of them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 " Only in England the term “straight” is bend so much meaning “not too much bi”. Makes me think its probably a DNA thing to be bi. Anywhere else a straight man is a straight man. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There isn't any blurring the lines straight is straight " to quote from a 1970s Gay Sweatshop play: " straight as in laced; straight as in narrow; straight as in jacket " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There isn't any blurring the lines straight is straight " Unless it’s on a Fab profile, then it means anything but | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There isn't any blurring the lines straight is straight to quote from a 1970s Gay Sweatshop play: " straight as in laced; straight as in narrow; straight as in jacket " " An international joke about English men... “How do English men take the condom off?...They fart..!!!” Thst says it all.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"straight eh? and you are on this site. Straight is only having sex within a marriage with your spouse, the 'straight and narrow path' a religious concept. The term straight in context of sexuality was coined to disassociate heterosexual, god fearing religious men from those bent and twisted perverts who liked other men: i.e. a homophobic term. It is now in casual use for heterosexual people but is about as valid as a Donald Trump tweet. Stop bothering about labels and just be who you are. Personally I am omnisexual.(though I haven't actually met any aliens especially those with double penises) " You just put a huge label on straight men, did you notice it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Like who gives a fuck what you’re called or what you do..the fun is doing it not labelling it " Personally i believe labels are valuable on this site. It is a useful starting point for establishing basic ground rules and expectations when looking at meeting unknown people. Of course this falls down if people cynically misrepresent themselves. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I also meant to add in addition to oral with men..playing with tv/cd/pre-op TS.. or an exclusive attraction to TS. I argue you are definitely on the spectrum." Thats called being bi | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 " Does it really matter, and why should we have to put labels on every thing, in this day and age who gives a shit, as long as they happy and not causing problems then so what? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So much debate with the labels here. I mean, labels do exist for a reason? And nothing is wrong with labels. With that said, I see so many people blurring the lines of what 'straight' actually is or should be. This includes things like men giving oral to each other and etc. I would like to know what is or should be the proper label or term for men who exclusively 100% are attracted to and only fuck women. Seems like their label of straight is being hijacked LOL. Shall they be called "gold star heterosexuals"? A rip of "Gold star lesbians"-- lesbians that have never slept with men. I've observed more than enough men are actually heter-oflexible on here, wish that was an option. But, really, in a world where labels matter whether we like it or not.. if you like cock and etc. should straight really describe you? Ehhhh. I think in the end it comes down to clinging to some 'straight' privileges. But that's just me. For the record, I'm bi. Just some of my thoughts inspired by this thread: https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/766650 Does it really matter, and why should we have to put labels on every thing, in this day and age who gives a shit, as long as they happy and not causing problems then so what? " Uh yes, labels matter. Nothing is wrong with labels. What’s wrong is if you treat people with certain labels in a different unfair way. Labels help you not to drink poison fatal products also. Look the labels doesn’t matter argument is wack because it aids in people’s denial about whatever they are doing. It also is convenient for people trying to hold on to labels that are perceived to be more ‘normal’ or associated with more privilege. Hm, wonder why that is. Also, read this: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/sermonsfromthemound/2014/08/why-do-we-need-labels/ “The most obvious reason why we need labels is as a short way of describing a complex concept or identity. New labels for subgroups emerge all the time as people discover that what they mean by a word is not the same as what others mean by it. For example, if you have a broad definition of ‘male’ which includes transgender men, cisgender men, genderqueer men, gay men, bisexual men, straight men, and so on, then it comes as a shock if you come across someone whose definition only includes cisgender heterosexual men, and they may want a different label to indicate what they mean by the term ‘male’, since their definition is narrower.” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel no need to cling to labels." Except for those you peel off things which refuse to get off your finger however hard you shake your hand | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I also meant to add in addition to oral with men..playing with tv/cd/pre-op TS.. or an exclusive attraction to TS. I argue you are definitely on the spectrum. Thats called being bi " For your information, all knowing one, it’s not actually. When you are dealing with non-cisgender individuals, we are going beyond the realm of “just bi” and beyond the binary of cisgender men and women. Some people argue there should be an exclusive label for men attracted to trans women. In some parts of the world they are referred to as their own gender or 3rd gender. So why not? So I stand by what I say of it being someone on the spectrum and closer to pansexual/omnisexual. And you thought this would be so easy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Like who gives a fuck what you’re called or what you do..the fun is doing it not labelling it " Really? That sounds like some ignorance. And totally ignores the context of this thread. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |