Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"that verifications are not a true reflection of the person or is it we all have different tastes? How many have met the person and think really? We are not bothered about them now and only write one if someone takes the trouble to do one for us. The least we can do " I guess some click with others better. I’ve had two different meets with well verified guys, they didn’t satisfy me the way verifications claimed they could. One there was no spark so I had to decline meeting again, the other I met a further two times but still found myself bored. Oh and there was a third our chemistry was great and built up to the meet made it exciting, unfortunately the sex wasn’t good for me. Maybe I’m just a shit shag Anyway I just view verifications as the person is reliable and meets, i don’t take what they say very seriously. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything." Always amazes me that some choose who to interact with based on a few words left by strangers instead of using their own judgement. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And one that says I’m slightly better than a wank " I loved that one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But how long do you have to reply? I had a very nice verification from a couple I'd met at a club. I didn't want to rush a reply so didn't respond immediately. Two days later I wrote one back and pressed 'Send', only to find they'd blocked me in the 20 minutes or so I took to write it." You obviously left it 20 minutes too long to reply | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything. Always amazes me that some choose who to interact with based on a few words left by strangers instead of using their own judgement. " For us it’s extra information in addition to our own judgement. Our own judgement isn’t good enough to make a decision on whether to meet someone, we need a bit of help. For example we’re not able to make a judgement, based on profile information and a bit of chat, as to whether that man is experienced with couples. But a number of verifications claiming play with a couples, will be proof of what we want to know. Also, I’m aware that I have a similar taste in men to a lot of other women, so if others wanted to meet him, then there is a chance that I might want to too. Obviously once we’ve met face to face then we will rely totally on our own judgement. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Verifications are better than no verifications" Agreed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen few profiles with exact verifications from the same person... like copy and paste... and most annoying sentence... "don't pass this one ladies" Other day I looked at a profile... a guy joined 12 hours ago and had 2 met in person veries all within 12 hours... it's a bullshit..." Sometimes though, ‘new joiners’ could have veris from people that have met when they’ve been on here before. Or perhaps at clubs before joining. Perhaps a ‘date of meet’ should be added. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen few profiles with exact verifications from the same person... like copy and paste... and most annoying sentence... "don't pass this one ladies" Other day I looked at a profile... a guy joined 12 hours ago and had 2 met in person veries all within 12 hours... it's a bullshit... " Quite a few ladies leave and then rejoin with a new profile. Their previous playmates then send verifications in order to re-establish themselves for her or their benefit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've seen few profiles with exact verifications from the same person... like copy and paste... and most annoying sentence... "don't pass this one ladies" Other day I looked at a profile... a guy joined 12 hours ago and had 2 met in person veries all within 12 hours... it's a bullshit... Quite a few ladies leave and then rejoin with a new profile. Their previous playmates then send verifications in order to re-establish themselves for her or their benefit. " Yes, I agree but it says on their profile that they have been here before... in my case guy didn't have any pictures plus was one liners... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything. Always amazes me that some choose who to interact with based on a few words left by strangers instead of using their own judgement. For us it’s extra information in addition to our own judgement. Our own judgement isn’t good enough to make a decision on whether to meet someone, we need a bit of help. For example we’re not able to make a judgement, based on profile information and a bit of chat, as to whether that man is experienced with couples. But a number of verifications claiming play with a couples, will be proof of what we want to know. Also, I’m aware that I have a similar taste in men to a lot of other women, so if others wanted to meet him, then there is a chance that I might want to too. Obviously once we’ve met face to face then we will rely totally on our own judgement. Mrs " We are all different. I'm meeting someone to invite into my home alone. I have to make that call so for me one hundred verifications saying he's great doesn't sway me. I've met people for socials who have been verified who have acted like cunts. We all do what's best for us. If I'm buying a laptop I'll take the opinions of others into account. When it comes to who I have sex with in my home, 100% me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything. Always amazes me that some choose who to interact with based on a few words left by strangers instead of using their own judgement. For us it’s extra information in addition to our own judgement. Our own judgement isn’t good enough to make a decision on whether to meet someone, we need a bit of help. For example we’re not able to make a judgement, based on profile information and a bit of chat, as to whether that man is experienced with couples. But a number of verifications claiming play with a couples, will be proof of what we want to know. Also, I’m aware that I have a similar taste in men to a lot of other women, so if others wanted to meet him, then there is a chance that I might want to too. Obviously once we’ve met face to face then we will rely totally on our own judgement. Mrs We are all different. I'm meeting someone to invite into my home alone. I have to make that call so for me one hundred verifications saying he's great doesn't sway me. I've met people for socials who have been verified who have acted like cunts. We all do what's best for us. If I'm buying a laptop I'll take the opinions of others into account. When it comes to who I have sex with in my home, 100% me. " Of course we’re all different. I just wanted to explain out rationale, to those who think we can’t make my own decisions, to why using our own judgement on who we meet is not always sufficient for our needs. I must stress though that we certainly do not rely on others when deciding who we have sex with or invite into our home. I’m with you on that one. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, I have one that says I’m a shit shag. " And a cunt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me veris aren't just about proving someone is genuine as I have plenty of them (though they do show you are still currently meeting at least) No, it might sound selfish but I like exchanging them so I can look through them at a later date and get a lovely reminder of a delicious encounter! Probably why mine tend to be rather detailed? " Good for you , and an excellent reason to have them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And one that says I’m slightly better than a wank I loved that one " Haha! It was, of course, a fantastic meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes, I have one that says I’m a shit shag. And a cunt. " Oh yeah, I’d forgotten that one! They are, of course, joke verifications otherwise I wouldn’t show them. I’m confident enough to have a laugh at myself and show them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"2 of mine say similar things i think its a fair reflection of me" Lots of mine mention laughter, that I'm small, and that I'm orally gifted. They can't all be wrong surely! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we all have different tastes, I also think some people are polite. I call it as I see it. If I thought someone was a cunt, I'd either not verify them coz I don't want to be associated with them, or I would, but it would say... "I met xxx and can confirm they look like their pics dated (insert date - don't want them changing photos and then me getting blamed if they use fake photos) I personally thought they were a selfish prick, but they are indeed real"" My thoughts as well but we don't veri anyone whose a disaster | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything." So true | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think verifications are a reflection of someone - but as a reflection they're through someone else's eyes and their own taste and often through an additional haze of (hopefully) post-orgasmic endorphin rush. As such, their general effusiveness is entirely understandable and if I bother to read them I read them with that in mind. And that includes my own." Great approach x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But how long do you have to reply? I had a very nice verification from a couple I'd met at a club. I didn't want to rush a reply so didn't respond immediately. Two days later I wrote one back and pressed 'Send', only to find they'd blocked me in the 20 minutes or so I took to write it. You obviously left it 20 minutes too long to reply " Blocked so you can't display the veri. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No I think people have different tastes. It's crazy to use veris as 'proof' of anything. Always amazes me that some choose who to interact with based on a few words left by strangers instead of using their own judgement. For us it’s extra information in addition to our own judgement. Our own judgement isn’t good enough to make a decision on whether to meet someone, we need a bit of help. For example we’re not able to make a judgement, based on profile information and a bit of chat, as to whether that man is experienced with couples. But a number of verifications claiming play with a couples, will be proof of what we want to know. Also, I’m aware that I have a similar taste in men to a lot of other women, so if others wanted to meet him, then there is a chance that I might want to too. Obviously once we’ve met face to face then we will rely totally on our own judgement. Mrs " The only problem we've found is they're nothing like how they've been described in their verifications. Described as handsome but nothing like it when we meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"that verifications are not a true reflection of the person or is it we all have different tastes? How many have met the person and think really? We are not bothered about them now and only write one if someone takes the trouble to do one for us. The least we can do " Know exactly what you mean, mine say I'm a nice bloke! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have found the verification system open to abuse and doesn't provide proof that a profile is genuine or what their character might be. Surley shouldn't be used to review any individuals sexual prowess What we like verifications to convey simply they we're who they say they were. The rest is up to us to decide. It may be a bad habit, but we do look to see what type of people they are attracted to and what kind of things they did on their meets. " After they are useful to see if they are attracted to a certain type and not just working their way through the site to get satisfaction. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have found when I put up a verification at least one person will block me " As long as it wasn’t the person that you met I think you’re ok | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to leave bad verifications for people just for the sheer amusement factor (obviously with the recipients agreement) I found that they proved a fun counterpoint to the aggressively sexual lamp post pissing ones that often get left" It's shocking how many people believe the over the top crap ones are actually real. They don't understand. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have found the verification system open to abuse and doesn't provide proof that a profile is genuine or what their character might be. Surley shouldn't be used to review any individuals sexual prowess What we like verifications to convey simply they we're who they say they were. The rest is up to us to decide. It may be a bad habit, but we do look to see what type of people they are attracted to and what kind of things they did on their meets. After they are useful to see if they are attracted to a certain type and not just working their way through the site to get satisfaction." How on earth can you know that from looking at someone's veris??! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But how long do you have to reply? I had a very nice verification from a couple I'd met at a club. I didn't want to rush a reply so didn't respond immediately. Two days later I wrote one back and pressed 'Send', only to find they'd blocked me in the 20 minutes or so I took to write it. You obviously left it 20 minutes too long to reply Blocked so you can't display the veri." So why write a veri if you don't want it displayed? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |