Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've just had some very interesting message interaction, a guy who's only verifications are 4 males and 1 trans person. All extremely graphic describing the meet in sexual details. However he maintains on his profile and by message that he is 100% straight, just meets guys because he knows how to have sex. I'm really shaking my head at the extent of his denial. I don't understand how he can feel that he is straight. I'm posting this, because it has confused me, and put me off him, even though he ticks a few of my boxes. I just can't understand how someone can be that far in denial and it actually feels a bit like a kind of unbalanced thinking. My preference is bi guys, but this feels strange. I'm moving on, but wanted to see what others make of my thoughts. I can't really understand why it makes me feel so uncomfortable that amount of denial, but it really does. " It's the radical subjectivism we see all around us these days. In simpler times if you voluntarily engaged in sexual activity with people with penises and people with vaginas everyone would agree you were bi. These days, if you don't "feel" bi, the sexual activities you objectively get up to are irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion " Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual" Depends if he had sex with the men and also fucks women. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know someone like that, from what I can gather, to him it’s embarrassment, he’s not attracted to men he sees in the streets but likes the taboo aspect of being with a guy, he’s tried it several times and didn’t enjoy once he’d started, I think most everyone is somewhere on the scale of being bi but some find it harder to accept than others, I also think there are a lot of reasons for someone to be more open about it with themselves and others and some of those reasons will effect wether they act upon the desires or not " For me personally, I class myself as bi, only in that I enjoy sex with men. I could never enter a relationship with one as I need a woman for that. To be honest, if I was with a woman that would happily peg me (along with a few other kinks!) I dont really think I would bother with men. It might sound cold and calculating but Its only a guys cock that Im after. I dont particularly want to kiss a guy either...some of them are awful at it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know someone like that, from what I can gather, to him it’s embarrassment, he’s not attracted to men he sees in the streets but likes the taboo aspect of being with a guy, he’s tried it several times and didn’t enjoy once he’d started, I think most everyone is somewhere on the scale of being bi but some find it harder to accept than others, I also think there are a lot of reasons for someone to be more open about it with themselves and others and some of those reasons will effect wether they act upon the desires or not For me personally, I class myself as bi, only in that I enjoy sex with men. I could never enter a relationship with one as I need a woman for that. To be honest, if I was with a woman that would happily peg me (along with a few other kinks!) I dont really think I would bother with men. It might sound cold and calculating but Its only a guys cock that Im after. I dont particularly want to kiss a guy either...some of them are awful at it!" I do understand that, there's a massive difference between wanting to have a relationship with someone, and just dissolving into a scene with everything you've got, and letting things happen. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've just had some very interesting message interaction, a guy who's only verifications are 4 males and 1 trans person. All extremely graphic describing the meet in sexual details. However he maintains on his profile and by message that he is 100% straight, just meets guys because he knows how to have sex. I'm really shaking my head at the extent of his denial. I don't understand how he can feel that he is straight. I'm posting this, because it has confused me, and put me off him, even though he ticks a few of my boxes. I just can't understand how someone can be that far in denial and it actually feels a bit like a kind of unbalanced thinking. My preference is bi guys, but this feels strange. I'm moving on, but wanted to see what others make of my thoughts. I can't really understand why it makes me feel so uncomfortable that amount of denial, but it really does. It's the radical subjectivism we see all around us these days. In simpler times if you voluntarily engaged in sexual activity with people with penises and people with vaginas everyone would agree you were bi. These days, if you don't "feel" bi, the sexual activities you objectively get up to are irrelevant. " Yup, i had someone shouting at me on quora that labels were invented to cause harm! Nope, words help us describe the world around us! And that guy is bi. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a big fan of lables as their far too restrictive, I get this guys perspective (I think), I'm down as straight on here because, of the choices available that most closely resembles who/what I am, however if there was an option for Pansexual that's what I'd choose because for me it's the person I'm attracted too rather than the gender. Just my two penneth. " In fab world "bi" indicates nothing more than that you like sex with people with penises AND people with vaginas. It is just a handy label that lets other people know what you are into. It says nothing about how you might feel in your wider social identity. I am down as bi here, because I am happy to play with people with all types of genitals, though in the real world I only have relationships with women, so I wouldn't say I was bi in any deep seated sense. However, I don't feel it an oppression that there isn't a precise description for my individual sexuality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual" I disagree. I don’t see how a feminine TV receiving anal sex from a guy is any different to a cis female receiving anal sex from a guy - from the guy’s perspective at least. I’m a straight female, I play with men but I wouldn’t play with a TV, as I’m not attracted to girls - even though they are biologically male. To me, that would be the same as playing with a woman. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual I disagree. I don’t see how a feminine TV receiving anal sex from a guy is any different to a cis female receiving anal sex from a guy - from the guy’s perspective at least. " I think you're trying very hard not to see it. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual I disagree. I don’t see how a feminine TV receiving anal sex from a guy is any different to a cis female receiving anal sex from a guy - from the guy’s perspective at least. I think you're trying very hard not to see it. ![]() Why would I need to ‘try hard’ not to see it? Not sure what you’re inferring by that? Just because my perspective is different to yours, doesn’t make it any less valid as an opinion. I’m not making any judgement on it & I’m not concerned what label people choose to use for themselves ... but IMO a feminine tv & a cis female are more alike than a feminine tv & a cis male. I wouldn’t play with a tv any more than I’d play with a woman wearing a strap on If you see it differently, that’s your prerogative. I’m sure you’d find plenty more differing opinions on it too, as I’m pretty sure there is no definitive answer. Apart from yours which is apparently the only correct one? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a big fan of lables as their far too restrictive, I get this guys perspective (I think), I'm down as straight on here because, of the choices available that most closely resembles who/what I am, however if there was an option for Pansexual that's what I'd choose because for me it's the person I'm attracted too rather than the gender. Just my two penneth. " ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t look as trans fun as being gay my opinion Everyone is allowed an opinion reality is though it’s gay/homosexual I disagree. I don’t see how a feminine TV receiving anal sex from a guy is any different to a cis female receiving anal sex from a guy - from the guy’s perspective at least. I think you're trying very hard not to see it. ![]() It's not a perspective, it's just words and the English language. You don't choose a label, putting your penis in another mans ass is a homosexual / bisexual act. Laws have been written around that fact, it's really not complex. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am a straight man and I rim men and more but i identify as a straight man I am not gay or inbetween . This is who I am as a man" I identify as a pink elephant named rosey. I'm still bi because i like sucking dicks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am a straight man and I rim men and more but i identify as a straight man I am not gay or inbetween . This is who I am as a man I identify as a pink elephant named rosey. I'm still bi because i like sucking dicks. " Coffee on screen moment ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people." Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. " I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a friend who did some sexual health awareness work with MSM (men who have sex with men) mainly at local cottaging sites. A large proportion of them would vehemently (sometimes violently) assert that they were not bisexual even though they'd just been having sex with men in woods and public toilets. Often they turned down offers of free condoms. They almost all returned home to their wives and families, and this was often the reason cited for them identifying as straight. There's still a stigma around less mainstream expressions of sexuality that leads to utter denial of orientation. So much so that people cannot contemplate identifying as anything other than what fits into the norms of the society they belong to" This makes sense to how he is thinking I feel. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? " It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. " You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. " Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. " I am not sure that's right. I think "bi" implies some sort of positive orientation not just a shrugging "I suppose so, if there's nothing better going on". How about this. If I once had sex with a man, thought it was OK, but decided I didn't want to do it again, would that make me bi? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. I am not sure that's right. I think "bi" implies some sort of positive orientation not just a shrugging "I suppose so, if there's nothing better going on". How about this. If I once had sex with a man, thought it was OK, but decided I didn't want to do it again, would that make me bi? " Question 1 - a distinction without a difference. For ease of understanding, if you like putting your penis inside other men, you are bi or gay. Question 2 - in my opinion, no. You were just experimenting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. I am not sure that's right. I think "bi" implies some sort of positive orientation not just a shrugging "I suppose so, if there's nothing better going on". How about this. If I once had sex with a man, thought it was OK, but decided I didn't want to do it again, would that make me bi? Question 1 - a distinction without a difference. For ease of understanding, if you like putting your penis inside other men, you are bi or gay. Question 2 - in my opinion, no. You were just experimenting." I am trying to get at why, with some activities, it is considered that even though you do them in frequently and without much enthusiasm, you fall into the same category as those who participate frequently and enthusiastically and in other activities, you don't. Another example. I go to a Michelin starred restaurant three or four times a year, but the rest of the time, subsist on baked beans and spam. Am I a foodie? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. I am not sure that's right. I think "bi" implies some sort of positive orientation not just a shrugging "I suppose so, if there's nothing better going on". How about this. If I once had sex with a man, thought it was OK, but decided I didn't want to do it again, would that make me bi? Question 1 - a distinction without a difference. For ease of understanding, if you like putting your penis inside other men, you are bi or gay. Question 2 - in my opinion, no. You were just experimenting. I am trying to get at why, with some activities, it is considered that even though you do them in frequently and without much enthusiasm, you fall into the same category as those who participate frequently and enthusiastically and in other activities, you don't. " Because you're ignoring all the sub-labels that we already have like "casual fan" vrs "west ham till i die" types. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people. Well if 50% of people call a bus a car and 25% call a bus a bike and the other 25% call it a train but sometimes a bus. You'd have a hard time working at the DVLA. I'll play devil's advocate a bit as it's a boring morning in the legal world... Say, I am not really that bothered about football but if I am a bit bored I will watch a game on the TV and sometimes, my son being a dead keen Accrington fan, I will go and watch a Stanley game with him. I watched about five games last year. Say, in another situation, I really fancy women, but if there are no women on offer, I will, for want of anything better have sex with a man. I had sex with three men last year. Say, in a third situation, I killed one person thirty years ago, did my time and have no intention of killing again. In situation 1, I not labelled a football fan. In situation 2, I am probably labelled bi. In situation 3, I am definitely labelled a murderer. What's the distinction? It's the question being asked. We aren't asking "are you a fan of cock?" Or "are you a professional cock handler?" The question is simply whether you are open to same sex, sexual contact. If you are then you are bi or gay. You're missing my point. Like I say if I am not that bothered about football but will watch the occasional game if I have nothing better to do, no one would put me in the social category of "football fan" On the other hand, if I am not the bothered about having sex with men, but will do so if there are no women on offer, most people would put me in the social category of "bi". My question is why, on the one hand in the case of watching football , the fact that I occasionally participate in activities that I am lukewarm about does not put me in the same social category as people who participate in said activities more frequently and enthusiastically, yet, in the case of sex with men, it does. Because being bi does not have to mean you are 'fanatical' about cock and bum fun. 'Fan' is a term relating to the intensity of a feeling, bisexual is simply a statement of fact about activities that may be infrequent. The frequency or intensity are irrelevant. I am not sure that's right. I think "bi" implies some sort of positive orientation not just a shrugging "I suppose so, if there's nothing better going on". How about this. If I once had sex with a man, thought it was OK, but decided I didn't want to do it again, would that make me bi? Question 1 - a distinction without a difference. For ease of understanding, if you like putting your penis inside other men, you are bi or gay. Question 2 - in my opinion, no. You were just experimenting. I am trying to get at why, with some activities, it is considered that even though you do them in frequently and without much enthusiasm, you fall into the same category as those who participate frequently and enthusiastically and in other activities, you don't. Because you're ignoring all the sub-labels that we already have like "casual fan" vrs "west ham till i die" types. " So, why can't we have those sub categories when it comes to sex? Why can't I be a "casual fan" of having sex with men, rather than being fully blown bi? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So, why can't we have those sub categories when it comes to sex? Why can't I be a "casual fan" of having sex with men, rather than being fully blown bi? " You can, also long as you acknowledge they are sub-categories of bisexual. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know someone like that, from what I can gather, to him it’s embarrassment, he’s not attracted to men he sees in the streets but likes the taboo aspect of being with a guy, he’s tried it several times and didn’t enjoy once he’d started, I think most everyone is somewhere on the scale of being bi but some find it harder to accept than others, I also think there are a lot of reasons for someone to be more open about it with themselves and others and some of those reasons will effect wether they act upon the desires or not For me personally, I class myself as bi, only in that I enjoy sex with men. I could never enter a relationship with one as I need a woman for that. To be honest, if I was with a woman that would happily peg me (along with a few other kinks!) I dont really think I would bother with men. It might sound cold and calculating but Its only a guys cock that Im after. I dont particularly want to kiss a guy either...some of them are awful at it!" ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Men who have sex with other men." Not gay or Bi. Just probably not getting any sex from the wife. Countryside dogging spots are full of them. " I’m not sure that’s the case. Most guys I know that do it, do it as part of a couple. For that extra kink. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Men who have sex with other men." Not gay or Bi. Just probably not getting any sex from the wife. Countryside dogging spots are full of them. " Because they turn up horny, having deluded themselves that as many women like dogging as men. Once they are there, they realise its them, 19 lorry drivers and 1 TV, but they popped the viagra an hour ago and think they may as well make use of it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've just had some very interesting message interaction, a guy who's only verifications are 4 males and 1 trans person. All extremely graphic describing the meet in sexual details. However he maintains on his profile and by message that he is 100% straight, just meets guys because he knows how to have sex. I'm really shaking my head at the extent of his denial. I don't understand how he can feel that he is straight. I'm posting this, because it has confused me, and put me off him, even though he ticks a few of my boxes. I just can't understand how someone can be that far in denial and it actually feels a bit like a kind of unbalanced thinking. My preference is bi guys, but this feels strange. I'm moving on, but wanted to see what others make of my thoughts. I can't really understand why it makes me feel so uncomfortable that amount of denial, but it really does. " 100% this. Each to his own, but I don't understand the "I'm straight, but love cock" brigade. And I've lost count of the number of messages from 'straight' men who want me to put my penis inside them...lol! For me, it's just a description - I live as a straight man, and have only had MF relationships, but am definitely "bi" as I enjoy sex with men and women! Maybe I'm too simple. But I think lots of bi guys keep straight on their profile as many couples make a point of not meeting bi guys... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know someone like that, from what I can gather, to him it’s embarrassment, he’s not attracted to men he sees in the streets but likes the taboo aspect of being with a guy, he’s tried it several times and didn’t enjoy once he’d started, I think most everyone is somewhere on the scale of being bi but some find it harder to accept than others, I also think there are a lot of reasons for someone to be more open about it with themselves and others and some of those reasons will effect wether they act upon the desires or not For me personally, I class myself as bi, only in that I enjoy sex with men. I could never enter a relationship with one as I need a woman for that. To be honest, if I was with a woman that would happily peg me (along with a few other kinks!) I dont really think I would bother with men. It might sound cold and calculating but Its only a guys cock that Im after. I dont particularly want to kiss a guy either...some of them are awful at it!" Haha... I know how you feel... I’m the same with women... I class myself as bi as I like playing with both women and men however for the relationship and passionate side of things it has to be a man for me... don’t think I could ever have a relationship with a woman.. too much drama haha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Seriously though what the hell does it matter. Meet who you want and just forget the labels. We're all people." Because on a site like this where we are looking to generally meet people who like the kind of play we do, the labels help us to find each other... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people can do what they want and call themselves what they want without me asking for an explanation. Has anything he's done impacting on my experiences on here? No, so I keep my nose out of his business. " fantastic post | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The facts: everyone is bi to a certain extent, if anyone says otherwise their just ignorant to the facts! What sexuality they consider themselves or list on their profile doesn't really matter in the least. List what you want to list on your profile, your still going to do what excites you sexually anyway lol, everyone does!!!" they are not facts,they are you're opinion,its an opinion that makes people in denial feel a bit better & less guilty.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |