Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is one already....." Yeah, the delete message and block buttons. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We work on the principle that if someone’s taken the time to write a message then they deserve a reply. That’s assuming it’s a considered message that is, not a ‘How’s U?’ / ‘Wot U up 2?’ type lazy fishing trip." I like that principle! I've never seen sent a "Fancy a fuck" or similar message and always tried to inject a bit of humour or engage conversation by using something I've read on their profile but have so far only ever had one response. I don't even bother sending messages these days as it just got to the point where I thought "why even bother?". I'm old enough and ugly enough to cope with the "thanks for the message but you're not what I'm looking for" line but women generally delete before they've even read the message. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X" Nailed it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X" I've just read your other post, about being outside someone's age bracket I think it says all you need to know about a person when they display an 'entitled' attitude. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X I've just read your other post, about being outside someone's age bracket I think it says all you need to know about a person when they display an 'entitled' attitude. " Sorry, I don’t quite follow? X | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No thanks Took me under 2 seconds Why do people want buttons I wonder Copy and paste your polite decline message are my thoughts " Because writing your own response just leads to questions on most occasions, and many people will pick apart your message to try and figure out why you don't like them. Anybody you send one of these two could still send you a new message, but they can't add to the current thread. When trying to send a new message, it can then warn you this person may not be interested in meeting. It could also push all mail from these people into a different folder, such as "social". Kind of a middle ground between a block and not a block. Happy to talk to, but not what you want to wade through when your actively seeking a meet. I just think it's far more polite than ignoring someone, and a lot less aggressive than a block. There are plenty of couples we'd chat to in a club that we might not want to play with. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No thanks Took me under 2 seconds Why do people want buttons I wonder Copy and paste your polite decline message are my thoughts " I used to do that. But then I realised that doing so meant that when I than activated messsage filters my polite no thanks reply months earlier meant they could still message through them, not remembering that my reply had been no thanks, and I'd have to go through it all over again or have to delete and block. So a tailored no thanks reply that wouldn't deactivate filters would actually be quite a good idea, I think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Delete button works wonder Thank me later " No, it doesn't. You never know if your message was specifically deleted or caught in a bulk delete. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X" It's easy to reply to first messages. I have a 'no thank you' type message on my phone ready to paste into replies. It only takes a second. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think it would be a good idea to have a button in the message fields that informed the user that you've read their message, but politely states that you weren't what they were looking for. It could also be something you couldn't reply to by removing the reply if someone has hit this and people would have to write a new message to send if they were pushing, which would give you a similar warning as you get if you message someone who hasn't responded. Not many people like typing out a rejection, and it's clearer than ignoring somone." Fantastic I like it, because it never tells you from a male pov whether a read message has actually been deleted after being read or it merely been bulk deleted. It saves you having to Re write the message again when their next online in order to grab their attention and potentially annoying the recipient in the process. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"'Why did you press the decline button on me, fat ugly bitch. Didn't wanna meet you anyway' " Maybe the auto decline button could also have an auto block function to remove the chance of receiving abuse. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think it would be a good idea to have a button in the message fields that informed the user that you've read their message, but politely states that you weren't what they were looking for. It could also be something you couldn't reply to by removing the reply if someone has hit this and people would have to write a new message to send if they were pushing, which would give you a similar warning as you get if you message someone who hasn't responded. Not many people like typing out a rejection, and it's clearer than ignoring somone." great idea and if included an automatic block ideal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nah, I don't need an auto response, or a 'no thanks'. If I send a message and it's deleted with no reply, so be it. It's hardly the end of the world. " exactly this. Why you think you are owed anything from a complete stranger is beyond me. If they don't want to reply it's not the crime of the century. Way too much angst and frustration shown on here by some regarding this. Chill out, delete all your sent mail as son as you've sent it and forget about it. You'll either get a reply or you won't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People would just whinge that they got the autoresponse decline, just like they whinge when their message is deleted with no reply. " Yep...guess what the number one beef is on sites that do have automatic reject buttons? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People would just whinge that they got the autoresponse decline, just like they whinge when their message is deleted with no reply. Yep...guess what the number one beef is on sites that do have automatic reject buttons?" I wish I hadn't hit that button?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People would just whinge that they got the autoresponse decline, just like they whinge when their message is deleted with no reply. Yep...guess what the number one beef is on sites that do have automatic reject buttons?I wish I hadn't hit that button?? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How about a 'why not?' button? It would save me having to type out 2 3 letter words. When I press this button it would automatically prevent the 'women and couples who receive hundreds of messages a day' receiving messages from anyone else until they'd sent a well thought out personalised response explaining why I'm 'not their type'..." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Delete button works wonder Thank me later No, it doesn't. You never know if your message was specifically deleted or caught in a bulk delete." it doesn't matter...the outcome is the same. Move on... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People would just whinge that they got the autoresponse decline, just like they whinge when their message is deleted with no reply. " Too many whingers get a grip man!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X" Very well said !!! Totally Agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nah, I don't need an auto response, or a 'no thanks'. If I send a message and it's deleted with no reply, so be it. It's hardly the end of the world. exactly this. Why you think you are owed anything from a complete stranger is beyond me. If they don't want to reply it's not the crime of the century. Way too much angst and frustration shown on here by some regarding this. Chill out, delete all your sent mail as son as you've sent it and forget about it. You'll either get a reply or you won't." That’s just rude | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Delete button works wonder Thank me later No, it doesn't. You never know if your message was specifically deleted or caught in a bulk delete. it doesn't matter...the outcome is the same. Move on..." Not true. If a message is specifically deleted, I want to know so I can make a note not to bother them again. If it's caught in a bulk dump then there's no barrier to me messaging again. In the absence of information, do I err on the side of caution and permanently rule that person out, or chance my arm again? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X Very well said !!! Totally Agree" How would you envisage that the ladies that get shedloads of messages, find the time to reply then? Neglect their work? Children? Grown up responsibilities? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to reply, don't have issues now I run my profile differently. I'd say thanks, not for me but all the best then block. Took less than 30 seconds. No drama, no bullshit, end of." I have on my profile I'll not respond to anyone outwith what I'm looking for and I don't. Everyone who meets my criteria gets a response. In seven years never had a problem. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X Very well said !!! Totally Agree How would you envisage that the ladies that get shedloads of messages, find the time to reply then? Neglect their work? Children? Grown up responsibilities? " When visible my profile is specific on the type of playmate I'm looking for and what I'm offering. There's no ambiguity whatsoever. I received a message from someone the polar opposite of what I'm looking for, I deleted his message unread. He then started a thread about rude women who delete well thought out messages unread. I asked if he meant me, and to point out what part of my criteria did he meet. Same thing with men who start threads along the lines: do women only want bbc/well endowed/gym fit/tall/non asians etc...because they're excluded. What I find worrying is we're here for "mutual" hedonistic pleasure. We're not providing a cum dump service, we're not here to massage fragile egos, we really don't have to acknowledge anyone we don't want to fuck, yet the amount of angst and entitlement displayed by some men is quite unnerving. "Well thought out message" usually means I want to fuck you even though I'm not what you want but this message may change your mind...You've deleted it unread?!! Rude cunt! Queue, whining ranting thread! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nah, I don't need an auto response, or a 'no thanks'. If I send a message and it's deleted with no reply, so be it. It's hardly the end of the world. exactly this. Why you think you are owed anything from a complete stranger is beyond me. If they don't want to reply it's not the crime of the century. Way too much angst and frustration shown on here by some regarding this. Chill out, delete all your sent mail as son as you've sent it and forget about it. You'll either get a reply or you won't. That’s just rude" What is rude? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It doesn't take long to type...'no thank you' surely " Once, no. A hundred times a day, yes. Not an issue I face, obviously. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How about a 'why not?' button? It would save me having to type out 2 3 letter words. When I press this button it would automatically prevent the 'women and couples who receive hundreds of messages a day' receiving messages from anyone else until they'd sent a well thought out personalised response explaining why I'm 'not their type'..." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X Very well said !!! Totally Agree How would you envisage that the ladies that get shedloads of messages, find the time to reply then? Neglect their work? Children? Grown up responsibilities? " Is that not one of the perils of joining this site You all know that you going to get a lot of messages At least be polite There are ladies that seem to be able to do it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely cracking idea OP, can’t stand the, ‘I’m too busy to reply’ and the ‘it’s in the site rules, you don’t have to reply if you don’t want too’ crowd, It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline, and oddly enough it’s the ‘too busy to reply’ crowd who somehow find the time to crow about how busy they are in the forums time and time again.... I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know So yes OP, this would be a welcome compromise for most polite well mannered people. HG X Very well said !!! Totally Agree How would you envisage that the ladies that get shedloads of messages, find the time to reply then? Neglect their work? Children? Grown up responsibilities? Is that not one of the perils of joining this site You all know that you going to get a lot of messages At least be polite There are ladies that seem to be able to do it " You didnt answer my question These ladies that " seem to be able to do it?" They reply to all their msgs? You know this, how? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It doesn't take long to type...'no thank you' surely Once, no. A hundred times a day, yes. Not an issue I face, obviously. " Now a sensible woman would use her filters if this is the case | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It doesn't take long to type...'no thank you' surely Once, no. A hundred times a day, yes. Not an issue I face, obviously. Now a sensible woman would use her filters if this is the case " Apparently receiving a meet verification from someone with a 12" dick should get rid of them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find that you honestly can't win either way. So i doubt this would make much difference. I either respond with a "No, Thank you" and get abuse, or delete - and get abuse! Don't get me wrong, im not referring to every guy/couple... but too many throw their teddy out of the pram then wonder why they haven't achieved a single meet! " This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think it would be a good idea to have a button in the message fields that informed the user that you've read their message, but politely states that you weren't what they were looking for. It could also be something you couldn't reply to by removing the reply if someone has hit this and people would have to write a new message to send if they were pushing, which would give you a similar warning as you get if you message someone who hasn't responded. Not many people like typing out a rejection, and it's clearer than ignoring somone." Admin had a thanks but no thanks button a few years ago. People complained it was impersonal and it only takes under a minute to type no thanks. You just can't win. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline. I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know Is that not one of the perils of joining this site. You all know that you going to get a lot of messages. At least be polite. There are ladies that seem to be able to do it. " Here's some simple arithmetic: Let's say that the average Fabber can read one message every thirty seconds, and takes thirty seconds to think over their response... Considering that some women receive 200 or 300 messages per day, they could potentially spend three and five hours just reading their messages... Let's also say that the average Fabber can type and send a 'polite decline' in thirty seconds... Even if only 20% of the messages they receive are found to warrant a 'polite' response, you still have to factor in an additional 20 or 30 minutes writing replies... So, if you demand that people invest the time needed to enable them to answer every single 'polite' message that they receive, you're asking them to sacrifice between 3.5 and 5.5 hours EACH DAY... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s about good manners and common decency, it only takes a few seconds to send a polite decline. I think it says all you need to know about a person if they can’t be arsed to reply to well written thoughtful message, not someone I would wish to know Is that not one of the perils of joining this site. You all know that you going to get a lot of messages. At least be polite. There are ladies that seem to be able to do it. Here's some simple arithmetic: Let's say that the average Fabber can read one message every thirty seconds, and takes thirty seconds to think over their response... Considering that some women receive 200 or 300 messages per day, they could potentially spend three and five hours just reading their messages... Let's also say that the average Fabber can type and send a 'polite decline' in thirty seconds... Even if only 20% of the messages they receive are found to warrant a 'polite' response, you still have to factor in an additional 20 or 30 minutes writing replies... So, if you demand that people invest the time needed to enable them to answer every single 'polite' message that they receive, you're asking them to sacrifice between 3.5 and 5.5 hours EACH DAY..." Unless that's the type of attention they are looking for I suspect they learn to use the message filters pretty quickly Or to search for the profiles they are I and take the risk of having their messages ignored themselves.. Or maybe not.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unless that's the type of attention they are looking for I suspect they learn to use the message filters pretty quickly Or to search for the profiles they are I and take the risk of having their messages ignored themselves.. Or maybe not.." Seriously...next time you meet with a woman or couple, ask them what filters they use and how many messages they receive each day... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We work on the principle that if someone’s taken the time to write a message then they deserve a reply. That’s assuming it’s a considered message that is, not a ‘How’s U?’ / ‘Wot U up 2?’ type lazy fishing trip." I used to think like this but not now. Before I hid my profile I used the delete and block a lot but saying that I’ve still to use it now! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really don't know why people get so annoyed about people not replying, chill out, this is all a load of old bollocks anyway, it's just a bit of fun never to be taken seriously. If people don't want to reply then that's up to them. Saying they should reply because it's rude is like asking people who do reply not to. Do what you feel comfortable doing and let others do the same. Why would non site supporters use their limited amount of messages declining 50 plus people a day? They want to use their quota to chat to people they are interested in. Maybe if people weren't abusive or pushy following a polite no thanks more people would reply? This site is what it is, this subject will always be discussed yet it will never change. It really isn't worth getting stressed about. " Believe it or not, the suggestion was born out of a need to say no thank you, without having to think of a way to word it that sounds completey polite. A generic "it looks like this user is looking for something different. Maybe youd have more luck with somebody else." Coming from a third party, it's like being told by a friend that someone's not really into you. You tend not to push that, as opposed to messaging back right away asking why. Neither of us have a problem handling rejection though. Also, I wasn't expecting sending an auto response saying "no thank you" to go against messaging credits, but we're site supporters and I didn't even know you had a limit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is one already..... Yeah, the delete message and block buttons. " That’s what I thought! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |