Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. " Possibly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think theres a lot of bullshitting goes off on here lol " An awful lot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it really matter what we call ourselves? At the end of the day its not the sort of hobby you can put on your cv, is it? " Bang on the money. Labels ruin things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s said many times on here that single men looking for sex are not swingers...I think this is totally true and would never consider myself a swinger...HOWEVER. what about couples who just seek women or worse still that pathetic term ‘unicorn’ that’s not entirely swinging, in the sense of ... “Swinging, sometimes called wife swapping or partner swapping“ So be honest, guys who are in that situation, you see it as a safe option as no cock is entering your wife/partner. It’s just a way you can get your rocks off seeing two women have a fiddle. Not swinging." you know, if they want to use the site for whatever they want leave them to it. as its not hurting or affecting me how i am using fab! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it really matter what we call ourselves? At the end of the day its not the sort of hobby you can put on your cv, is it? Bang on the money. Labels ruin things." My label fell off. No fecking idea what I’m meant to be looking for | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it really matter what we call ourselves? At the end of the day its not the sort of hobby you can put on your cv, is it? Bang on the money. Labels ruin things. My label fell off. No fecking idea what I’m meant to be looking for " I think I'm meant to be looking for my morals. Or possibly marbles Maybe both | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. " Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Love the fact that he has assumed that the only reason couples is swing is because the man wants to! The MAN wants the couple to have a single woman due to the “one penis policy”. So what he says goes. Absolute crap. What about the wives that love swinging and look for single women because SHE wants to? Or the fact that a lot of single men’s bad attitudes are the reasons why couples don’t want them in the first place. " Love you didn't understand my point at all?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity " I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"seems to be a few things about this lifestyle that you don't get OP " This is true. I openly admit that. I'm honest however,I don't pretend to be a swinger, I have no interest in playing with couples at all. But the site has allowed me to meet some amazing single women. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We're soft swing and meet more single men than couples, we're both straight and don't meet single women. Lord knows what that makes us! " Just plain weird | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders." So we are all hypocrites now?! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders. So we are all hypocrites now?! " I said hardcore forum crusaders...sorry no idea who you are and I can't say I'm aware of your work? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders." Hardcore forum crusaders? Was that directed at me, or am I misreading? I didn't say anything about labels, so I'm not sure where that came from? I generally don't have a problem with labels. As for the sexist card, you kinda encouraged that with your own wording. It might not have been meant that way, but there it is nevertheless. I believe I agreed generally with your point, that there is a hypocrisy in that particular way of thinking. I merely posited that pointing out such hypocrisy doesn't change anything...I doubt the people that are being hypocritical will notice it as such. Plus, people are generally hypocritical on here (I've noticed). Though I'll admit I'm not quite sure where hardcore forum crusaders fit into it all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders. Hardcore forum crusaders? Was that directed at me, or am I misreading? I didn't say anything about labels, so I'm not sure where that came from? I generally don't have a problem with labels. As for the sexist card, you kinda encouraged that with your own wording. It might not have been meant that way, but there it is nevertheless. I believe I agreed generally with your point, that there is a hypocrisy in that particular way of thinking. I merely posited that pointing out such hypocrisy doesn't change anything...I doubt the people that are being hypocritical will notice it as such. Plus, people are generally hypocritical on here (I've noticed). Though I'll admit I'm not quite sure where hardcore forum crusaders fit into it all. " Neither am I quite frankly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are single swingers, but most singles on here aren't swingers. Well said. Personally, swinging for me is about monogamy vs. non-monogamy. If all swinging is is "wife swapping" than fuck that! No one "swaps" me. OP, if you're looking for logical consistency and continuity, then yes - those people who view single men as not swingers would generally have to extend that logic to single women. But I don't think that argument is going to change anyone's behavior or their outlook (it's also probably not the dominant perspective). Not to mention that fab (and the internet in general) is not really the place to argue for logical continuity I'm not for one minute asking anyone to change their behaviour, not am I seeking to label anyone, nor am I looking for people to play the old sexist card....I am highlighting the inconsistent bollocks that floats on this site. I'm not here to approve or be approved, human behaviour fascinates me as does sex. I love the hypocrisy of the hardcore forum crusaders. So we are all hypocrites now?! I said hardcore forum crusaders...sorry no idea who you are and I can't say I'm aware of your work?" Not sure I get your point maybe you should elaborate? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s said many times on here that single men looking for sex are not swingers...I think this is totally true and would never consider myself a swinger...HOWEVER. what about couples who just seek women or worse still that pathetic term ‘unicorn’ that’s not entirely swinging, in the sense of ... “Swinging, sometimes called wife swapping or partner swapping“ So be honest, guys who are in that situation, you see it as a safe option as no cock is entering your wife/partner. It’s just a way you can get your rocks off seeing two women have a fiddle. Not swinging." Personally I feel swinging has changed over the years With the use of tinder and the like people are much more pen to non monganous relationships and single people are looking for uncomplicated sex with busy lives I think if you want to class yourselves as a swinger that’s fine and if you don’t you don’t I’m sure even though we are here on fabswingers the name doesn’t necessarily mean the same to all Just enjoy what you want and no one should worry whether they are a swinger or not I myself could be classed as a ‘shit swinger’ Because I rarely swing whereas my friends do all the time - do I care ? Hell no .. whatever I do it’s for my own reasons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |