FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Wife bareback sex

Jump to newest
 

By *aveieboy32 OP   Man
over a year ago

g

Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn’t

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andm_69Couple
over a year ago

Stevenage

Do You?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust Ms LovinWoman
over a year ago

birmingham

Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

You wanking to your questions again OP?

The Green arrow explains a lot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't LET my wife do anything, she makes her own decisions!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *OR THE WIFES PLEASUREMan
over a year ago

plymouth

Nope come on be safe !!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzz And WoodyCouple
over a year ago

Maidstone

No way!!! Might as well skip out the middle man and just let him cum in your mouth. Just madness.

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *epaWoman
over a year ago

Northampton

What could possibly go wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!"

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison"

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that"

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv! "

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that"

One in six chance of instant death?

No.

HIV can not 'do that' you just sound daft now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C"

It's petty spot on apart from the actual correctness off the statement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C"

Let's get the statistics right here... in the UK 1 in 600 people are actually living with HIV

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago

Hillside desolate


"I don't LET my wife do anything, she makes her own decisions!"

Right answer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ampWithABrainWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow

No 1 in 600 KNOW they're hiv positive not everyone that has the virus knows they do straight away you can be symptom free for up to 10 years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oapysubmarineMan
over a year ago

rotherham


"No 1 in 600 KNOW they're hiv positive not everyone that has the virus knows they do straight away you can be symptom free for up to 10 years "
and out of the 1 in 600 how many would actually have unprotected sex knowing they would pass infection so allot lower than that I would say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unseeker64Woman
over a year ago

Shrewsbury


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison"

I agree.....keeping healthy and safe has no comparison to Russian roulette. Keep it real guys!

I think everyone, even if you are someone's wife should make their own choices. We are all grown ups after all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andS CoupleCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

Would you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???"

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't let her she chooses to herself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C"

Thats not how statistics work for fuck sake

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C

Thats not how statistics work for fuck sake"

You've got admit that it's fun to go fishing in threads like this though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication"

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ex-a-frolicsCouple
over a year ago

Brizzle


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ?

You wanking to your questions again OP?

The Green arrow explains a lot "

No he works for Sydney University LOL!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well this turned shit pretty fast didn’t it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would yes

Been separated 6 years so it’s up to her really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imon and saffyCouple
over a year ago

southampton

Hey he's back.

Obviously needed a few days for the sores on his hand to clear up before he could post another thread to get some wanking fodder.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well all this talk of HIV, AIDS and russian roulette must really have pissed on the OP's wank today.

Ginger

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aenMan
over a year ago

Here and There


"Well all this talk of HIV, AIDS and russian roulette must really have pissed on the OP's wank today.

Ginger "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ieman300Man
over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East

Roughly 100k estimated in uk with hiv. This is where the 1 in 600 comes from as uk population is 60 million ish. That figure includes those who arent aware btw. I don't know of any weapon that holds 600 rounds and can be held to your head with one hand.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way. "

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

its up to all taking part .freedom of choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

whats curable and what isnt as a matter of interest......

say you werent on here and had say 3 relationships in ten years , youd go bareback with your partner i presume ......

or would you each get checked first.

what im saying is people that arent swingers still have bareback sex right .....

cant really explain what im trying to say lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

do what you want you know the risks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester

[Removed by poster at 09/11/17 01:56:11]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way. "

This is probably one of the best posts I’ve read in recent months . Finally someone has hit the nail on the head , and actually said exactly what I’ve been thinking for some time now .

The subject matter , bb sex is kind of irrelevant as to why , but the statements about the forum gathering the talkers , and that what gets said by them bears no relation to the rest of the site is spot on .

Oh and the fact that bb sex is nothing like Russian roulette is 100% correct too . A childish comparison at best . Get a grip , it’s way more common than you think , and although it carries a risk , so does unprotected oral , and pretty much everyone is happy to say they do that .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

Do you OP?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich

Ahh that's better. It only took 4 posts for a BB thread to get to Russian Roulette. The other day it took about 30 and I was a bit worried that someone had murdered some morons

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

My wife makes her own choices, but she wouldn't choose to take that type of risk.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opman1111Man
over a year ago

belfast

He’s back, open a thread then bugger off, wonder what pleasure he gets from this!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Why don't you tell us all your own answer's to your question's,it's irritating you don't.

I really must stop letting little thing's irritate me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All this thread is just wanking material for the OP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Ahh that's better. It only took 4 posts for a BB thread to get to Russian Roulette. The other day it took about 30 and I was a bit worried that someone had murdered some morons "
comedy genius lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophleeCouple
over a year ago

Fareham

This one is easy 'No'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He appears to be having bb sex with his "wife" in a couple of his profile pictures.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

Your profile says single. Do you have a wife even!?

Grabbing popcorn ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *easing_twoCouple
over a year ago

Bristol, Thornbury


"Ahh that's better. It only took 4 posts for a BB thread to get to Russian Roulette. The other day it took about 30 and I was a bit worried that someone had murdered some morons "

We can all live in hope

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bsinthe_boyMan
over a year ago

Luton

My wife makes her own decisions, being a feee human being and not my property. However we do have an agreement that we use condoms with everyone other than ourselves. Any change to fluid bonding with another person requires conversion all round and tests.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"My wife makes her own decisions, being a feee human being and not my property. However we do have an agreement that we use condoms with everyone other than ourselves. Any change to fluid bonding with another person requires conversion all round and tests.

"

Fluid bonding,is that just snagging other people?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"My wife makes her own decisions, being a feee human being and not my property. However we do have an agreement that we use condoms with everyone other than ourselves. Any change to fluid bonding with another person requires conversion all round and tests.

Fluid bonding,is that just snagging other people? "

Err shagging,don't know what the stuff snagging is!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think sex should be outlawed and cheese and potato s banned

No sex

No chips

No mash

No pizza

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My wife makes her own decisions, being a feee human being and not my property. However we do have an agreement that we use condoms with everyone other than ourselves. Any change to fluid bonding with another person requires conversion all round and tests.

Fluid bonding,is that just snagging other people? "

It's posh for bareback, to try and make it sound more meaningful than 'spunking inside with no condom

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eliciously DirtyMan
over a year ago

sawley

Not a bloody chance, and if weve ever met anyone who asks if bb is ok the play stops and there shown the door.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No I wouldn't be happy with my wife fucking bare back, two of us doing that increases the risk lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"My wife makes her own decisions, being a feee human being and not my property. However we do have an agreement that we use condoms with everyone other than ourselves. Any change to fluid bonding with another person requires conversion all round and tests.

Fluid bonding,is that just snagging other people?

It's posh for bareback, to try and make it sound more meaningful than 'spunking inside with no condom "

Oh right thankyou for explaining

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

She does as pleases, but she knows if she does, I won't have sex bb with her for atleast 6 months and 3 months safe.

Last time we was at a club she let a guy fuck her bb(didn't cum apparently), without me knowing(chlorine in eyes couldn't see anything). Now she has too wait and get tested before I'll romp her.

Luckily we have a gf, so I don't go without

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hestercpl4funCouple
over a year ago

chester

No way do we play BB all guys are strictly told to keep their socks on and they must be from Marks & Spencer's , we're not all perverts , oh you mean that type of bareback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sbotangoMan
over a year ago

Close by

As long as I get a go I don’t mind. Sloppy seconds can be fun lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otgirl32Woman
over a year ago

Ashton Under Lyne


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way. "

FINALLY a sensible post. Yes BB sex has some finite risks but the risks are quite small. I won't say it's impossible to get HIV from vaginal sex but it's much LESS likely than anal sex. The "russian roulette" comparison is so daft and stupid it's not even worth giving any lip. At the end of the day BB sex is a CHOICE. Like every choice in life there are pros and cons. I personally love BB sex and get tested every month and am still standing in one piece.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hilloutMan
over a year ago

All over the place! Northwesr, , Southwest


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way. "

I agree with some of your points, but to say that contracting HIV through unprotected vaginal is nearly impossible is simply not true. Granted, its easier for a woman to pick it up through bb than a man. Vaginal membranes are more susceptible to injury (think rough sex) which can create entry points for the transmission. This can occur for us gents if we suffer a small cut in the penis, particularly for uncircumcised individuals. True, unprotected anal is much riskier, but vaginal is not safe, especially for the lady.

In the end though, people are free to do what they will in the end.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why do people always focus on the AIDS aspect anyway. I wouldn't want to have unprotected sex early in a relationship because of the risk of herpes or some other more cureable but nevertheless itchy/scratchy incident.

I've been on rugby teams enough that pretty much every one I know - and yes me included - has had a C-Pac need at some point. Aids isn't why testing or wrapping is important. At least not to me.

Then again my wife lives 5000 miles away so I'm not that bothered what she does these days

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uited staffs guyMan
over a year ago

staffordshire

As above I’m delighted to see Russian roulette back so early in BB threads, I’d been missing the good old days of random statistics and made up information on the more evidence based threads recently!

Long live those who make up random stats! (Not including Jeremy Hunt though)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs"

Here is your reputable source:


"A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4"

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/


"A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uited staffs guyMan
over a year ago

staffordshire

You’ve done the proverbial on the Russian roulette bonfire now you do realise that!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub. "

Interesting to see a woman as a 'reciever' has greater odds than a man as an 'inserter' in that research. By greater I mean more chance

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Interesting to see a woman as a 'reciever' has greater odds than a man as an 'inserter' in that research. By greater I mean more chance "

Women have always had greater susceptibility to infection from sexual contact. Which, by reading the forums, you would not think is the case. After doing some research, I have come to realize we're surprisingly ill informed about the nature of STD's. We have really just taken to fear mongering as a place holder for a lack of real education about sexual health.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Again....itchy/burny far more a threat that killy/Tom Hanks plays you in a movie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"I don't LET my wife do anything, she makes her own decisions!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rLucky777Man
over a year ago

Leeds

What’s your deal Davieboy26?

Why do you always only ever post one line questions daily with zero interactions?

Are you a robot?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"What’s your deal Davieboy26?

Why do you always only ever post one line questions daily with zero interactions?

Are you a robot?"

Strange isn't it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's an automated sexual deviance level survey.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub. "

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue. "

No.

Once again...this is NOT HOW STATISTICS WORK. The chances of you catching HIV are from those WITH the disease...an already low number as is. The number of heterosexual women in the UK with HIV is low...very low. You do know many health practitioners awareness of said stats mean they often times end up not actually bothering to perform certain tests on demographics whose representation among sufferers is negligible.

The risk of catching HIV through vaginal intercourse is negligible. 0.04-0.08% is the very concept of negligible. In any statistical analysis, such a low number would often end up relegated to the margin of error.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue.

No.

Once again...this is NOT HOW STATISTICS WORK. The chances of you catching HIV are from those WITH the disease...an already low number as is. The number of heterosexual women in the UK with HIV is low...very low. You do know many health practitioners awareness of said stats mean they often times end up not actually bothering to perform certain tests on demographics whose representation among sufferers is negligible.

The risk of catching HIV through vaginal intercourse is negligible. 0.04-0.08% is the very concept of negligible. In any statistical analysis, such a low number would often end up relegated to the margin of error. "

32,000 women living with HIV in the UK... about a third of diagnosed cases... maybe not as low as you might think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmmMaybeCouple
over a year ago

West Wales


"I don't LET my wife do anything, she makes her own decisions!"

S

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue.

No.

Once again...this is NOT HOW STATISTICS WORK. The chances of you catching HIV are from those WITH the disease...an already low number as is. The number of heterosexual women in the UK with HIV is low...very low. You do know many health practitioners awareness of said stats mean they often times end up not actually bothering to perform certain tests on demographics whose representation among sufferers is negligible.

The risk of catching HIV through vaginal intercourse is negligible. 0.04-0.08% is the very concept of negligible. In any statistical analysis, such a low number would often end up relegated to the margin of error.

32,000 women living with HIV in the UK... about a third of diagnosed cases... maybe not as low as you might think"

32000 out of a population of 30-35 million. Come on man. People should know how this works. And even, very few of those women will be native of here neither likely swingers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tt1Couple
over a year ago

North Yorkshire


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison"

Five to one

One in six

Sorry .......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue.

No.

Once again...this is NOT HOW STATISTICS WORK. The chances of you catching HIV are from those WITH the disease...an already low number as is. The number of heterosexual women in the UK with HIV is low...very low. You do know many health practitioners awareness of said stats mean they often times end up not actually bothering to perform certain tests on demographics whose representation among sufferers is negligible.

The risk of catching HIV through vaginal intercourse is negligible. 0.04-0.08% is the very concept of negligible. In any statistical analysis, such a low number would often end up relegated to the margin of error.

32,000 women living with HIV in the UK... about a third of diagnosed cases... maybe not as low as you might think

32000 out of a population of 30-35 million. Come on man. People should know how this works. And even, very few of those women will be native of here neither likely swingers. "

I am not denying that.... you stated that the incidence of Positive females in the UK "is very low" 32,000+ is not "very low".... I am glad you are not my accountant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why oh why do all you idiots get uptight when you see a bareback post.i wonder why the op posted this thread,why give him the satisfaction???

I'm not uptight at all... I love BB sex...

The OP always posts a question and never answers, just uses them for wank fodder I'm guessing...

The statistics are 1 in 600 people living with HIV in the UK, fact. As a previous poster said though, not all HIV positive people will be fucking bareback, but some will be, plus those who don't know they are carrying the virus and are infectious whilst not on medication

Add to this the fact that spreading HIV through vaginal sex is near impossible. The lack of sex education in a so called sex site is as tragic as it is comical.

Bareback sex is not like playing russian roulette and is pretty common if you have even remote experience in the swinging scene. The problem is the forum gathers all the full of shit Fabbers who spend more time talking about swinging rather than doing it and often have experiences and expectations of swinging which dont correlate with the rest of the site in any way.

While I agree russian roulette is a ridiculous comparison to make, saying "spreading hiv through vaginal sex is near impossible" is just not true either. Don't combat lack of sex education with lack of sex education. I would urge people to get the facts from a reputable source. Then make your own decision about your own body. And leave everyone else to make theirs

Here is your reputable source:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies exploring the risk of transmission through vaginal sex was published in 2009.4 It estimated the risk of HIV transmission through receptive vaginal sex (receiving the penis in the vagina) to be 0.08% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 1,250 exposures).

A meta-analysis of three studies exploring the risk from insertive vaginal sex (inserting the penis into the vagina) was estimated to be 0.04% (equivalent to 1 transmission per 2,500 exposures).4

http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/summer-2012/putting-number-it-risk-exposure-hiv

And...

https://www.aidsmap.com/Vaginal-intercourse/page/1323532/

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV-positive, and 0.08% when the male partner was HIV-positive. However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2

LOL, yes. 0.04% is pretty much near impossible in layman terms. Its pretty much a medical lingo for "If you come to your doctor and claim that you caught HIV from vaginal sex with a woman whilst claiming to be heterosexual, its obvious you're full of shit".

As said, a lot of you really have no idea what you're talking about and most of what you know about sex is second hand information gathered from round the pub.

Unless you pick the wrong partner...

"However, these rates were considerably higher in lower-income countries, if the source partner was in either the very early or the late stage of HIV infection, or if one partner had genital ulcer disease.2"

So if you are with someone in the very early stages of hiv and they just dont know they have it (as estimated is the case in 13% of hiv sufferers in the uk) chances are "considerably higher". No longer "pretty much impossible" as you stated. Yes other ways of catching it may be riskier. But stating there is no risk in vaginal sex is just irresponsible and untrue.

No.

Once again...this is NOT HOW STATISTICS WORK. The chances of you catching HIV are from those WITH the disease...an already low number as is. The number of heterosexual women in the UK with HIV is low...very low. You do know many health practitioners awareness of said stats mean they often times end up not actually bothering to perform certain tests on demographics whose representation among sufferers is negligible.

The risk of catching HIV through vaginal intercourse is negligible. 0.04-0.08% is the very concept of negligible. In any statistical analysis, such a low number would often end up relegated to the margin of error.

32,000 women living with HIV in the UK... about a third of diagnosed cases... maybe not as low as you might think

32000 out of a population of 30-35 million. Come on man. People should know how this works. And even, very few of those women will be native of here neither likely swingers. "

When using statistics to encourage women to believe they are safe from ever catching hiv through unprotected vaginal sex, you better be sure, very damn sure. Hopefully nobody is going to take the word of some random on fab that would argue black was white... I say again. Take advice from a reputable source people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkywife1981Couple
over a year ago

A town near you

I'm sure if you take third world figures out of the equation the ratio of people with hiv would be much different than 1 in 6

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iWifeHappyLifeCouple
over a year ago

Liverpool


"I don't LET my wife do anything, she makes her own decisions!"

This is the answer you're looking for

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nly lookingMan
over a year ago

Fraddon

Wife has a mind of her own, so up to her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iWifeHappyLifeCouple
over a year ago

Liverpool

If you're interested in hearing a woman's opinion on it I wouldn't go near back with a stranger because I'd be worried about things like Chlamydia and other common STDs, not HIV.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iWifeHappyLifeCouple
over a year ago

Liverpool

*bearback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ?

You wanking to your questions again OP?

The Green arrow explains a lot "

What's the green arrow mean??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes when she had a regular FB, they always had sex unprotected. Very arousing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ransGuyTV/TS
over a year ago

Cardiff


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ?

You wanking to your questions again OP?

The Green arrow explains a lot

What's the green arrow mean?? "

The little green arrow next to a person's name is a link to other posts they have commented on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Wouldn't anyway not into Russian roulette !!

Russian roulette?

A six to one chance of instant death?

What a stupid and comparison

Lol not really aids and hiv could do that

Blimy! I didn't realise 1 in 6 people had hiv!

Statistically speaking one out of the six people you sleep with COULD have HIV. So not the worst comparison

C

Let's get the statistics right here... in the UK 1 in 600 people are actually living with HIV"

Well they can't be "living" with HIV, if it causes instant death like a bullet to the brain from Russian roulette.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Has anyone considered this piece of evidence?

https://youtu.be/5yC7HwPh6Es

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

[Removed by poster at 09/11/17 21:07:10]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Has anyone considered this piece of evidence?

https://youtu.be/5yC7HwPh6Es"

Hahaha! Can't argue with such a credible source as Team America!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Has anyone considered this piece of evidence?

https://youtu.be/5yC7HwPh6Es

Hahaha! Can't argue with such a credible source as Team America!"

The finest minds at work on the subject right here

Got it on the internet, therefore it's correct.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Scientifically and by statistics, there’s 0,001% that your straight lover is hiv pos and even if he/she were, the chance to get infected us from 0.04% for vaginal non period sex to 0.1% for anal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It not nearly impossible to pass on HIV through vaginal sex, it carries less of a chance than unprotected anal sex, but is still very possible. Men that have unprotected vaginal sex with a HIV positive woman has more chance of contracting HIV than a woman having unprotected vaginal sex with an HIV positive man.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Here we go again OP....

Guys click on the green arrow and all will become apparent!

If you’re after a bit of written wank material I suggest the fantasies and stories section may be where you want to peruse

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "
only if I didn't like her

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *voryforebonyMan
over a year ago

boogie town


"What could possibly go wrong"

What could go wrong..that's obvious isn't it? If he's not wearing a condom he might spill over onto your nice clean duvet! (Seriously though...anyone that goes bareback in such circumstances is just plain daft, stupid in fact) Wrap up and stay safe!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Looking at the OP threads he's started, he obviously likes to ask questions and sit there with his trollies around his ankles knocking one out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Looking at the OP threads he's started, he obviously likes to ask questions and sit there with his trollies around his ankles knocking one out "
shopping trollies ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"Do you let you wife have bareback sex with other men ? "

Yeah, why not?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Only if their strangers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top