FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

God Squad

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A little background. I live in a block of flats, we have a video phone door entry system from street level.

Within the block I have a neighbour with benefits we both enjoy an independent life while having some fun when the mood takes us.

Yesterday lunch time my neighbour pings a message "fancy some afternoon delight" of course I replied "you bet I do". "Great be up in 10 minutes" was the response.

Just time for me to get a quick shower, set the shower running and stripped of already semi hard with thoughts of what the delights the afternoon might have instore.

With the same tap tap on the door rushed and flung it open saying something along the lines of "christ you're keen are your knickers on fire or what".

Stood in front of me were three smartly dressed women and a bloke in a suit grasping a bible and some leaflets.

Seeing my nakedness and arousal one of the ladies let out a little scream and dived back around the corner, the other two stood their ground with smiles on their faces.

The bloke clearly annoyed pushed in front of the two women and started verbally abusing me, accusing me of public indecency and he was going to call the police, with that they left, the two ladies still giggling. I should add that my door is not visible to other flats. When my NWB did arrive we had a fantastic afternoon speculating on how the situation might have developed differently.

What do you think was it public indecency? After all the god squad arrived at my door unannounced.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No, it wasn’t public indecency.

You were in your flat.

You weren’t expecting them to knock on your door.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Of course it wasn't,it was damn unfortunate timing that's all. Would have been funny to have seen though!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think public decency was outraged.

I think that's the case whenever somebody propagates a myth as fact, especially when doing so in an unsolicited manner.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *zamiWoman
over a year ago

LONDON

I think the God squad have got a nerve!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

I would have turned the tables on them and invited them in to discuss their religious views further.

Payback!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't know about public decency being offended but it's certainly the most hilarious post on here for a long while. I wouldn't worry too much about them trying to make something of it, if they did they wouldn't be likely to get very far. XXX

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A little background. I live in a block of flats, we have a video phone door entry system from street level.

Within the block I have a neighbour with benefits we both enjoy an independent life while having some fun when the mood takes us.

Yesterday lunch time my neighbour pings a message "fancy some afternoon delight" of course I replied "you bet I do". "Great be up in 10 minutes" was the response.

Just time for me to get a quick shower, set the shower running and stripped of already semi hard with thoughts of what the delights the afternoon might have instore.

With the same tap tap on the door rushed and flung it open saying something along the lines of "christ you're keen are your knickers on fire or what".

Stood in front of me were three smartly dressed women and a bloke in a suit grasping a bible and some leaflets.

Seeing my nakedness and arousal one of the ladies let out a little scream and dived back around the corner, the other two stood their ground with smiles on their faces.

The bloke clearly annoyed pushed in front of the two women and started verbally abusing me, accusing me of public indecency and he was going to call the police, with that they left, the two ladies still giggling. I should add that my door is not visible to other flats. When my NWB did arrive we had a fantastic afternoon speculating on how the situation might have developed differently.

What do you think was it public indecency? After all the god squad arrived at my door unannounced.

"

No its not public indecency and they took the risk in knocking your door (cold calling)

least you might not have to see the god squad again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inful xWoman
over a year ago

In a sleepy little village

If the ladies were impressed they might come back and knock again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported. "

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illy_the_tvTV/TS
over a year ago

hoorn, Netherlands

Should hav said you was dressed as 'god' intended

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This made me smile

Might answer the door topless next time the Jehovas Witness crew come knocking round this way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence. "

Sounds like you've had this problem before?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imbo59seMan
over a year ago

North Norfolk area

As a youngster I had a JH as a boss, hypocritical b*stard!

My blood doning (rare group) was always a cause for "discussion"!

He sent some of his mob around on a Saturday morning, the looks on their faces when my "guest" strolled down the stairs behind me.....boobs and pubes rustling in the wind...priceless

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"If the ladies were impressed they might come back and knock again "

That was the basis of our fantasies for the afternoon. Alas did not come to pass.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.

Sounds like you've had this problem before? "

Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.

Sounds like you've had this problem before?

Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer! "

There must be crimes against swinging happening every 5 mins on here, thank god you’re here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

Unfortunately they knocked on your door at the wrong time, I guess that's one way to make them go quickly lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.

Sounds like you've had this problem before?

Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer! "

Do you get asked to show your briefs a lot on here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *.1079Man
over a year ago

Lincolnshire

Ive answered the door loads of times to the bible bashers in my dressing gown stlightly open, always got a smile but they tend to not try and stop to bother me. Once I kept them there for ages to give them a taste of their own medicine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London


"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.

You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...

As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.

Sounds like you've had this problem before?

Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer!

Do you get asked to show your briefs a lot on here? "

The old ones are the best...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London

With all due respect to the OP, he was a bit daft. Who answers the door naked without checking who is there first?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Bullshit op. The god botherers don't come to your door in a group of 4. No bad story though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *.1079Man
over a year ago

Lincolnshire


"Bullshit op. The god botherers don't come to your door in a group of 4. No bad story though "

I've had them at my bloody door in groups of 3 and 4.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Should have wanked into your hand and seagulled them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple
over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville


"Should have wanked into your hand and seagulled them "

Not an expression I’ve heard before. Is it what I think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

[Removed by poster at 27/10/17 15:33:18]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Should have wanked into your hand and seagulled them

Not an expression I’ve heard before. Is it what I think "

It's basically a vertical version of when you spiderman them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atcherwankerMan
over a year ago

Birmingham


"Should have wanked into your hand and seagulled them

Not an expression I’ve heard before. Is it what I think

It's basically a vertical version of when you spiderman them"

Yeah, think hotel balconies and Status Quo.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *s_bettyboopWoman
over a year ago

-3


"Should hav said you was dressed as 'god' intended"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top