Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" It screams of arrogance to me. It's all well and good having preferences. We all have them, but to say those specific words would be a filter for me to avoid them, as I personally find arrogance the most off putting trait. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't send a message if they were asking for hot people I tend to send messages if they have a funny status or they've posted something in the lounge and I have private messaged them " yes - must be able to have a laugh about life - is more appealing to me than hot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" To be honest it's not a feeling of insecurity or inferiority that puts me off messaging these people, it's more 1) if they are so full of themselves ( probably without reason) why would I be bothered trying to get to know them ,just a time waste as I probably wouldn't like them as people with that kind of attitude, particularly when there are stunning women on here who also seem like lovely people | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We think it's for other people to comment on wether they think we're "hot" we would never describe or think of ourselves in that way , also we've found a connection is way more important than just hotness lol xx " This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Banana hammock, micro pedi foot roller, Barry m aqua gel nail polishe glengetti tea bag, chocolate digestive thins. Sky Q remote. " Tea & chocolate digestives | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some times it does put me off, cause don't know if 'hot enough to message them' like u said OP its subjective. & sometimes it's ironic the profile saying that I wonder 'have they looked at themselves lately in the mirror lol' " Your hot my little cub lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Banana hammock, micro pedi foot roller, Barry m aqua gel nail polishe glengetti tea bag, chocolate digestive thins. Sky Q remote. Tea & chocolate digestives " I'm just taking the piss, I can write the very response that the op is looking for but always get ignored so was just writing the things that were next to me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if you can pull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when you're out in the real world, then you can message the profiles that state things like, "must be hot" or "extremely picky" or whatever else shit people say. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if you can pull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when you're out in the real world, then you can message the profiles that state things like, "must be hot" or "extremely picky" or whatever else shit people say. " Oh my some HOT guys on this thread | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" Yeah i just avoid any profile that says "You must" or "you will" I mean your obviously so conceted that your making demands before youve even talked let alone met | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"pull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when out in the real world" so I assume profiles looking for and/or asking for hot or some variation on it are not looking for me. It doesn't get my back up anymore than someone looking for a tall, slim blonde would. Just basic incompatibility due to physical preferences. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don'tpull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when out in the real world so I assume profiles looking for and/or asking for hot or some variation on it are not looking for me. It doesn't get my back up anymore than someone looking for a tall, slim blonde would. Just basic incompatibility due to physical preferences." This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don'tpull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when out in the real world so I assume profiles looking for and/or asking for hot or some variation on it are not looking for me. It doesn't get my back up anymore than someone looking for a tall, slim blonde would. Just basic incompatibility due to physical preferences." And ive seen your pics dont let anyone tell you your not hot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Banana hammock, micro pedi foot roller, Barry m aqua gel nail polishe glengetti tea bag, chocolate digestive thins. Sky Q remote. Tea & chocolate digestives I'm just taking the piss, I can write the very response that the op is looking for but always get ignored so was just writing the things that were next to me!" Wouldn't dream of ignoring you lovely. I just can't sit on here too much at work haha. Loved your little list though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh. Never had a problem with it. Why not. No one is owed a pity fuck. I have no idea on a site where Dick size and "gymfit" seems to rule the roost that people have an issue with the term "hot". In truth many of the people asking for such genuinely are "hot". Seen it on a lot of the younger couples who definitely have the mainstream "sexy" look. And why not? FAB is a strange place where people start to get personally offended when people have an ounce of confidence or preferences which make them seem "shallow". In many cases I tend to prefer the picky couples. Waaaaay more serious and way less likely to flop. Arranged a meet yesterday with a couples who flopped on me. They were the typical "shy" type on here whose nerves/cold feet make them a lot more likely to be time wasters." This is exactly why I asked for other peoples opinion mate. I will say though that there definitely some unnatractive single girls who might as well say that there not interested unless your a Brad Pitt / Ryan Reynolds / Taye Diggs type with a massive cock. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh. Never had a problem with it. Why not. No one is owed a pity fuck. I have no idea on a site where Dick size and "gymfit" seems to rule the roost that people have an issue with the term "hot". In truth many of the people asking for such genuinely are "hot". Seen it on a lot of the younger couples who definitely have the mainstream "sexy" look. And why not? FAB is a strange place where people start to get personally offended when people have an ounce of confidence or preferences which make them seem "shallow". In many cases I tend to prefer the picky couples. Waaaaay more serious and way less likely to flop. Arranged a meet yesterday with a couples who flopped on me. They were the typical "shy" type on here whose nerves/cold feet make them a lot more likely to be time wasters. This is exactly why I asked for other peoples opinion mate. I will say though that there definitely some unnatractive single girls who might as well say that there not interested unless your a Brad Pitt / Ryan Reynolds / Taye Diggs type with a massive cock. " And some do...i call it the Stafford effect, after where i went to uni, where the lad-girl ratio was 17-1...a bit like fab | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I read it on profile I Dont message. Having a couples profile also I know how hard it can be to filter fakes single males etc. And at times to even get a response. I actually wonder how many messages these people receive." Not too many, I'm guessing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I read it on profile I Dont message. Having a couples profile also I know how hard it can be to filter fakes single males etc. And at times to even get a response. I actually wonder how many messages these people receive. Not too many, I'm guessing. " If this thread and the othets ive seen are anything to go by anyway | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I read it on profile I Dont message. Having a couples profile also I know how hard it can be to filter fakes single males etc. And at times to even get a response. I actually wonder how many messages these people receive. Not too many, I'm guessing. " I think they probably do alright. I've seen profiles with this written and the couple/person is generally attractive (in the mainstream sense) and they have plenty of verifications. I bet they aren't wanting for the type of meets they desire. At least, not any more wanting than every one else on fab | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wouldn't be overly fussed about it. Our main issue when looking for couples is the fact that most profiles don't show photos of the guy, or if they do it's only a couple " And most of those are just 1 person prrtending to be a couple | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh. Never had a problem with it. Why not. No one is owed a pity fuck. I have no idea on a site where Dick size and "gymfit" seems to rule the roost that people have an issue with the term "hot". In truth many of the people asking for such genuinely are "hot". Seen it on a lot of the younger couples who definitely have the mainstream "sexy" look. And why not? FAB is a strange place where people start to get personally offended when people have an ounce of confidence or preferences which make them seem "shallow". In many cases I tend to prefer the picky couples. Waaaaay more serious and way less likely to flop. Arranged a meet yesterday with a couples who flopped on me. They were the typical "shy" type on here whose nerves/cold feet make them a lot more likely to be time wasters. This is exactly why I asked for other peoples opinion mate. I will say though that there definitely some unnatractive single girls who might as well say that there not interested unless your a Brad Pitt / Ryan Reynolds / Taye Diggs type with a massive cock. " Yeah and more power to them. Buyers market. Same way if I am a man of considerable wealth then I can go somewhere like a sugar daddy dating site and demand the best of the best. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" I Stop reading and move on. Im very confident but i aint hot lmao. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh. Never had a problem with it. Why not. No one is owed a pity fuck. I have no idea on a site where Dick size and "gymfit" seems to rule the roost that people have an issue with the term "hot". In truth many of the people asking for such genuinely are "hot". Seen it on a lot of the younger couples who definitely have the mainstream "sexy" look. And why not? FAB is a strange place where people start to get personally offended when people have an ounce of confidence or preferences which make them seem "shallow". In many cases I tend to prefer the picky couples. Waaaaay more serious and way less likely to flop. Arranged a meet yesterday with a couples who flopped on me. They were the typical "shy" type on here whose nerves/cold feet make them a lot more likely to be time wasters. This is exactly why I asked for other peoples opinion mate. I will say though that there definitely some unnatractive single girls who might as well say that there not interested unless your a Brad Pitt / Ryan Reynolds / Taye Diggs type with a massive cock. Yeah and more power to them. Buyers market. Same way if I am a man of considerable wealth then I can go somewhere like a sugar daddy dating site and demand the best of the best." Nah. Buyers market yes. But one should still choose who you sell yourself to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it's written as a preference its less off putting something like "Prefer tall, as I am tall myself".. rather than "must be over 6'2"." I'd rather tell 100 people they're not what we're looking forward than have what we could potentially be looking for assume it wasn't worth the effort and that we're entitled. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh. Never had a problem with it. Why not. No one is owed a pity fuck. I have no idea on a site where Dick size and "gymfit" seems to rule the roost that people have an issue with the term "hot". In truth many of the people asking for such genuinely are "hot". Seen it on a lot of the younger couples who definitely have the mainstream "sexy" look. And why not? FAB is a strange place where people start to get personally offended when people have an ounce of confidence or preferences which make them seem "shallow". In many cases I tend to prefer the picky couples. Waaaaay more serious and way less likely to flop. Arranged a meet yesterday with a couples who flopped on me. They were the typical "shy" type on here whose nerves/cold feet make them a lot more likely to be time wasters. This is exactly why I asked for other peoples opinion mate. I will say though that there definitely some unnatractive single girls who might as well say that there not interested unless your a Brad Pitt / Ryan Reynolds / Taye Diggs type with a massive cock. Yeah and more power to them. Buyers market. Same way if I am a man of considerable wealth then I can go somewhere like a sugar daddy dating site and demand the best of the best. Nah. Buyers market yes. But one should still choose who you sell yourself to." In a perfect world yes. But I notice the same thing on ebay. When I am looking for a product which is saturated I tend to become complacent, needlessly picky, entitled and can even end up deciding against purchasing altogether. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don'tpull easily on a night out and attract a sufficient amount of attention from the opposite sex when out in the real world so I assume profiles looking for and/or asking for hot or some variation on it are not looking for me. It doesn't get my back up anymore than someone looking for a tall, slim blonde would. Just basic incompatibility due to physical preferences." Same here No harm in writing that because it will filter out many people. Of course some will still mail them to rant about their preference discriminating against 'ugly' people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Kills me when they say that then you see that they're far from perfect themselves As someone said earlier, beauty is from within" Why do they have to be perfect? Can short people not look for tall people? What if a brunette wants to meet a blonde? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" That just tell me they're soooooooooo pretentious | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It wouldn't matter to us. If you are hot or not is going to be entirely subjective, so you'll never know if they fancy you or not if you don't message them. What does it tell you about them? Nothing really, except they want to meet hot people, which is an acceptable aim on a sex site. " I would agree with this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are always getting slated for fucking anything. Yet if they are looking for people they fancy it's considered a crime worse than murder!! " Aye. You can't win whatever you do, so you may as well do things your way and anyone that doesn't like it can fuck themselves. ..or someone else anyway | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some times it does put me off, cause don't know if 'hot enough to message them' like u said OP its subjective. & sometimes it's ironic the profile saying that I wonder 'have they looked at themselves lately in the mirror lol' " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. " But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah let 'em all wallow together in self-adulation at somewhere like Killing Kittens and let the rest of us mere mortals enjoy ourselves on here! " I've been to a killing kittens night! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. " Isn't it just? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. " Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! " As I put earlier, it seems that the unwillingness to message for us is driven by the fact that we don't consider ourselves in the upper echelon of "Instagram pretty" and it appears that's what the majority of the people who have a preference for when they dictate this on their profile. Judging by most the responses on here though, it's those with Instagram and gym fit bodies that are totally ok with this, or the black guys with big cocks. Kind of makes us think that these people require a sense of self assurement from their play partners that mere mortal types don't always have. I'm not offended by someone not finding us attractive, we've spoken to a few people who don't float our boats, but we try not to prevent putting people off messaging because there is so much more to attraction than what magazines tell you is hott. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. " I'm not self assembly or held together by glue - a non model type for sure... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! As I put earlier, it seems that the unwillingness to message for us is driven by the fact that we don't consider ourselves in the upper echelon of "Instagram pretty" and it appears that's what the majority of the people who have a preference for when they dictate this on their profile. Judging by most the responses on here though, it's those with Instagram and gym fit bodies that are totally ok with this, or the black guys with big cocks. Kind of makes us think that these people require a sense of self assurement from their play partners that mere mortal types don't always have. I'm not offended by someone not finding us attractive, we've spoken to a few people who don't float our boats, but we try not to prevent putting people off messaging because there is so much more to attraction than what magazines tell you is hott. " My issue with this entire thread is that it comes off as sour grapes and if this exact same thread was made by a man then the responses would be rightly telling one to suck it up and get used to it. Women (who are ultimately the prize for the vast majority on this site) are in the minority. The ones who look conventionally attractive are even less so. Therefore they can have whatever ridiculous standards they desire. It is irksome when people say that women can do what they like out of one side of their mouth but then when said women get rejected by even luckier couples they're right back in here to complain about "shallow" people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! As I put earlier, it seems that the unwillingness to message for us is driven by the fact that we don't consider ourselves in the upper echelon of "Instagram pretty" and it appears that's what the majority of the people who have a preference for when they dictate this on their profile. Judging by most the responses on here though, it's those with Instagram and gym fit bodies that are totally ok with this, or the black guys with big cocks. Kind of makes us think that these people require a sense of self assurement from their play partners that mere mortal types don't always have. I'm not offended by someone not finding us attractive, we've spoken to a few people who don't float our boats, but we try not to prevent putting people off messaging because there is so much more to attraction than what magazines tell you is hott. My issue with this entire thread is that it comes off as sour grapes and if this exact same thread was made by a man then the responses would be rightly telling one to suck it up and get used to it. Women (who are ultimately the prize for the vast majority on this site) are in the minority. The ones who look conventionally attractive are even less so. Therefore they can have whatever ridiculous standards they desire. It is irksome when people say that women can do what they like out of one side of their mouth but then when said women get rejected by even luckier couples they're right back in here to complain about "shallow" people. " And as I said before, the biggest defenders of this attitude are those who would likely consider themselves typically attractive, and what you're saying is "suck it up, you may not be hott enough for them". So it becomes an argument between the pretty or the desirable (average single girls who realise they can be picky on here), when what I'm asking is just for how each person reacts to seeing this, not trying to shit on people for having a preference. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! As I put earlier, it seems that the unwillingness to message for us is driven by the fact that we don't consider ourselves in the upper echelon of "Instagram pretty" and it appears that's what the majority of the people who have a preference for when they dictate this on their profile. Judging by most the responses on here though, it's those with Instagram and gym fit bodies that are totally ok with this, or the black guys with big cocks. Kind of makes us think that these people require a sense of self assurement from their play partners that mere mortal types don't always have. I'm not offended by someone not finding us attractive, we've spoken to a few people who don't float our boats, but we try not to prevent putting people off messaging because there is so much more to attraction than what magazines tell you is hott. My issue with this entire thread is that it comes off as sour grapes and if this exact same thread was made by a man then the responses would be rightly telling one to suck it up and get used to it. Women (who are ultimately the prize for the vast majority on this site) are in the minority. The ones who look conventionally attractive are even less so. Therefore they can have whatever ridiculous standards they desire. It is irksome when people say that women can do what they like out of one side of their mouth but then when said women get rejected by even luckier couples they're right back in here to complain about "shallow" people. And as I said before, the biggest defenders of this attitude are those who would likely consider themselves typically attractive, and what you're saying is "suck it up, you may not be hott enough for them". So it becomes an argument between the pretty or the desirable (average single girls who realise they can be picky on here), when what I'm asking is just for how each person reacts to seeing this, not trying to shit on people for having a preference. " Their "reaction" is going to be exactly what you want it to be. That these couples are just mean/shallow/arrogant/whatever other variant of nonsense Fabbers wish to use to berate others for daring to have preferences that don't align with how they look. Ultimately, these threads are always passive aggressive. People will have had a reaction they don't like and then they'll come to complain about it in the main forum. So really this is just a way of criticizing people for having "conventional pretty" standards. Is it fair? Maybe not. But I do know that I side eye anyone who starts trying to chastise people for having their own desires. There is nothing wrong with someone wanting someone who is conventionally hot the same way there is nothing wrong with someone wanting partners who are exclusively white. It's amusing and telling that people seem to get way more up in arms on here about the former than they do the latter. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" We don't bother as were only normal and not very hot. We don't like having our time wasted so why waste others time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. Isn't it just? " Lol yes I'm afraid it is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it said 'non model types need not apply' I'd know not to apply. I have an entirely realistic understanding of what I look like, and I'm very definitely a 'non model'. The lovely sassy ladies who say 'quirky geeks only apply' I'm totally up for. One lives in dorky hope. Does 'must be hot' equal 'model types only' though? It's not the same thing, surely? And if you can't reply to a 'must be hot' seeking profile, then we may as well all give up! As I put earlier, it seems that the unwillingness to message for us is driven by the fact that we don't consider ourselves in the upper echelon of "Instagram pretty" and it appears that's what the majority of the people who have a preference for when they dictate this on their profile. Judging by most the responses on here though, it's those with Instagram and gym fit bodies that are totally ok with this, or the black guys with big cocks. Kind of makes us think that these people require a sense of self assurement from their play partners that mere mortal types don't always have. I'm not offended by someone not finding us attractive, we've spoken to a few people who don't float our boats, but we try not to prevent putting people off messaging because there is so much more to attraction than what magazines tell you is hott. My issue with this entire thread is that it comes off as sour grapes and if this exact same thread was made by a man then the responses would be rightly telling one to suck it up and get used to it. Women (who are ultimately the prize for the vast majority on this site) are in the minority. The ones who look conventionally attractive are even less so. Therefore they can have whatever ridiculous standards they desire. It is irksome when people say that women can do what they like out of one side of their mouth but then when said women get rejected by even luckier couples they're right back in here to complain about "shallow" people. " Not wishing to be confrontational but surely its everybody's right to have exactly as they wish. Whether they get it is a different matter. Because we are on here to crave something different than our mundane boring lives and want excitement. I dnt put I want hot guys but trust me if they dnt fit my requirements I will decline. Not because I'm shallow I just like fit looking men. I work out hard every week and I'm sorry if it sounds bad but I have a choice and its hot fit men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" yep if i see " must be hot " i immediately turn the central heating on full blast ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to?" Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to? Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. " It will appeal to the right kind of people that think they fit the criteria. The people that don't fit the criteria just come on these threads to cry while flashing their entitlement around. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. Isn't it just? Lol yes I'm afraid it is. " It provides a modicum of amusement betwixt a splash and a wipe | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. Isn't it just? Lol yes I'm afraid it is. It provides a modicum of amusement betwixt a splash and a wipe " Cool avatar | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't bother answering. I always message the 'looking for vwe bbc' though on the off chance they will lower their standards by several degrees. But that's just annoying for someone like myself looking for black guys only and state it quite clearly as I have a preference. Isn't it just? Lol yes I'm afraid it is. It provides a modicum of amusement betwixt a splash and a wipe Cool avatar " Thanks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" We sometimes message and say "Define hot..." When we don't get a reply, we know we're not it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""any non model types need not apply"." We quite like this - cuts down the field for those of us who love airfix and balsa wood | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I usually skip profiles that say they're looking for hot people. I much rather when people are specific about their preferences, so I know if we're aligned or not. Hot is so subjective. It just sends the idea that the people behind the profile think they are so good, that they don't need to put an effort." So what should they say? How can they be specific? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to? Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. It will appeal to the right kind of people that think they fit the criteria. The people that don't fit the criteria just come on these threads to cry while flashing their entitlement around. " It's not about entitlement, my point was about what these guys could be missing out on. Saying you only want hotties can put a lot of very attractive, maybe more self conscious people off. Also, not all stunners are as fussed about perfection as others, so it feels like it could be making a rod for your own back. We've had messages and winks from said profiles before, and we just think it isn't worth the effort. So it's not a whinge, it's me trying to see if we're the only ones who find this off putting, or if there are some more "media pretty" people that agree. Judging from the mixed bag of responses it would appear the Uber hot mostly prefer this attitude, but some find it arrogant, of the people that wouldn't class themselves as "media pretty" it seems to go the other way. There is no right way to do fab, there's just you're own way, but there may be someone who reads this and decides they may fancy changing tact, as they may have seen someone who maybe wouldn't contact that them that they would like to. Does that make sense? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are always getting slated for fucking anything. Yet if they are looking for people they fancy it's considered a crime worse than murder!! " Its not on i tell thee! Just the wording bugs me. Tall is tall , big is big etc. Hot is such a subjective one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to? Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. It will appeal to the right kind of people that think they fit the criteria. The people that don't fit the criteria just come on these threads to cry while flashing their entitlement around. It's not about entitlement, my point was about what these guys could be missing out on. Saying you only want hotties can put a lot of very attractive, maybe more self conscious people off. Also, not all stunners are as fussed about perfection as others, so it feels like it could be making a rod for your own back. We've had messages and winks from said profiles before, and we just think it isn't worth the effort. So it's not a whinge, it's me trying to see if we're the only ones who find this off putting, or if there are some more "media pretty" people that agree. Judging from the mixed bag of responses it would appear the Uber hot mostly prefer this attitude, but some find it arrogant, of the people that wouldn't class themselves as "media pretty" it seems to go the other way. There is no right way to do fab, there's just you're own way, but there may be someone who reads this and decides they may fancy changing tact, as they may have seen someone who maybe wouldn't contact that them that they would like to. Does that make sense?" One of the first things in your own profile is you state the fem of the couple is 'hot'. Aren't you worried you are putting people off messaging you? Making a rod for your own back, as you say? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to? Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. It will appeal to the right kind of people that think they fit the criteria. The people that don't fit the criteria just come on these threads to cry while flashing their entitlement around. It's not about entitlement, my point was about what these guys could be missing out on. Saying you only want hotties can put a lot of very attractive, maybe more self conscious people off. Also, not all stunners are as fussed about perfection as others, so it feels like it could be making a rod for your own back. We've had messages and winks from said profiles before, and we just think it isn't worth the effort. So it's not a whinge, it's me trying to see if we're the only ones who find this off putting, or if there are some more "media pretty" people that agree. Judging from the mixed bag of responses it would appear the Uber hot mostly prefer this attitude, but some find it arrogant, of the people that wouldn't class themselves as "media pretty" it seems to go the other way. There is no right way to do fab, there's just you're own way, but there may be someone who reads this and decides they may fancy changing tact, as they may have seen someone who maybe wouldn't contact that them that they would like to. Does that make sense? One of the first things in your own profile is you state the fem of the couple is 'hot'. Aren't you worried you are putting people off messaging you? Making a rod for your own back, as you say? " Looks hot to me lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is there a seperate category for "Fabhot" - a state of delusion brought about by supply and demand? " Are you really? - Mrs. J - | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? " It's almost like subjective statements are entirely open to personal interpretation, isn't it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a lot of replies. I can't read them all to see if what I've intending to say has already been said, but... We like people who sound fun and interesting. Whilst it may not be a dealbreaker, phrases like that definitely put us off; and the phrase "need not apply" is the worst. All cliches are bad, but especially those that eccentuate the similarity with job applications. And as to preferences - well they're fine, but there's no need to broadcast them to everyone when to do so makes one look overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory). Why don't they just not reply to people they're not attracted to? Or why don't they put whatever they like on their profiles, and word it however they want? 'How it looks' is not set in stone, but in the eye of the beholder. What looks 'overly arrogant, boring, officious (or discriminatory) looks perfectly fine to them, and the people who like it. And it's their opinion of their own profile that counts, not yours. It will appeal to the right kind of people that think they fit the criteria. The people that don't fit the criteria just come on these threads to cry while flashing their entitlement around. It's not about entitlement, my point was about what these guys could be missing out on. Saying you only want hotties can put a lot of very attractive, maybe more self conscious people off. Also, not all stunners are as fussed about perfection as others, so it feels like it could be making a rod for your own back. We've had messages and winks from said profiles before, and we just think it isn't worth the effort. So it's not a whinge, it's me trying to see if we're the only ones who find this off putting, or if there are some more "media pretty" people that agree. Judging from the mixed bag of responses it would appear the Uber hot mostly prefer this attitude, but some find it arrogant, of the people that wouldn't class themselves as "media pretty" it seems to go the other way. There is no right way to do fab, there's just you're own way, but there may be someone who reads this and decides they may fancy changing tact, as they may have seen someone who maybe wouldn't contact that them that they would like to. Does that make sense?" Yes it makes sense. My comment was general to the posts on the thread, not aimed at your OP. They may want super hot people with a lot of self confidence or even arrogance. Hence why using those words to put off people with confidence issues. If people read this and decide to change the way they word their profile that's cool too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? " Great minds...... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've been sent messages then read the profile and it states "must be under size 12" really guys? " What's wrong with them saying that? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? Great minds...... " Perhaps if you just state "must not be mental". But then that could drastically reduce your chances ten fold. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? Great minds...... Perhaps if you just state "must not be mental". But then that could drastically reduce your chances ten fold. " My profile is a very long winded way of saying exactly that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's a crazy thought. Maybe they want to attract those that have confidence in their physical being enough to think that they are hot? Maybe they are achieving what they have set out to do and put most of you off? Great minds...... Perhaps if you just state "must not be mental". But then that could drastically reduce your chances ten fold. My profile is a very long winded way of saying exactly that. " Surreptitiously! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Banana hammock, micro pedi foot roller, Barry m aqua gel nail polishe glengetti tea bag, chocolate digestive thins. Sky Q remote. Tea & chocolate digestives " You never saw that on the generation game conveyor belt!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of you still bother to message someone when you read something like this on a profile that you like the look of? Does it put you off, or does anyone feel that this basically means a good bit of confidence / arrogance is a must for those people? It's not like we don't have a level of confidence and we don't think we're ugly, but we don't think we're body perfect either. We're aware the term "hot" is very subjective, and that it doesn't necessarily mean: "any non model types need not apply". However we don't tend to not follow these up if we spot it. Maybe that's a confidence thing on our part, and we should just try anyway, I'm not sure, but it's certainly off-putting for us. Thoughts?" We wouldn't make first contact because it's hard to tell what other people's idea of hot is. I don't see much of a problem with it though because I won't meet people I don't find attractive either...why would I? Swinging is mostly shallow and about physical attraction. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |