FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Guys, it's ok to cheat

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enny79TV/TS
over a year ago

chesterfield


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"

Click aim bang ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roticGoddessXXWoman
over a year ago

Richmond


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"

Goldie Hawn being well known, of course, as the premier anthropologist/human behaviourologist of our time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *axandbooCouple
over a year ago

Bristol

A woman filled with a poison (yes botox is a poison) ....is it not possible she might be delirious?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Women arent either or at least im not lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

well,there we are then..vacuous twat! actually more current social anthropologists are much more likely to suggest that the opposite is true.. completely blowing that die hard 'i can't help it because i'm a man' excuse out of the water!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Did she actually say that or was it taken out of context?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Did she actually say that or was it taken out of context?"

haven't sen the footage, but she often says spectacularly stupid things..she's been making a living out of being a twee,giggling asshole for over 40 years..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Did she actually say that or was it taken out of context?

haven't sen the footage, but she often says spectacularly stupid things..she's been making a living out of being a twee,giggling asshole for over 40 years.."

"Twee" great word!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleAcornMan
over a year ago

visiting the beach

I read somewhere a while back, that the control of STIs might have been a factor in turning our societies monogamous as groupings became bigger.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Did she actually say that or was it taken out of context?

haven't sen the footage, but she often says spectacularly stupid things..she's been making a living out of being a twee,giggling asshole for over 40 years..

"Twee" great word!!"

Bwanches are good too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I read somewhere a while back, that the control of STIs might have been a factor in turning our societies monogamous as groupings became bigger."

Nonsense

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"

Factually incorrect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

Goldie Hawn being well known, of course, as the premier anthropologist/human behaviourologist of our time."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Women arent either or at least im not lol"

right with you there sex pot xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arkside2698Man
over a year ago

luton

She might be a vacuous, air-headed twat but I still would!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who gives a fuck? I'm single and couldn't care less x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"well,there we are then..vacuous twat! actually more current social anthropologists are much more likely to suggest that the opposite is true.. completely blowing that die hard 'i can't help it because i'm a man' excuse out of the water!"

I'd heard it from that side too. Although i couldn't quote a source

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"
nooooooooo ive wasted my life .........devastated

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ptimusDMan
over a year ago

Birmingham

Well, I don't know about Goldie Hawn but I've seen figures from studies, ranging from 9 - 25% given as the number of children who aren't the genetic offspring of the man who thinks he's their father within a marriage.

I've also seen a study that found that of a sample of 15,000 men who claim to have never cheated on their wives, just over a third, say it's out of fear of being caught. In other words, given a scenario where they're guaranteed their wives will never find out, they will sleep with other women.

In my opinion, "staying faithful because you have no desire for anyone else but your spouse" isn't by far the overwhelming reason for couples staying faithful.

Now, in the purest sense of fidelity as it is expected in society, that should be the only reason.

Infidelity has been going on since the beginning of time. So, the question of whether fidelity is a natural state for humans, obviously can't be written off as an unserious question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Well, I don't know about Goldie Hawn but I've seen figures from studies, ranging from 9 - 25% given as the number of children who aren't the genetic offspring of the man who thinks he's their father within a marriage.

I've also seen a study that found that of a sample of 15,000 men who claim to have never cheated on their wives, just over a third, say it's out of fear of being caught. In other words, given a scenario where they're guaranteed their wives will never find out, they will sleep with other women.

In my opinion, "staying faithful because you have no desire for anyone else but your spouse" isn't by far the overwhelming reason for couples staying faithful.

Now, in the purest sense of fidelity as it is expected in society, that should be the only reason.

Infidelity has been going on since the beginning of time. So, the question of whether fidelity is a natural state for humans, obviously can't be written off as an unserious question."

Evolution ensures there won't be a single answer for everyone because adaptive strategies are usually successful. The best estimates usually converge around 70% of the population predisposed towards multiple partners and 30% predisposed towards monogamy. It's not one or the other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Boys will be boys....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ptimusDMan
over a year ago

Birmingham


"Boys will be boys.... "

So will girls

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

Goldie Hawn being well known, of course, as the premier anthropologist/human behaviourologist of our time."

Genuinely laughing out loud

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Goldie is entitled to her opinion,just like everyone else.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging "

That implies the human race was designed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging "
would you Adam and eve it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed. "

It was by nature through years of evolution

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution "
monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution "

Evolution doesn't take a single path though. For some monogamy would have been a reproductive advantage, for others a hinderance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha "

Actually the early begginings of the human race (homosapiens) weren't monogamous they were polygamists so though they had family units they weren't the stereotypical ones depicted today in us modern humans they were family units that encouraged sleeping with multiple partners

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asybbwCouple
over a year ago

bangor

This is brilliant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingtolifeCouple
over a year ago

who knows

society or cultures generally dictates whats what,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution

Evolution doesn't take a single path though. For some monogamy would have been a reproductive advantage, for others a hinderance. "

yes because people have free will and makes choices but from a basic evolutionary standpoint we're not a species designed for monogamy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution

Evolution doesn't take a single path though. For some monogamy would have been a reproductive advantage, for others a hinderance.

yes because people have free will and makes choices but from a basic evolutionary standpoint we're not a species designed for monogamy "

The answer isn't one or the other. Some of our ancestors gained reproductive advantage by focussing all their resources into monogamous relationships and others gained advantage doing the opposite. The polyamorous approach was the more successful of the two which is why more people are predisposed to it now. But ~30% of the population are still naturally predisposed towards monogamy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha

Actually the early begginings of the human race (homosapiens) weren't monogamous they were polygamists so though they had family units they weren't the stereotypical ones depicted today in us modern humans they were family units that encouraged sleeping with multiple partners

"
yes but as the brain evolved and saw the sense of the family unit and the benefits to human life and an orderly systematic ritualised lifestyle then monogamy became the accepted way of life ,I mean is it great to be a grandad ? That is a question because I'm not one yet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha

Actually the early begginings of the human race (homosapiens) weren't monogamous they were polygamists so though they had family units they weren't the stereotypical ones depicted today in us modern humans they were family units that encouraged sleeping with multiple partners

yes but as the brain evolved and saw the sense of the family unit and the benefits to human life and an orderly systematic ritualised lifestyle then monogamy became the accepted way of life ,I mean is it great to be a grandad ? That is a question because I'm not one yet "

A societal preferance for monogamy is linked to inheritance rights. Fews things spark bloodshed quicker than disputed inherentance. Especially when one's inheritance is a throne.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha

Actually the early begginings of the human race (homosapiens) weren't monogamous they were polygamists so though they had family units they weren't the stereotypical ones depicted today in us modern humans they were family units that encouraged sleeping with multiple partners

yes but as the brain evolved and saw the sense of the family unit and the benefits to human life and an orderly systematic ritualised lifestyle then monogamy became the accepted way of life ,I mean is it great to be a grandad ? That is a question because I'm not one yet "

No the brain didn't evolve past it it was societally reprogrammed over time to think manogamy is "right". As I've previously said if that was the case there would be no necessity for swinging, yet it exists

If humans were truely sexually managomous we'd never be able to shag Anyone else even in the event of death of a partner, that however isn't the case.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution

Evolution doesn't take a single path though. For some monogamy would have been a reproductive advantage, for others a hinderance.

yes because people have free will and makes choices but from a basic evolutionary standpoint we're not a species designed for monogamy

The answer isn't one or the other. Some of our ancestors gained reproductive advantage by focussing all their resources into monogamous relationships and others gained advantage doing the opposite. The polyamorous approach was the more successful of the two which is why more people are predisposed to it now. But ~30% of the population are still naturally predisposed towards monogamy. "

Do you have a link to that statistic as it honestly seems too high at 30% I'd be more inclined to say it was around 5% in all honesty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Monogomy is social conditioning the same as religion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"Monogomy is social conditioning the same as religion."

Agreed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution

Evolution doesn't take a single path though. For some monogamy would have been a reproductive advantage, for others a hinderance.

yes because people have free will and makes choices but from a basic evolutionary standpoint we're not a species designed for monogamy

The answer isn't one or the other. Some of our ancestors gained reproductive advantage by focussing all their resources into monogamous relationships and others gained advantage doing the opposite. The polyamorous approach was the more successful of the two which is why more people are predisposed to it now. But ~30% of the population are still naturally predisposed towards monogamy.

Do you have a link to that statistic as it honestly seems too high at 30% I'd be more inclined to say it was around 5% in all honesty "

It was either "Drive" by Daniel Pink or "The Modern Scholar: Evolutionary Psychology" by Allen MacNeill. I can't remember which sorry, but it's based on aggregating multiple studies as a sort of consensus ballpark figure.

Seperately studies of infedility have shown than 60-70% of married people are unfaithful at some point which suggests that most people aren't good at fighting their natural predisposition.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

Even the singles here that would have a manogamous relationship is they find it, can't technically be monogamous as they sexual haven't been, they've had previous sexual partners, they are merely socially manoganmous because they believe it's "right" whilst in the dynamics of a relationship

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"

I'm kinda inclined to agree, but then again I don't want to marry one either. Plus I'd even get bored of banging Tom Hardy solidly after a couple of years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

I'm kinda inclined to agree, but then again I don't want to marry one either. Plus I'd even get bored of banging Tom Hardy solidly after a couple of years."

Send him to us when you're done with him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ames1763Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen

Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people."

It's not true for the reasons recently explained but carry on as you were.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ames1763Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen


"Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people.

It's not true for the reasons recently explained but carry on as you were. "

It is very true, when a guy has so many women he instantly becomes a superstar amoung his friends and gain s respect, why is it so? It is because all the guys know this is how they feel inside but social conditioning puts them in check.

I love swinging because it is not reckless, at least to a large degree, some guys cannot handle having so many women , some can. Plus swinging has enabled women to do the same thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"If the human race was meant to be monogamous there would be no place for cheating or indeed swinging

That implies the human race was designed.

It was by nature through years of evolution monogamy was introduced by humans remember, I think the main influence was the family unit and for many it still works ha "

so, when you are in the infatuation stages of love (with only one person) and wanting to know all about that person only (coz they are your main interest), idealising them as a partner (coz you think they're 'the one') that is society shaping you? really...

even swingers go on about the 'danger's of falling for someone else and leaving a partner for someone else. they don't truly believe in pologamy either, the ones who think they should have a partner they swing with and do not enter relationships with others.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people.

It's not true for the reasons recently explained but carry on as you were.

It is very true, when a guy has so many women he instantly becomes a superstar amoung his friends and gain s respect, why is it so? It is because all the guys know this is how they feel inside but social conditioning puts them in check.

I love swinging because it is not reckless, at least to a large degree, some guys cannot handle having so many women , some can. Plus swinging has enabled women to do the same thing."

If you read the other posts and then you'll see flaws in the arguement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ames1763Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen


"Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people.

It's not true for the reasons recently explained but carry on as you were.

It is very true, when a guy has so many women he instantly becomes a superstar amoung his friends and gain s respect, why is it so? It is because all the guys know this is how they feel inside but social conditioning puts them in check.

I love swinging because it is not reckless, at least to a large degree, some guys cannot handle having so many women , some can. Plus swinging has enabled women to do the same thing.

If you read the other posts and then you'll see flaws in the arguement. "

I like being real and I know how most guys feel inside, from when I was young I started noticing that having just one girl was not for me, I had multiple girlfriends and I never hid the girls from each other, I introduced them to each other and told them this is me, you are very free to leave me if you don't like it, they accepted me as I was.

Fastforward to the future and here is swinging, same thing only now some of the ladies are even married.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't about Ms Hawn But I did see a programme That explored human relationships that came up with a theory that Humankind are not really programmed to be Monogamous, but the needs of society and religion and other factors make us conform to it. How valid that is I don't know. I do know however they did not confine it to one gender.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Yes I agree with the post and it comes from a wealth of experience and is true.

This is exactly what swinging solves,I know most vanilla people would love to be swingers but they cannot master their own emotions and therefore cannot swing,this is the key difference between the two groups of people.

It's not true for the reasons recently explained but carry on as you were.

It is very true, when a guy has so many women he instantly becomes a superstar amoung his friends and gain s respect, why is it so? It is because all the guys know this is how they feel inside but social conditioning puts them in check.

I love swinging because it is not reckless, at least to a large degree, some guys cannot handle having so many women , some can. Plus swinging has enabled women to do the same thing.

If you read the other posts and then you'll see flaws in the arguement.

I like being real and I know how most guys feel inside, from when I was young I started noticing that having just one girl was not for me, I had multiple girlfriends and I never hid the girls from each other, I introduced them to each other and told them this is me, you are very free to leave me if you don't like it, they accepted me as I was.

Fastforward to the future and here is swinging, same thing only now some of the ladies are even married."

Yes so you are in the 70%. But the original post is an absolute statement that doesn't recognise the other 30%.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Goldie hawn has said so:

“Men are not suppose to see one woman and only desire one woman…that’s just science. If the species doesn’t mutate, it’ll die…This is a man. That is what he is on earth for.”

-----------------------------------------

Don't shoot the messenger. )

"

Whether you agree or disagree I don't see any reference to cheating in this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ptimusDMan
over a year ago

Birmingham

With all the talk of evolution, social conditioning, ancestors were not monogamous, etc etc.., nobody seems to have mentioned the reason why even though it is obvious that more people than not want to have multiple sex partners, it still isn't socially acceptable.

Jealousy and similar emotions are the main culprits of why many can't handle unfaithful partners. These are feelings that can't be helped or controled, even when there's a conscious effort to do so.

This happens even amongst swingers. Couples who suddenly become jealous seeing their partner with someone else or singles who get jealous seeing a playmate with someone else.

So, what to do about these emotions? That's the question and the main reason why infidelity will never become mainstream.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top