Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back." I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back. I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me." It's not necessarily hypocrisy but purely what appeals to the female. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back. I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back. I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me." why is it hypocrisy if the female is bisexual and is looking for bisexual contact with another woman but doesn't find bi male play appealing? they're completely different things...and I speak as a bi female with a bi male partner... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. " Although the first point may be true, I think there's a lot more to it than that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find female on female a turn on, I don't find guy on guy a turn on and more to the point I find it off putting so why should we meet bi guys just because we would meet bi girls? You're acting like personal choice is a bad thing. " You see I'm the total opposite, female on female porn does nothing for me in the slightest however guy on guy porn mmm now we are talking, However guy on guy porn whilst there dressed as females or cd/cd or tv/tv or ts/ts now we are talking........ Work that out! Personal choice is great on this site Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find female on female a turn on, I don't find guy on guy a turn on and more to the point I find it off putting so why should we meet bi guys just because we would meet bi girls? You're acting like personal choice is a bad thing. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. " Hmmm in a nutshell it is male on male buggery that is the crux of the matter.. Look at its history...thats what frightens the horses and lots of straight men.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad." This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad." Yes, indeed. It's obviously fine to have a preference, but I think people should at least consider where preferences come from. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad. Yes, indeed. It's obviously fine to have a preference, but I think people should at least consider where preferences come from. " It seems that the preference should be "no bi play" rather than "no bi men" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me..." I just spat my drink out onto my tablet here! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad." Yes I think I Would agree with this. You certainly often notice bi play among women and this seems to be more acceptable and out in the open than bi play between men. ..is it because men are more worried about not being seen as a real man? I dunno. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me." Then you obviously do not understand the risks involved in different type of sex. Perhaps that is a little unfair as not all bi-men entertain anal sex and some women do. The basic fact of the matter is anal sex involves more risk of catching a STI than vaginal sex. Most people imagine bi-men are involved with anal sex therefore they are a higher risk group. Swinging is about deciding what level of risk is acceptable to you and adjusting your play to fit the risk | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad." I agree, but it seems to me that, slowly, there are more openly bi men on here which is encouraging (although too slow for me ) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I've noticed the same thing. I think girl girl is more socially acceptable than MM probably due to various things over the years. Lesbian porn is widely watched by both sexes and has been for years. Maybe when the AIDS scare hit in the 80s and was blamed mainly on gay/bi men for the spread still holds firm in some people's minds? Then again it could just be down to personal preference but if the female of a couple is bi and they state NO BI MEN it just smacks of hypocrisy to me. Then you obviously do not understand the risks involved in different type of sex. Perhaps that is a little unfair as not all bi-men entertain anal sex and some women do. The basic fact of the matter is anal sex involves more risk of catching a STI than vaginal sex. Most people imagine bi-men are involved with anal sex therefore they are a higher risk group. Swinging is about deciding what level of risk is acceptable to you and adjusting your play to fit the risk " Why not rule out every woman who has anal listed as an interest? Or everyone who hasn't explicitly ticked "safe sex"? Surely there are a hell of a lot of risks involved from a woman who's barebacked up the arse every weekend than someone who sucks a cock every now and then? The lifestyle is full of people who dodge the checklists. So why not just pick the nice people and take appropriate precautions? Perhaps it's naive, but i'm going to trust the openly bi guy over the liar if there's an sti somewhere in the picture. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Why not rule out every woman who has anal listed as an interest? Or everyone who hasn't explicitly ticked "safe sex"? Surely there are a hell of a lot of risks involved from a woman who's barebacked up the arse every weekend than someone who sucks a cock every now and then? The lifestyle is full of people who dodge the checklists. So why not just pick the nice people and take appropriate precautions? Perhaps it's naive, but i'm going to trust the openly bi guy over the liar if there's an sti somewhere in the picture." Some do, some will not play with women who do anal, we were not asked about that, your comments have just verified what we wrote about the perception people have about bi-males and anal sex. The risk is the anal sex not the sex of the people taking part. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Why not rule out every woman who has anal listed as an interest? Or everyone who hasn't explicitly ticked "safe sex"? Surely there are a hell of a lot of risks involved from a woman who's barebacked up the arse every weekend than someone who sucks a cock every now and then? The lifestyle is full of people who dodge the checklists. So why not just pick the nice people and take appropriate precautions? Perhaps it's naive, but i'm going to trust the openly bi guy over the liar if there's an sti somewhere in the picture. Some do, some will not play with women who do anal, we were not asked about that, your comments have just verified what we wrote about the perception people have about bi-males and anal sex. The risk is the anal sex not the sex of the people taking part." But i've never seen a profile that says "no-one that takes it up the bum"... so it's still seen as prejudice against a whole section of people for a small minded opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. " That is right they are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad. Yes, indeed. It's obviously fine to have a preference, but I think people should at least consider where preferences come from. " But why? I don't like cabbage but I like aubergines. I don't see any reason why I need to see a shrink about it - Mrs. J - | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad. Yes, indeed. It's obviously fine to have a preference, but I think people should at least consider where preferences come from. But why? I don't like cabbage but I like aubergines. I don't see any reason why I need to see a shrink about it - Mrs. J -" I bet you tried a cabbage before you dismissed it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad. Yes, indeed. It's obviously fine to have a preference, but I think people should at least consider where preferences come from. But why? I don't like cabbage but I like aubergines. I don't see any reason why I need to see a shrink about it - Mrs. J - I bet you tried a cabbage before you dismissed it" Yes; it tasted horrible to me. Does not mean that it is a horrible vegetable. A lot of people like it but I bet they don't analyse why they like it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meh, I don't care so much, if a woman says something like "no bi guys" I consider it my benefit for having not met them and their antiquated sense of masculinity. I'd rather be with someone who accepts me and doubly so if they actually enjoy me being bi" Well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. That is right they are" But if yr practising safer sex it matters not one iota.. Would you have protected sex with someone who was hiv positive? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. That is right they are But if yr practising safer sex it matters not one iota.. Would you have protected sex with someone who was hiv positive? " There is no absolute 'safe sex', though you are right in saying safer sex. Most people for example to not use condoms for oral sex. HIV and other STI risks still stand. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back." We have a very simple response to those types. We say fuck em and ignore em... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi men are seen as a higher risk in terms of STIs, that's it in a nutshell. " Bi women meet more people and have more sex so in fact thats not right at all . Try this page Plenty more actual facts out there people ... http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=117877&page=1 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed this while being on the site for a year. Bi-curious/sexual women is ok and peachy keen but if a man decided to explore the same thing it can mean less possible meets for him I know when taking about differences between males and females, the harpies and their beta orbiter male drones come out to decry me. For once, focus on the question and not the author. You throw slurs and I'll throw them back." Double standards. This girl loves bisexual men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I find female on female a turn on, I don't find guy on guy a turn on and more to the point I find it off putting so why should we meet bi guys just because we would meet bi girls? You're acting like personal choice is a bad thing. " this for me. Although girl on girl is only a turn on for me if equal or more than cock is involved. And I don't agree with if a guy is bi he gets less meets.. as amongst my swinging friends I am definitely in the minority of not wanting or liking guy on guy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad It seems that the preference should be "no bi play" rather than "no bi men" " I completely agree with the above points! The thing is that while there is some stigma attached to bi guys, many of us play straight regularly too without feeling a need to grab any cock in close proximity. I find meets are completely situational to the people I am meeting with. The reality is that there are so many "straight" guy profiles who approach bi or bi-curious blokes. What would people generally prefer, people being open about their fantasies, desires and sexuality or others who hide the reality? "No bi play" would be a good solution but ultimately it does come down to people's personal preferences. If the hubby in a couple felt uncomfortable playing with someone who'd previously had a cock in heir mouth then it's unlikely to be a fulfilling meet anyway. But then again, I am a bit of a swinging idealist | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see it a lot. I have never seen a profile specify "no bi women" If you don't want bi play, that's fine! I play straight a lot.... a lot of bi men i'm sure can be in the proximity of a cock and not jump on it So there seems to be some residual conditioning of what makes a man "a man" and that's sad It seems that the preference should be "no bi play" rather than "no bi men" I completely agree with the above points! The thing is that while there is some stigma attached to bi guys, many of us play straight regularly too without feeling a need to grab any cock in close proximity. I find meets are completely situational to the people I am meeting with. The reality is that there are so many "straight" guy profiles who approach bi or bi-curious blokes. What would people generally prefer, people being open about their fantasies, desires and sexuality or others who hide the reality? "No bi play" would be a good solution but ultimately it does come down to people's personal preferences. If the hubby in a couple felt uncomfortable playing with someone who'd previously had a cock in heir mouth then it's unlikely to be a fulfilling meet anyway. But then again, I am a bit of a swinging idealist " A sensible post I don't think that anyone should dictate what another person's preference should be restricted to. Well, they can, but it is foolish to do so We do not wish to play with single bisexual men in a threesome. It is our preference as it could be someone's preference that they do not wish to play with tall blondes; we won't suggest to them that they re-state their preference as, "tall blondes are ok as long as they cover their hair and stay on their knees" And to suggest that people should be examining why they have a particular preference is a foolish thing to say too. Why would we want to do that anyway when we know that we find the idea of man-on-man sex a sexual turn-off | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |