Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What you're missing is that we're all different and what seems logical or right to some people might not to others " I couldn't agree more, Kinky Minx, I'm all for different opinions. But then don't judge me. I just had a message that was unprovoked 30 mins ago, from a woman saying she thought I was too promiscuous. Go figure! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What you're missing is that we're all different and what seems logical or right to some people might not to others I couldn't agree more, Kinky Minx, I'm all for different opinions. But then don't judge me. I just had a message that was unprovoked 30 mins ago, from a woman saying she thought I was too promiscuous. Go figure!" It might be a man? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What you're missing is that we're all different and what seems logical or right to some people might not to others I couldn't agree more, Kinky Minx, I'm all for different opinions. But then don't judge me. I just had a message that was unprovoked 30 mins ago, from a woman saying she thought I was too promiscuous. Go figure!" just block ...unless she has blocked you first | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is." But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. " Most of mine are social veris and are we only supposed to meet one guy a year so that, after 4 years on here, I should only have 4 veris? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What you're missing is that we're all different and what seems logical or right to some people might not to others I couldn't agree more, Kinky Minx, I'm all for different opinions. But then don't judge me. I just had a message that was unprovoked 30 mins ago, from a woman saying she thought I was too promiscuous. Go figure! just block ...unless she has blocked you first " She's not blocked me. She actually originally messaged me to find out who the man was with the huge cock, who's been fanning all my pics. Talk about double standards! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is." Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow." LOL! Think what you like, you're not me therefore your opinion doesn't count. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is beginning to look remarkably like an advert for your profile " Believe me, it's not. I don't need to advertise and I'm emigrating soon. It's just really bothered me of late and the last message has me a little angry. I just can't understand the hypocrisy and wondering if I'm missing something. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is." I'm exceptionally picky and don't forget you've no idea how long a person has been on this site once it hits over a year. 6 years for me. It's a swinging site but each persons view differs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive had this a lot lately which after the irritation dissapeared, made me laugh as I haven't so much as been close to a man or woman in over two years but according to the fab police I'm putting it about and it's unbelievable that I've not "been fucked today" go figure " Mad. I thought the one thing about a swinging lifestyle is that people didn't judge you. I'm probably being naiive. So it seems. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't get the - lots of veris = not selective argument . If 400 people contact you and you sleep with 40 (just an example ) that's not 'not being selective '" Exactly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive had this a lot lately which after the irritation dissapeared, made me laugh as I haven't so much as been close to a man or woman in over two years but according to the fab police I'm putting it about and it's unbelievable that I've not "been fucked today" go figure Mad. I thought the one thing about a swinging lifestyle is that people didn't judge you. I'm probably being naiive. So it seems." I should not be surprised by it, but I am taken aback by how people are quick to make assumptions when they see things rather than even ask questions (sure people can lie but still) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I actually found the lack of promiscuity song a good proportion of site members the shucks big factor upon joining as a naive newbie, I personally thought promiscuity was the name of the game " Yeah considering it proves you're real and not dangerous many veri's was what I saw people desired to see. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't take it personally. People develop a bigger backbone online. If they met you in real life they wouldn't say shit. I just block nonsense. I'm not personal enough with anyone to let it bother me. We're all just text and a username til proved otherwise. I got called fat and ugly by someone on pof who had no pic. I just laughed. It can only bother you if you let it. " Thank you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised." Why? -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt" Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume." L O L | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume." That's bollocks. I've always liked those competitions where people try to break the world record for most cream crackers eaten in an hour without water. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume." Huh. Interesting view. I don't see what those tools/attributes/looks/status etc have to do with it. Sounds more like you think Jack The Stud should be celebrated but not Lucy The Slut. Why the double standard? -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. That's bollocks. I've always liked those competitions where people try to break the world record for most cream crackers eaten in an hour without water." ...whilst wanking over pics of Donald Trump? now that would be impressive. -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. That's bollocks. I've always liked those competitions where people try to break the world record for most cream crackers eaten in an hour without water. ...whilst wanking over pics of Donald Trump? now that would be impressive. -Matt" Shit. You've been looking at my webcam again Matt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't knock Trump wanking until you've tried it yourself...." I bumped into him yesterday and said you'd be over to see him soon. -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't knock Trump wanking until you've tried it yourself.... I bumped into him yesterday and said you'd be over to see him soon. -Matt" Fake sex!!!! Fake sex!!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" Slut shaming ain't cool. Having said that, some of the veris on my profile are "character references" from guys (I'm straight) and club owners to say that I'm basically a gentleman. Or whatever. I've actually hidden some of the veris where there are multiple ones from the same person. Because they actually enjoyed me so much the first, second and third time! Lol Shameless plug over... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here? Slut shaming ain't cool. Having said that, some of the veris on my profile are "character references" from guys (I'm straight) and club owners to say that I'm basically a gentleman. Or whatever. I've actually hidden some of the veris where there are multiple ones from the same person. Because they actually enjoyed me so much the first, second and third time! Lol Shameless plug over... " Yeah I have Veri's from men and Women I've just chatted with, and happy to do so for others to confirm the people I meat are decent people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. That's bollocks. I've always liked those competitions where people try to break the world record for most cream crackers eaten in an hour without water." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" I think people like to feel a bit special despite the nature of many encounters here. I say as long as you aren't misleading anyone crack on. Don't explain or justify. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is." I guess as someone who hasn't had a new veri in 3 years, you either can't get a meet, or you are so selective that nobody in 3 years has been good enough for you. Having multiple partners is normal for swingers. Being selective in choosing those partners is also normal, but over a period of time the numbers do build up for those who choose swinging as a lifestyle choice. Maybe a dating site would be better for your needs as you seem to frown on people having multiple partners, which is very much the ethos of what this site is about. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. Most of mine are social veris and are we only supposed to meet one guy a year so that, after 4 years on here, I should only have 4 veris?" I've been here several years too so devided I've not got that many. Quite a few are social meets too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is." So you'd have sex with a woman with say, five veris? She could be fucking three different guys a day for the last 25 years. How about the woman with 90 veris but she'd only shagged 2 of them? How about the woman with 50 veris over ten years? How about the woman who has been shagging for 30 years but hasn't had any veris because none of them were from Fab? Veris mean nothing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume." Stop copy pasting Superfreaks opinions and get some of your own. Preferably some not quite so misogynistic. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow." I'm interested as to why you (and others) post veris from the same people? Each to his or her own, but I tend to avoid those as it seems to smack of possessiveness/inability to attract different people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. I guess as someone who hasn't had a new veri in 3 years, you either can't get a meet, or you are so selective that nobody in 3 years has been good enough for you. Having multiple partners is normal for swingers. Being selective in choosing those partners is also normal, but over a period of time the numbers do build up for those who choose swinging as a lifestyle choice. Maybe a dating site would be better for your needs as you seem to frown on people having multiple partners, which is very much the ethos of what this site is about. Mrs" Exactly This is a swingers site so no one should be surprised by any number of meets anyone has ?? The older we get the number can only build (unless you create another profile ) Think people obit look at previous meets though and make certain judgements on their tastes ? Think that's only natural though? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. I guess as someone who hasn't had a new veri in 3 years, you either can't get a meet, or you are so selective that nobody in 3 years has been good enough for you. Having multiple partners is normal for swingers. Being selective in choosing those partners is also normal, but over a period of time the numbers do build up for those who choose swinging as a lifestyle choice. Maybe a dating site would be better for your needs as you seem to frown on people having multiple partners, which is very much the ethos of what this site is about. Mrs" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow. I'm interested as to why you (and others) post veris from the same people? Each to his or her own, but I tend to avoid those as it seems to smack of possessiveness/inability to attract different people." Hi Pash, I tend to post veris from the same people because, as I said in my original post, that it shows a consistency. I hear how some people are given a veri out of politeness, even some who nag for a veri after a bad meet. Some couples and females on here say they're looking for someone who won't be a one off, 'wham bam thank you mam'. As I've said on my profile, I tend to prefer regular partners. I hope my veris put my money where my mouth is. I hope that answers your question. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On the other hand, I've been out for a coffee with guys and they've said things like 'I'm so glad you don't have veris on your profile, it means you're not a slut.' No mate. All it means is that I ask people not to verify my profile. Needless to say, I quickly make my excuses to leave." That always astonishes me. To the great vanilla world everyone on here is a disgusting perv, yet still people on here slut shame. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. Different for a man than a woman though. A single guy with a lot of Veris and if they are quality too should be praised. Why? -Matt Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. Stop copy pasting Superfreaks opinions and get some of your own. Preferably some not quite so misogynistic. " But he was on the money there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow. I'm interested as to why you (and others) post veris from the same people? Each to his or her own, but I tend to avoid those as it seems to smack of possessiveness/inability to attract different people. Hi Pash, I tend to post veris from the same people because, as I said in my original post, that it shows a consistency. I hear how some people are given a veri out of politeness, even some who nag for a veri after a bad meet. Some couples and females on here say they're looking for someone who won't be a one off, 'wham bam thank you mam'. As I've said on my profile, I tend to prefer regular partners. I hope my veris put my money where my mouth is. I hope that answers your question." I think whatever you (not just you, I mean everyone) does is open to misinterpretation. For example I would say I am the same as you in that I prefer regular partners, and am certainly not into "wham bam" encounters, but would not post more than one veri from the same person. I use mine to give an overview of what I'm like from several different viewpoints, and to show the kind of people I enjoy meeting too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So please let the women be happy and free to enjoy themselves, all I ask is for the women to be able to get people looking at them when they enter any space cause of their beauty . " Mmm.... I'm not so sure. I prefer they wear Burkas, and when they're interested, they can flash an ankle at you to show they're interested. The only problem then is that it's a real lottery when the sheet comes off. You might end up with Hilda Ogden. All the more reason for veris..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow. I'm interested as to why you (and others) post veris from the same people? Each to his or her own, but I tend to avoid those as it seems to smack of possessiveness/inability to attract different people." We post multiple verifications from the same people for a number of reasons. Firstly our verifications tell a story for us - they are a history of our journey, which is probably irrelevant to others but it's an important account to us. Repeat veris are part of our story. In fact we find it very irritating when playmates remove their profiles and we loose substantial portions of our story. Secondly we use our verifications as an informative addition to our profile. They give an indication of how we like to do things, the nature of our meets etc. Repeat veris indicate that our playmates are willing to come back for more, and that we are the sort of people who will have regulars. If someone becomes a valued friend to us, we wouldn't want it reflected in our verifications that they were just a one-off, which is how it would look if we only have a verification from the first ever meet. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I see a long list of veri's I wouldn't even entertain getting in touch. I just see it as they're not very selective. But as you say, people could hide them and I wouldn't even know. So at the end of the day, you're probably right, but there's something instinctive it about it so no doubt I'll continue to discriminate based on the number of veri's. It is what it is. But as I've said. My veris tend to be from the same people over and over. I think you're being a tad shallow. I'm interested as to why you (and others) post veris from the same people? Each to his or her own, but I tend to avoid those as it seems to smack of possessiveness/inability to attract different people. We post multiple verifications from the same people for a number of reasons. Firstly our verifications tell a story for us - they are a history of our journey, which is probably irrelevant to others but it's an important account to us. Repeat veris are part of our story. In fact we find it very irritating when playmates remove their profiles and we loose substantial portions of our story. Secondly we use our verifications as an informative addition to our profile. They give an indication of how we like to do things, the nature of our meets etc. Repeat veris indicate that our playmates are willing to come back for more, and that we are the sort of people who will have regulars. If someone becomes a valued friend to us, we wouldn't want it reflected in our verifications that they were just a one-off, which is how it would look if we only have a verification from the first ever meet. Mrs" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It sounds counterintuitive for a website that literally has swingers in the title, but not everyone on here is here to swing. It's part and parcel of it being an open and popular website with a low barrier to entry - Some people are here to fantasise, some to have a perv, some are here for the attention, some might of had a shit sex life in the past and are looking to date people a bit more ambitious....there's a whole host of individual reasons for joining this site beyond actually swinging, and people might actually find the reality of swinging quite off-putting. My hot take; if you want to actually swing, go to a swingers club. This is just naughty facebook. " Is you're username intentionally ironic? Fab definitely doesn't need more single men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... My hot take; if you want to actually swing, go to a swingers club. This is just naughty facebook. " Abso-fucking-lutely! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" Why should anyone on here worry about promiscuity when this is a swinging site | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're open and honest " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It sounds counterintuitive for a website that literally has swingers in the title, but not everyone on here is here to swing. It's part and parcel of it being an open and popular website with a low barrier to entry - Some people are here to fantasise, some to have a perv, some are here for the attention, some might of had a shit sex life in the past and are looking to date people a bit more ambitious....there's a whole host of individual reasons for joining this site beyond actually swinging, and people might actually find the reality of swinging quite off-putting. My hot take; if you want to actually swing, go to a swingers club. This is just naughty facebook. " Do alright on here thanks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's been suggested on this thread that lots of veris gives the impression the person is not selective and that they may not go for quality over quantity. I would like to point out that promiscuity doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how selective one is or the quality of their meets. As I said earlier, swinging is a lifestyle choice to us. We usually have 2 or 3 regular guys and we will probably see one of them about once a month. We also go to a swing club or party every couple of months and we make sure someone is also attending who we would be interested in and playing with. Are we promiscuous? Most definately. Are we selective? God yeah, there are loads of people we have both turned down for play, and we have been to parties and left empty handed. Quality over quantity? We think we are lucky enough to play with a reasonable quantity of quality people. If we cease to find quality people we will play with less people. We do not play with people we don't like or don't find attractive. There will however be people on Fab who will fuck anybody, but rarely get a meet. Those people are not selective nor do they care about quality. It is not a linear equation between numbers of meets and selectivity. Quite understand that our lifestyle would make us unsuitable for people on a Fab who use this site for other purposes, e.g. to find a friend with benefits. But I don't think it fair to assume people who are embracing the swinging lifestyle are not being selective. Mrs" Well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's been suggested on this thread that lots of veris gives the impression the person is not selective and that they may not go for quality over quantity. I would like to point out that promiscuity doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how selective one is or the quality of their meets. As I said earlier, swinging is a lifestyle choice to us. We usually have 2 or 3 regular guys and we will probably see one of them about once a month. We also go to a swing club or party every couple of months and we make sure someone is also attending who we would be interested in and playing with. Are we promiscuous? Most definately. Are we selective? God yeah, there are loads of people we have both turned down for play, and we have been to parties and left empty handed. Quality over quantity? We think we are lucky enough to play with a reasonable quantity of quality people. If we cease to find quality people we will play with less people. We do not play with people we don't like or don't find attractive. There will however be people on Fab who will fuck anybody, but rarely get a meet. Those people are not selective nor do they care about quality. It is not a linear equation between numbers of meets and selectivity. Quite understand that our lifestyle would make us unsuitable for people on a Fab who use this site for other purposes, e.g. to find a friend with benefits. But I don't think it fair to assume people who are embracing the swinging lifestyle are not being selective. Mrs" Spot on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's been suggested on this thread that lots of veris gives the impression the person is not selective and that they may not go for quality over quantity. I would like to point out that promiscuity doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how selective one is or the quality of their meets. As I said earlier, swinging is a lifestyle choice to us. We usually have 2 or 3 regular guys and we will probably see one of them about once a month. We also go to a swing club or party every couple of months and we make sure someone is also attending who we would be interested in and playing with. Are we promiscuous? Most definately. Are we selective? God yeah, there are loads of people we have both turned down for play, and we have been to parties and left empty handed. Quality over quantity? We think we are lucky enough to play with a reasonable quantity of quality people. If we cease to find quality people we will play with less people. We do not play with people we don't like or don't find attractive. There will however be people on Fab who will fuck anybody, but rarely get a meet. Those people are not selective nor do they care about quality. It is not a linear equation between numbers of meets and selectivity. Quite understand that our lifestyle would make us unsuitable for people on a Fab who use this site for other purposes, e.g. to find a friend with benefits. But I don't think it fair to assume people who are embracing the swinging lifestyle are not being selective. Mrs" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex." Translation: Women who have lots of meets with different men are obviously sluts who gladly lie back and open their legs for every bloke who comes along. Men who have lots of meets with different women obviously work hard to improve their looks/tools/personality/status/attributes... As has been pointed out to you already, you're just recycling TheSuperfreak's misogynistic, fat-shaming, slut-shaming garbage...if you're going to insult people on here, at least practice what you preach and put some effort into coming up with ORIGINAL material... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It sounds counterintuitive for a website that literally has swingers in the title, but not everyone on here is here to swing. It's part and parcel of it being an open and popular website with a low barrier to entry - Some people are here to fantasise, some to have a perv, some are here for the attention, some might of had a shit sex life in the past and are looking to date people a bit more ambitious....there's a whole host of individual reasons for joining this site beyond actually swinging, and people might actually find the reality of swinging quite off-putting. My hot take; if you want to actually swing, go to a swingers club. This is just naughty facebook. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Translation: Women who have lots of meets with different men are obviously sluts who gladly lie back and open their legs for every bloke who comes along. Men who have lots of meets with different women obviously work hard to improve their looks/tools/personality/status/attributes... As has been pointed out to you already, you're just recycling TheSuperfreak's misogynistic, fat-shaming, slut-shaming garbage...if you're going to insult people on here, at least practice what you preach and put some effort into coming up with ORIGINAL material..." Actually I do see where he's coming from. In very basic terms it is easier for a woman to be promiscuous than for a man. That is if one removes standards and selectivity from the equation. Most women could go on Fab and get a fuck whenever they like if they were to drop their standards, whereas there are men who don't care who they fuck. Some men dish hundreds of messages to random women in the hope that one fish in the sea will bite. Such guys would love to be promiscuous but dont get the opportunity. When my husband and I go to a club, I know that I can convince someone to play with me. I might choose not to because I have standards, but as a woman the opportunity will always be there. Men go to a club and know that with the best will the world they might not get lucky. It is easier for women to be promiscuous than men. However, it should not be assumed that a promiscuous woman is easy. For women who want to attract the right kind of men, and have the treat her accordingly and come back for more, that requires effort. Mrs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually I do see where he's coming from. In very basic terms it is easier for a woman to be promiscuous than for a man. That is if one removes standards and selectivity from the equation...However, it should not be assumed that a promiscuous woman is easy" Unfortunately, that is PRECISELY the assumption that Rock-Hardy is making. Earlier in this thread, he stated that a man with lots of verifications - if they are quality - should be praised, because it's a sign that the man in question has worked to improve themselves. By contrast, when faced with a woman with lots of verifications, he simply states that 'promiscuity for women requires no effort'...implying that her large number of veris is the result of having lower standards. For the Rock-Hardys and TheSuperfreaks of this world, if a woman has lots of veris, that is a sure sign that she is a slut; if a man has lots of veris, that is a sure sign of his commitment to self-improvement... I would also point out that their model assumes that the men and women concerned are HETEROSEXUAL, and that ALL verifications are the result of SEXUAL encounters. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually I do see where he's coming from. In very basic terms it is easier for a woman to be promiscuous than for a man. That is if one removes standards and selectivity from the equation...However, it should not be assumed that a promiscuous woman is easy Unfortunately, that is PRECISELY the assumption that Rock-Hardy is making. Earlier in this thread, he stated that a man with lots of verifications - if they are quality - should be praised, because it's a sign that the man in question has worked to improve themselves. By contrast, when faced with a woman with lots of verifications, he simply states that 'promiscuity for women requires no effort'...implying that her large number of veris is the result of having lower standards. For the Rock-Hardys and TheSuperfreaks of this world, if a woman has lots of veris, that is a sure sign that she is a slut; if a man has lots of veris, that is a sure sign of his commitment to self-improvement... I would also point out that their model assumes that the men and women concerned are HETEROSEXUAL, and that ALL verifications are the result of SEXUAL encounters. " This isn't just fantasy land. The same sentiment from real life can apply here that is why the OP is being judged. I know women who have mets loads of men on here but will hide the verification summary or not show verifications. That obviously shows we aren't the only 1's who think like this. It is a general consensus and only on a swinging site would you get a conflicting view about it. I will point out that The SuperFreak has bisexual as his sexuality so you are mistaken there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is a general consensus and only on a swinging site would you get a conflicting view about it. I will point out that The SuperFreak has bisexual as his sexuality so you are mistaken there." First off, what 'general consensus' are you referring to? Second, the OP's point - entirely valid IMO - is that you cannot simply look at the NUMBER of verifications a person has. Third, TheSuperfreak may be listed as bisexual, but his original comments - which you have regurgitated - referred ONLY to heterosexual couplings, not same-sex activity. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is a general consensus and only on a swinging site would you get a conflicting view about it. I will point out that The SuperFreak has bisexual as his sexuality so you are mistaken there. First off, what 'general consensus' are you referring to? Second, the OP's point - entirely valid IMO - is that you cannot simply look at the NUMBER of verifications a person has. Third, TheSuperfreak may be listed as bisexual, but his original comments - which you have regurgitated - referred ONLY to heterosexual couplings, not same-sex activity." Shhhh. Don't be so angry. There's no need. Have a Cadbury's Caramel. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is a general consensus and only on a swinging site would you get a conflicting view about it. I will point out that The SuperFreak has bisexual as his sexuality so you are mistaken there. First off, what 'general consensus' are you referring to? Second, the OP's point - entirely valid IMO - is that you cannot simply look at the NUMBER of verifications a person has. Third, TheSuperfreak may be listed as bisexual, but his original comments - which you have regurgitated - referred ONLY to heterosexual couplings, not same-sex activity." It is a general consensus that if a man is promiscuous he is considered a player, stud etc while if a woman is they are considered easy, slutty. Women tend to be the worst for shaming other women who are promiscuous. It maybe misogynistic and a double standard but that is how it is. Just because you join a swinging site don't expect people to radically alter their views. I'm not sure how you apply that to the LGBT community. It was more relative to the OP. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shhhh. Don't be so angry. There's no need. Have a Cadbury's Caramel. " You wouldn't have any Creme Eggs on you by any chance? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how you apply that to the LGBT community." That's pretty much my point though... The twin assumptions of: Promiscuous Man = Player/Stud And Promiscuous Woman = Slut/Whore Are rarely, if ever, applied to bisexuals or gay people. In fact, it's often the reverse... Far from being praised as 'studs' or 'heroes,' promiscuous gay or bi men will often be looked upon as potential carriers of STDs such as AIDS. Conversely, far from being dismissed as 'whores' or 'sluts,' promiscuous gay or bi women are treated as the 'Holy Grail'... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how you apply that to the LGBT community. That's pretty much my point though... The twin assumptions of: Promiscuous Man = Player/Stud And Promiscuous Woman = Slut/Whore Are rarely, if ever, applied to bisexuals or gay people. In fact, it's often the reverse... Far from being praised as 'studs' or 'heroes,' promiscuous gay or bi men will often be looked upon as potential carriers of STDs such as AIDS. Conversely, far from being dismissed as 'whores' or 'sluts,' promiscuous gay or bi women are treated as the 'Holy Grail'..." Interesting, I'd like to hear The SuperFreak's views on this I think people would think gay men are more promiscuous and easier to be so. Perhaps that's why they aren't viewed the same as heterosexual. I don't really know about bi or lesbian women though I still can't imagine that being the case. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" Perhaps they're jealous about how many veris you have. ...I know I am. Lol. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" I'm in the same boat. . the vast majority of my verifications are as a result of small intimate house parties I've hosted. Just because they've attended doesn't mean I've had sex with everyone. . . verifications can be a double edged sword. . . .,popular and promiscuous are two very different things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually I do see where he's coming from. In very basic terms it is easier for a woman to be promiscuous than for a man. That is if one removes standards and selectivity from the equation...However, it should not be assumed that a promiscuous woman is easy Unfortunately, that is PRECISELY the assumption that Rock-Hardy is making. Earlier in this thread, he stated that a man with lots of verifications - if they are quality - should be praised, because it's a sign that the man in question has worked to improve themselves By contrast, when faced with a woman with lots of verifications, he simply states that 'promiscuity for women requires no effort'...implying that her large number of veris is the result of having lower standards. For the Rock-Hardys and TheSuperfreaks of this world, if a woman has lots of veris, that is a sure sign that she is a slut; if a man has lots of veris, that is a sure sign of his commitment to self-improvement... I would also point out that their model assumes that the men and women concerned are HETEROSEXUAL, and that ALL verifications are the result of SEXUAL encounters. " Well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" Plus veris can be based solely on socials, it's not a bed post notch count. People have different wants, some are funny and will look for any excuse to be "different" from everyone else or holier than thou, but it's also their perogative whatever the reason is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" sod them what I'm more impressed is that you have got 54 verifications but only been on here 10 months. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here?" All women have different likes and dislikes some find a man worth loads of varis a bit icky like they will sleep with anything and anyone, those people like the connection between two bodies. while there are women or there who like an experienced man. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had the same thing said to me by someone I met on here. He told me that I'm "far too active with other guys for his liking" so he won't be seeing me again " Notice how he did it after he had the meet. Coward | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually I do see where he's coming from. In very basic terms it is easier for a woman to be promiscuous than for a man. That is if one removes standards and selectivity from the equation...However, it should not be assumed that a promiscuous woman is easy Unfortunately, that is PRECISELY the assumption that Rock-Hardy is making. Earlier in this thread, he stated that a man with lots of verifications - if they are quality - should be praised, because it's a sign that the man in question has worked to improve themselves By contrast, when faced with a woman with lots of verifications, he simply states that 'promiscuity for women requires no effort'...implying that her large number of veris is the result of having lower standards. For the Rock-Hardys and TheSuperfreaks of this world, if a woman has lots of veris, that is a sure sign that she is a slut; if a man has lots of veris, that is a sure sign of his commitment to self-improvement... I would also point out that their model assumes that the men and women concerned are HETEROSEXUAL, and that ALL verifications are the result of SEXUAL encounters. Well said " here here well said. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here? All women have different likes and dislikes some find a man worth loads of varis a bit icky like they will sleep with anything and anyone, those people like the connection between two bodies. while there are women or there who like an experienced man. " Again it's this assumption that loads of veris means they will sleep with anybody. It should be taken that there are loads of quality people available. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here? All women have different likes and dislikes some find a man worth loads of varis a bit icky like they will sleep with anything and anyone, those people like the connection between two bodies. while there are women or there who like an experienced man. Again it's this assumption that loads of veris means they will sleep with anybody. It should be taken that there are loads of quality people available. " and I absolutely agree with you. people make assumptions on how a profile reads, there pictures and there poetically in real life is totally different. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had a few comments lately in messages on here, saying that I'm too promiscuous and I'm a little taken aback by it. Apparently I have too many veris. The truth is that my veris tend to be from the same people that I see regularly again and again, and I'm astonished to get that attitude on Fab - a swinging site of all places. I keep them on show as I think it's a sign that you're not some kind of one off one-night-stand nightmare male. And don't these people realise that the number of veris you have aren't anything to go by - it's so easy to hide how how many you've got if you want to? I'm just a bit staggered by the double standards. Or ami missing something here? All women have different likes and dislikes some find a man worth loads of varis a bit icky like they will sleep with anything and anyone, those people like the connection between two bodies. while there are women or there who like an experienced man. Again it's this assumption that loads of veris means they will sleep with anybody. It should be taken that there are loads of quality people available. and I absolutely agree with you. people make assumptions on how a profile reads, there pictures and there poetically in real life is totally different." I don't think in this instance it's so muchthe profile. I think it's people coming to the swing scene with vanilla values. In vanilla life lots of partners means no standards, and people, despite wanting this lifestyle, just can't get past that vanilla inbuilt attitude, and realise that it's possible to have lots of high quality carefully selected partners. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" sod them what I'm more impressed is that you have got 54 verifications but only been on here 10 months. " Regular visits to an active club for ten months could easily get you that many *new* verifications. Let alone repeats. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Promiscuous = definition of swinging " The wierd thing is I dont really see myself as being promiscuous becasue I dont play that often. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |