Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think we all do that? " He did say some women, not all women. OP, no idea. Number of verifications doesn't affect my opinion of men whatsoever. You're best off asking the women involved. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently" I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" I've never had this from any women on here... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Here's a radical idea: - Don't ask her how many people she's sleeping with. - Refuse to answer questions about how many people you're sleeping with when people on here ask." I never ask women how many guys they are sleeping with Most people who meet on here will agree talkin about each others fab experiences is a bit of conversation starter though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Here's a radical idea: - Don't ask her how many people she's sleeping with. - Refuse to answer questions about how many people you're sleeping with when people on here ask." Think verifications from both parties kind of give it away. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet." Ive met these women | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women " oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it " You think Its a forum, people share thoughts, some will agree, some wont Where all adults here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for." I would say its difficult to gauge someones full character/attitude from just exchanging msgs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it " Why isn't it the type of question to ask? I don't take umbrage at a guy asking a question about bat shit crazy women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it You think Its a forum, people share thoughts, some will agree, some wont Where all adults here" Not even close mate, try reasoning with the one above you, see how you get on,seriously! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for. I would say its difficult to gauge someones full character/attitude from just exchanging msgs" I guess. Well, its a shame that you've had that experience. At the risk of sounding like a white knight, we're not all like that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for. I would say its difficult to gauge someones full character/attitude from just exchanging msgs " most people don't show you they're fucked up until they feel comfortable enough doing so. as soon as they do i cut them outta my life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for. I would say its difficult to gauge someones full character/attitude from just exchanging msgs I guess. Well, its a shame that you've had that experience. At the risk of sounding like a white knight, we're not all like that." I know lol I was quick to make the point it wasnt all women earlier, just talking of a recent experience and left me puzzled | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet. Ive met these women oh, OK. Then I guess you should ask yourself why you're meeting women with those opinions, instead of meeting women who won't judge you for doing something this site is for. I would say its difficult to gauge someones full character/attitude from just exchanging msgs I guess. Well, its a shame that you've had that experience. At the risk of sounding like a white knight, we're not all like that. I know lol I was quick to make the point it wasnt all women earlier, just talking of a recent experience and left me puzzled" It is strange, especially on this site. And its certainly not just women with that attitude. But I agree with you that its odd that women who have a lot of verifications would be miffed at a man with the same. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. " What has that got to do with sex? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. What has that got to do with sex? " It's an analogy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. " the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis." Doesn't work | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. Doesn't work " yeah it does. most men struggle to get a fuck so have a shitty lock, most women get sex easily so have master keys. makes total sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" Think you're over generalizing a bit, but there are some wackos out there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. Doesn't work yeah it does. most men struggle to get a fuck so have a shitty lock, most women get sex easily so have master keys. makes total sense." No the key symbolises a penis that enters a hole in a lock like a vagina. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jealousy. Simples" Would be the simplest logic but i think am more annoyed at the 'i can do whatever i want but you cant approach' Very jarring | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Jealousy. Simples Would be the simplest logic but i think am more annoyed at the 'i can do whatever i want but you cant approach' Very jarring" Fuck them off. Mental. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. Doesn't work yeah it does. most men struggle to get a fuck so have a shitty lock, most women get sex easily so have master keys. makes total sense. No the key symbolises a penis that enters a hole in a lock like a vagina. " men are struggling to get sex, master keys cannot exist when you apply them to mens' penises. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jealousy. Simples Would be the simplest logic but i think am more annoyed at the 'i can do whatever i want but you cant approach' Very jarring Fuck them off. Mental. " They already beat me to it after sending me abusive msgs lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jealousy. Simples Would be the simplest logic but i think am more annoyed at the 'i can do whatever i want but you cant approach' Very jarring Fuck them off. Mental. " What she said | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Jealousy. Simples Would be the simplest logic but i think am more annoyed at the 'i can do whatever i want but you cant approach' Very jarring" But you can do what you like ! The ones who judge you and criticise you for how many you meet aren't worth a light , so ignore them . Simple | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis." I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" There's no clear answer to why some women are like this, you can't influence this. You need to learn how to deal with it when it happens. I'd say take a breath, roll your eyes, chuckle about it, and move on to a more level headed person (or persons!). Don't get caught up in the drama. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not." basically he is saying a guy who can fuck loads of women is a master key, like whahey he is a stud...yet men struggle to get sex. women are sluts for letting all the keys in their fanny and should have less sex but they get it easily and are shit for being able to do that. i'm just taking the piss coz i've seen that analogy so many times online. really men wouldn't be 'master keys' if women were no 'shitty locks' coz who would they be fucking? shitty men use that analogy imo. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not." It's a popular analogy get with the times. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. " popular with misogynists and patriarchs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me There's no clear answer to why some women are like this, you can't influence this. You need to learn how to deal with it when it happens. I'd say take a breath, roll your eyes, chuckle about it, and move on to a more level headed person (or persons!). Don't get caught up in the drama. " Good advice My profile is clear what i am wanting and i dont mislead in any way We like to stay drama free round eya lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. popular with misogynists and patriarchs." Yeah, I know. The fact that only the most colossal misogynists come out with it makes it perfect for identifying them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. basically he is saying a guy who can fuck loads of women is a master key, like whahey he is a stud...yet men struggle to get sex. women are sluts for letting all the keys in their fanny and should have less sex but they get it easily and are shit for being able to do that. i'm just taking the piss coz i've seen that analogy so many times online. really men wouldn't be 'master keys' if women were no 'shitty locks' coz who would they be fucking? shitty men use that analogy imo." No they got to be the kind of locks protecting valuable stuff that are tough to open. Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them." Have you considered that this site might not be for you with your outdated, sexist, and utterly disgusting views about women enjoying sex? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them. Have you considered that this site might not be for you with your outdated, sexist, and utterly disgusting views about women enjoying sex?" ooh i got i bite from the feminist, i said it tongue in cheek hence the | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. basically he is saying a guy who can fuck loads of women is a master key, like whahey he is a stud...yet men struggle to get sex. women are sluts for letting all the keys in their fanny and should have less sex but they get it easily and are shit for being able to do that. i'm just taking the piss coz i've seen that analogy so many times online. really men wouldn't be 'master keys' if women were no 'shitty locks' coz who would they be fucking? shitty men use that analogy imo. No they got to be the kind of locks protecting valuable stuff that are tough to open. Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them." but, going off those standards, a low quality man is considered a master? sexist. a woman can still be fussy and have high standards and get fucked loads, that's what you don't get here. the master key can only apply to women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them. Have you considered that this site might not be for you with your outdated, sexist, and utterly disgusting views about women enjoying sex? ooh i got i bite from the feminist, i said it tongue in cheek hence the " It's not funny, even with a little cute smiley face, when you hear this kind of misogynistic comment regularly. (You say feminist like it's an insult...) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP there are two sides to every story. Could it be something you said or suggested? If it's happened with more than one person it's you that's the common denominator. " It was on the back of a status i put up, basically saying i was free and that triggered it but its ok for that person to post many pics with a different cock in there mouth I just dunno man lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them. Have you considered that this site might not be for you with your outdated, sexist, and utterly disgusting views about women enjoying sex? ooh i got i bite from the feminist, i said it tongue in cheek hence the It's not funny, even with a little cute smiley face, when you hear this kind of misogynistic comment regularly. (You say feminist like it's an insult...)" If he calls you a liberal feminist you'll definitely not be on his Christmas card list. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it You think Its a forum, people share thoughts, some will agree, some wont Where all adults here" What do you think now? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. " Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it You think Its a forum, people share thoughts, some will agree, some wont Where all adults here What do you think now? " Looool Am actually not involved in the sub plot within this thread I just kept it moving lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh dear, you get bunny boilers whatever type of site your on " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it You think Its a forum, people share thoughts, some will agree, some wont Where all adults here What do you think now? Looool Am actually not involved in the sub plot within this thread I just kept it moving lol" Lol,threads discussing this kind of thing get crazy, really really quickly!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Reading this thread i consider myself really lucky with fwb's who havent turned psycho on me " kudos!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" When I was a swingle, the men I met would be like this. I never was. I needed my space. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP there are two sides to every story. Could it be something you said or suggested? If it's happened with more than one person it's you that's the common denominator. It was on the back of a status i put up, basically saying i was free and that triggered it but its ok for that person to post many pics with a different cock in there mouth I just dunno man lol " Sorry for the derailing OP yes like mentioned above, it's not so much double standards a as it is jealousy and insecurities. We may aim for NSA but every so often emotions are hard to control. You are not responsive for others' insecurities. We all have to learn how to share here eh! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Hey lol ur pic caught my eye b honest but u right i think its just full v vain women what think there it but forget men will say owt to get into u nix n wen a genuine man messages they cant understand why he aint sayin loads bullshit purely over inflated egos defo xnice pic anyways n fuk em man tell usel lucky escape next one b mint x" I think it could deffo be an ego thing And thank you for liking my pic I aim to please lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Reading this thread i consider myself really lucky with fwb's who havent turned psycho on me " There's always time, sweety. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP there are two sides to every story. Could it be something you said or suggested? If it's happened with more than one person it's you that's the common denominator. " Lots of mental women. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OP there are two sides to every story. Could it be something you said or suggested? If it's happened with more than one person it's you that's the common denominator. It was on the back of a status i put up, basically saying i was free and that triggered it but its ok for that person to post many pics with a different cock in there mouth I just dunno man lol Sorry for the derailing OP yes like mentioned above, it's not so much double standards a as it is jealousy and insecurities. We may aim for NSA but every so often emotions are hard to control. You are not responsive for others' insecurities. We all have to learn how to share here eh!" Apology accepted lol Ive not had one bag experience here meet wise so they could have been just having a bad day i suppose Yep sharing is caring lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. " Foul. And deluded! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Meaning a higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them. Have you considered that this site might not be for you with your outdated, sexist, and utterly disgusting views about women enjoying sex? ooh i got i bite from the feminist, i said it tongue in cheek hence the It's not funny, even with a little cute smiley face, when you hear this kind of misogynistic comment regularly. (You say feminist like it's an insult...)" I think it might apply to the OP maybe this woman seen his key mastery and got jealous. Sorry I meant militant feminist my bad | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p" Was said tongue in cheek read the thread. Using words like sluts is misogyny. I would never call a woman that my mum raised me better than that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Humans And before you say some thing I am a bourge " Ahem, perchance you mean borg? I think you may have been assimilated | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Humans And before you say some thing I am a bourge " Shouldn't that be Borg? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p Was said tongue in cheek read the thread. Using words like sluts is misogyny. I would never call a woman that my mum raised me better than that. " You mean she raised you to respect the "higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them"? Emoji all you like - the vast majority of your posts are dismissive towards women, your position comes across pretty solidly. OP I mistyped - I meant "you are not responsible for others' insecurities", not responsive. Made me giggle to see you replied with a typo of your own - "no bag experience"! You prefer keeping everything in your pockets, right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p Was said tongue in cheek read the thread. Using words like sluts is misogyny. I would never call a woman that my mum raised me better than that. You mean she raised you to respect the "higher quality woman that wouldn't let just anybody fuck them"? Emoji all you like - the vast majority of your posts are dismissive towards women, your position comes across pretty solidly. OP I mistyped - I meant "you are not responsible for others' insecurities", not responsive. Made me giggle to see you replied with a typo of your own - "no bag experience"! You prefer keeping everything in your pockets, right? " Sorry I can't take someone seriously who is judging me for being dismissive of women when you refer to them as sluts. That kind of irony is beautiful | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p" "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. " I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. " whaaa? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry its not a dig at all women just a couple ive come across recently I suppose you should ask yourself why you care about the opinions of women you'll never meet." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Humans And before you say some thing I am a bourge Shouldn't that be Borg?" never watched star trek in france? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. " Ah yes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... " Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. whaaa? " There is defo mental unwellness on here .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right?" I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered." Predictable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered." Blimey, I haven't had meaningful sex for a decade. Doesn't mean it aint fun though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Predictable." Sorry you can't find a thesis to answer someone who disagrees with your world view about women ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! " What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Blimey, I haven't had meaningful sex for a decade. Doesn't mean it aint fun though." You might be misguided too? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... " It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right?" and you know things about human behaviour and thought process that most others don't, you even know what people don't know about themselves, you can predict answers and how people will react, your educated and on a 'in the know' probably studied it..or something or other similar....yeah yeah yeah, there are plenty of you too but then, you already knew somebody would say something like that no doubt........ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Blimey, I haven't had meaningful sex for a decade. Doesn't mean it aint fun though. You might be misguided too?" Some people may think so. But they're not me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. " Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. " I don't need to feel that a man is attracted to me though .... that's a different thing I think. The meaningless sex doesn't mean anything ... its very different from the sex I have with my OH | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Predictable. Sorry you can't find a thesis to answer someone who disagrees with your world view about women ..." I dont make comments that will get me banned by those who get offended. I just hope you dont start seeing you in my inbox and embarrassing yourself again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Blimey, I haven't had meaningful sex for a decade. Doesn't mean it aint fun though." it often means an orgasm...that's enough | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them?" If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? and you know things about human behaviour and thought process that most others don't, you even know what people don't know about themselves, you can predict answers and how people will react, your educated and on a 'in the know' probably studied it..or something or other similar....yeah yeah yeah, there are plenty of you too but then, you already knew somebody would say something like that no doubt........" What I don't get is there is no concept that anyone else could be educated too .... there is only room for one 'educated' person here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Blimey, I haven't had meaningful sex for a decade. Doesn't mean it aint fun though. it often means an orgasm...that's enough " Yes indeed . Then I boot them out and sleep the sleep of the guiltless. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Predictable. Sorry you can't find a thesis to answer someone who disagrees with your world view about women ... I dont make comments that will get me banned by those who get offended. I just hope you dont start seeing you in my inbox and embarrassing yourself again. " That was the OH, not me ... but you aren't allowed to bring personal issues on here .... how exactly did he embarrass himself? He didn't try to get your address so he could move in, did he? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? and you know things about human behaviour and thought process that most others don't, you even know what people don't know about themselves, you can predict answers and how people will react, your educated and on a 'in the know' probably studied it..or something or other similar....yeah yeah yeah, there are plenty of you too but then, you already knew somebody would say something like that no doubt........" Lets be honest about something we probably both know, people are not that special. The more they try to run away from it, the more they end up fulfilling it. There are plenty of those like me, and I am definitely not a hard person to figure out (especially considering I am a guy...we're a simple species). But I must admit, being on Fab and seeing people try to dress up their various desires in innuendo and bullshit can become...irksome. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? and you know things about human behaviour and thought process that most others don't, you even know what people don't know about themselves, you can predict answers and how people will react, your educated and on a 'in the know' probably studied it..or something or other similar....yeah yeah yeah, there are plenty of you too but then, you already knew somebody would say something like that no doubt........ Lets be honest about something we probably both know, people are not that special. The more they try to run away from it, the more they end up fulfilling it. There are plenty of those like me, and I am definitely not a hard person to figure out (especially considering I am a guy...we're a simple species). But I must admit, being on Fab and seeing people try to dress up their various desires in innuendo and bullshit can become...irksome." If its so irksome, why not leave. Just for the record ... I am here, so haven't been banned from anything? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. " You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? and you know things about human behaviour and thought process that most others don't, you even know what people don't know about themselves, you can predict answers and how people will react, your educated and on a 'in the know' probably studied it..or something or other similar....yeah yeah yeah, there are plenty of you too but then, you already knew somebody would say something like that no doubt........ Lets be honest about something we probably both know, people are not that special. The more they try to run away from it, the more they end up fulfilling it. There are plenty of those like me, and I am definitely not a hard person to figure out (especially considering I am a guy...we're a simple species). But I must admit, being on Fab and seeing people try to dress up their various desires in innuendo and bullshit can become...irksome. If its so irksome, why not leave. Just for the record ... I am here, so haven't been banned from anything? " Because I still get plenty of offers and have some pretty cool cats on here too. I take the good and the bad but I am vocal about the bad. Fab can be great and the forum is still...surprisingly better and more level headed than alot of others. But I wont deny the bad aspects because of that. Keeps the experience grounded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. I don't need to feel that a man is attracted to me though .... that's a different thing I think. The meaningless sex doesn't mean anything ... its very different from the sex I have with my OH" We operate differently, as I'm single. I think that makes a difference. I don't go to clubs or parties. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. " I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. I don't need to feel that a man is attracted to me though .... that's a different thing I think. The meaningless sex doesn't mean anything ... its very different from the sex I have with my OH We operate differently, as I'm single. I think that makes a difference. I don't go to clubs or parties. " Well, I also have a single profile and before I met my OH I was on here over five years as a single female. So I can speak from that experience too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... Yup. Never heard that before. Ever in my life. Lemme guess, you're not like other women too right? I think you will find many many women on here and in real life also love meaningless sex. I am not too different. Some men can't cope with that concept, for whatever reason I dont know. But if you can't fathom that, no worries .... I am not too bothered. Predictable. Sorry you can't find a thesis to answer someone who disagrees with your world view about women ... I dont make comments that will get me banned by those who get offended. I just hope you dont start seeing you in my inbox and embarrassing yourself again. That was the OH, not me ... but you aren't allowed to bring personal issues on here .... how exactly did he embarrass himself? He didn't try to get your address so he could move in, did he? " Ah yes, it was your other half. Of course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. " So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. I don't need to feel that a man is attracted to me though .... that's a different thing I think. The meaningless sex doesn't mean anything ... its very different from the sex I have with my OH We operate differently, as I'm single. I think that makes a difference. I don't go to clubs or parties. Well, I also have a single profile and before I met my OH I was on here over five years as a single female. So I can speak from that experience too" Like I said, we operate differently. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis. I'm still confused. I've never seen a cock in the shape of a key, and my vagina doesn't open for just any key, master or not. It's a popular analogy get with the times. Get with the times? That saying is last century if anything. Do you really still see sex with women as something that needs unlocking? This is the reason why we don't have enough sluts on fabs or anywhere, women still trying to be good locks :p "Last century thinking" Fab seems to be full of dimwits who seem to think humanity has somehow evolved in the last 70 years. Whilst I definitely dont think people should be expecting chaste on a sex site, people need to realize that promiscuity is, quite frankly, different for men and women. Being promiscuous takes absolutely no effort as a woman. For men, we need to gain tools/attributes/looks/status/personalities which make us desirable to the opposite sex. Its the same attitude people have toward drug abusers or the obese...no one really admires excessive consumption of that which doesnt take any effort to consume. As I have said. Fab doesnt have good sluts for the reason most of the world doesnt have a good helping of "good" sluts. Women are not men. They never will be. 99% of the time women who claim to enjoy meaningless sex for meaningless sex sake are lying. The only question is how long they're willing to deny the obvious. We men can have sex simply to get off...for women its entirely more complex. This difference is so apparent, it reflects itself in our biology. Very rare you will run into two women who experience sex the same way. The concept of the "female orgasm" is still woefully misunderstood...with many think the concept itself is illusory simply because women dont experience climax the same way men do. Its this same complexity which makes me laugh at the deluded on here who think they're can run around pretending to be "players". The general mental unwellness and lack of decisiveness on here should make that pretty apparent. I am not lying. I love meaningless sex and have done for years .... It isn't meaningless, however you see it. It's sex for pleasure, ergo, it has a meaning and a purpose. I don't need to think a man is smitten by me to enjoy sex. I do want him to be attracted to me and not just want a hole to fill. There's the meaning for me, and I think a lot of men will think similar. I think. I don't need to feel that a man is attracted to me though .... that's a different thing I think. The meaningless sex doesn't mean anything ... its very different from the sex I have with my OH We operate differently, as I'm single. I think that makes a difference. I don't go to clubs or parties. Well, I also have a single profile and before I met my OH I was on here over five years as a single female. So I can speak from that experience too Like I said, we operate differently. " We do, but our experiences aren't that different. I never went to clubs or parties when I was on here single. Even now I rarely go ... now its very different. But that is the whole point of my previous comments, you can't lump all women under one comment ... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. " Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you can't lump all women under one comment ..." Actually, yes...u can. Thats a fundamental misunerdstanding of modern thinking. That you cant lump people together according to their most base desires. MOST humans will go hungry if they dont eat MOST humans have a deep desire to procreate MOST humans have sexual desire MOST men have higher testosterone levels making them more aggressive MOST women will experience menopause in the 40s | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you can't lump all women under one comment ... Actually, yes...u can. Thats a fundamental misunerdstanding of modern thinking. That you cant lump people together according to their most base desires. MOST humans will go hungry if they dont eat MOST humans have a deep desire to procreate MOST humans have sexual desire MOST men have higher testosterone levels making them more aggressive MOST women will experience menopause in the 40s" We aren't talking about the same thing here. Never mind, maybe too subtle differences to understand. I think a little more reading around the subject is needed .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. " Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"can folk just quote the necessary bits of the previous posts...it's getting like war and peace in here but it makes less sense " it's making my lurking very difficult! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? " Apologies, in this instance you are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"can folk just quote the necessary bits of the previous posts...it's getting like war and peace in here but it makes less sense it's making my lurking very difficult!" it's cool...i found a see saw | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. " Fuck them white knights | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... " We love it though .... him telling us that, keeps us real and in our place .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? " LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Theses women need to know that a key that can open many locks is a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock. the key is a fanny though and the lock is a penis." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? " And secretly hate all women who all get sex effortlessly .... or is it only the obese women they all hate, but wont admit it?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? " Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? " I presume that you are exempting yourself from the 'most sex, least effort' category? Given that you spend most of your time in the forums being openly insulting towards most of the women on this site, I'd be surprised if you were getting any at all... In fact, you're putting the most amount of effort possible into getting NO SEX whatsoever... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. " Just noticed your reply to me, that's hysterical fella! Passive aggressive cryptic commentary,...oh reeeealy! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture." Do you see yourself as an alpha male? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? " All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture. Do you see yourself as an alpha male? " Nope. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture." In my experience DN gets enough meets and I have never seen him crying for not getting enough. What gives you the right to call someone else's profile picture repugnant? That attitude is honestly so disrespectful .... and it is your opinion only. How do you know yours is not? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive?" Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I presume that you are exempting yourself from the 'most sex, least effort' category? Given that you spend most of your time in the forums being openly insulting towards most of the women on this site, I'd be surprised if you were getting any at all... In fact, you're putting the most amount of effort possible into getting NO SEX whatsoever..." Nope. I am DEFINTELY someone who wants to put in the LEAST the amount of effort to get the most sex. Lord knows that. I am no different. And your other paragraph is what is so fundamentally different between you and me. I have no qualms about expressing my distaste...I still do well here though, because I realize that sexual attraction doesnt have to correlate with political/social beliefs. You, on the other hand, believe that women should be accepting of those simply because they're nice. A pathetic, weakminded and childish way of thinking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture." Ohh...you're a real tough guy aren't you? Clearly, you are so insecure in your masculinity that the sight of me in women's underwear makes you feel threatened...perhaps you think that I'm going to try and fuck you? Trust me, I wouldn't touch you if you PAID me... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture. Do you see yourself as an alpha male? Nope. " But not a beta? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive?" Everybody knows that the majority of men use this site because they think it gives them access to easy free sex. Nobody is naiive to that matter, and nobody has suggested otherwise. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me Oh man, this is exactly the kind of question you really don't want to ask in forums! Hope the thread doesn't implode, but best of luck with it " You were right Dave | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I presume that you are exempting yourself from the 'most sex, least effort' category? Given that you spend most of your time in the forums being openly insulting towards most of the women on this site, I'd be surprised if you were getting any at all... In fact, you're putting the most amount of effort possible into getting NO SEX whatsoever... Nope. I am DEFINTELY someone who wants to put in the LEAST the amount of effort to get the most sex. Lord knows that. I am no different. And your other paragraph is what is so fundamentally different between you and me. I have no qualms about expressing my distaste...I still do well here though, because I realize that sexual attraction doesnt have to correlate with political/social beliefs. You, on the other hand, believe that women should be accepting of those simply because they're nice. A pathetic, weakminded and childish way of thinking. " Did you even read his profile? Or know anything about him? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. " Yeah. That reads like you know exactly what I am saying in regards to your inbox. Whats amusing is that you're actually caught between disagreeing with an asshole like myself and admitting that your inbox is likely filled with trollish/meaningless/rude/effortless messages. Oh the conflict | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I presume that you are exempting yourself from the 'most sex, least effort' category? Given that you spend most of your time in the forums being openly insulting towards most of the women on this site, I'd be surprised if you were getting any at all... In fact, you're putting the most amount of effort possible into getting NO SEX whatsoever... Nope. I am DEFINTELY someone who wants to put in the LEAST the amount of effort to get the most sex. Lord knows that. I am no different. And your other paragraph is what is so fundamentally different between you and me. I have no qualms about expressing my distaste...I still do well here though, because I realize that sexual attraction doesnt have to correlate with political/social beliefs. You, on the other hand, believe that women should be accepting of those simply because they're nice. A pathetic, weakminded and childish way of thinking. " So, you are projecting your thoughts and feelings onto other men. What makes you think most other men are like you? I don't assume most women are like me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Everybody knows that the majority of men use this site because they think it gives them access to easy free sex. Nobody is naiive to that matter, and nobody has suggested otherwise. " Doesn't this go for women too? This Si what I have always used it for .... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Trust me, I wouldn't touch you if you PAID me..." Oh no!! Really?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"why do some women on here sleep with how many guys they like on here but when you do it they make you feel like your cheating Send you abusive msgs then block all contact with you an all sorts, just dont get it me" Women don't do that....girls do ... they're not age related terms... is all about attitude | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. Yeah. That reads like you know exactly what I am saying in regards to your inbox. Whats amusing is that you're actually caught between disagreeing with an asshole like myself and admitting that your inbox is likely filled with trollish/meaningless/rude/effortless messages. Oh the conflict " I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I wasn't talking about the messages and get. I was referring to your previous comments about the men on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Everybody knows that the majority of men use this site because they think it gives them access to easy free sex. Nobody is naiive to that matter, and nobody has suggested otherwise. Doesn't this go for women too? This Si what I have always used it for ...." Me too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Trust me, I wouldn't touch you if you PAID me... Oh no!! Really?? " Only the people who PM you want to met up with you. That's how it works here on fab | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You, on the other hand, believe that women should be accepting of those simply because they're nice. A pathetic, weakminded and childish way of thinking. " Er, WHERE did I say that? If you recall, I objected to being excluded FROM A CLUB on the basis of my physical appearance. AT NO POINT did I object to INDIVIDUALS rejecting me on the basis of my physical appearance, or ask for what you term a 'Pity Fuck.' If you are going to try and argue with me, kindly do not misrepresent my views. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. Yeah. That reads like you know exactly what I am saying in regards to your inbox. Whats amusing is that you're actually caught between disagreeing with an asshole like myself and admitting that your inbox is likely filled with trollish/meaningless/rude/effortless messages. Oh the conflict I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I wasn't talking about the messages and get. I was referring to your previous comments about the men on here. " Men send those messages. LOL stop it, this is silly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. Yeah. That reads like you know exactly what I am saying in regards to your inbox. Whats amusing is that you're actually caught between disagreeing with an asshole like myself and admitting that your inbox is likely filled with trollish/meaningless/rude/effortless messages. Oh the conflict I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I wasn't talking about the messages and get. I was referring to your previous comments about the men on here. Men send those messages. LOL stop it, this is silly." What messages? What do you think men say to women like myself? Bearing in mind we are both here for sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" If you recall, I objected to being excluded FROM A CLUB on the basis of my physical appearance. " Uh huh. And, as I said, someone who feels they should be entitled entry to a private venue with selected patrons makes it clear the kind of entitled mentality I am dealing with. Its simply putting 2 and 2 together. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Holy crap, there's a lot of words in this thread! What I do find amusing about so many of the "men" on this forum is how so many of you cant seem to address anything outside of passive aggressive cryptic commentary. Its sad how desperation makes so many on here muted. Why are you assuming they are desperate. Are you projecting your own emotions onto them? If saying that makes you feel better... Its funny though because, in another thread, I will hear woman laughing at the same sycophancy expressed by many on here. You didn't answer my question. You answered it with a question, which is a deflection tactic. I wasn't feeling bad, so it couldn't make me feel better. I never said you were feeling bad. But its probably likely that you want to believe I am venting my frustrations. As said, if you want to believe that then go ahead. But I can say that I dont feel desperate or in need of having to negotiate interest from anyone. So, why do you think other men are different to you and do need to? I'm curious as to how you come to your conclusions about people on here. Do yourself a favor. Go to the search bar, type in "forum clique" and then "sycophancy" and realize that my opinion is a pretty common thing. Group think exists here...alot of it. The reason many shy away from offering different opinios on here (many of the men especially) is because they feel they will become unpopular. Dont be obtuse. Can you not explain your reasoning yourself? What has forum cliques got to do with the men on the site? There are a fraction of the male profiles using the site. Are you just talking about forum men or the whole site? LOL. Do you really think the men on the forum are not fundamentally different from the men on the rest of the site? That they dont all want the most amount of sex with the least amount of effort? Ah, clarification. So you're saying you are like that, yes? And because you are you think all other men are? All men? No. Most? Yes. I mean, seriously. Your inbox should make this apparent what most men on this site are like. Its not even because men on here are somehow uniquely terrible, they're not. But we ARE men. The ratio is about 10:1. Many treat this site as a way to get easy sex. Surely you cannot be this naive? Now you think you know what's in my inbox? I'm far from naive, I'm quite worldly wise actually, and I don't have an ego that needs inflating. I think it's called being a realist. Yeah. That reads like you know exactly what I am saying in regards to your inbox. Whats amusing is that you're actually caught between disagreeing with an asshole like myself and admitting that your inbox is likely filled with trollish/meaningless/rude/effortless messages. Oh the conflict I don't know how you came to that conclusion. I wasn't talking about the messages and get. I was referring to your previous comments about the men on here. Men send those messages. LOL stop it, this is silly." And, so you know, my inbox isn't filled with those kinds of messages. I don't know what a trolling message would be for a start. The others are introductory messages and subsequent chat from anyone I like the sound of. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also Superfreak... You've not yet said why you think my PP is 'repugnant'... Or indeed why you refer to me as a 'Beta Male'... I'm intrigued as to why I seem to pose such a threat to your fragile masculinity..." Uh huh, just like everyone who doesnt want to attend clubs with people who they are not attracted to is some big meanie...a guy who finds your picture a turnoff has their masculinity threatened. You're so lame. Lemme guess you're one of those PC, "safe space" types right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oi you lot its 1am and passed bedtime.. " And we are up at five am, but have been napping most of the afternoon. I will blame the England game for that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also Superfreak... You've not yet said why you think my PP is 'repugnant'... Or indeed why you refer to me as a 'Beta Male'... I'm intrigued as to why I seem to pose such a threat to your fragile masculinity... Uh huh, just like everyone who doesnt want to attend clubs with people who they are not attracted to is some big meanie...a guy who finds your picture a turnoff has their masculinity threatened. You're so lame. Lemme guess you're one of those PC, "safe space" types right? " You have every right to find someone's picture offensive, but I am not sure you have the right to be offensive and rude on here, I think you will find that it may be defined as abusive. You feel entitled to endow everyone with your opinion, but can't take it when someone gives you theirs back ..... it should work both ways, surely? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My OH's first message to me was 'nice tits' and the second was him asking me to come to a watersports party .... but when we did meet, it took three meets before we played as we chatted so much. That was a good while ago ... I would take it most women see though this type of message and see men as human beings, well, most of them ... " If only he could see actual messages men send, he would realise he's massively generalising and getting it so wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oi you lot its 1am and passed bedtime.. " I have to leave anyway. A hot man awaits me | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also Superfreak... You've not yet said why you think my PP is 'repugnant'... Or indeed why you refer to me as a 'Beta Male'... I'm intrigued as to why I seem to pose such a threat to your fragile masculinity... Uh huh, just like everyone who doesnt want to attend clubs with people who they are not attracted to is some big meanie...a guy who finds your picture a turnoff has their masculinity threatened. You're so lame. Lemme guess you're one of those PC, "safe space" types right? You have every right to find someone's picture offensive, but I am not sure you have the right to be offensive and rude on here, I think you will find that it may be defined as abusive. You feel entitled to endow everyone with your opinion, but can't take it when someone gives you theirs back ..... it should work both ways, surely?" It does. And he is giving his opinion. Well within his right to. But it is a stupid opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Pay no heed to thesuperfreak Virtually every forum post he writes involves him bitching about how women on this site are either 'deluded,' 'desperate,' or 'liberal third-wave feminists'... Seriously dude...change the record... Says the guy crying that selective sex parties wont let in his overweight self. You're indicative of every weakminded beta male who cries when he hasnt received a pity fuck. It even shows itself in your repugnant looking profile picture. In my experience DN gets enough meets and I have never seen him crying for not getting enough. What gives you the right to call someone else's profile picture repugnant? That attitude is honestly so disrespectful .... and it is your opinion only. How do you know yours is not?" To be fair , he is as fit as fuck | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"as I said, someone who feels they should be entitled entry to a private venue with selected patrons makes it clear the kind of entitled mentality I am dealing with." As I said to you, ENTITLEMENT would be if I was demanding that the other patrons be obliged to play with me. But then again, given what's on your profile, I'm not surprised that you can't bear to be around people like myself... Everything about your profile and your forum comments screams 'Narcissistic Personality Disorder.' Vanity, lack of empathy, inability to accept criticism, need for admiration, desire to be the centre of attention, and obsession with physical appearance... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also Superfreak... You've not yet said why you think my PP is 'repugnant'... Or indeed why you refer to me as a 'Beta Male'... I'm intrigued as to why I seem to pose such a threat to your fragile masculinity..." i think he fancies ya, remember primary school? picking on each other because your too young to know what you wanna say so you get the attention by pulling that girls pony tail or whatever, play the big man in an attempt to impress as you don't know better | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |