Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" doesnt seem like anyone else was around" Must have been, I can't believe the police have it on their regular beat. Isn't the risk of getting caught part of the thrill? I'm not saying I want to be, but there must be an element that gives you the buzz. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mum caught having sex in Whitley Bay lighthouse car park claims she was 'looking for gloves - Newcastle Chronicle " Don't you think your mum has already been embarrassed enough without you telling everyone ? Cal ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mum caught having sex in Whitley Bay lighthouse car park claims she was 'looking for gloves - Newcastle Chronicle Don't you think your mum has already been embarrassed enough without you telling everyone ? Made me smile , Cal ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seems a bit odd that they would have been charged for OPD if no one else was around. Criteria for an OPD charge are: 1.the act was of such a lewd character as to outrage public decency; this element constitutes the nature of the act, which has to be proved before the offence can be established, and 2. the act took place in a public place and must have been capable of being seen by two or more persons who were actually present, even if they did not actually see it. So.... 'you were giving a blow job in the bushes in the park and those dog walkers over there could have seen you but didn't. You're knicked' Which reminds me of the old adage - 'you don't get in trouble for breaking the law. Only for getting caught breaking the law' ![]() The police officers count as the 2 people seeing or capable of seeing and if they allege that they were outraged, the criteria is met. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" doesnt seem like anyone else was around Must have been, I can't believe the police have it on their regular beat. Isn't the risk of getting caught part of the thrill? I'm not saying I want to be, but there must be an element that gives you the buzz." If it's a regular dogging spot, it probably is on their beat. My local dogging spots are crawling with police these days. Fortunately I'm not a dogger. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Two women were in court here for masturbating and having oral sex in a public place. It was 2am, dark and involved nobody else." I sometimes wonder how these cases get to court. I thought the public decency laws had to prove genuine risk of enraging /shocking a member of the public. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The police officers count as the 2 people seeing or capable of seeing and if they allege that they were outraged, the criteria is met." Ah! Picturing the two coppers watching from a distance for some time. 'are you outraged yet, Steve?' 'give it 5 more minutes, Gary. Got any more crisps?' ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"there are laws against it so the prosecution is valid. probably is a waste of resources though." But its meant to be only if its causing offence to the public. At that time im sure the wildlife dont mind. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"there are laws against it so the prosecution is valid. probably is a waste of resources though. But its meant to be only if its causing offence to the public. At that time im sure the wildlife dont mind. " the police are the public also. tbh the woman lied to the police and did not co-operate, that pisses them off more than anything so i'm not surprised they wasted their time charging her. the guy who admitted what he did only got a caution. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mum caught having sex in Whitley Bay lighthouse car park claims she was 'looking for gloves - Newcastle Chronicle A woman has been found guilty of outraging public decency and fined. The man admitted the offence at the time and was cautioned." "Outraging public decency" is a pretty wide ranging offence that can be used for pretty much anything a police officer might want to apply a 'moral' judgement about. OTOH I was under the impression that it had been held (on appeal) that one would not normally expect a police officer to be able to be "outraged" by public sexual activity. Some other member of public maybe but not a police officer. The standard that normally applies for other offences (indecent exposure for instance) is that of "reasonable expectation of privacy". However much of this depends on how police, CPS and magistrates attempt to apply it and how much the accused (victim) wants to pursue defending the case. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The police officers count as the 2 people seeing or capable of seeing and if they allege that they were outraged, the criteria is met." Not any more it doesn't... cases recently have held that it must "reasonable" that a person would be outraged and it has been held that police officers could not reasonably be expected to be outraged by a behaviour ie police officers are robust people, not easily shocked. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The police officers count as the 2 people seeing or capable of seeing and if they allege that they were outraged, the criteria is met. Ah! Picturing the two coppers watching from a distance for some time. 'are you outraged yet, Steve?' 'give it 5 more minutes, Gary. Got any more crisps?' ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH the location they were at isn't that secluded. I don't think it's somewhere you could have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It's not like driving out into the woods in the middle of nowhere." At midnight you should be okay in most places. We love outdoor fun.. and often have daytime fun but are careful and dont go outside during school holidays for obvious reasons. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The police officers count as the 2 people seeing or capable of seeing and if they allege that they were outraged, the criteria is met. Ah! Picturing the two coppers watching from a distance for some time. 'are you outraged yet, Steve?' 'give it 5 more minutes, Gary. Got any more crisps?' ![]() They were female officers ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH the location they were at isn't that secluded. I don't think it's somewhere you could have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It's not like driving out into the woods in the middle of nowhere. At midnight you should be okay in most places. We love outdoor fun.. and often have daytime fun but are careful and dont go outside during school holidays for obvious reasons. " Not really - as is evidenced by the fact they were caught! Which means that either someone saw them and tipped off the police, or the police saw them when passing on a routine patrol which really shows how it's not a private place. It was a daft place to go and she was daft for not admitting it when he did. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One time I was parked up with a girlfriend in the car park of a local sports club. We saw headlights coming down the long driveway to the car park so we stopped and had a look around. The car circled us a couple of times so I pulled my jeans on backwards, jumped in the front and started the car. Then the blue lights flashed and they turned on a flood light and lit up the whole car. She was in the back screaming trying to cover herself up. A female office walked over so I wound down the window. She then said "We've had a lot of break ins here recently but that's obviously not what you're doing. Have a good night". The best bit was catching a glimpse of the male officer laughing his head off as she got back in the police car ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I suspect there is a lot more to this story than what you get from that article. The fact that the man got away with a caution after accepting he did something wrong suggests to me she kicked up a fuss at the time." she lied about what she did. she said she hadn't done anything sexual despite being seen doing that. you always get a lesser sentence if you admit to what you did as it saves police time and also shows some level of responsibility for what you did. probably wouldn't have even gone to court if she had admitted guilt and they'd both just have got a caution at the police station. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I live just down the way from here and in fairness the police are always going to the lighthouse at all hours mainly for boy racers and the likes so I think that it was a silly place to play. I agree that the police should have looked over the other shoulder but they can't nowadays so unlucky!" They can and do x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" .......Criteria for an OPD charge are: ...... 2. the act took place in a public place and must have been capable of being seen by two or more persons who were actually present, even if they did not actually see it....... )" Two people were present and saw it; two police officers. ( female officers, as it happens) So there you are. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well I'm unsympathetic. That's the risk people take with outdoor sex. If they didn't want to be caught they should have just been adult enough to have enough self restraint to not fuck in the street. " ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |