FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Sex acts that are to be banned in UK

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Are you into spanking? Well then, we’ve got some bad news for you if you live in the UK – it’s due to be officially banned from use in all online pornography.

As reported by the Independent, the acts likely to be affected by a clause of the Digital Economy Bill, which was passed unopposed in the UK House of Commons this week, are as follows:

Aggressive whipping

Caning

Spanking

Role-playing as non-adults

Physical restraint

Humiliation

Water sports

Physical or verbal abuse, regardless of consent

Penetration by any object associated with violence

Female ejaculation

Strangulation

Face sitting

Fisting

Assuming the bill passes unopposed through the House of Lords, then pornographic perusers in the UK will probably not be able to access this type of content online. As pointed out by the Guardian, there is no definitive list, but these acts fall under the “obscene” brief.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman
Forum Mod
over a year ago

My Own Little World

Yep, you haven't been able to have images porteaying any of these on Fab for the last year. I think it applies to sites based in the UK, if they are based overseas then the law doesn't apply to them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman
Forum Mod
over a year ago

My Own Little World

* portraying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Grrrr this makes my blood boil. I really hope this doesn't get passed, it sets a very dangerous precedent. The internet had the illusion of a place of relative freedom... Welcome, dark net.

Who even made this list or thought up this idea? I genuinely cannot even imagine having such a mindset. It's probably the same kind of person who complains about soaps to OFCOM.

But yeah, I don't even watch most of these things but this is an infringement of civil liberties. Blanket banning is not the bloody answer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it applies to sites based in the UK."

This isn't AS bad then... So people in the UK can still upload their own stuff to an international site?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he horny kinkstersCouple
over a year ago

North West

That list pretty much sums up the spare time activities of most of the House of Lords anyway probably.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Female ejaculation though, how can that even...?? It's a natural occurrence for many people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andVBCouple
over a year ago

Wrexham

The act is essentially saying that the BBFC has to rate each professional pornographic video released online as they do through physical media. This means that anything the BBFC currently considers too extreme for classification will also apply to online videos too.

There are also some bits and pieces about robust age filters and giving ISPs a mandate to block access to sites without them.

The Guardian had a reasonable write-up of it last month, google "UK to censor online videos of 'non-conventional' sex acts".

There are also a lot of roleplay scenarios already banned in the UK under the heading of "extreme porn". See www.backlash.org.uk for further information.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estaftermidnightCouple
over a year ago

Chorley


"That list pretty much sums up the spare time activities of most of the House of Lords anyway probably.

"

Lol. Very likely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"Are you into spanking? Well then, we’ve got some bad news for you if you live in the UK – it’s due to be officially banned from use in all online pornography.

As reported by the Independent, the acts likely to be affected by a clause of the Digital Economy Bill, which was passed unopposed in the UK House of Commons this week, are as follows:

Aggressive whipping

Caning WRONG

Spanking WRONG

Role-playing as non-adults WRONG

Physical restraint WRONG

Humiliation WRONG

Water sports

Physical or verbal abuse, regardless of consent WRONG

Penetration by any object associated with violence WRONG

Female ejaculation

Strangulation WRONG

Face sitting

Fisting

Assuming the bill passes unopposed through the House of Lords, then pornographic perusers in the UK will probably not be able to access this type of content online. As pointed out by the Guardian, there is no definitive list, but these acts fall under the “obscene” brief."
they are only banned where severe marking or injury can be seen just means most online s&m photography sites wil,have to move abroad as most already have done

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"That list pretty much sums up the spare time activities of most of the House of Lords anyway probably.

Lol. Very likely "
notice that the online snoopig bill was apssed overnight with the only exemtion being yep you have guessed it MPs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No big deal to me. It's just photos and videos. I much rather do it in person. Someone will be losing money from it though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Started a thread similar to this last week.

https://fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/575035

There have been other threads too. The general consensus seems to be 'I don't like porn so I'm OK' or 'will somebody please think of the children'

Which is fair enough, but there is the feeling to me that we're all frogs bring slowly cooked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andVBCouple
over a year ago

Wrexham


"Started a thread similar to this last week.

https://fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/575035

There have been other threads too. The general consensus seems to be 'I don't like porn so I'm OK' or 'will somebody please think of the children'

Which is fair enough, but there is the feeling to me that we're all frogs bring slowly cooked. "

Oops, missed this thread. It seems I just rehashed what has already been said!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Typical ok for a man to ejaculate but not a woman

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No big deal to me. It's just photos and videos. I much rather do it in person. Someone will be losing money from it though. "

It's no big deal to me either. There are bigger things in the world to worry me than photos and videos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"Typical ok for a man to ejaculate but not a woman "
bit it's not actualy a woman ejaculating they are banning it's a woman urinating but folk call it ejaculating to get around it so they have banned both

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuckCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield

OP that list is wrong / distorting the truth.

People need to look on BBFC website, there is a list and they uphold what is 'allowed' .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuckCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour."

What aspect of the 'ban' is worse for gay porn as opposed to heterosexual porn?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Started a thread similar to this last week.

https://fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/575035

There have been other threads too. The general consensus seems to be 'I don't like porn so I'm OK' or 'will somebody please think of the children'

Which is fair enough, but there is the feeling to me that we're all frogs bring slowly cooked.

Oops, missed this thread. It seems I just rehashed what has already been said! "

No worries, it is the forums at the end of the day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ncutgemMan
over a year ago

Bath ish

Ironic it only applies to porn as all those violent movies are fine of course and do no harm what so ever. A beautiful thing like intercourse is bad exposing children to violence is not Its quite MAD

PS I thought female ejaculation was a myth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

Just wondering, as soon as all these forms of porn are banned and the snoopers charter is rolled out. Or as soon as the snoopers charter comes into effect; how do employees who view or have viewed porn continue to work in those departments? If someone wants you out of their department I think there might be a quick exit meeting?? lol

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/investigatory-powers-bill-act-snoopers-charter-browsing-history-what-does-it-mean-a7436251.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just wondering is it the same law in ireland?

Xx

Raven

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour.

What aspect of the 'ban' is worse for gay porn as opposed to heterosexual porn?"

Queer porn - not gay. I specifically said queer because I generally meant f/f porn and ftm porn.

Male ejaculation ok - female ejaculation banned. So it's ok to come in straight or gay porn, but not queer porn.

Face sitting - one of the dominant activities in queer porn. Banned.

Ethical porn (i.e. those with a strong queer, intersectional or feminist leaning) often celebrates activities such as spanking, bondage, humiliation, roleplaying, etc, because it doesn't involve penetration.

There's very limited acts you can do if you don't have penetration as an option. So this essentially makes it very, very hard to make good queer porn for the UK market. Thus creating another generation who think that a bloke banging away at a woman is really the primary (if not the only) option for both your bedtime fun and your porn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mo-amas-amatMan
over a year ago

brighton

Pornography? Falls foul of the law

Set between rich folk and poor

You know that MPs

Are fucking ripe cheese

Until their brie bollocks are sore...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is already illegal to publish such photographs in the UK and has been for some time. Old news, I am afraid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loppsyWoman
over a year ago

marlow

Thank god I'm a good girl and wouldn't dream of doing any of them...........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What's that? They're making the Internet redundant!?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuckCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour.

What aspect of the 'ban' is worse for gay porn as opposed to heterosexual porn?

Queer porn - not gay. I specifically said queer because I generally meant f/f porn and ftm porn.

Male ejaculation ok - female ejaculation banned. So it's ok to come in straight or gay porn, but not queer porn.

Face sitting - one of the dominant activities in queer porn. Banned.

Ethical porn (i.e. those with a strong queer, intersectional or feminist leaning) often celebrates activities such as spanking, bondage, humiliation, roleplaying, etc, because it doesn't involve penetration.

There's very limited acts you can do if you don't have penetration as an option. So this essentially makes it very, very hard to make good queer porn for the UK market. Thus creating another generation who think that a bloke banging away at a woman is really the primary (if not the only) option for both your bedtime fun and your porn."

OK, understand. But:

Female ejaculation. I agree on inappropriateness of the 'ban' . But equally affects women in a heterosexual and bi relationship.

Face sitting. Same for any dom female, gay , bi, trans. But I think the 'ban' doesn't actually apply anyway, depends how 'non-consensual' it is.

BDSM porn exists for all sexualities and will be affected equally as harshly.

Also, in terms of sexual politics the ban will hit heterosexual forced and rape type porn. That has to be a massive positive?

I'd suggest people look on the BBFC and CPS websites for actual details, as opposed to hear-say.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour.

What aspect of the 'ban' is worse for gay porn as opposed to heterosexual porn?

Queer porn - not gay. I specifically said queer because I generally meant f/f porn and ftm porn.

Male ejaculation ok - female ejaculation banned. So it's ok to come in straight or gay porn, but not queer porn.

Face sitting - one of the dominant activities in queer porn. Banned.

Ethical porn (i.e. those with a strong queer, intersectional or feminist leaning) often celebrates activities such as spanking, bondage, humiliation, roleplaying, etc, because it doesn't involve penetration.

There's very limited acts you can do if you don't have penetration as an option. So this essentially makes it very, very hard to make good queer porn for the UK market. Thus creating another generation who think that a bloke banging away at a woman is really the primary (if not the only) option for both your bedtime fun and your porn.

OK, understand. But:

Female ejaculation. I agree on inappropriateness of the 'ban' . But equally affects women in a heterosexual and bi relationship.

Face sitting. Same for any dom female, gay , bi, trans. But I think the 'ban' doesn't actually apply anyway, depends how 'non-consensual' it is.

BDSM porn exists for all sexualities and will be affected equally as harshly.

Also, in terms of sexual politics the ban will hit heterosexual forced and rape type porn. That has to be a massive positive?

I'd suggest people look on the BBFC and CPS websites for actual details, as opposed to hear-say.

"

It will hit queer porn disproportionately more than straight porn, which is the problem. With straight porn there are many, many more activities to choose from.

FWIW, I don't actually have a problem with fully consensual activities like rape porn. As long as it's legal and everyone is consensual then I don't see why it shouldn't be out there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

All together now to that Edwardian music hall favourite Alexander's Ragtime Band:

"Missionary position here I come Doo Dah Doo Dah Dey"

Cx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *egasus NobMan
over a year ago

Wandsworth


"Thank god I'm a good girl and wouldn't dream of doing any of them...........

"

In time we'll lead you to the dark side

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There have been waves of bans in other countries, France and Scandinavian countries to name a couple plus in particular Northern Ireland, where spanking of any kind is illegal.

I suspect, (and I am being a but flippant here), that the British government banned acts it personally doesn't like or can't do. They are all wankers, so male ejaculation is in, but as misogynists, women shouldn't enjoy sex and certainly not ejaculate. Besides which, they are too damn lazy to find out how to do it properly, so rather than change that, ban it, then no wife may demand it from the MP of Much Groaning behind the woodpile.

That said, most were raised by nannies and then sent to public schools, where both Prefects and Masters battered lumps out of them on a daily basis, until they were old enough to do it to others themselves. So it was a bit of a shock to hear caning and spanking had become illegal sports. Personally fond of reddening a man's rear end

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he horny kinkstersCouple
over a year ago

North West


"Typical ok for a man to ejaculate but not a woman "

To be honest, most of the time we're faking it. (MrK)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

Surprised everyone is interested in what is to be banned rather than who can see what you are viewing.

The number of Government departments are enormous. Link provided in previous post.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely if it's done by consenting adults what does it matter???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unandbuckCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield

There is absolutely no change in what porn is legal in the UK. This law is about what records the authorities can see and what the ISP must keep.

Porn is a side issue, as far as it now becomes possible to restrict access to only porn that is 'acceptable' to uk law. The BBFC is supposed to be governing that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

This bill has got to go through the house of lords yet, hasn't it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What's wrong with face sitting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imjohnCouple
over a year ago

Clacton on sea, Essex

The good thing is when the BBFC become responsible for online material overnight they will get shitloads of complaints & legal actions from porn producers who have paid over top fee's to the BBFC for years for nothing.

Tubes sites will be a thing of the past because the government will not want to get caught up in a political battle of its own making, only pay sites sanctioned by the BBFC will be allowed to operate doing away with free porn.

At least they have made changes from their orginal plans of banning anything sexual online but we are still the only democratic country in the world to censor our internet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

quick someone sit on my face.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"quick someone sit on my face....."

Be careful for what you wish for.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"quick someone sit on my face.....

Be careful for what you wish for. "

please don't say its Mr typing that....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"quick someone sit on my face.....

Be careful for what you wish for.

please don't say its Mr typing that.... "

It's always Mr typing in the forum, but I wasn't volunteering

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What I find odd is that most, if not all, of these activities are legal to do in person, or in a club or wherever but illegal to view on a computer.

Whereas illegal acts, robbing a bank, killing someone, and so on are covered in perfectly allowable films day in and day out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imjohnCouple
over a year ago

Clacton on sea, Essex


"What I find odd is that most, if not all, of these activities are legal to do in person, or in a club or wherever but illegal to view on a computer.

Whereas illegal acts, robbing a bank, killing someone, and so on are covered in perfectly allowable films day in and day out."

We would say you are right but we don't live in a free country & these censorships are only the start of whats to come...missing Europe already.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Typical ok for a man to ejaculate but not a woman "

I agree with most but not female ejaculate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It will drive more people to the dark web, vpn's and tor.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It will drive more people to the dark web, vpn's and tor. "

That'll be like the search for the g-spot all over again!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral DMan
over a year ago

Leicestershire

This is all part of the "Snoopers Charter" every single persons phone and web activity is logged any porn viewed (of the catagories of Original post) or talk of drugs etc could land you a criminal record and a stay in prison. Frankie Boyle wrote a great article about it in the Gaurdian. Basically its big brother watching everything you do. Oh yes no swapping pics on kik etc either when it comes into force as you will get banged up for distribution of unsuitable images.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The sex toy shops that sell DVD are happy..they can still sell most of those things as it is internet porn that is changing and not professionally produced porn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Penetration by any object associated with violence - I'm pretty sure this could ban 99% of day to day objects...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imjohnCouple
over a year ago

Clacton on sea, Essex


"The sex toy shops that sell DVD are happy..they can still sell most of those things as it is internet porn that is changing and not professionally produced porn"

All porn is under the scrutiny of the BBFC Pro & Am, sites can't operate without the all clear from them unless you are based overseas.

They done it has a measure to sting the adult industry mainly but its worked in reverse as all free stuff will be removed if uploaded from the UK so our battles with the pirates is half won due the kind BBFC lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imjohnCouple
over a year ago

Clacton on sea, Essex


"Penetration by any object associated with violence - I'm pretty sure this could ban 99% of day to day objects..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Death knell for queer pornography, and reinforcement of heteronormative behaviour.

What aspect of the 'ban' is worse for gay porn as opposed to heterosexual porn?

Queer porn - not gay. I specifically said queer because I generally meant f/f porn and ftm porn.

Male ejaculation ok - female ejaculation banned. So it's ok to come in straight or gay porn, but not queer porn.

Face sitting - one of the dominant activities in queer porn. Banned.

Ethical porn (i.e. those with a strong queer, intersectional or feminist leaning) often celebrates activities such as spanking, bondage, humiliation, roleplaying, etc, because it doesn't involve penetration.

There's very limited acts you can do if you don't have penetration as an option. So this essentially makes it very, very hard to make good queer porn for the UK market. Thus creating another generation who think that a bloke banging away at a woman is really the primary (if not the only) option for both your bedtime fun and your porn."

I don't have many strong veiws. But this is spot on.

It's backwards thinking the whole thing.

Look at some of the nonesense laws around the world. And this is right up there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top