FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Foreskin or no foreskin?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I can only think of the Bad Education episode

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I can only think of the Bad Education episode "

Lol dried up foreskin, protein mun haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotFit4funMan
over a year ago

Kettering

I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!"

He didn't mention children.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotFit4funMan
over a year ago

Kettering


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!

He didn't mention children. "

As long as it's an adult choice to have it done then that's fine but most circumcision is done on children who have no say in it... it's child mutilation and no other explanation!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely a sausage roll without the roll is just a sausage,,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!

He didn't mention children. "

Thanks, some people just go way to much into lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

What if you have no foreskin and women suddenly prefer one, what can you do, knit one. You have, you haven't, does it matter? I certainly wouldn't have mine sliced off for someone's preference.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"What if you have no foreskin and women suddenly prefer one, what can you do, knit one. You have, you haven't, does it matter? I certainly wouldn't have mine sliced off for someone's preference."

Thanks for your answer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

OP are you considering elective surgery, or planning to grow it back?

(I'm assuming there's a pictorial answer, I just choose not to look)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opman1111Man
over a year ago

belfast

I love my foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

love mine being played with

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can't imagine what it must be like to not have one like half the package.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!"

I met a girl and she swore that circumcised men were more pleasurable, both feel the same on the forward stroke she said, but on the withdrawal stroke the circumcised men felt more pleasurable, due to uncircumcised men's forskin covering the head of their penis on the back stroke. So I beg to differ that it doesn't matter to woman

Now she did say both were very pleasurable just circumcised felt better

I'm uncircumcised, as are all of my three brothers, my father is circumcised though. Medical reasons when he was 12

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotFit4funMan
over a year ago

Kettering


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!

I met a girl and she swore that circumcised men were more pleasurable, both feel the same on the forward stroke she said, but on the withdrawal stroke the circumcised men felt more pleasurable, due to uncircumcised men's forskin covering the head of their penis on the back stroke. So I beg to differ that it doesn't matter to woman

Now she did say both were very pleasurable just circumcised felt better

I'm uncircumcised, as are all of my three brothers, my father is circumcised though. Medical reasons when he was 12

"

I understand your comments... however when i said it doesn't matter i meant that i don't really care what women think... unless done by personal choice or medical grounds then it's child mutilation on young boys... there is so much in the news about FGM but i also believe it's wrong to circumcise young boys without consent..

I definitely understand the reasons why it may feel better for a woman...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ithardscotMan
over a year ago

Kelty

I think we all get waaaaaay too hung up on how our cocks look or how big they are.

Most women really are not too bothered (unless it's either tiny or massive).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall

Foreskins all the way, I don't like circumcised willies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andb69Couple
over a year ago

leeds


"I think we all get waaaaaay too hung up on how our cocks look or how big they are.

Most women really are not too bothered (unless it's either tiny or massive)."

Really? Perhaps you could tell us how you know this. I, and most women I know, are just as bothered about how a cock looks as men are about the bits that women have.

Personally I much prefer a cock with a foreskin as long as it's fully retractable. For me it feels and looks much better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When I first became sexually active, it was painful for me because my foreskin was so tight it hurt to pull it all the way back, so I had a circumcision...

That month of healing was hell for my and my GF at the time haha I can tell you!

But ever since, I'd never have it any other way, love my cock this way, it feels great for me and I've never had anything but compliments about it and how it feels for the ladies, let alone hygiene-wise

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who cares, sorry can't grow one back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *haunMan
over a year ago

Halton


"What if you have no foreskin and women suddenly prefer one, what can you do, knit one. You have, you haven't, does it matter? I certainly wouldn't have mine sliced off for someone's preference."

---

Great response.

I for medical reasons don't have one.

Nothing I can do about it. (Well I imagine in this day and age there is... But nothing I want to do about it)

Lived most of my life without.

And in all the years ( in general, or the time on here) it's been brought up in conversation a handful of times.

Certainly (to my knowledge) it's never been a deal breaker either way about meeting someone.

Yes (like most things in life and especially on here or in clubs) people have preferences.

But hey ho.. such is life.

I'll carry on and not worry about something I can't control

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mber GamblerCouple
over a year ago

rugby

I prefer circumcised men. Their cocks look better for sure, they seem cleaner to me and they give me more pleasure. Like somebody said earlier. It's not the inside stroke, it's the pulling out stroke. I can feel the head of my hubby's cock so well and that feels fabulous. I am so used to it that I wouldn't now give a blowie to a man with a foreskin.

As much as I love them. I agree that they should not be done on children. It should be your own decision as an adult (as was hubby's). It is however relatively straight forward when compared to fgm. Fgm is done very often without anaesthetic, with dirty blades, glass and sharpened rocks. A lot of girls die from infections from it. Where men are left with a working (some would say improved penis) these poor girls are left in pain and most never enjoy sex again. Even the act of urination is excruciating. As urine drips out and can take half hour. There are so many after problems. The two cannot really be compared.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Foreskin or no foreskin?"

I'd stick with what you've got.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hmmmm, im circumsized & been told MANY times, it's cleaner/better feel.. Etc. Im not sure what the diff is to be honest (well i know the diff), but as in preference for the ladies and others.

Im thinking as like anything else in the world it's all about personal preferance eh?!..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason "

If you have a foreskin and the majority of women say they prefer circumcised, what are you going to do: cut it off? Or grow it back if circumcised?

As with all things some will prefer one to the other.

Don't understand threads like these. No one has universal appeal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

....my kitty prefers a 'roundhead'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I love my foreskin "
me too! It's meant to be there and there's no way I'm chopping it off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm quite attached to mine and can't imagine not having it, much like I'm sure those who were circumcised young can't imagine having one. Whichever camp you're in, I'm sure you make it work for you, and if ladies choose not to meet someone based on whether they have a little bit of skin covering their bell end or not, then that's their loss!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoot45Man
over a year ago

Ramsgate

Love foreskin - the more the better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atie ShayTV/TS
over a year ago

@@

I must be lucky haha!

I have foreskin when floppy but when hard it automatically retracts and my cock looks circumcised, nothing there to cover the end on the back stroke.

Other than for medical reasons I've never understood why folk get it done?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *van ArdenMan
over a year ago

Coleford, Forest of Dean, Gloucestershire.

When I cam in the bisexual chatroom I often receive compliments about my biggish foreskin. It is fully retractable so it can appear to be cut.

I like a guy with a nice juicy foreskin as long as it's clean so no wash no play lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoot45Man
over a year ago

Ramsgate

A big helmet outlined under a foreskin looks well horny. If a guy's foreskin is really tight and won't retract then I can see why it might be better to be circumcised. Being circumcised as an adult can't be very pleasant I would imagine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

it's never been part of the consideration we give when choosing people to meet...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he_virgin_maryWoman
over a year ago

Here, there and everywhere!

I really don't like floppy foreskins so would generally prefer cut cock

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm circumstised and ready for my helmet to be sucked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Had mine done as baby don't know the reason for it have never asked but has ruined my life so far

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"....my kitty prefers a 'roundhead' "

Haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A big helmet outlined under a foreskin looks well horny. If a guy's foreskin is really tight and won't retract then I can see why it might be better to be circumcised. Being circumcised as an adult can't be very pleasant I would imagine. "

I was 21 when I got mine done. I remember taking the bandage off for the first time and seeing my cock all swollen and covered in dried blood... almost passed out on the bathroom floor!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

With male genital mutilation or without, sir?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As I see it having a foreskin can be a huge drawback

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason "

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact "

Not strictly true! I know a few septic tanks that are intact in the hood department!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ithardscotMan
over a year ago

Kelty


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact "

Are you sure it's circumcised and not idiots you meant to type?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ithardscotMan
over a year ago

Kelty


"I think we all get waaaaaay too hung up on how our cocks look or how big they are.

Most women really are not too bothered (unless it's either tiny or massive).

Really? Perhaps you could tell us how you know this. I, and most women I know, are just as bothered about how a cock looks as men are about the bits that women have.

Personally I much prefer a cock with a foreskin as long as it's fully retractable. For me it feels and looks much better."

Well obviously I can't know "most women" any more than you can. I can say that, having had to be circumcised at the age of 23, there has been no change in the responses I have had from women with whom I have had relationships (or one-offs).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyChrissy99TV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol

I prefer foreskin bu I think thats just jealousy as I don't have any to play with lol

I think it looks neater without tbh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised and not idiots you meant to type?"

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ettyboop61Woman
over a year ago

St Neots

I prefer with .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without "

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *attys74Man
over a year ago

Pontefract

Cut all the way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards"

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards"

Yes I have

Even Obama and Trumps

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

"

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was circumcised as a kid for medical reasons, I've never had a woman even mention it and they obviously know I'm cut when they see it. As someone said above we might be thinking about this a bit too much

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"I was circumcised as a kid for medical reasons, I've never had a woman even mention it and they obviously know I'm cut when they see it. As someone said above we might be thinking about this a bit too much "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

"

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nysladMan
over a year ago

Anglesey


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact "

Yep just like me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Had mine done as baby don't know the reason for it have never asked but has ruined my life so far "

Why has it ruined your life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue."

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

"

Yes it is; it is removing a perfectly normal body part for no good reason whatsoever.

And done ( usually) to children who have no choice.

And nowadays, there is virtually no " medical reason " to do it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

"

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse."

Never have I seen or read about a case where male circumcised has gone wrong or been forced upon someone.

Unless you read the sun newspaper

You stick your opinions and I will stick to mine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse.

Never have I seen or read about a case where male circumcised has gone wrong or been forced upon someone.

Unless you read the sun newspaper

You stick your opinions and I will stick to mine "

What part of " it's done to children without their consent" isn't forced upon them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse.

Never have I seen or read about a case where male circumcised has gone wrong or been forced upon someone.

Unless you read the sun newspaper

You stick your opinions and I will stick to mine

What part of " it's done to children without their consent" isn't forced upon them?"

All of it.

The procedure is done by a trained medical doctor

Not the local butcher

If it was "forced upon" I'm sure the police would get involved for child abuse

Like i said it's done for medical, religion, culture reasons

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *QManc35Man
over a year ago

Manchester


"When I first became sexually active, it was painful for me because my foreskin was so tight it hurt to pull it all the way back, so I had a circumcision...

That month of healing was hell for my and my GF at the time haha I can tell you!

But ever since, I'd never have it any other way, love my cock this way, it feels great for me and I've never had anything but compliments about it and how it feels for the ladies, let alone hygiene-wise "

I've got a long and tight one and the threat of circumcision doesn't appeal to me - I prefer the look and feel of having a foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *herealdeal90Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I think it doesnt matter what women like... infant circumcision is child abuse unless on medical only grounds... all other reasons are mutilation without consent... not as if the child can do anything about it!

He didn't mention children.

As long as it's an adult choice to have it done then that's fine but most circumcision is done on children who have no say in it... it's child mutilation and no other explanation! "

who the fuck is this guy????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I like both but tend less towards guys with really tight foreskins

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Might be worth reading the link below.

My husband is circumcised so not completely against it on medical grounds, but it is not without risks. We have 3 boys and I certainly wouldn't do it to them, it's their body and their choice not mine to make.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple

As long as under the foreskin is clean...as a nurse many a time I have rolled it back and nearly vomited with the smell and crust - ohhh I feel ill now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Each year in the United States more than 100 newborn baby boys die as a result of circumcision and circumcision complications. This is the alarming conclusion of a study, published in the journal Thymos, which examined hospital discharge and mortality statistics in order to answer two questions: (1) How many baby boys dies as a result of circumcision in the neonatal period (within 28 days of birth)? (2) Why are so few of these deaths officially recorded as due to circumcision?

The study, by researcher Dan Bollinger, concluded that approximately 117 neonatal deaths due directly or indirectly to circumcision occur annually in the United States, or one out of every 77 male neonatal deaths. This compares with 44 neonatal deaths from suffocation, 8 in automobile accidents and 115 from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, all of which losses have aroused deep concern among child health authorities and stimulated special programs to reduce mortality.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Each year in the United States more than 100 newborn baby boys die as a result of circumcision and circumcision complications. This is the alarming conclusion of a study, published in the journal Thymos, which examined hospital discharge and mortality statistics in order to answer two questions: (1) How many baby boys dies as a result of circumcision in the neonatal period (within 28 days of birth)? (2) Why are so few of these deaths officially recorded as due to circumcision?

The study, by researcher Dan Bollinger, concluded that approximately 117 neonatal deaths due directly or indirectly to circumcision occur annually in the United States, or one out of every 77 male neonatal deaths. This compares with 44 neonatal deaths from suffocation, 8 in automobile accidents and 115 from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, all of which losses have aroused deep concern among child health authorities and stimulated special programs to reduce mortality. "

Plus approximately 250 killed by serial killers each year in America

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nterracial2Couple
over a year ago

Ribble Valley

Are you considering circumcision?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

had both - not bothered either way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What if you have no foreskin and women suddenly prefer one, what can you do, knit one. You have, you haven't, does it matter? I certainly wouldn't have mine sliced off for someone's preference."

I was thinking this myself.

Surely if you find someone who prefers a cut cock and you are uncut - or vice versa - there's really very little point bothering yourself about it.

I suppose you could use a similar argument about those who have a preference regarding body shape, skin colour, length, height etc.

Some women like circumcised cocks. Others don't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nterracial2Couple
over a year ago

Ribble Valley


"What if you have no foreskin and women suddenly prefer one, what can you do, knit one. "

Once a year the innocent smoothie companies place a small woollen hat an their small smoothie bottles. Could use that as a foreskin! I did once wear one was a willy warmer to entertain the Mrs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse.

Never have I seen or read about a case where male circumcised has gone wrong or been forced upon someone.

Unless you read the sun newspaper

You stick your opinions and I will stick to mine

What part of " it's done to children without their consent" isn't forced upon them?

All of it.

The procedure is done by a trained medical doctor

Not the local butcher

If it was "forced upon" I'm sure the police would get involved for child abuse

Like i said it's done for medical, religion, culture reasons

"

Nowadays there is hardly any "medical reason" to do it;

Religion is bollocks and nonsense.

"Cultural reasons" are no reason at all ;

FGM ( which I admit is far worse) is done for " cultural reasons ".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndigo40Woman
over a year ago

secret town


"Which do you prefer ladies? Is it a big deal? Is there one that you prefer for any reason

Muslims have to be circumcised due to religion

And all Americans are circumcised

Fact

Are you sure it's circumcised andbg not idiots you meant to type?

Yes I'm sure

And

I prefer without

Have you seen every penis in America? that will be a feat even by FAB standards

The US has an obsession with circumcision;

In the 70s and 80s it was a routine procedure at birth ( or soon after). And remains a default in most places unless the parents request otherwise.

As a result, about 79% of American males are circumcised.

It stems from an archaic belief that circumcision prevents disease; worryingly, recently, the CDC (Centre for Disease control) has revitalised this belief, and is even starting a programme in schools and colleges promoting circumcision for adolescents.

Like many things; the US continues to live largely in the 18th century in its attitudes.

Why a government organisation is allowed to promote child mutilation is beyond me.

Isn't child multilation

Some have to be done due to religious beliefs etc

The girls who get multilation In Africa is due to them having no sexual pleasure which is wrong

Be circumcised isn't child multilation

There is no medical justification for routine circumcision and religoon is no justification for anything. It's (usually) an unnecessary surgical procedure that causes a permanent change in the child's body, inflicts pain and, like all surgery, carries the risk of complications and infection. If an adull wants it done for cosmetic reasons, then that's sad but acceptable. Doing it to a child should be outlawed except when there's a specific medical issue.

All the males in my family have been circumcised and they have no lasting damage.

And it religion not religoon unless you have invented a new religoon where everyones foreskin's are intact

Typos happen to everyone. And the fact that the men in your family were fortunate doesn't alter the fact that there are others who aren't. Without a medical reason for the procedure, it's an unnecessary risk being forced on a child who lacks the ability to refuse.

Never have I seen or read about a case where male circumcised has gone wrong or been forced upon someone.

Unless you read the sun newspaper

You stick your opinions and I will stick to mine

What part of " it's done to children without their consent" isn't forced upon them?

All of it.

The procedure is done by a trained medical doctor

Not the local butcher

If it was "forced upon" I'm sure the police would get involved for child abuse

Like i said it's done for medical, religion, culture reasons

Nowadays there is hardly any "medical reason" to do it;

Religion is bollocks and nonsense.

"Cultural reasons" are no reason at all ;

FGM ( which I admit is far worse) is done for " cultural reasons "."

Your allowed your opinion, dose not mean I have to take any notice of your ramblings

P.S. Back to the OP's question

I prefer it without

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cotFit4funMan
over a year ago

Kettering


"Might be worth reading the link below.

My husband is circumcised so not completely against it on medical grounds, but it is not without risks. We have 3 boys and I certainly wouldn't do it to them, it's their body and their choice not mine to make.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe"

This link really sums it up... As far as im concerned it's inflicting unnecessary pain and mutilating a baby boy... Apart from occasional medical reasons there is no justification gor this procedure... Religious reasons are bollocks especially!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't care either way. If it's clean I'll put it in my mouth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ill_likeMan
over a year ago

Whitehaven

I was cut in my 30s and one partner said it was the same but different lol and told her friends lead to a few encounters for them to find out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top