Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol" Not everyone wants to meet a lot of people some prefer just one or two but that they can see frequently. Like everything on here It's preference  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We will take a quantity of quality any day thanks . Mostly we ignore profiles stating this . Can't stand the phrase . "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We will take a quantity of quality any day thanks . Mostly we ignore profiles stating this . Can't stand the phrase . " 
Pretentious. Up there with "don't want to shag the whole site".
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not entirely sure why it's often used unless it's meant to imply that the less frequently you have sex the better quality it will be. Which seems a tad odd to me because in general most things get better with practice. It could also mean that the fewer people you have sex with the better it will be which again seems a bit odd. " Or that the more you have it with the same people the more you get to understand and the better it gets | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol" Because people want to imply their have standards and, again by implication, this is rare in this site so they have to make it clear .... it shows more about their attitude to everyone else on here. We steer away too .... they are probably not the quality we are after. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol" Seldom appropriate to the men of fab, the women use it to explain that they only manage 5 or 6 men a day so the other 56 men just have to go without | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Statistically speaking, the more people you meet the better the chance of finding someone of quality...
If you meet once a year with one person, or couple, after masses of chat and socials, and it's a crap meet then it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy; you should choose carefully so meet less.
If you meet quantity you can select the quality ones from amongst them, as I do. but each to their own .... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality." Nice little dig there. Classy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy." Not ....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy." Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. " Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me. "We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too . And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet ."Maybe you are a little too "precious" then Gail. As another couple have said you are not the only one. And I was generalising from previous similar threads whereby people have said "quantity and quality". Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. " Damn, how dare someone accuse someone else of bear baiting other forum users, I thought it was only me who did that .... do what you want, but why have a dig at other people about what they do. Why does quality only mean you have higher standards .... look at it this way, we've been to clubs where the 'quality' people are so far Jo their own arse they only want other 'quality' people to play with. Why? Because that makes them feel better .... who is to say what quality is anyway? Is it the beautiful people? Is it those with a masters degree? We dont play often, and when we do, its when we click ... if we clicked with a hundred people one night and none the next, we'd still be the same people. Gosh, an I actually agreeing with some of my 'foes' here ... snobbery is alive and well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet ."blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity."The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous .... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity."Absolutely spot on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality over quantity people = avoid for us as in OUR experience we find these people vain, self obsessed and snobbish We enjoy our quality of quantity and have some fantastic playmates, as for some people who are very picky on this thread, seems you don't expect people to be fussy about you having no pics of the male, so we guess everyone who contacts you can't be fussy eh? "The old "no male pics" craic. Well, not that we have to defend ANYTHING that is or ISN'T on our profile but I have a very unique and identifiable body art so due to the fact that I earn money in a career that would not be conducive to "swinging" my (mr) photos are friends only. So I think that answers that little question quite nicely and kind of shits on your presumption
Are we picky? Hell yes!
Are we vain? No but we know we are both good looking people!
Snobbish? Well one persons view of snobbish can be different to another's so your opinion will be of absolutely no importance to us.
Primarily we are here to satisfy out sexual appetites and enhance out sex life, NOT people please, "fit in" or make people "like us" by saying anything other than what we think.
Do you HONESTLY think that we give two shits about what other people on an Internet forum think of us? Really?
We have no problem attracting the people we want from the people we want to pass. We go to clubs and do it, here just ups the chances of the odd passing quality coming in from the masses of quantity.
Some might find this controversial/offensive.
We don't really mind. They should be less precious. It's an Internet forum on a swinging site. People express their opinions. We expressed ours, you expressed yours, we aren't getting all het up about shit said on fab.
We have our standards, others have theirs. Great. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
my guess is that statement holds true to everyone who uses these site the bit about only wanting to fuck people who turn them on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ...."I've had sex wearing my clothes, had some ripped off, thrown 'em on the floor with wild abandonment & casually laid them over a chair. All spontaneous & no penises were kept waiting in the process
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ...."To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not express an opinion without criticising others directly? Although I have been accused of doing this, I always ask it as a question as no-one really knows what my opinion on anything is. It is, after all, and internet forum and who cares. We can air any opinion we want to. My beanstalk view is, for someone who doesn't care what others think, you are spending a lot of time justifying your view ...." Justification? No, ex inaction of my viewpoint. And time wise? I am lucky enough not to have to work much, I get bored, the forums are a distraction when I'm pottering around. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Some might find this controversial/offensive. " I personally don't find your opinions either controversial or offensive. I just think it's possible to express an opinion without deliberately trying to offend people or wind them up (as the little at the end of your post suggested you were trying to do).
A little thinking before you type goes a very long way. Unless you're the kind of person who just sees usernames and not the people behind them - in which case I guess that's why you don't care about hurting people with words. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
"Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality  But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Quality over quantity people = avoid for us as in OUR experience we find these people vain, self obsessed and snobbish We enjoy our quality of quantity and have some fantastic playmates, as for some people who are very picky on this thread, seems you don't expect people to be fussy about you having no pics of the male, so we guess everyone who contacts you can't be fussy eh?
The old "no male pics" craic.
Well, not that we have to defend ANYTHING that is or ISN'T on our profile but I have a very unique and identifiable body art so due to the fact that I earn money in a career that would not be conducive to "swinging" my (mr) photos are friends only.
So I think that answers that little question quite nicely and kind of shits on your presumption
Are we picky? Hell yes!
Are we vain? No but we know we are both good looking people!
Snobbish? Well one persons view of snobbish can be different to another's so your opinion will be of absolutely no importance to us.
Primarily we are here to satisfy out sexual appetites and enhance out sex life, NOT people please, "fit in" or make people "like us" by saying anything other than what we think.
Do you HONESTLY think that we give two shits about what other people on an Internet forum think of us? Really?
We have no problem attracting the people we want from the people we want to pass. We go to clubs and do it, here just ups the chances of the odd passing quality coming in from the masses of quantity.
Some might find this controversial/offensive.
We don't really mind. They should be less precious. It's an Internet forum on a swinging site. People express their opinions. We expressed ours, you expressed yours, we aren't getting all het up about shit said on fab.
We have our standards, others have theirs. Great."No presumption was made over the make not having pictures, just making the point people contacting you can't be that picky, no need to reply to any of our other observations as they were OUR experiences xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over. Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention. " It happens on every thread and will continue to do so I imagine for a long time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Some might find this controversial/offensive. I personally don't find your opinions either controversial or offensive. I just think it's possible to express an opinion without deliberately trying to offend people or wind them up (as the little at the end of your post suggested you were trying to do).
A little thinking before you type goes a very long way. Unless you're the kind of person who just sees usernames and not the people behind them - in which case I guess that's why you don't care about hurting people with words."Jesus are you bear baiting again. Behave yourself, you are starting to look silly with your presumptions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ... "So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal? You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Some might find this controversial/offensive. I personally don't find your opinions either controversial or offensive. I just think it's possible to express an opinion without deliberately trying to offend people or wind them up (as the little at the end of your post suggested you were trying to do).
A little thinking before you type goes a very long way. Unless you're the kind of person who just sees usernames and not the people behind them - in which case I guess that's why you don't care about hurting people with words.
Jesus are you bear baiting again. Behave yourself, you are starting to look silly with your presumptions."I'm not sure it's me that's 'baiting'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him."Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother .... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over. Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention. It happens on every thread and will continue to do so I imagine for a long time." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Some might find this controversial/offensive. I personally don't find your opinions either controversial or offensive. I just think it's possible to express an opinion without deliberately trying to offend people or wind them up (as the little at the end of your post suggested you were trying to do).
A little thinking before you type goes a very long way. Unless you're the kind of person who just sees usernames and not the people behind them - in which case I guess that's why you don't care about hurting people with words.
Jesus are you bear baiting again. Behave yourself, you are starting to look silly with your presumptions.
I'm not sure it's me that's 'baiting'. "I'll have to second that ... from my experience of the posts of interrupted ... she doesn't bait, she says her own opinion. I don't always agree, but I respect it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"By FAR, its quality for us. We pick our meet ups VERY carefully and we are selective. Why? Because we have a great sex life together and we do this to enhance it. We are not interested in meeting people we A) are not attracted to and B) not into the same thing as us. Call us "picky, elitist, stuck up" and all these other wordings getting bandied about but the fact is we want what we want and we like what we like. We don't have to settle for anything other than the quality we look for as we aren't that desperate for sex that we will lower out standards of either what we physically and/or sexually enjoy. People who like quantity great, their choice. People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Agree/disagree, it's what we think "Agree | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ...."No I don't think it is. I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ... "No I don't mind you asking at all. So, if we choose from our "quality criteria" are all meet ups "successful/quality"? Sadly no, but we do have a high percentage of "successful/quality" meets. We put this down to as you said chemistry and dynamics on the day. We do however have a system we use to ensure we have more quality/successful meet ups than less successful/non quality meet ups. Firstly when we contact people (this is very rare) or are contacted we look at the profile and read it. If it has little/limited info we often think it indicates (to us anyway) a lack of effort. If it has lots of info it peaks out interest. We then look at pics on profile if public. If we both like what we see/read then we send out a message we have copy and paste (saves time and says everything we want to say very well) its long and detailed. If we get a reply then we arrange a fem/fem phone chat (if couple or single fem) or fem/male (if looking for them). We can "usually" get a feel if there will be chemistry as we have a bit of craic on the phone (and despite being cast as the "villain of the peice" here we are very gregarious people socially but sexually we are "picky") and if so we then arrange a social drink. We go for a quick social drink if both parties like what they see/hear then we go ahead and arrange the sexual play. It works for us. Does this answer your question? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over. Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention. It happens on every thread and will continue to do so I imagine for a long time."god was never a truer word spoken in a forum | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios."What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Love the way these threads escalate.. "Me too .... helps the filters for sure | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Some might find this controversial/offensive. I personally don't find your opinions either controversial or offensive. I just think it's possible to express an opinion without deliberately trying to offend people or wind them up (as the little at the end of your post suggested you were trying to do).
A little thinking before you type goes a very long way. Unless you're the kind of person who just sees usernames and not the people behind them - in which case I guess that's why you don't care about hurting people with words.
Jesus are you bear baiting again. Behave yourself, you are starting to look silly with your presumptions.
I'm not sure it's me that's 'baiting'.
I'll have to second that ... from my experience of the posts of interrupted ... she doesn't bait, she says her own opinion. I don't always agree, but I respect it."Very true | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism"Sponteniety vs materialism? So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic? I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism
Sponteniety vs materialism?
So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic?
I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish."Are we redefining our definition of baiting here? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism
Sponteniety vs materialism?
So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic?
I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish.
Are we redefining our definition of baiting here?"Not at all you made a ridiculous statement and I wanted you to answer it. Good way of detracting from answering the question though that last post. Kind of tried to bypass looking stupid there, but don't worry I will always call out those that make rudiculous sweeping statements. So again you are saying that all people who fold their clothes instead of throwing them on the floor at meet ups are materialistic? Because that's what you implied? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism
Sponteniety vs materialism?
So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic?
I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish.
Are we redefining our definition of baiting here?
Not at all you made a ridiculous statement and I wanted you to answer it.
Good way of detracting from answering the question though that last post.
Kind of tried to bypass looking stupid there, but don't worry I will always call out those that make rudiculous sweeping statements.
So again you are saying that all people who fold their clothes instead of throwing them on the floor at meet ups are materialistic? Because that's what you implied?" 
Fuck! You clearly have to much time on your hands | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism
Sponteniety vs materialism?
So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic?
I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish.
Are we redefining our definition of baiting here?
Not at all you made a ridiculous statement and I wanted you to answer it.
Good way of detracting from answering the question though that last post.
Kind of tried to bypass looking stupid there, but don't worry I will always call out those that make rudiculous sweeping statements.
So again you are saying that all people who fold their clothes instead of throwing them on the floor at meet ups are materialistic? Because that's what you implied?
Fuck! You clearly have to much time on your hands "It's my day off, but I was going to go into work anyway ... I am still going. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Love the way these threads escalate..
Me too .... helps the filters for sure"Fact. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... " Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker)." Okay .... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker)." You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Well since I think I am the only one to say on this thread that I want quantity and quality... yeah. I think it was a dig at me.
We said it too... A quantity of quality is our thing too .
And we are very happy with the quality of the people we meet .
blackwidows also said they prefer quality in their quantity. Tattwosome your post implies that those that go for quantity are desperate, and prepared to meet with people they find unattractive and generally lower their standards - this is what the dig is, it is purely judgement on your part because it is not necessarily the case. You can be a prolific fucker and still remain picky/maintain high standards in the way you describe it, it all depends on how much time and energy you have to invest in this activity.
The other reason we avoid picky people is that they are likely to fold their clothes during a meet, not something we have time for, we prefer to be spontaneous ....
To be honest I probably would fold my clothes, tailored suit jackets are quite expensive and dry clean only
Also, yes it would appear that that is what I (mr) was saying but if people interpret something I say one way or another that is something I have no power over.
Internet foruming is non personal, there is no personal interaction and therefore usually the words can/are/will be either misconstrued, taken personally when they are often not, and misread from the intention.
I often find people can have a conversation on an Internet forum and there be "aggravation" and have the exact same conversation in person without incident.
I stand by my first post on this subject, I will say the same again I'm sure the next time this subject comes up on here (they always recycle).
People may not agree with us, we may not agree with them, that's fine.
We aren't here to be "popular". We also rarely want to "fit in".
Ah, that's it ... we are talking about clothes here .... I shop at primark so I can't be quality But then my OH wouldn't be seen dead there .... but he doesn't wear tailored suits when swinging. Interestingly though, if you dont mind me asking .... when you've sought quality meets based on your own criteria, have they always been that? When swinging single I felt I was selective (not many meets now, so can't compare) but some of the meets I thought were going to be quality most certainly were not .... chemistry and dynamics on the day I put it down to ...
So he's into his clothes & wants to fold them, what's the big deal?
You're the one saying that shopping at Primark makes you not quality, not him.
Gawd, sense of irony is lost on some. Why do I bother ....
No I don't think it is.
I think he's hit a nerve & you're overreacting with all these scenarios.
What exactly would that nerve be? I am lost ..... I'll be honest here. As part of someone in my family's job we get a clothing allowance from designer shops ... around ten grand a year, but all I have got out of this is a pair of trainers because it's not what I am into. Can you explain what the nerve is please, since it was me who brought it up in the first place ... re: spontaneity and vs. Materialism
Sponteniety vs materialism?
So people who don't throw their clothes on the floor in wild abandonment are materialistic?
I don't think I've ever heard such a sweeping statement that is coupled with being utter rubbish.
Are we redefining our definition of baiting here?
Not at all you made a ridiculous statement and I wanted you to answer it.
Good way of detracting from answering the question though that last post.
Kind of tried to bypass looking stupid there, but don't worry I will always call out those that make rudiculous sweeping statements.
So again you are saying that all people who fold their clothes instead of throwing them on the floor at meet ups are materialistic? Because that's what you implied?
Fuck! You clearly have to much time on your hands "*too much time.... This clearly shows I do. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you????" Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because it's what lots of people prefer? Give me one quality shag over 5 crap ones every day! Which would you go for?" Id go for the 5 ( crap ) ones and make them better | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's only one thing for it. Mass orgy "As Harry hill says "fiiiiiiight" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off." Ahh, 'quality' again. Well, if belonging to your gang means talking down to people and trying to make them look stupid so you look better, good luck to you. As you don't know anything about me, but have to prove you are better with petty insults, I think that says more about you than it does me ... Good luck with your search | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... " I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. Ahh, 'quality' again. Well, if belonging to your gang means talking down to people and trying to make them look stupid so you look better, good luck to you. As you don't know anything about me, but have to prove you are better with petty insults, I think that says more about you than it does me ... Good luck with your search" Thank you, you too. It only took 50 odd messages for you to realise that people have different styles of selecting meet ups, different standards for meet ups and different ideas of quality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. Ahh, 'quality' again. Well, if belonging to your gang means talking down to people and trying to make them look stupid so you look better, good luck to you. As you don't know anything about me, but have to prove you are better with petty insults, I think that says more about you than it does me ... Good luck with your search Thank you, you too. It only took 50 odd messages for you to realise that people have different styles of selecting meet ups, different standards for meet ups and different ideas of quality." Funny thing is, I never contested that .... I have been on the scene long enough to know it. How many messages did it take you to insult just about everyone on the thread that disagreed with you or even suggested something you took as personal criticism ....?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me." I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol" Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. Ahh, 'quality' again. Well, if belonging to your gang means talking down to people and trying to make them look stupid so you look better, good luck to you. As you don't know anything about me, but have to prove you are better with petty insults, I think that says more about you than it does me ... Good luck with your search Thank you, you too. It only took 50 odd messages for you to realise that people have different styles of selecting meet ups, different standards for meet ups and different ideas of quality. Funny thing is, I never contested that .... I have been on the scene long enough to know it. How many messages did it take you to insult just about everyone on the thread that disagreed with you or even suggested something you took as personal criticism ....?? " I'm not sure I Insulted anyone? If I did they must be very precious and easily offended? Perhaps they shouldn't be on a forum where people will disagree in that case? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me." Its not me that gets it, it is a member of my family, its not a grant, its a sponsorship deal .... and I mentioned it because I have the option to partake of it, but choose not to. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy "OR it's actually what they want? Us as an example. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical "I am not having a go at anyone. Its the female speaking and I am not in a cage ... lovely to hear you are whispering very loudly about me to another poster, did you ever hear about PM's .... or you prefer to do this in public, why? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. Its not me that gets it, it is a member of my family, its not a grant, its a sponsorship deal .... and I mentioned it because I have the option to partake of it, but choose not to. " OR you mentioned it to make you sound "Soooooo non materialistic darliiiiing" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... Hmmm a "reasonable" attempt at backtracking from your "spontaneity vs materialism" statement but unfortunately far too weak for anyone of even marginal intelligence to see right through it and realise its just a twaddle-some attempt at internalising your words to make it appear you weren't generalising (and ergo looking silly). Ah bless, you were doing so well before that too. Have a "must try harder" sticker (it has a frog with its thumb up in my mind, and is yellow in colour, not the frog, that's green, I meant the sticker). You seem very concerned about me explaining myself .... do I know you???? Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. Ahh, 'quality' again. Well, if belonging to your gang means talking down to people and trying to make them look stupid so you look better, good luck to you. As you don't know anything about me, but have to prove you are better with petty insults, I think that says more about you than it does me ... Good luck with your search Thank you, you too. It only took 50 odd messages for you to realise that people have different styles of selecting meet ups, different standards for meet ups and different ideas of quality. Funny thing is, I never contested that .... I have been on the scene long enough to know it. How many messages did it take you to insult just about everyone on the thread that disagreed with you or even suggested something you took as personal criticism ....?? I'm not sure I Insulted anyone? If I did they must be very precious and easily offended? Perhaps they shouldn't be on a forum where people will disagree in that case? " Lots of people have left .... after you implied they have lower standards. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it is quantity, it is a sport and as it is all about the numbers "There's no bullshit with you shag. .it's why I like ya | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. Its not me that gets it, it is a member of my family, its not a grant, its a sponsorship deal .... and I mentioned it because I have the option to partake of it, but choose not to. OR you mentioned it to make you sound "Soooooo non materialistic darliiiiing" "Well, I suppose after the point being made about designer suits ... or whatever, obviously that was so important to say .... why? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it is quantity, it is a sport and as it is all about the numbers
There's no bullshit with you shag. .it's why I like ya "Ty pal and that is right. I like you as well and yeah its all about variety as it is the spice of life | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical
I am not having a go at anyone. Its the female speaking and I am not in a cage ... lovely to hear you are whispering very loudly about me to another poster, did you ever hear about PM's .... or you prefer to do this in public, why?"It's a PUBLIC forum. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Simple. I've said nothing here against user policy. You seem to be one of those "poke the animals" types, but this animal has sharp teeth and won't be forum vultured. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical
I am not having a go at anyone. Its the female speaking and I am not in a cage ... lovely to hear you are whispering very loudly about me to another poster, did you ever hear about PM's .... or you prefer to do this in public, why?
It's a PUBLIC forum. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Simple.
I've said nothing here against user policy.
You seem to be one of those "poke the animals" types, but this animal has sharp teeth and won't be forum vultured.
"I have no idea what a poke the animal type is, but you are sure showing your teeth. Thing is, you are making it very personal. I don't mind, as its obviously something you enjoy. Sounds like you don't want people here that don't follow your rules and if they don't like it, you resort to insults, its okay to have a difference of opinion, in fact I find is fascinating ... and the responses it gets. First you moan about me saying I am going to skulk off, then you tell me to go .... sadly I have to go into work. So, I am going to skulk off because hog told me to | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example."Okay Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity, Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it is quantity, it is a sport and as it is all about the numbers
There's no bullshit with you shag. .it's why I like ya Ty pal and that is right. I like you as well and yeah its all about variety as it is the spice of life "Absolutely good man | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up) "Strange viewpoint. But your entitled to think whatever goes on in your mind. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy "It's not on my profile but I am selective & choosy based on what I said way up there ^^ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical
I am not having a go at anyone. Its the female speaking and I am not in a cage ... lovely to hear you are whispering very loudly about me to another poster, did you ever hear about PM's .... or you prefer to do this in public, why?
It's a PUBLIC forum. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Simple.
I've said nothing here against user policy.
You seem to be one of those "poke the animals" types, but this animal has sharp teeth and won't be forum vultured.
I have no idea what a poke the animal type is, but you are sure showing your teeth. Thing is, you are making it very personal. I don't mind, as its obviously something you enjoy. Sounds like you don't want people here that don't follow your rules and if they don't like it, you resort to insults, its okay to have a difference of opinion, in fact I find is fascinating ... and the responses it gets. First you moan about me saying I am going to skulk off, then you tell me to go .... sadly I have to go into work. So, I am going to skulk off because hog told me to"To be fair you've been a bit weak in your replies for a while. Good coming out the gate but when your against the ropes, you curl up. Been interesting debating though. Enjoy work. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up) "Then that is wasting everyone's time. If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me it is quantity, it is a sport and as it is all about the numbers
There's no bullshit with you shag. .it's why I like ya Ty pal and that is right. I like you as well and yeah its all about variety as it is the spice of life
Absolutely good man " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off." You seem to have a thing about calling people silly and stupid. Just my opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps you read it wrong, or wanted to see something that wasn't. This is me: I am spontaneous in terms of sex ... don't have hard and fast rules as such (doesn't mean we meet loads) but I am also not materialistic. These two are not mutually exclusive ... they aren't necessarily connected .... they describe me, spontaneous and not materialistic .... so anyone who is materialist is not for me .... anyone who isn't spontaneous and plans things to the hilt isn't for me either .... I can use it as a filter as a way of screening out a meet that I don't think will be 'quality' .... I think mentioning that you get a grant of 10k a year for clothes is a little materialistic as well as ironic, given the other posts. But what do I know as irony is lost on me. I wouldn't rattle their cage mate, will end up in a circle of them passively aggressively having a go at you (whilst clearly not having a go at you) then they slope off after you call them out for making silly sweeping generalisations and being hypocritical
I am not having a go at anyone. Its the female speaking and I am not in a cage ... lovely to hear you are whispering very loudly about me to another poster, did you ever hear about PM's .... or you prefer to do this in public, why?
It's a PUBLIC forum. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Simple.
I've said nothing here against user policy.
You seem to be one of those "poke the animals" types, but this animal has sharp teeth and won't be forum vultured.
I have no idea what a poke the animal type is, but you are sure showing your teeth. Thing is, you are making it very personal. I don't mind, as its obviously something you enjoy. Sounds like you don't want people here that don't follow your rules and if they don't like it, you resort to insults, its okay to have a difference of opinion, in fact I find is fascinating ... and the responses it gets. First you moan about me saying I am going to skulk off, then you tell me to go .... sadly I have to go into work. So, I am going to skulk off because hog told me to
To be fair you've been a bit weak in your replies for a while. Good coming out the gate but when your against the ropes, you curl up.
Been interesting debating though. Enjoy work."I didn't realise it was a competition .... knock yourself out. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
"Lots of people get pissed off with people who say "quality over quantity" "PERHAPS" because they don't feel inwardly that they are what others consider quality? Maybe they are self conscious and have self image issues? We don't want to waste people's time and if aren't attracted will just say "not for us but thanks". We have found that when at clubs and we talk to couples who's female maybe are slightly more overweight or less "generally appealing" than miss they get a bit "catty", especially when their male partner starts to pay miss lots of compliments and attention. Not always the case but often. We are actually very sociable people, get along with "almost" anyone in person but we won't have sex with them and sometimes when we have been friendly to couples they take it as "come ons" and get shitty when we say no when they ask us to a play room. I think personally that (usually it is) women who realise they may not be as attractive as they would like to be generally bitch about couples that are confident enough in their appearance to put "quality over quantity". Just my opinion. Really don't care if anyone gets offended. I am entitled to my opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
"Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all. You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. You seem to have a thing about calling people silly and stupid. Just my opinion. "If they are silly and stupid (in our opinion) and the cap fits....... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because it's what lots of people prefer? Give me one quality shag over 5 crap ones every day! Which would you go for?" But how do you know who is going to be the "quality shag" so surely it's best to take what you can get?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"By FAR, its quality for us. We pick our meet ups VERY carefully and we are selective. Why? Because we have a great sex life together and we do this to enhance it. We are not interested in meeting people we A) are not attracted to and B) not into the same thing as us. Call us "picky, elitist, stuck up" and all these other wordings getting bandied about but the fact is we want what we want and we like what we like. We don't have to settle for anything other than the quality we look for as we aren't that desperate for sex that we will lower out standards of either what we physically and/or sexually enjoy. People who like quantity great, their choice. People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Agree/disagree, it's what we think "Totally with you on this one! It is and always will be QUALITY for us too! Stuck up is definetly not a definition of us! Couldnt meet more friendly, approachable people!! Picky - yeah that's me & so I should be. I prefer to have a physical attraction/sexual chemistry for me to sleep with anyone! I can't bring myself to even kiss someone I'm not attracted to! Not saying we are by any means gorgeous/good looking etc. There just has to be an attraction be it physical or mentally. Make me giggle and I'm probably thinking naughty things anyway! Call it whatever you want but standards is what I call it! Not prepared to have an sti for just a quick fumble! Happy fabbibg!! xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Thankfully no, you don't. I keep my social circle quite small. If you "can't" explain it its ok, just slope off looking quite silly and come back when you've given your "thinking cap" a dust off. You seem to have a thing about calling people silly and stupid. Just my opinion. "Putting others down is often a way of making ones self feel better | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
"Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!? The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine. Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic. We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life. We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in. We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want. I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us. So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc? If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on. There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people". | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people"."Applause ???? I'm not that in shape or anything special but I still want in shape good looking people with high standards because that's what I'm attracted to!! I'm sorry but I am the one who checks out anyone who's winked us - I check their veri's on their pages because I like to try understand their standards before speaking and possibly wasting theirs and our time! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people"."Lol, your not better at all. That's hilarious | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people".
Applause ????
I'm not that in shape or anything special but I still want in shape good looking people with high standards because that's what I'm attracted to!!
I'm sorry but I am the one who checks out anyone who's winked us - I check their veri's on their pages because I like to try understand their standards before speaking and possibly wasting theirs and our time! "It appears that there are a lot of people on this site judging by the "I'd avoid people who put quality over quantity" comments that think there is something wrong with this personal choice. We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with. Miss too finds even kissing a person she isn't attracted to impossible. We workout, we take pride in our appearance, we go on the sunbeds and look after ourselves so we want people who we are attracted to. We don't claim to be brad Pitt and angelina jolie, but we know we look good. Why? Because people tell us and compliment us and its nice that the hard work in the gym etc is noticed. Do we have an ego? No but we do feel confident enough to express our opinion on here. We don't "need" to try to get a shag by "fitting in" or agreeing with folk to get "likes" attention, we are both really confident and speak our minds. People may see this as arrogance? Well we can't help how people see anything. We are us. And we like us. And funnily enough so do many of the people we meet. Funnily enough a little back story. A guy on here who was critical and a bit snotty with us on some of our posts we actually bumped into at a club. The duplicitous little wretch was fawning all over miss like a puppy. "Oh your so beautiful, I only mess about and wind people up on the forums, I was just playing around, winding you guys up, teasing you". She actually told him (which is something I love about her as she says it like it is) that he was snivelling on to get a fuck, and clearly a coward as if he had any balls he would be the same as he was in the forums and stand up and have courage in his convictions and it showed his general lack of backbone! Funny how people change. With us we don't bullshit. We like what we like, we are who we are. Who we are in "forum life" is who we are. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people".
Lol, your not better at all. That's hilarious "Mate, you are the type of guy I guarantee it that comes on here sychophantically cosies up to the regulars and says what they all want to hear. You wouldn't say boo to a goose in the real world mate, hiding behind your keyboard spouting predicta-fluff. The fact is we like what we like. You'd be one of these clowns that if you saw miss at a club/social you'd be fawning all over her like a little puppy trying to get your dick wet. The simple matter is your a "craic for likes" hound who in the real world is just the same. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with. " 2%? That's an awful lot more than I would want to take my clothes off with... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with. 2%? That's an awful lot more than I would want to take my clothes off with..." Freedom of choice pet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with. 2%? That's an awful lot more than I would want to take my clothes off with... Freedom of choice pet." Yes, but you were the one who said that people who want quantity must have lower standards than you. If I wouldn't fuck as many as 2% of people on this site, that surely means that I have higher standards than yourself... pet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people".
Lol, your not better at all. That's hilarious
Mate, you are the type of guy I guarantee it that comes on here sychophantically cosies up to the regulars and says what they all want to hear.
You wouldn't say boo to a goose in the real world mate, hiding behind your keyboard spouting predicta-fluff.
The fact is we like what we like.
You'd be one of these clowns that if you saw miss at a club/social you'd be fawning all over her like a little puppy trying to get your dick wet.
The simple matter is your a "craic for likes" hound who in the real world is just the same."Lol no..far too skinny for me and does nowt for me so no thank you at all
And err...no...anyone who's met me will tell you I'm just the same
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people".
Applause ????
I'm not that in shape or anything special but I still want in shape good looking people with high standards because that's what I'm attracted to!!
I'm sorry but I am the one who checks out anyone who's winked us - I check their veri's on their pages because I like to try understand their standards before speaking and possibly wasting theirs and our time!
It appears that there are a lot of people on this site judging by the "I'd avoid people who put quality over quantity" comments that think there is something wrong with this personal choice.
We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with.
Miss too finds even kissing a person she isn't attracted to impossible. We workout, we take pride in our appearance, we go on the sunbeds and look after ourselves so we want people who we are attracted to.
We don't claim to be brad Pitt and angelina jolie, but we know we look good. Why? Because people tell us and compliment us and its nice that the hard work in the gym etc is noticed.
Do we have an ego? No but we do feel confident enough to express our opinion on here.
We don't "need" to try to get a shag by "fitting in" or agreeing with folk to get "likes" attention, we are both really confident and speak our minds.
People may see this as arrogance? Well we can't help how people see anything.
We are us. And we like us. And funnily enough so do many of the people we meet.
Funnily enough a little back story.
A guy on here who was critical and a bit snotty with us on some of our posts we actually bumped into at a club. The duplicitous little wretch was fawning all over miss like a puppy.
"Oh your so beautiful, I only mess about and wind people up on the forums, I was just playing around, winding you guys up, teasing you".
She actually told him (which is something I love about her as she says it like it is) that he was snivelling on to get a fuck, and clearly a coward as if he had any balls he would be the same as he was in the forums and stand up and have courage in his convictions and it showed his general lack of backbone!
Funny how people change. With us we don't bullshit.
We like what we like, we are who we are. Who we are in "forum life" is who we are.
"Absolutely!! I'd prefer someone honest who can stand and believe what they actually say instead of being a cinievling sneak who says anything just to get their leg over! Please have some standards people!! Believe it or not it's what people are attracted to!! (Unless u want filthy dirty sex in an alleyway - which was once put to us??) People says I'm too honest for my own good but I'm happy! Happy with the meets we've had. Which have been repetitive meets because we have held out for genuine classy people who have high standards like us. Believe it or not most people are a decent fuck but when u have quality repeatedly its a damn site better than just a fuck!! We have a great sex life and this is an added bonus occasionally. We aren't desperate and we will not lower our standards for anyone regardless of how much self confidence or worth they have!! Good luck to all  xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh my goodness is this STILL going on?! Kinky "Yeah it's my (mr) day off and have done all the cleaning tasks around the house, been to the gym so its been a bit slow in "real life" so Internet life has perked me up a bit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Yeah but if folk put 'I want to fuck the whole site' on their profile folk get snooty...so people keep their profiles the way they think folk want to see. Or a lot do anyhow, not all.
You see it on the profile critique threads. Folk get ripped into for sounding like they just want to fuck peolle and told how shit their profiles are and get given loads of generic shite to bung in instead...kind of a 'suit all' profile.
Yes but in your "billy....." Post you yourself are hypothesising and trying to insulate you know how people "billy" are thinking by what they put in their profiles!?
The fact is people on here are here for lots of reasons. Some genuine, some not so genuine.
Some people say what they think, others say what others to hear to gain popularity. Some even change their opinion if somebody they "like" comes in on a thread and has an opinion that differs from their original craic.
We are here to primarily have sex with people we are attracted to to fuel our already good sex life.
We do NOT want to waste people's time or our own with idle chat via inbox with those we are not interested in.
We have OUR standards. We will NOT lower them. Numbers mean nothing to us as we can just have great sex together anytime so additional people we bring into out sex life MUST be what we BOTH want.
I think there are a lot of people here who are sex mad and will fuck anyone. That's THEIR choice, I couldn't give two shits, because it doesn't affect us.
So why the hell are people losing their shit that others want good looking people etc?
If someone has a preference for one eyed hunchback types craic on.
There's just some goons on here who can't face the fact that "better looking/in shape" people want sex with "better looking/in shape people".
Applause ????
I'm not that in shape or anything special but I still want in shape good looking people with high standards because that's what I'm attracted to!!
I'm sorry but I am the one who checks out anyone who's winked us - I check their veri's on their pages because I like to try understand their standards before speaking and possibly wasting theirs and our time!
It appears that there are a lot of people on this site judging by the "I'd avoid people who put quality over quantity" comments that think there is something wrong with this personal choice.
We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with.
Miss too finds even kissing a person she isn't attracted to impossible. We workout, we take pride in our appearance, we go on the sunbeds and look after ourselves so we want people who we are attracted to.
We don't claim to be brad Pitt and angelina jolie, but we know we look good. Why? Because people tell us and compliment us and its nice that the hard work in the gym etc is noticed.
Do we have an ego? No but we do feel confident enough to express our opinion on here.
We don't "need" to try to get a shag by "fitting in" or agreeing with folk to get "likes" attention, we are both really confident and speak our minds.
People may see this as arrogance? Well we can't help how people see anything.
We are us. And we like us. And funnily enough so do many of the people we meet.
Funnily enough a little back story.
A guy on here who was critical and a bit snotty with us on some of our posts we actually bumped into at a club. The duplicitous little wretch was fawning all over miss like a puppy.
"Oh your so beautiful, I only mess about and wind people up on the forums, I was just playing around, winding you guys up, teasing you".
She actually told him (which is something I love about her as she says it like it is) that he was snivelling on to get a fuck, and clearly a coward as if he had any balls he would be the same as he was in the forums and stand up and have courage in his convictions and it showed his general lack of backbone!
Funny how people change. With us we don't bullshit.
We like what we like, we are who we are. Who we are in "forum life" is who we are.
Absolutely!!
I'd prefer someone honest who can stand and believe what they actually say instead of being a cinievling sneak who says anything just to get their leg over!
Please have some standards people!! Believe it or not it's what people are attracted to!! (Unless u want filthy dirty sex in an alleyway - which was once put to us??)
People says I'm too honest for my own good but I'm happy! Happy with the meets we've had. Which have been repetitive meets because we have held out for genuine classy people who have high standards like us. Believe it or not most people are a decent fuck but when u have quality repeatedly its a damn site better than just a fuck!!
We have a great sex life and this is an added bonus occasionally. We aren't desperate and we will not lower our standards for anyone regardless of how much self confidence or worth they have!!
Good luck to all xx"Boom, nailed it (pun intended). Have one of these on us | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Lots of people get pissed off with people who say "quality over quantity" "PERHAPS" because they don't feel inwardly that they are what others consider quality?
Maybe they are self conscious and have self image issues?
We don't want to waste people's time and if aren't attracted will just say "not for us but thanks".
We have found that when at clubs and we talk to couples who's female maybe are slightly more overweight or less "generally appealing" than miss they get a bit "catty", especially when their male partner starts to pay miss lots of compliments and attention.
Not always the case but often.
We are actually very sociable people, get along with "almost" anyone in person but we won't have sex with them and sometimes when we have been friendly to couples they take it as "come ons" and get shitty when we say no when they ask us to a play room.
I think personally that (usually it is) women who realise they may not be as attractive as they would like to be generally bitch about couples that are confident enough in their appearance to put "quality over quantity".
Just my opinion. Really don't care if anyone gets offended. I am entitled to my opinion."So either these women are insecure or their husbands prefer your partner? It's all banter to get to play .. you really shouldn't believe it or need to feel so much in competition with other couples. I think that is a very strange attitude to have to other couples. I never assume anyone would want anyone else over their partner .... nor would I try to second guess their relationship. Now about on those rare occasions when someone more authentically pleasing than your Mrs turns up? Does she get catty? Its quite easy to see who feels aloof and superior at a club or party and who enjoys the thrill of felling better than the others, or needs to feel better and belittle others to make themselves feel good or validated .... we prefer quality people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Lots of people get pissed off with people who say "quality over quantity" "PERHAPS" because they don't feel inwardly that they are what others consider quality?
Maybe they are self conscious and have self image issues?
We don't want to waste people's time and if aren't attracted will just say "not for us but thanks".
We have found that when at clubs and we talk to couples who's female maybe are slightly more overweight or less "generally appealing" than miss they get a bit "catty", especially when their male partner starts to pay miss lots of compliments and attention.
Not always the case but often.
We are actually very sociable people, get along with "almost" anyone in person but we won't have sex with them and sometimes when we have been friendly to couples they take it as "come ons" and get shitty when we say no when they ask us to a play room.
I think personally that (usually it is) women who realise they may not be as attractive as they would like to be generally bitch about couples that are confident enough in their appearance to put "quality over quantity".
Just my opinion. Really don't care if anyone gets offended. I am entitled to my opinion."And this statement is exactly why we pass profiles by which go on about quality over quantity . The belief that she is more attractive , and that guys pawn over her ! Have you ever thought that maybe she is just another human being and isn't more attractive to everyone ? Any guy preferring curves , or all manner of physical attributes may not think so . And for them their idea of quality would be entirely different . What if you attend a club which is full of the type of people you find attractive ? You go twice a week for a year and play a couple of times each visit . That's 208 meets in a year , but all with the quality of people you like . Wouldn't that be a quantity of quality ? Just the same as it is for us mingers who will supposedly play with anyone , but in our way we find each other equally as attractive . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That pretty much covers things i guess, some prefer quality over quantity and blah blah blah, I tell you something though, just about the points in my life i have thought to myself,, damb shes good and likely the best i have ever had, another drifts along and shows me i was wrong, Moral of my story is, its better off out of the bag than it is in "That is so true. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That pretty much covers things i guess, some prefer quality over quantity and blah blah blah, I tell you something though, just about the points in my life i have thought to myself,, damb shes good and likely the best i have ever had, another drifts along and shows me i was wrong, Moral of my story is, its better off out of the bag than it is in
That is so true. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We as a couple understand that there is probably only maybe 2% of users we would actually want to take our clothes off with. 2%? That's an awful lot more than I would want to take my clothes off with... Freedom of choice pet. Yes, but you were the one who said that people who want quantity must have lower standards than you. If I wouldn't fuck as many as 2% of people on this site, that surely means that I have higher standards than yourself... pet." Boom. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm hoping to meet a large quantity of quality people. The idea that it's either or and not both is a bit limiting, I think. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " Nothing wrong with lots of quality people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " 14 veris?? Not following. What criteria are you using to determine the quality of these veris and what is your definition of quality that leads you to suggest you're not too sure about the 'quality' that's on the site? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " I think there is if you are what they are looking for, it helps if youre able to travel, depending on what area you live and how much free time you have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Damn, how dare someone accuse someone else of bear baiting other forum users, I thought it was only me who did that .... do what you want, but why have a dig at other people about what they do. Why does quality only mean you have higher standards .... look at it this way, we've been to clubs where the 'quality' people are so far Jo their own arse they only want other 'quality' people to play with. Why? Because that makes them feel better .... who is to say what quality is anyway? Is it the beautiful people? Is it those with a masters degree? We dont play often, and when we do, its when we click ... if we clicked with a hundred people one night and none the next, we'd still be the same people. Gosh, an I actually agreeing with some of my 'foes' here ... snobbery is alive and well. " Exactly. 'Quality' is the people you click with, the people you are sexually attracted to. It's subjective. Someone may be quality to one person but not quality to another. I interpret that statement as meaning someone only plays with people they click with or are attracted to, as opposed to fucking for the sake of it. They are saying that if there is no one they want to play with then they will go without. That's happened to me a few times. But on others nights I've played with a number of men because I liked a number of men. If I like those men then to me they are quality. But if there are several on one night I'm getting quantity too. But I would still go without if I liked no one. Therefore quantity is of lower priory. If im lucky I'll have both. Mrs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " I'm sure it's possible to find 14 quality men on Fab amongst the thousands that are here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is that phrase used so much on here?? Lol Because it's often what people think others want to hear...makes them sound selective and choosy
OR it's actually what they want?
Us as an example.
Okay
Billy wrote in his profile 'I like quality and not quantity,
Billy really likes to have lots but he doesn't think that Jennifer would like that so he wrote what everyone else does because it makes him sound discerning
(There Might be certain parts of that I just made up)
Then that is wasting everyone's time.
If people stopped trying to 2nd guess what everyone was thinking & just said what they liked it would make fab life so much easier.
Lots of people get pissed off with people who say "quality over quantity" "PERHAPS" because they don't feel inwardly that they are what others consider quality?
Maybe they are self conscious and have self image issues?
We don't want to waste people's time and if aren't attracted will just say "not for us but thanks".
We have found that when at clubs and we talk to couples who's female maybe are slightly more overweight or less "generally appealing" than miss they get a bit "catty", especially when their male partner starts to pay miss lots of compliments and attention.
Not always the case but often.
We are actually very sociable people, get along with "almost" anyone in person but we won't have sex with them and sometimes when we have been friendly to couples they take it as "come ons" and get shitty when we say no when they ask us to a play room.
I think personally that (usually it is) women who realise they may not be as attractive as they would like to be generally bitch about couples that are confident enough in their appearance to put "quality over quantity".
Just my opinion. Really don't care if anyone gets offended. I am entitled to my opinion."Here we go...I'm actually impressed it took s long | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its a load of bullshit tbh. I see that phrase on profiles where they have more than 14 veris...... Theres definitely a lot of quantity on here not soo sure about quality " 14 is fine. More though and your a bit of a slag
Oh....hang on.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" People who say "we have quality AND quantity" we think they must have a lower definition of "QUALITY" than us as from our experience it is difficult to find quality. Nice little dig there. Classy. Hahaha what? You honestly believe you are THAT important that we singled YOU out? Get over yourself pet. No need to reply, we don't waste out time arguing with people who come on the forums looking for opportunities to "bear bait" users. Damn, how dare someone accuse someone else of bear baiting other forum users, I thought it was only me who did that .... do what you want, but why have a dig at other people about what they do. Why does quality only mean you have higher standards .... look at it this way, we've been to clubs where the 'quality' people are so far Jo their own arse they only want other 'quality' people to play with. Why? Because that makes them feel better .... who is to say what quality is anyway? Is it the beautiful people? Is it those with a masters degree? We dont play often, and when we do, its when we click ... if we clicked with a hundred people one night and none the next, we'd still be the same people. Gosh, an I actually agreeing with some of my 'foes' here ... snobbery is alive and well. Exactly. 'Quality' is the people you click with, the people you are sexually attracted to. It's subjective. Someone may be quality to one person but not quality to another. I interpret that statement as meaning someone only plays with people they click with or are attracted to, as opposed to fucking for the sake of it. They are saying that if there is no one they want to play with then they will go without. That's happened to me a few times. But on others nights I've played with a number of men because I liked a number of men. If I like those men then to me they are quality. But if there are several on one night I'm getting quantity too. But I would still go without if I liked no one. Therefore quantity is of lower priory. If im lucky I'll have both. Mrs" Well said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We prefer......biscuits. It's probably less likely to get you into "naughty step" for having an opinion. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
