FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Body type

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

none of the descriptions match me, i'm the athletic pregnant type but there's no option for that so i chose 'fabulous'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elma and ShaggyCouple
over a year ago

Bedworth

Anything too big?

We may be fatties but we're sure not things!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I consider myself curvy and I've plenty of full body pics that show the real me. Plus I put a new pic up daily. xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer? "

Because people have to pick from a limited range of size options on here. All of which are vague and open to interpretation. I am curvy. I am also podgy. To some I am large. Statistically speaking I am average. So I would say look at the pictures and make your own mind up. If people don't have enough pictures for you to decide on then move on. You might miss a corker but you'll avoid those who may not suit your preferences in the process.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're terrified at the prospect of accidentally meeting someone fat, then I'd suggest avoiding profiles which don't have clear body photos. It really is that easy.

There's no consistency because the terms available are subjective, and it's impossible to shoehorn the wide variety of body shapes and sizes out there in the world into six definitive categories.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

The options for body type will always be subjective. Im confident enough to go with curvy, if people wish to disagree they can't but it's not their opinion of me that matters

When meeting I have full body shots _iewable, so people can take me or leave me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Body options are limited & subjective to ones own interpretations.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer? "

It's how people perceive themselves i guess... i would class myself as big or ample or as the terminology says bbw.. but the men I have met have refused to accept my discription of myself saying I am not as big as I think I am.

If a person is more attracted to size 8-10 then they will find a woman who is a size 12 a big podgy...14-16 big.. and the 18+ size ladies huge... it's all how we each perceive each other and what piques our interest in that other person i guess.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Body options are limited & subjective to ones own interpretations."

Exactly this

A better choice of body options would help for men and women.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It isn't just women.

Men do the same.

As i dont feel there is a suitable description for my size..i simply put that i am 'obese' on my profile.

But wether or not folk choose to read that, is their problem, not mine.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope. There's no consistency. Go by the pics. It's the only way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anything too big?

We may be fatties but we're sure not things!"

Totally agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I (Mrs ) am a size 18 . To some that may be very large to others not . I didn't pick bbw as the term annoys me but I'd like to think our pictures show my body enough for people to judge for themselves

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"If you're terrified at the prospect of accidentally meeting someone fat, then I'd suggest avoiding profiles which don't have clear body photos. It really is that easy.

There's no consistency because the terms available are subjective, and it's impossible to shoehorn the wide variety of body shapes and sizes out there in the world into six definitive categories."

I'm not terrified of meeting anyone I just don't want to waste her time as much as my own. Surely it's as much in the lady's interest to ensure clarity. You have plenty of body shots and your figure is . It's not all about physique but there's a cut off, as there is for everyone. I'm sure my physique is not to everyone's taste but at least they can see what they are getting....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you're terrified at the prospect of accidentally meeting someone fat, then I'd suggest avoiding profiles which don't have clear body photos. It really is that easy.

There's no consistency because the terms available are subjective, and it's impossible to shoehorn the wide variety of body shapes and sizes out there in the world into six definitive categories.

I'm not terrified of meeting anyone I just don't want to waste her time as much as my own. Surely it's as much in the lady's interest to ensure clarity. You have plenty of body shots and your figure is . It's not all about physique but there's a cut off, as there is for everyone. I'm sure my physique is not to everyone's taste but at least they can see what they are getting...."

Avoid those with ambiguous photos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer? "

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I actually think this is an excellent question.....

No matter what the drop down menu offers us (which is subjective) it can be stated in our profile, our size ... our shape...it's also self confronting and painful if we want to be simething we are not.

Perhaps a body shape diagram choice may be the future of Fabs.

In my opinion some people are not comfortable with their body shape and prefer it to be altered to a more society acceptable image for the society they wish to enter into.

It's a criteria of belonging to our most desirable club as well as advertising a merchandise in a competitive market place. So presentation is key.

As a generalisation we expect food in a restaurant to be presented in a visually appealing way, purchasing a car to be in top condition or even going on holiday we want it to be as advertised .....so yes it would be easier if the package was accurately described to an acceptabile commonality, I agree.

I like like to present in the best light, being real yet not derogatively to my own body shape. I state my clothing size and my height is there to see and I have flattering body shots and I also have a naked body shot of my "largest bits" yet tastefully darken as there is an element of modesty in me .

This is enough for me..... I am not meat to market or a throughbread for sale yet I am promoting myself in the best light so I suppose to answer your question is between those two ends of the spectrum - is a very wide subjective zone .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!"

Well said FM .... wasnt his question also why aren't women clearer....

How are your eggs by the way ...

Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!

Well said FM .... wasnt his question also why aren't women clearer....

How are your eggs by the way ...

Xx"

Yes an in answer to the what aren't they clearer question

The simple answer is because it's their profile and the can present themselves on it how they wish

As others have said to the OP (and sane would applt to other people that take issue with how others run their profiles when they aren't to their taste) just avoid those profiles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!"

It's a reasonable suggestion, which I'll consider, although I won't be using the term 'fatties'. However it's somewhat subsidiary to the original issue. I don't really understand your last line, as it's clear thats what I'm TRYING to do...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exycouplemmmmCouple
over a year ago

Surrey

I'm a size 14 with wobbly bits. I'm describing myself as curvy. But, as others have said - some guys may describe me as fat (if their type is 8-10) others I'm slim and others I'm average.

I think what will help you OP is to specify 'no one over x size' in your profile (someone else has suggested this) That way we can all be clear and no ones time get wasted xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eryBigGirlWoman
over a year ago

East Yorkshire

The body type options are impossible to cover every option of body types. I'm a fat git and chose fabulous as it came after ample in the choices list. Some may interpret that as wrong but I'm certainly not trying to hide behind anything and am very clear in my profile that I'm big and have pics for people I'm looking to meet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!

Well said FM .... wasnt his question also why aren't women clearer....

How are your eggs by the way ...

Xx"

Unhatched as yet!

But the man claims to have some intelligence and the answer is obvious - in most cases it is because women are not comfortable publicly displaying what they are not showing ! Duh! Move on if they aren't clearly showing what you need to see and approve!

Ruby is by her own claims a big girl, and yet the op finds her hot (cos she is of course) and yet I am damn sure he might find someone else of her size, who was not hot, unattractive. As far as I can see his attraction is therefore entirely as subjective as the women he berates and he should put up or shut up!!

I don't normally comment on these threads as I have no ace to grind but on this one the hypocrisy really irritated me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer? "

I'm fat but, as others have said, I am not a thing, maybe be a little more careful I'm how you word your posts in future so as to not cause offence.

You claim to be athletic in your profile, I'd dispute that, in my eyes you are average, athletic is someone with definition in the midriff area, you don't have that looking at your pictures.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

Why aren't you? Just put 'no fatties' or 'no-one over size 12' on the first line of your profile and then you won't waste anyone's time by chatting up women who do not fit your preferences! As Ruby says if they don't have clear enough body pics for you to be sure, move on, YOU take responsibility for your choices!

It's a reasonable suggestion, which I'll consider, although I won't be using the term 'fatties'. However it's somewhat subsidiary to the original issue. I don't really understand your last line, as it's clear thats what I'm TRYING to do... "

No - you are trying to make other people responsible for your own subjectivity! If YOU cannot see what YOU need to see - move on. Loads of men do not have clear pics - and most who claim athletic are either overweight or so unfit they could not swim a length! I just avoid them and choose what I DO want, what I CAN see that I like.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I don't normally comment on these threads as I have no ace to grind but on this one the hypocrisy really irritated me. "

Actually I thought you'd just come on to be gratuitously insulting so you've achieved that. Congratulations...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

just ask them....

what size are you as I am not attracted to someone too big.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

From what I can gather, fabulous means big. Athletic can mean slim, skinny or built like a rugby player! And average or curvy can mean literally anything. Like a few others have said, peoples' self perception is likely to vary from how you see them, at least a little

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

I'm fat but, as others have said, I am not a thing, maybe be a little more careful I'm how you word your posts in future so as to not cause offence.

You claim to be athletic in your profile, I'd dispute that, in my eyes you are average, athletic is someone with definition in the midriff area, you don't have that looking at your pictures. "

I didn't intend any offence so I apologise for anyone who feels offended.

However the point is you can see what my physique is like so make your own interpretation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"I don't normally comment on these threads as I have no ace to grind but on this one the hypocrisy really irritated me.

Actually I thought you'd just come on to be gratuitously insulting so you've achieved that. Congratulations..."

Nope, that is never my style as all those who know me here will testify, so you are misinterpreting. My comment was authentic - I am rarely irritated by an attitude, but you managed it, so maybe some self reflection is in order at your end.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Weird not many men have posted on this post?

As a chick that has been slim..average ...curvy I agree with the OP..

Great if folk have clear pics that you can see size and body shape..but most larger women are not comfortable showing theres on pics...as I am not...all chicks have body issues no matter what size...but...there are pics that are done in the weird angles or have loads of filters on them making it extremely difficult to see what's what...and I'm sure the OP dosnt want to cause offence but chatting to a chick then finding out does larger than he thought?

Ps...guys do it too

Its all about preference

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Weird not many men have posted on this post?

As a chick that has been slim..average ...curvy I agree with the OP..

Great if folk have clear pics that you can see size and body shape..but most larger women are not comfortable showing theres on pics...as I am not...all chicks have body issues no matter what size...but...there are pics that are done in the weird angles or have loads of filters on them making it extremely difficult to see what's what...and I'm sure the OP dosnt want to cause offence but chatting to a chick then finding out does larger than he thought?

Ps...guys do it too

Its all about preference

"

Absolutely. Some guys like big girls. Thank God we don't all like the same. I also agree that women are perfectly entitled to run their profiles ANYWAY they want. However it can't be in anyone's interest for people to meet and then be surprised that either party's physique is not what they were expecting (not that it all comes down to that). That's all lol...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer?

I'm fat but, as others have said, I am not a thing, maybe be a little more careful I'm how you word your posts in future so as to not cause offence.

You claim to be athletic in your profile, I'd dispute that, in my eyes you are average, athletic is someone with definition in the midriff area, you don't have that looking at your pictures.

I didn't intend any offence so I apologise for anyone who feels offended.

However the point is you can see what my physique is like so make your own interpretation. "

I have, and you are average, not athletic. My interpretation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *jcmjcCouple
over a year ago

Newport

We put body type as average then put her dress size on the profile so people are clear as she's a curvy 10/12.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Weird not many men have posted on this post?

As a chick that has been slim..average ...curvy I agree with the OP..

Great if folk have clear pics that you can see size and body shape..but most larger women are not comfortable showing theres on pics...as I am not...all chicks have body issues no matter what size...but...there are pics that are done in the weird angles or have loads of filters on them making it extremely difficult to see what's what...and I'm sure the OP dosnt want to cause offence but chatting to a chick then finding out does larger than he thought?

Ps...guys do it too

Its all about preference

Absolutely. Some guys like big girls. Thank God we don't all like the same. I also agree that women are perfectly entitled to run their profiles ANYWAY they want. However it can't be in anyone's interest for people to meet and then be surprised that either party's physique is not what they were expecting (not that it all comes down to that). That's all lol..."

Exactly, nor cock size for instance - men are often obtuse if not downright deceptive about that. That is why I am clear on my profile that I will not tolerate deception, and always make sure I am clear myself. And yet aside from that it is still MY responsibility make sure someone fulfills my criteria before agreeing to meet them.

I prefer men to have clear normal perspective cock shots on their public profile therefore, it's so embarrassing to reject someone for being unsuitable later, so if they refuse to clarify or try to palm me off with 'I've never had any complaints', then I will simply thank them and move on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Weird not many men have posted on this post?

As a chick that has been slim..average ...curvy I agree with the OP..

Great if folk have clear pics that you can see size and body shape..but most larger women are not comfortable showing theres on pics...as I am not...all chicks have body issues no matter what size...but...there are pics that are done in the weird angles or have loads of filters on them making it extremely difficult to see what's what...and I'm sure the OP dosnt want to cause offence but chatting to a chick then finding out does larger than he thought?

Ps...guys do it too

Its all about preference

Absolutely. Some guys like big girls. Thank God we don't all like the same. I also agree that women are perfectly entitled to run their profiles ANYWAY they want. However it can't be in anyone's interest for people to meet and then be surprised that either party's physique is not what they were expecting (not that it all comes down to that). That's all lol..."

So then don't meet anyone where there's ambiguity....I've never looked at the way someone describes their body...i go by what i can see. I've never met someone and thought "bloody hell i wasn't expecting that! "....i don't understand why this is even an issue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There just seems to be no consistency in the use of terms 'curvy', 'ample' and 'fabulous' on women's profiles. It's not helped by the lack of clear body photos. Now whilst I'm not necessarily looking for stick thin (and many voluptuous - another undefined term - women are very sexy) anything too big just doesn't do it for me. I wouldn't want to waste anyone's time by misinterpreting their description of themselves so why aren't women clearer? "

I like curvy ladies, but I can see why you'd run into a big problem (pun intended) when meeting people or figuring out who to message.

You could try to ask for photo's (fully clothed!), ask them their dress size or maybe their BMI. Maybe you could explain that you like the slimmer lady, there's nothing wrong in that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I see it as being a little counterproductive to downplay your size. Although I've put large on my profile, I'm a size 22, I still have guys say I'm curvy and I have to stop them and explain that I'm actually fat. Yes, there are curves, but they're on my rolls of fat!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I happen to like slim to curvy so quite a broad body type to choose from.

I'm not bothered how they describe themselves as I'll be the judge of that when I see a picture of them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LUKCouple
over a year ago

Loughborough

We had no idea what to put in the checkbox for her.

She's a size 8-10 so we thought we should go with slim. But she also has curves, so maybe curvy. But she does pole fitness so has quite muscular arms and back, maybe we should go with athletic instead.

In the end we just went with average.

To be honest I don't think I've ever read the "Body Type" on a profile to gauge what their body type is, I just look at the pics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobs1Woman
over a year ago

Sussex


"I see it as being a little counterproductive to downplay your size. Although I've put large on my profile, I'm a size 22, I still have guys say I'm curvy and I have to stop them and explain that I'm actually fat. Yes, there are curves, but they're on my rolls of fat! "

I am also a 22 and make use of what I have... I have a whole variety of interest from men, from the body building type/young/the suited and booted. My profile is very too the point and it states e a fly what body type I am but I still find myself questioning myself at times about whether someone is genuinely interested in playing. For me personally I don't have a type, it is down to the way a person behaves and or carries themselves...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobs1Woman
over a year ago

Sussex

Excuse my spelling errors in the bath lmao

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Body size or shape isn't any sort of single influencing factor in wether I like a person or not. Even in terms of physical attraction. Yet quite often when I state this, I'm branded as desperate or not fussy. (Guess that goes with the territory of being a single guy in a way).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I see it as being a little counterproductive to downplay your size. Although I've put large on my profile, I'm a size 22, I still have guys say I'm curvy and I have to stop them and explain that I'm actually fat. Yes, there are curves, but they're on my rolls of fat!

I am also a 22 and make use of what I have... I have a whole variety of interest from men, from the body building type/young/the suited and booted. My profile is very too the point and it states e a fly what body type I am but I still find myself questioning myself at times about whether someone is genuinely interested in playing. For me personally I don't have a type, it is down to the way a person behaves and or carries themselves... "

I think the swinging community are more body positive and also, it's opened my eyes to how many guys do like larger girls! Dress size is subjective really as it depends how tall you are! I just checked out your profile and there's no way I'd put you in the large bracket!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobs1Woman
over a year ago

Sussex


"I see it as being a little counterproductive to downplay your size. Although I've put large on my profile, I'm a size 22, I still have guys say I'm curvy and I have to stop them and explain that I'm actually fat. Yes, there are curves, but they're on my rolls of fat!

I am also a 22 and make use of what I have... I have a whole variety of interest from men, from the body building type/young/the suited and booted. My profile is very too the point and it states e a fly what body type I am but I still find myself questioning myself at times about whether someone is genuinely interested in playing. For me personally I don't have a type, it is down to the way a person behaves and or carries themselves...

I think the swinging community are more body positive and also, it's opened my eyes to how many guys do like larger girls! Dress size is subjective really as it depends how tall you are! I just checked out your profile and there's no way I'd put you in the large bracket! "

Yes definitely a big girl and on the swinging scene for almost 10 years on another site... Thought I'd see what the hype was about on fab. Xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobs1Woman
over a year ago

Sussex

And BlueEyedGirl your profile is excellent... Your a pretty girl x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And BlueEyedGirl your profile is excellent... Your a pretty girl x"

Right back at you! X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top