Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?" No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. " True. I've had people demand face pics and location without even sending theirs. Now l just assume they are pic hunters. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, I find face pics are very useful in helping to identify the people you are meeting... just wandering round a pub asking everyone if they're here for a shag is very time consuming. Cal" That's just the charity tin guy! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, I find face pics are very useful in helping to identify the people you are meeting... just wandering round a pub asking everyone if they're here for a shag is very time consuming. Cal"  it is isn't it. We have started missing out the elderly ladies on the corner with a milk stout in the interests of efficiency. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. " What she said. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, I find face pics are very useful in helping to identify the people you are meeting... just wandering round a pub asking everyone if they're here for a shag is very time consuming. Cal" I just go for the ones that are d*unk. Beer goggles.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. True. I've had people demand face pics and location without even sending theirs. Now l just assume they are pic hunters." Newsflash - you don't have to comply with these demands!
If anyone gets funny about returning a face pic them leave them to it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. " Or it's a guy posing as a woman? No face back by return = warning bells! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes it is unreasonable, you send an unsolicitied face pic and demand a face pic in return, its a mild form of blackmail. Everyone has the right to refuse to send a face pic if they choose not to. If you do not like that move on" Blackmail? I don't quite think you understand what the means. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No it's not unreasonable. However if you want a face pic and they won't send one, you're not compatible. Or it's a guy posing as a woman? No face back by return = warning bells!" Women do it too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"wont meet without one so up to them " this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?" No, it's not unreasonable. However, they don't have to comply if they don't want to. Not everyone will send face pics. If someone chooses not to share a face pic, we wont continue chatting or meet them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? No, it's not unreasonable. However, they don't have to comply if they don't want to. Not everyone will send face pics. If someone chooses not to share a face pic, we wont continue chatting or meet them." Ditto. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?" I dont think so op,but everyone will have conflicting views.We like it when we get face pics early on and will happily return them. Miss | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I always send a forearm pic and never get one in return  "is this a fetish of yours ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sent someone a face pic and they replied with 'nice tits' "Silver linings. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi, I have to check face pic, where you live & what you do first to make sure we don't know each other due to my job! I need to know your genuine as well and not out for a quickie. After that I will share. Puts people off I know but my job is important to me "I think tats selfish actually so u feel u have the right to see who they are but not them see who you are?. That puts pple in a vulnerable position wouldn't u agree?. If ur job is that important maybe it's not the activity for u.  . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hi, I have to check face pic, where you live & what you do first to make sure we don't know each other due to my job! I need to know your genuine as well and not out for a quickie. After that I will share. Puts people off I know but my job is important to me
I think tats selfish actually so u feel u have the right to see who they are but not them see who you are?. That puts pple in a vulnerable position wouldn't u agree?. If ur job is that important maybe it's not the activity for u. ."No I don't feel I have a right to see them first, I just let who we are chatting with know that until I feel comfortable we won't do face pics. A few have chosen not to carry on chatting and that's fine! Most have been happy to chat and in the end we've shared. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sent someone a face pic and they replied with 'nice tits'
Silver linings."Eh  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?" Surely it depends on whether you just randomly sent a face-pic expecting one back, or were asked to do so. You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. Mr ddc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? Surely it depends on whether you just randomly sent a face-pic expecting one back, or were asked to do so. You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. Mr ddc" And l quote (sticky 'y' key accounted for) ''If you send a face pic first, and they reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?'' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I sent someone a face pic and they replied with 'nice tits'
Silver linings.
Eh "Use your brain. Silver linings in regards to you at least getting a compliment about something else. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
some do some don't | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? Surely it depends on whether you just randomly sent a face-pic expecting one back, or were asked to do so. You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. Mr ddc And l quote (sticky 'y' key accounted for) ''If you send a face pic first, and they reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?''" Surely if you think I'm too thick to understand the myriad array of letters you have typed, simply re-typing the same ones again, in an identical order, won't help me? Perhaps it isn't your face that's letting you down, but your attitude... 
Still, if it helps:
You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And it's nice to get one in the first message coz I'm not spending days back and fourth with a lovely penis avatar, for the keeper of said penis to end up looking like a shoe horn" This is nicely put | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?" No its not unreasonable OP . If someone turns down your request after seeing you best move on with no malice in your heart . The face picture dilemma doesn’t really exist if you know your genes mixed well and gave you a great looking face that you know on the whole lots of people find attractive . But it does for those of us who do not think we are all that attractive when it comes to our face . After all when someone blocks you after seeing your picture or says sorry your not my type what there really saying is your not good looking enough for my personal tastes . Which through not thought of the one saying it can effect the confidence of the other person and even hurt in some cases . The truth is a cruel bedfellow always has been and always will be I'd love to be able to have a face picture up as my profile picture or in my public picture's because by doing so it would stop all the awkwardness when it comes to picture exchange after a few messages . Because when I swap a picture to me I'm saying for the first time yes I do fancy you and yes id like to meet you. which means I have a small emotional interest in the out come of the picture exchange .expectation at that moment can lead to disappointment if my picture disappoints them and they no longer wish to explore the possibility of fun with me . Because I cant have a picture up for public to see I have been trying to remember to send a face picture to everyone I chat to but I often forget to do this because like I said earlier to me I'm just chatting forming a opinion on the other person as a person first sex partner second . A friend once said to me I need to start from the other way round look on then as a sex partner first and act accordingly IE make sure there is physical attraction first then see if I like them enough to want to play . And that approach makes sense its still cruel but that’s life in general. its just trying to reprogram my brain into that mind set and still keep my compassion for those I interact with intact that I worry about if I change my thought patterns on how to go about my dealing with others . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? Surely it depends on whether you just randomly sent a face-pic expecting one back, or were asked to do so. You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. Mr ddc And l quote (sticky 'y' key accounted for) ''If you send a face pic first, and they reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?'' Surely if you think I'm too thick to understand the myriad array of letters you have typed, simply re-typing the same ones again, in an identical order, won't help me? Perhaps it isn't your face that's letting you down, but your attitude...
Still, if it helps:
You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes."You consider one sentence to be a 'myriad?'. No my definition. Nothing is letting me down, if you won't meet because of my outlook, you've done me a favour. No compatibility. l suspect that most are pic hunters. lf someone responds with a message and they are eager to sort something out, it's unreasonable of me to want to know what their faces look like? Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...and the reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it? Surely it depends on whether you just randomly sent a face-pic expecting one back, or were asked to do so. You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes. Mr ddc And l quote (sticky 'y' key accounted for) ''If you send a face pic first, and they reply with interest, it's not unreasonable to require a face pic back to see it you fancy them, is it?'' Surely if you think I'm too thick to understand the myriad array of letters you have typed, simply re-typing the same ones again, in an identical order, won't help me? Perhaps it isn't your face that's letting you down, but your attitude...
Still, if it helps:
You can send us anything you like, but expecting us to respond only on your own terms is unreasonable, yes.
You consider one sentence to be a 'myriad?'. No my definition.
Nothing is letting me down, if you won't meet because of my outlook, you've done me a favour. No compatibility.
l suspect that most are pic hunters. lf someone responds with a message and they are eager to sort something out, it's unreasonable of me to want to know what their faces look like?
Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you?"Can you not comment on a forum topic when your profile is hidden then? Pic hunters are generally after naughty graphic pics, why the hell would they want a collection of face pics? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! " You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For me I just need to make sure it's not a pupils dad I'm chatting too...especially if they claim to be single and I know they aren't
"Teachers are very hot. No matter what lol. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"... I have to check face pic, where you live & what you do first to make sure we don't know each other due to my job!.. " Me too. We appear to have arrived at an impasse. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"With regard to your original post, you have voluntarily decided to send a face pic with your first message. This doesn't entitle you to one back even if they seem interested. If after a couple of messages they still haven't sent one and still seem interested then its not unreasonable to ask for one. If they don't want to send one then leave them to it. They may be hiding something or they may be totally genuine and dong things on their terms as are you. If the way they run their profile doesn't fit with the way you run yours then move on and find someone's who does. " i've yet to say l was entitled to one. Not having a face sent back puts me in the uncomfortable position. They like me but l don't know lf l totally like them. This is an unfair situation, and that's life but without a face pic no one is meeting me. Fin. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"With regard to your original post, you have voluntarily decided to send a face pic with your first message. This doesn't entitle you to one back even if they seem interested. If after a couple of messages they still haven't sent one and still seem interested then its not unreasonable to ask for one. If they don't want to send one then leave them to it. They may be hiding something or they may be totally genuine and dong things on their terms as are you. If the way they run their profile doesn't fit with the way you run yours then move on and find someone's who does. i've yet to say l was entitled to one. Not having a face sent back puts me in the uncomfortable position. They like me but l don't know lf l totally like them. This is an unfair situation, and that's life but without a face pic no one is meeting me. Fin." I never implied you did say you were entitled to one in return. If it makes you uncomfortable then don't send one with your first message. This is life on here unfortunately. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you?" Objectivity and visibility are not mutually exclusive: it's only hidden because we're not currently looking to meet, and I've been away. If someone were to demand to see your pic, and then refuse to show you theirs, that may be considered double-standards, but perhaps they have their reasons, and hence even that scenario is not 'unreasonable'. Just ask them. Ultimately it is your choice whether you choose to meet them or not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"With regard to your original post, you have voluntarily decided to send a face pic with your first message. This doesn't entitle you to one back even if they seem interested. If after a couple of messages they still haven't sent one and still seem interested then its not unreasonable to ask for one. If they don't want to send one then leave them to it. They may be hiding something or they may be totally genuine and dong things on their terms as are you. If the way they run their profile doesn't fit with the way you run yours then move on and find someone's who does. i've yet to say l was entitled to one. Not having a face sent back puts me in the uncomfortable position. They like me but l don't know lf l totally like them. This is an unfair situation, and that's life but without a face pic no one is meeting me. Fin. I never implied you did say you were entitled to one in return. If it makes you uncomfortable then don't send one with your first message. This is life on here unfortunately. " True x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also OP, as you are a site supporter, are you making use of the auto remove pic feature?" l am now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you? Objectivity and visibility are not mutually exclusive: it's only hidden because we're not currently looking to meet, and I've been away. If someone were to demand to see your pic, and then refuse to show you theirs, that may be considered double-standards, but perhaps they have their reasons, and hence even that scenario is not 'unreasonable'. Just ask them. Ultimately it is your choice whether you choose to meet them or not. " l agree. Thank you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. " But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it!" No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD" What's to say you meet someone socially who you fancy the pants off going by their pics but in reality, there is something about them that you don't find attractive face to face. I've met people socially who just didn't do it for me personality wise even though I found them attractive. Call me old fashioned but clicking mentally is just as important as fancying someone physically. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" l suspect that most are pic hunters. lf someone responds with a message and they are eager to sort something out, it's unreasonable of me to want to know what their faces look like? Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you?" You claim other people are pic hunters but it is you who demands a face pic not the other people. Says it all! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" l suspect that most are pic hunters. lf someone responds with a message and they are eager to sort something out, it's unreasonable of me to want to know what their faces look like? Your profile is hidden and you have no pic so you are hardy objective are you? You claim other people are pic hunters but it is you who demands a face pic not the other people. Says it all!" You are right. l demand to know what the person l could be having sex withs face looks like. Shoot me at dawn. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD What's to say you meet someone socially who you fancy the pants off going by their pics but in reality, there is something about them that you don't find attractive face to face. I've met people socially who just didn't do it for me personality wise even though I found them attractive. Call me old fashioned but clicking mentally is just as important as fancying someone physically. " There's every chance but it's a sex site, not blind date. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't think people would have a problem with returning a face picture assuming there's some mutual interest it shows people are genuine and on here for the right reasons I guess" Exactly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD What's to say you meet someone socially who you fancy the pants off going by their pics but in reality, there is something about them that you don't find attractive face to face. I've met people socially who just didn't do it for me personality wise even though I found them attractive. Call me old fashioned but clicking mentally is just as important as fancying someone physically. " Do a poll. Ask the girls here. 'Would you meet a guy if you've never seen his face and he won't send a pic?' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD What's to say you meet someone socially who you fancy the pants off going by their pics but in reality, there is something about them that you don't find attractive face to face. I've met people socially who just didn't do it for me personality wise even though I found them attractive. Call me old fashioned but clicking mentally is just as important as fancying someone physically. There's every chance but it's a sex site, not blind date." My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The quote above is sad but true. Physical attraction is all we have at our disposal on the Internet. There will always be someone more attractive and so people click onwards. I insist on a face pic before the conversation gets going as for me, there has to be some attraction. That's not to say I only go for beautiful people, on the contrary, I can feel somewhat out of their league if they are too attractive. For me, the face is simply the front door. The rest of the house, the important foundations are to be discovered behind it. I've decided to stop a conversation if I'm not physically attracted and had it done to me. I've also progressed a couple of platonic friendships with people that make me laugh. Be brave, expect to win some & lose some. There's nothing more unattractive than withholding a pic because if your 'job'. If you are that important or such a public figure, then back off. I don't want to be named in the papers for shagging a politician! You can comment all you like, it just gives your points less heft. Pic hunter come in all forms. But you voluntarily sent the fist face pic, they haven't "hunted" you for it! No but l get the feeling that they just want to talk sexual or something of that ilk. Especially after a few messages. To me, there is no logical reason. What if you meet someone for a social and they don't fancy you? That's setting yourself up for rejection, OR they are that arrogant that they think they are irresistible lol. The third option would be time wasters/fantasists etc. You seem to enjoy debating xD What's to say you meet someone socially who you fancy the pants off going by their pics but in reality, there is something about them that you don't find attractive face to face. I've met people socially who just didn't do it for me personality wise even though I found them attractive. Call me old fashioned but clicking mentally is just as important as fancying someone physically. There's every chance but it's a sex site, not blind date. My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. " Oh, l see. l misread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. " l usually have face pics public. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My exaple is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. " Nice chatting with you x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. l usually have face pics public. " I don't have issues with anyone that doesn't have face pics in public as I don't, I just choose not to message them as its too much hassle sometimes, as this thread adequately demonstrates! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. l usually have face pics public. I don't have issues with anyone that doesn't have face pics in public as I don't, I just choose not to message them as its too much hassle sometimes, as this thread adequately demonstrates! " l put my face pics public for you. xD Seems a fitting way to conclude the thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. l usually have face pics public. I don't have issues with anyone that doesn't have face pics in public as I don't, I just choose not to message them as its too much hassle sometimes, as this thread adequately demonstrates! l put my face pics public for you. xD Seems a fitting way to conclude the thread." Oh just for me? Thanks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My example is assuming you have exchanged face pics before a social meet hence why I said you could fancy the pants off them going by their pics but not click or feel comfortable taking it further face to face. I would never meet someone without seeing face pics but then, I never message guys who don't have public face pics and always attach mine with my first message. l usually have face pics public. I don't have issues with anyone that doesn't have face pics in public as I don't, I just choose not to message them as its too much hassle sometimes, as this thread adequately demonstrates! l put my face pics public for you. xD Seems a fitting way to conclude the thread. Oh just for me? Thanks "For you alone  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
