Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. " As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. " Yes but why do people think that lots of verifications equates to 'random faceless passionless fucks' ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. Yes but why do people think that lots of verifications equates to 'random faceless passionless fucks' ?" Previous threads criticising those who don't meet every week or fuck in clubs. And comments like "They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cos we actually get to meet and fuck not sit and dream or waste countless hours on the forums worrying what others are or maybe doing only saying like " So what's the threshold for being a time wasting forum dreamer? Anything less than 50? 30? 20? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " So well put! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " So somebody who has met a lot of people wouldn't want to meet and want you As an individual? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15]" When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. " I've had a lot of meets in my 4 years,they weren't random,faceless,passionless fucks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. I've had a lot of meets in my 4 years,they weren't random,faceless,passionless fucks. " People on this site are only able to compute 2 extremes of a situation. It's what makes me so amused in the forum and why i continue to contribute. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging?" No they aren't accurate. I have 4 verifications,1 from someone I met way before we joined here,1 from someone I met over a year ago,1 from a woman friend I haven't had sex with. Which leaves one recent one,and I've had a lot more sexual meets than 2 from here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " What makes you different to 'anyone'? You say meet you but aren't you a anyone at some point to somebody | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet." This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. " I have a few veris and have both a face and passion, when required. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging?" There's no set number for me - it's just what picture that number contributes to. 50 veris over a couple of years, all seem to be individual meets with women, great. 50 veris over a month, all seem to be individual meets with women, makes me think they have fuck all else going on in their life than meeting people for sex and that's deeply unattractive to me. 50 veris over 6 months, all from clubs, makes me think they are "lifestyle" swingers and that's not for me. I will judge the fuck out of anyone and everyone I want, in whatever way I want. You're damn right I want to feel special, and I'm getting what I want, so I'll stay here on this swinging site pleasing myself if that's ok with the people who make the rules. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. " Why justify it to people... .. what does it matter if someone has 100 play meets or social ones. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. Why justify it to people... .. what does it matter if someone has 100 play meets or social ones." Exactly. Nobody should have to justify anything and if others don't like the way we do things they don't have to meet us. But the attitudes of some on here seem to think they are law. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. " Why let it jar, just be happy doing your thing. People judge I judge I am judged In the grand scheme of life, who the fuck cares what random people on the internet think The second I do, I stop | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. " It shocked me to be honset with you. As I certainly didn't expect the reaction I did when I messaged him. I just said well if coming out for a drink with me is a hazard to your health then yeah u suppose I am a danger to mankind lol x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Removed by poster at 28/08/16 20:27:15] When I had a single profile on here. I was told by a single male I was a health hazard because I had a number of verifications. If he had taken the time to read them everyone apart from 1 from my boyfriend was a social meet. This is what jars with me, the way verifications are used to judge someone's behaviour. We've been verified by 41 people through 58 meets. Some of these people we probably spent 5 minutes chat chatting to at a party. We have met a grand total of 7 men privately through a Fab and 2 of them we didn't even have sex with. That's in 2 years! Nobody could possibly say we have a lot of meets. " Why do you care? Has someone said something to you - if so - just ignore them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " You've had 4 verifications in 5 weeks - that averages out at about 40 per year. Is that too many? In 3 years you'll have over 100 at that rate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " Agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging? There's no set number for me - it's just what picture that number contributes to. 50 veris over a couple of years, all seem to be individual meets with women, great. 50 veris over a month, all seem to be individual meets with women, makes me think they have fuck all else going on in their life than meeting people for sex and that's deeply unattractive to me. 50 veris over 6 months, all from clubs, makes me think they are "lifestyle" swingers and that's not for me. I will judge the fuck out of anyone and everyone I want, in whatever way I want. You're damn right I want to feel special, and I'm getting what I want, so I'll stay here on this swinging site pleasing myself if that's ok with the people who make the rules." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not judging people who've met "lots" (insert your own number here based on timescales, types of meet and lifestyle) of others. I'm just not looking to meet them. The OP asked why and I answered from my opinion. Some people have a different _iew,obviously, because we're a diverse group. But I don't understand why me not wanting to meet someone is seen as overly negative. They wouldn't want to meet me either. " Basically, there's not much point asking the question if you don't want the answer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. I've had a lot of meets in my 4 years,they weren't random,faceless,passionless fucks. People on this site are only able to compute 2 extremes of a situation. It's what makes me so amused in the forum and why i continue to contribute. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. I've had a lot of meets in my 4 years,they weren't random,faceless,passionless fucks. People on this site are only able to compute 2 extremes of a situation. It's what makes me so amused in the forum and why i continue to contribute. " The title of the thread in this case mentions "lots". Not a couple. Or a few. Or a few more than most. Or anything within the central part of the graph if anyone cared to plot the frequency distribution of verifications. But "lots". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " I ditto that. I find it puts me right off when I read loads of verifications | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Stupid...the whole verification process is stupid..." Because...? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. I ditto that. I find it puts me right off when I read loads of verifications " Lol 99% of guys on here will meet anyone, they so out number women that if they get a sniff of interest they go for it, none of us are special Being in here is about finding people to have NSA fun with, that's it! What or who they've done in the past makes no difference. What puts people off loads of verifications is there own self doubt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"don't let him get to you all. so what if you're not compatible with him?" You are mistaking toying with someone as letting him get to us | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. " NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either" I agree. That's exactly what I said. I was countering the comment mocking those who want to feel more than just another number. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either I agree. That's exactly what I said. I was countering the comment mocking those who want to feel more than just another number. " I would say you were just going from one extreme to the other and Nanna's post didn't come across as mocking you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either" Or passionless, I've had great mind blowing sex with a guy that was random and only once due to circumstances. And I've had shit sex with someone I've had a connection with chatted to for a while but physically weren't compatible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Stupid...the whole verification process is stupid..." You've been verified, surely as a single man on here that has helped you? If your referring to the written text well that's subjective as to whether it's stupid or not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either" Well said Of course it doesn't .... Every meet we have is designed to leave everyone involved feeling special , and we succeed . The meet and the play are why we swing . No more , no less . Anyone who thinks a meet with lifestyle swingers is without passion and feeling is wrong . It's all about the passion , eroticism , lust and carnal desire . Ok , so some want the pre meet build up , the drinks , the social , etc.... And that's cool for them . We just love unbridled sexual encounters and surprising as this may seem , the passion is often enhanced by not knowing much at all about those you play with , despite so many claiming that getting to know your meet first leads to better sex . Not for everyone it doesn't , especially us . Meets with those we have barely chatted to are invariably better than those we have chatted to for ages . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although a warm toilet seat in a public toilet is more comfortable, one always wonders who was there first..." Ok , it was us | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although a warm toilet seat in a public toilet is more comfortable, one always wonders who was there first... Ok , it was us " No doubt!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. I've had a lot of meets in my 4 years,they weren't random,faceless,passionless fucks. " Same here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although a warm toilet seat in a public toilet is more comfortable, one always wonders who was there first... Ok , it was us " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Although a warm toilet seat in a public toilet is more comfortable, one always wonders who was there first... Ok , it was us No doubt!! " And it was proper passionate and with meaning too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I rarely look but if I do and there were volumes of sex meets over a short time line, I would move on. I am put off my people who seem to live and breath swinging, it's like the oxygen they need. That for me is off putting. " I think the same, though it doesnt always put me off meeting people depends how many verifications and who they have met. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " So why are you on here then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging?" No such thing as too many for us - it's the content that matters. They reveal as much as the profile text and pics. And we wouldn't meet anyone not displaying veries, any more than we'd meet without seeing pics. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. So well put!" I have a fair few verifications. Not many to do with sexual engagement. Most of mine are from men and women that I have only talked to at clubs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thank you all for your contributions. How I'm interpreting the responses is that is sounds like the main reason people would be turned off a profile like ours, with a fair number of verifications, is because they think those verifications represent so many meets that they would not be special, and that the sex would be impersonal. The reality is that we've actually only met 7 men privately in 2 years, even though our veris state we have met 43 profiles. The men we have met privately we have enjoyed very special friendships with. How is it possible for us to have so many veris? Well we go to parties and we host parties. Simples. To the people who say 'don't worry about what others think'. No of course I'm not going to worry. It wasn't until I started chatting in the forums that I learnt some people don't like verifications, because my previous experience of Fab from attending parties was that verifications after every parties was the norm. I think I'm just more intrigued as to why people regard verification numbers as an accurate reflection on someone's approach, when it clearly is totally inaccurate. " I think in the event of mass verifications there are those who have them for multiple reasons but there are those who just live for the scene and shag their way through Fab (and it's their choice). But even if anyone chooses the latter - it's no more than their own business. As long as safety is a thing then fuck anyone else whether it's 1 meet or 100. Granted we're all different - but life is for living within the boundaries of whatever an individual deems as what is for them. Enjoy it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thank you all for your contributions. How I'm interpreting the responses is that is sounds like the main reason people would be turned off a profile like ours, with a fair number of verifications, is because they think those verifications represent so many meets that they would not be special, and that the sex would be impersonal. The reality is that we've actually only met 7 men privately in 2 years, even though our veris state we have met 43 profiles. The men we have met privately we have enjoyed very special friendships with. How is it possible for us to have so many veris? Well we go to parties and we host parties. Simples. To the people who say 'don't worry about what others think'. No of course I'm not going to worry. It wasn't until I started chatting in the forums that I learnt some people don't like verifications, because my previous experience of Fab from attending parties was that verifications after every parties was the norm. I think I'm just more intrigued as to why people regard verification numbers as an accurate reflection on someone's approach, when it clearly is totally inaccurate. " But literally no one has said it's all about that number. It's about what picture that number and their content contributes to. I sure get judged for my 2 hidden verifications and for having the temerity to like being made to feel special, just as much as any of the more prolific meeters claim to be judged for theirs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thank you all for your contributions. How I'm interpreting the responses is that is sounds like the main reason people would be turned off a profile like ours, with a fair number of verifications, is because they think those verifications represent so many meets that they would not be special, and that the sex would be impersonal. The reality is that we've actually only met 7 men privately in 2 years, even though our veris state we have met 43 profiles. The men we have met privately we have enjoyed very special friendships with. How is it possible for us to have so many veris? Well we go to parties and we host parties. Simples. To the people who say 'don't worry about what others think'. No of course I'm not going to worry. It wasn't until I started chatting in the forums that I learnt some people don't like verifications, because my previous experience of Fab from attending parties was that verifications after every parties was the norm. I think I'm just more intrigued as to why people regard verification numbers as an accurate reflection on someone's approach, when it clearly is totally inaccurate. But literally no one has said it's all about that number. It's about what picture that number and their content contributes to. I sure get judged for my 2 hidden verifications and for having the temerity to like being made to feel special, just as much as any of the more prolific meeters claim to be judged for theirs. " Ruby love your profile, people are always going to judge! Be it your looks your profile your verifications!! We can only be who we are and if others like them great if not it's their loss | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Thank you all for your contributions. How I'm interpreting the responses is that is sounds like the main reason people would be turned off a profile like ours, with a fair number of verifications, is because they think those verifications represent so many meets that they would not be special, and that the sex would be impersonal. The reality is that we've actually only met 7 men privately in 2 years, even though our veris state we have met 43 profiles. The men we have met privately we have enjoyed very special friendships with. How is it possible for us to have so many veris? Well we go to parties and we host parties. Simples. To the people who say 'don't worry about what others think'. No of course I'm not going to worry. It wasn't until I started chatting in the forums that I learnt some people don't like verifications, because my previous experience of Fab from attending parties was that verifications after every parties was the norm. I think I'm just more intrigued as to why people regard verification numbers as an accurate reflection on someone's approach, when it clearly is totally inaccurate. " Probably because there are some people who will look at a profile take it for face value & not see maybe the bigger picture when it comes to veris ~ Similar to those that believe all they read in the Daily Mail! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what would people class as a lot of veris? And do you read the veris first to see if they are social or play meets? We have 66 veris which seems quite high but then that is over 8 years and most or from socials we actually have 9 play meet veris over 8 years which is not a high number at all, but if you just looked at our summary you would think we get about a bit" It's subjective isn't it, what I think is high would be considered low by other's standards. My consideration isnt the tally per se, more how many they recieved in one day / one week & by whom. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what would people class as a lot of veris? And do you read the veris first to see if they are social or play meets? We have 66 veris which seems quite high but then that is over 8 years and most or from socials we actually have 9 play meet veris over 8 years which is not a high number at all, but if you just looked at our summary you would think we get about a bit It's subjective isn't it, what I think is high would be considered low by other's standards. My consideration isnt the tally per se, more how many they recieved in one day / one week & by whom." But would you read them veris? If you have been to a social you can easily get 10 in a day or 2 but none of them play meets so is it the number or the content as well? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. " Same for me I would also be looking for repeat meets so if they are just meeting people for one off enjoyment I'd wish them well but would not be interested in being another one off for them. It's just my personal preference. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging? There's no set number for me - it's just what picture that number contributes to. 50 veris over a couple of years, all seem to be individual meets with women, great. 50 veris over a month, all seem to be individual meets with women, makes me think they have fuck all else going on in their life than meeting people for sex and that's deeply unattractive to me. 50 veris over 6 months, all from clubs, makes me think they are "lifestyle" swingers and that's not for me. I will judge the fuck out of anyone and everyone I want, in whatever way I want. You're damn right I want to feel special, and I'm getting what I want, so I'll stay here on this swinging site pleasing myself if that's ok with the people who make the rules." well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what would people class as a lot of veris? And do you read the veris first to see if they are social or play meets? We have 66 veris which seems quite high but then that is over 8 years and most or from socials we actually have 9 play meet veris over 8 years which is not a high number at all, but if you just looked at our summary you would think we get about a bit It's subjective isn't it, what I think is high would be considered low by other's standards. My consideration isnt the tally per se, more how many they recieved in one day / one week & by whom. But would you read them veris? If you have been to a social you can easily get 10 in a day or 2 but none of them play meets so is it the number or the content as well?" I'd skim read them & make my mind up that way. I'd _iew multiple veris from a party / club in a different way then I'd _iew say 3 veris from 3 different meets in one day. Veris for me are part of the whole picture as to whether I'd meet someone or not. They're not the be all end all but they help give an indication into that persons preferences & style of meeting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. Same for me I would also be looking for repeat meets so if they are just meeting people for one off enjoyment I'd wish them well but would not be interested in being another one off for them. It's just my personal preference." So you feel that large numbers of veris means that that person/couple only do one-offs? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't be egotistical enough to flatter myself I'm special, this is nsa, and I'm just another fuck to the guys on here. I like veris, I like to use them as a quick judge of the person I'm interested in meeting. Are they good in bed? Are they experienced swingers, so less likely to be nervous and awkward? I know it's not an accurate gauge of someone but it seems to work well for me." Agreed - for me as single guy - its a simple check that they are real and not time wasters. The quantity of ver is can also be helpful - if they have had only one meet in 5 years - then implies they are unlikely to meet. The rest is meaningless | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"10 veri's or less - no condom. 20 veri's or less - wear 1 condom. 30 veri's or less - wear 2 condoms. Over 50 veri's - wear 3 condoms. Over 100 veri's - use a femidom and 3 condoms and spray genitals with "fabreeze car - dog scent removal anti bacterial spray". Over 500 veri's - full HAZ MAT handling suit. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. " So people who meet regualr with different people are just having random faceless passionless fucks? Interesting _iew | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"10 veri's or less - no condom. 20 veri's or less - wear 1 condom. 30 veri's or less - wear 2 condoms. Over 50 veri's - wear 3 condoms. Over 100 veri's - use a femidom and 3 condoms and spray genitals with "fabreeze car - dog scent removal anti bacterial spray". Over 500 veri's - full HAZ MAT handling suit. " Oh and if there's 100 veri's but 98 are socials..... move on!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I rarely look but if I do and there were volumes of sex meets over a short time line, I would move on. I am put off my people who seem to live and breath swinging, it's like the oxygen they need. That for me is off putting. " The same here for me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. Yes but why do people think that lots of verifications equates to 'random faceless passionless fucks' ? Previous threads criticising those who don't meet every week or fuck in clubs. And comments like "They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site." " But isn't that what your basically saying when you posted this "Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I rarely look but if I do and there were volumes of sex meets over a short time line, I would move on. I am put off my people who seem to live and breath swinging, it's like the oxygen they need. That for me is off putting. The same here for me " And me to be honest I've had loads of guys asking me to pull a sicky at work so I can meet them To me that just comes over as crass, like some people really do rearrange their life's to fit a meet in | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people." There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people." Well that's something I've often wondered too. For the sexually liberated (which I assume we all are) how many partners is too promiscuous? Surely it's normal to have multiple partners on the swing scene. For those who prefer one partner I would have thought a dating site would cater better for that. Either way numbers of verifications cannot be an accurate measure for numbers of partners. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. So people who meet regualr with different people are just having random faceless passionless fucks? Interesting _iew" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . " And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? " Yeah of course it should | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. As I've said countless times before, NSA has room for more than just random faceless passionless fucks. NSA doesn't have to mean a random faceless fuck either Well said Of course it doesn't .... Every meet we have is designed to leave everyone involved feeling special , and we succeed . The meet and the play are why we swing . No more , no less . Anyone who thinks a meet with lifestyle swingers is without passion and feeling is wrong . It's all about the passion , eroticism , lust and carnal desire . Ok , so some want the pre meet build up , the drinks , the social , etc.... And that's cool for them . We just love unbridled sexual encounters and surprising as this may seem , the passion is often enhanced by not knowing much at all about those you play with , despite so many claiming that getting to know your meet first leads to better sex . Not for everyone it doesn't , especially us . Meets with those we have barely chatted to are invariably better than those we have chatted to for ages . " I have to agree with most of what you say. We don't normally meet without chatting a bit beforehand, then meet for a drink with a _iew of playing the same night but it isn't on the same level as others do but the horniest most passionate meet was the one we had after putting a meet request up and meeting that person two hours after first talking with him. I also found that I didn't want repeat meets ( except for one ) as the excitement of the unknown wasn't there as much....but as you say, you can still get the passion , eroticism , lust and carnal desire from meets this way just as much as I am sure people get from meets from doing things their way | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Confucius say, a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock " And are you one of many keys wanting to open a shitty lock ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? " Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Confucius say, a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " Ah....swinging snobs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every body seems to be following the thread that I tried to delete due to the typo. What I asked in the other thread was, if too many verifications are a turn-off as it equates to too many meets, then what do people consider 'too many meets'? And if people on a swing site are that judgemental about numbers, are verifications an accurate way of judging?" think with all common sense if the person has a lot of sexual meets in a short space of time other than verifications of a social nature then in some minds it begs the question of whether to meet or not this can be are they to experience. For me ! Are the amount of meets in that short a time line safe ect ! We all have different sex drives and needs a.newbie may shock you and old hand with lots of meets may actually not be that experienced a lover ect it's each to our own and it's our own judgement of.the merits of.the meet if this makes sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. " Nobody has to put up with anything....people that do things differently will always exist. Some think that their way is the only way. Why bother taking any notice? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They want to feel special,which seems strange to me on a swinging,sex site. " It's not strange at all. I like to ensure whoever I am with feels special during the time we are together...be it someone I have just met at a club or someone I see regularly for long sessions. I have most of my veris published, because I feel they show that I am genuine and say a bit about me...they show me through other people's eyes and experiences, whereas my profile is my own words. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. Nobody has to put up with anything....people that do things differently will always exist. Some think that their way is the only way. Why bother taking any notice?" For the same reason as the multiple verified person whose wording I copied, who you stated your agreement with, has to put up with anything. All of this works both ways. I judge, everyone judges, why pretend you don't? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. Nobody has to put up with anything....people that do things differently will always exist. Some think that their way is the only way. Why bother taking any notice? For the same reason as the multiple verified person whose wording I copied, who you stated your agreement with, has to put up with anything. All of this works both ways. I judge, everyone judges, why pretend you don't? " It was a general question to both sides although i quoted you. I agree it works both ways. I don't think I've pretended i don't judge i just don't care what others think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. Nobody has to put up with anything....people that do things differently will always exist. Some think that their way is the only way. Why bother taking any notice? For the same reason as the multiple verified person whose wording I copied, who you stated your agreement with, has to put up with anything. All of this works both ways. I judge, everyone judges, why pretend you don't? " that always gets me aswell i just think full of shit when i see people onhere talking about not judging anyone get real everyone judges. its just different levels of judgement | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " and by saying 'the I want to feel special brigade' you're automatically judging the way others meet or can't you see that..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And these 'people who think they are better than' probably don't care they are considered so. I don't. Some people just love thinking others are thinking this and that about them, their preferred position is hard done by, on here and in real life. " ....exactly my point...but put more eloquently. I really don't see why they are so bothered. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. " We could go back and forth all day, our own personal experience is listed above and our own opinion of those rarely verified is this:- we garner if someone is worth pursuing for a meet based on the evidence in front of us, if unverified, verified but not showing, then we question why and generally move on, simple, but actually we meet lots of rarely verified & newbies, evidenced by our verifications, ahem see how useful they are? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. We could go back and forth all day, our own personal experience is listed above and our own opinion of those rarely verified is this:- we garner if someone is worth pursuing for a meet based on the evidence in front of us, if unverified, verified but not showing, then we question why and generally move on, simple, but actually we meet lots of rarely verified & newbies, evidenced by our verifications, ahem see how useful they are? " So, essentially, you use verifications as part of deciding whether you think you'll be compatible with someone? I don't see the problem in me or anyone else doing exactly the same thing then, and in explaining that process to someone (the OP of the thread) who asked how/why people take them into account. You're criticising someone for doing exactly what you do yourselves. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. We could go back and forth all day, our own personal experience is listed above and our own opinion of those rarely verified is this:- we garner if someone is worth pursuing for a meet based on the evidence in front of us, if unverified, verified but not showing, then we question why and generally move on, simple, but actually we meet lots of rarely verified & newbies, evidenced by our verifications, ahem see how useful they are? So, essentially, you use verifications as part of deciding whether you think you'll be compatible with someone? I don't see the problem in me or anyone else doing exactly the same thing then, and in explaining that process to someone (the OP of the thread) who asked how/why people take them into account. You're criticising someone for doing exactly what you do yourselves." Lol twisting our words, we don't decide to meet or not meet someone based on how MANY verifications they have! Clearly if you looked at our verifications you would see that and we refer you to the answer we gave previously, so no need to repeat ourselves, just read back, so the question that needs to be asked is thus:- why would you not meet someone with loads of verifications? After all we are going to show up, in our experience those with little verifications or hidden are very difficult to pin down to a meet, Note: IN OUR EXPERIENCE | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! and by saying 'the I want to feel special brigade' you're automatically judging the way others meet or can't you see that..... " Mmmm no this I quoted from a thread and seen on other threads and profiles, we don't judge, evidenced by our verifications | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does the OP ever read the verifications or does he just count them? ))))" No we don't count verifications, as numbers of verifications is not relevant to us. Yes we do read verifications if we are interested in someone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? " Most won't judge you, but many would not pursue you as they would wonder why your verifications are hidden, that's not a judgement on you, it's simply a matter of deciding if the pursuit is worth the effort and based on the evidence on the profile put in front of us, it's not based on how many verifications you have after all you've only been here 3 weeks! And before you start we are not making a judgement on you being here only 3 weeks!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I was really asking was why do some regard multiple verications as a representation of numbers of sexual partners ? I don't think people who display their veris look down on those who don't display their veris and vise versa. I'm certainly not looking down on anyone or thinking I'm better than anyone, or accusing anyone of thinking they're better than me. I'm just genuinely curious as to why it would be assumed that our multiple verifications mean that we have many meets, or the way we play is anonymous, or that we don't treat our partners as though they are special, or that we don't have regular partners. Because all that is untrue. Its true it doesn't matter, but I'm ever interested in what makes people tick, and come up with the conclusions they do." Just assumptions I guess. Faced with hundreds of profiles people need to make decisions on who they want to meet. But... people seem to assume that if someone doesn't want to meet someone with lots of verifications, that they are looking down on them. Perhaps they are just intimidated and don't have much experience. Someone that has a lot of verifications and lots of experience would surely want to meet someone with the same level of experience...? Would they want to meet little me who's only ever had sex with the lights off..........?! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Im not bothered if people are put off by me not showing them..though if they ask I might. I have loads of social veris which are very nice too. Im not fond of people meeting all those on my veris and vice versa. I like to keep it quiet and go about my business." I won't show mine either as I've had a bunny boiler stalk me from reading a veri trail and another male much the same thing (when I was previously on here) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And these 'people who think they are better than' probably don't care they are considered so. I don't. Some people just love thinking others are thinking this and that about them, their preferred position is hard done by, on here and in real life. " Yep when we first started using the forums we got ourselves in a twist. We were worried about how others perceived us, our style of swinging, both being bi, verifications etc. Feeling hard done by as you say. But we've had something of an epiphany and come out the other side of that angst and stopped giving a shit. Feeling better for it and the swinging is going our way a bit more lately. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I was really asking was why do some regard multiple verications as a representation of numbers of sexual partners ? I don't think people who display their veris look down on those who don't display their veris and vise versa. I'm certainly not looking down on anyone or thinking I'm better than anyone, or accusing anyone of thinking they're better than me. I'm just genuinely curious as to why it would be assumed that our multiple verifications mean that we have many meets, or the way we play is anonymous, or that we don't treat our partners as though they are special, or that we don't have regular partners. Because all that is untrue. Its true it doesn't matter, but I'm ever interested in what makes people tick, and come up with the conclusions they do. Just assumptions I guess. Faced with hundreds of profiles people need to make decisions on who they want to meet. But... people seem to assume that if someone doesn't want to meet someone with lots of verifications, that they are looking down on them. Perhaps they are just intimidated and don't have much experience. Someone that has a lot of verifications and lots of experience would surely want to meet someone with the same level of experience...? Would they want to meet little me who's only ever had sex with the lights off..........?!" We meet people of similar experience, more experience, less experience, no experience, in fact the amount of verifications has no bearing on who we meet as the amount of verifications has no bearing on whether we hit it off with the people and we all have fun and that is the whole point of the argument. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! " Exactly this When we see a profile that harks on about quality over quantity we just switch off . What on earth makes them write this ? Do they believe this makes them special ? All it does is make us think they must think they are all that , so us mere mortals who like a quantity of quality would be incompatible . Swinging for us is an opportunity to have lots of fun with lots of people , without being judged for what we enjoy . By all means use the site for whatever you like , but don't put yourself on a pedestal by claiming you are better than anyone else , because quite simply you're not ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And these 'people who think they are better than' probably don't care they are considered so. I don't. Some people just love thinking others are thinking this and that about them, their preferred position is hard done by, on here and in real life. Yep when we first started using the forums we got ourselves in a twist. We were worried about how others perceived us, our style of swinging, both being bi, verifications etc. Feeling hard done by as you say. But we've had something of an epiphany and come out the other side of that angst and stopped giving a shit. Feeling better for it and the swinging is going our way a bit more lately. " That's good to read Continue to have a blast | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because I want to meet someone who wants to meet me not just anyone. Difficult for me to feel wanted as an individual if I'm just to be the latest random. yep, same here " And me . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! Exactly this When we see a profile that harks on about quality over quantity we just switch off . What on earth makes them write this ? Do they believe this makes them special ? All it does is make us think they must think they are all that , so us mere mortals who like a quantity of quality would be incompatible . Swinging for us is an opportunity to have lots of fun with lots of people , without being judged for what we enjoy . By all means use the site for whatever you like , but don't put yourself on a pedestal by claiming you are better than anyone else , because quite simply you're not ! " Well said. We are here to have fun not massage people's ego's! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What I don't understand is the many people saying that their veri's are not all sex meets so don't judge them ( not just on this thread it has been said ) I say, we are on a swinging site where people look for sex with others so if they were all sex meets what does it matter? You are all enjoying yourself doing what you joined the site for. Reading between the lines ( I could be totally wrong of course ) but it seems that there is still a stigma of people having sex with many people. There certainly is , and on the few occasions that we have said we only have veris from sex meets , we do get a bit of abuse . As time goes by we get less bothered by this , and now don't really care . So much so we have decided to show our summary and to hell with the haters ! There is no doubt in our minds that we meet some of the nicest , non judgemental people through fab , and those who wish to judge us for meeting up as often as we do to have sex on a swinging site can do one . And those who judge me for not meeting very often or for having social meets or not displaying my verifications? Because they do, regularly - I see all the time that people who don't meet often are special snowflakes, timewasters, fakes, not swingers, attention seekers, shouldn't be here. Should they not also do one? Shouldn't it work both ways? Totally agree, each to there own etc etc I think what really gets on multiple verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are any better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "quality not quantity, we have a life outside of fab, I want to feel special" brigade who think they are better than us!! And what really gets on rarely verified fabbers nerves is that we don't think we are better than anyone else, yet we have to put up with the "we're proper swingers, you're just special snowflakes, you're looking for more than NSA, why are you on a swinging site, you don't even meet, you must be fake, what are you hiding" brigade who think they are better than us. " Do people really say that to you? Who the hell cares who other people meet You must have way to much time in your hands to go through peoples profiles and giving enough shits to send such messages | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |