FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Getting reprimanded for naming and shaming

Jump to newest
 

By *dtanya OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

gallowayshire

The good dabblers on here always get done for naming time wasters what gets done about them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

they should report to admin privately and block them, privacy laws prevent you from open discussion any further

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Naming and shaming will always be open to abuse and open the floodgates for angry folk who felt slighted because they didn't get a reply or who were rejected after a social meet - whats to stop them making up stuff about folk?

So I can see why this cannot happen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"they should report to admin privately and block them, privacy laws prevent you from open discussion any further"

It won't be covered by privacy laws

We had our pics stolen and I reported them.nothing was done .it was obvious ours was the real profile.

so I named the fake profile. Before anything had been done about the stolen pics we were threatened with a ban!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn


"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time."

A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.

A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?"

Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn


"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.

A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?

Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters ."

We all know time wasters will always exist so no point encouraging them by discussing them, so yeah a waste of time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.

A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?

Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters .

We all know time wasters will always exist so no point encouraging them by discussing them, so yeah a waste of time."

Yep , agree with that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top