FabSwingers.com forum: Is it wrong ?

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *adysueandneroCouple
over a year ago

witney

We don't think it's wrong. As long as everyone is a consenting adult do what you like is our opinion.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ill74Man
over a year ago

New forest area

What about playing with someone who wears glasses?!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can't see any problem with spicing up your sex lives. You do express some odd couplings but then at least your not narrow minded about things.

As long as all parties are consenting adults and you all have talked it though then what's the problem. It won't be everyone's choice but you will be told that here and get opinions, after all that's the idea of the forum.

Just because someones got a disability it does mean they don't think about sex (I know I do lol).

As for nuns it's not like you are going to be breaking into a convent and seeing if any nuns interested, well at least I hope not.

I think you are just asking to be dressed up as one. so in that case ain't that like others who like people to dress in nurses/ school uniform or sexy secretary for fun.

Maybe going to a graveyard as a nun might be a bit far

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

You know the answer really, don't you?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

Only danger I can see is what do you do once you have fullfilled those fantasies? Where does your next "buzz" come from?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If i like a girl with a disability etc i like for her. Not what ever disability she as.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"If i like a girl with a disability etc i like for her. Not what ever disability she as.

We would just like her a bit more if she had a disability .

A bit like if someone preferred blondes ....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"If i like a girl with a disability etc i like for her. Not what ever disability she as.

We would just like her a bit more if she had a disability .

A bit like if someone preferred blondes ....

Whatever floats your boat

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ervent_fervourMan
over a year ago

Halifax

I love your truly liberal non-PCishness.

Or rather, your non conformity.

Keep on truckin guys!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *encarolCouple
over a year ago

Tyneside

Nothing wrong with it at all

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

All of the above please,plus more

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

Yes it's wrong.

Happy to help

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is just a bucket list, no problem, go for it lol.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just have fun glos if every one consenting what does it matter...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

From some of your past posts i've seen, it sounds like you're just trying to think of extreme, or maybe taboo scenarios for the sake of it or for the shock factor.

Nothing wrong with playing with any on your list if you're doing it for the right reasons, but only you can answer that

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any thread started by you two adorable deviants entitled 'is it wrong?' is guaranteed to send a shiver down the spine

As others have said; consenting adults, each to their own and all that jazz.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ola.Woman
over a year ago

Just where I need to be.

It is not wrong if you and the other persons are wanting to do it. I just feel that if I were a dwarf, amputee it would be me having that condition rather than me as a person you would want to meet. Very much how some couples want a single female joining them as their sex toy rather than an equal.

I understand that you want new highs but where will the buzz stop.? We all want to try new experiences but only you will know if you are doing it for shock value or it is something that makes you feel excited. As long as you can be honest with yourself then it's not wrong.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I was an amputee and saw you two coming I'd run a mile...oh wait...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 18/03/16 16:16:07]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's all legal.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ighty1969Man
over a year ago

st helens

"I can't see any problem with spicing up your sex lives. You do express some odd couplings but then at least your not narrow minded about things.

Just because someones got a disability it does mean they don't think about sex (I know I do lol).

As for nuns it's not like you are going to be breaking into a convent and seeing if any nuns interested, well at least I hope not.

I think you are just asking to be dressed up as one. so in that case ain't that like others who like people to dress in nurses/ school uniform or sexy secretary for fun.

Maybe going to a graveyard as a nun might be a bit far

Wrong?. You are kidding. Problem is there isn't enough people like you. If there is I can't find them x

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ighty1969Man
over a year ago

st helens

"If I was an amputee and saw you two coming I'd run a mile...oh wait...

Very funny

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"As long as everyone is consenting I can't see how it is "wrong"."

What about cheating husbands?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is wrong for me. But you are not me so crack on

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ivemeyoursoulWoman
over a year ago

Easter just around the corner!

I feel a bit uncomfortable with it,not quite sure why to be honest. Maybe it's because it doesn't feel like you are seeing them as a person,just their differences.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I feel a bit uncomfortable with it,not quite sure why to be honest. Maybe it's because it doesn't feel like you are seeing them as a person,just their differences."

This

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've actually done 2 of them the sex with 2 or 3 in grave yard an best is hermaphrodite she was gorgeous in Scotland

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Perfect answer

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Like most have said, what you do is up to you. It doesn't matter what anyone says only you will decide whether you think it's wrong or not.

Personally, I've always thought having sex in a graveyard is wrong, as I feel it disrespect the dead, there's people from babies to the elderly that have just been buried with families mourning still, I know I'd be mortified if I found out someone had sex near my family members grave. But that's my opinion

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You say you're not looking to objectify people yet that's exactly what this is and using terminology which seeks to directly offend members of those communities at the same time.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "
It comes to something when disabled people are seen as a plaything and not an individual,if we were religious dwarf amputees we would block you before you could ask

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

nobody could ever say youre not open and up front about what you want - i love your posts - some make me

- some make me

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Can I see the photos as and when, please?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? It comes to something when disabled people are seen as a plaything and not an individual,if we were religious dwarf amputees we would block you before you could ask

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *irtydaddyfor youMan
over a year ago

corby

This week, I witnessed two girls with an amputee, giving him great pleasure, the poor man feels usesless because he thinks he looks useless, it was an act of kindness, to someone who thought he would never be able to face people and have sex again So everyone to their own pleasures

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *-4pleasureCouple
over a year ago

Belfast

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

Thoughts?

You're attention seekers.

Nothing wrong with that, but that's what you are.

That's all I have to say

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

go for it has long has everyone is happy with it you are all consenting adults

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

We think op is in danger of losing the "higher ground". Disgusting sexual deviants, if people could be arrested for their thoughts I for one would call the police. Threads like this only serve to encourage perverts and should be ripped down as soon as they are put up, but no that won't happen will it?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We think op is in danger of losing the "higher ground". Disgusting sexual deviants, if people could be arrested for their thoughts I for one would call the police. Threads like this only serve to encourage perverts and should be ripped down as soon as they are put up, but no that won't happen will it?"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

Just out of interest have you had much luck finding any nuns?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

Still here though isn't it? Obviously condoned.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ENDAROOSCouple
over a year ago

South West London / Surrey

Thoughts?

I think you post certain things to try and shock / offend people.

If you have to ask if something is wrong, you already really know the answer.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Graveyard dogging. If you think it;s acceptable, would you happily tell the loved ones of the person who's grave that you effectively desecrated about what you did? And what do you think their reaction would be?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

How are you not objectifying them?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ?

How are you not objectifying them?"

Yet still seen as acceptable thread. What a joke!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Only danger I can see is what do you do once you have fullfilled those fantasies? Where does your next "buzz" come from? "

I must admit that that is my thought, I do wonder how much sincerity is in these posts and how much is a desire to shock.

I'll be honest, considering some of the countless other posts the OP has made about what they get up to, if I was them I'd be worried that I was seeking out more and more extreme scenarios to get my kicks.

'spice up our sex lives' is a phrase that always raises eyebrows, even more so in this case. What's driving it and where will it end.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *exycouplemmmmCouple
over a year ago

Surrey

"Like most have said, what you do is up to you. It doesn't matter what anyone says only you will decide whether you think it's wrong or not.

I agree totally with this! Have some respect for the families. No one needs to know someone's been bonking on their loved ones grave!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion. "

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion. "

What because they aren't the reaction and attention the OP wants?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?"

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion. "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?"

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

What because they aren't the reaction and attention the OP wants?

But they are online, but I do see a reason for them to be unable to reply but I am sure they will be reading all comments.

Personally I think the post a from the OP over the last couple of days are being used as a shock factor, whether they are serious or just fantasies I do not know.

I think posters above have valid points about objectifying certain people due to disability, height etc but if all parties are consenting then it's not my, or anyone else's, place to judge what people do as long as it's legal.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Whys this thread still up? The general public can see the forums. Gives swingers a bad name.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves "

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

How long until they have fulfilled their "legal" fantasies and moved on to the next fantasy just to find the next buzz and stretch a little further? Very dangerous territory. I would hate to see inside their thoughts. Plus are these the thoughts and wants of one person or are both parties in agreeance? Usually one person in the relationship is stronger than the other.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves"

I know I know and I'm not saying I agree with either I'm just not sure why people are just jumping to the conclusion they are fucking in a actual grave rather than a patch of grass in the corner that's all

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mmm so turned on now! Off to watch some hermaphrodite porn!! Carry on guys

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Whys this thread still up?

Because it isn't against forum rules. If you want to question that you will need to do so through the CONTACT button to Admin themselves

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion. "

I'm not being nasty but they are not stupid they knew what reactions they would get when they posted it.

So ask yourself why they posted it?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

To the OP....I think you are starting threads like these to shock people to get a reaction more than you actually want to meet people.

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

I'm not being nasty but they are not stupid they knew what reactions they would get when they posted it.

So ask yourself why they posted it?"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy"

Oh well my brain must be fucked up then because when I read that I never thought for one minute people would fuck in actual graves

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy

Oh well my brain must be fucked up then because when I read that I never thought for one minute people would fuck in actual graves "

I assumed on not in

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy

Oh well my brain must be fucked up then because when I read that I never thought for one minute people would fuck in actual graves "

Your right it's not the actual graves but it's in the grave yard. And yes the graves and atmosphere are the attraction. They have said this before I'm not speaking on their behalf.

I presumed you were just asking to clarify not condoning xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There be back with another thread soon enough. I for one wont be reading anymore

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Attack the post not the poster please

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy

Oh well my brain must be fucked up then because when I read that I never thought for one minute people would fuck in actual graves

Your right it's not the actual graves but it's in the grave yard. And yes the graves and atmosphere are the attraction. They have said this before I'm not speaking on their behalf.

I presumed you were just asking to clarify not condoning xx"

Don't care what they do so long as its legal

We will all do things some will look down their noses at I'm certainly not in the position to condone others

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

" I assumed on not in"

OK stop picking on my typos

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not."

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

" I assumed on not in

OK stop picking on my typos

I hadn't realised it was a typo, have you not realised by now I sometime take things a little too literally

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not.

I think they have but this is like thread 4 in a few days and I think people have given up saying it tbh xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know that the OPs have gone away for this weekend and are without Internet access so won't be able to reply. I think some of the comments made are pretty nasty in my opinion.

Pretty nasty until you find them fucking on your loved ones grave! Jesus what is wrong you?

Are they actually fucking on graves or just in grave yards?

Like it makes a difference. Consecrated ground, respect and all that.

OK calm down I was only asking

You said 'till you find them fucking on your loved ones grave' but I couldn't see anywhere where they said they fucked on graves not sure why it's assumed they fuck in actual graves

If you fuck in a graveyard, you are going to be near to graves

Might as well fuck in a park if you are going to fuck on the grass nowhere near the graves. It;s a pretty reasonable assumption that graves feature in the fantasy

Oh well my brain must be fucked up then because when I read that I never thought for one minute people would fuck in actual graves

Your right it's not the actual graves but it's in the grave yard. And yes the graves and atmosphere are the attraction. They have said this before I'm not speaking on their behalf.

I presumed you were just asking to clarify not condoning xx

Don't care what they do so long as its legal

We will all do things some will look down their noses at I'm certainly not in the position to condone others "

By condone I mean approving. As in you were just asking you didn't give a view point xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

" I assumed on not in

OK stop picking on my typos

I hadn't realised it was a typo, have you not realised by now I sometime take things a little too literally

I didn't think they were turning up in wellies with a spade

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not.

I think they have but this is like thread 4 in a few days and I think people have given up saying it tbh xx"

I am not sure I saw any to be honest

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I think if a couple fucked in a graveyard and she became pregnant then they would have created life in the midst of death. I quite like that circle of lion king life idea.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not.

I think they have but this is like thread 4 in a few days and I think people have given up saying it tbh xx

I am not sure I saw any to be honest"

I think you're right. Quite thought provoking...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am just surprised so many people have not mentioned that you are objectifying people even if you say you are not.

I think they have but this is like thread 4 in a few days and I think people have given up saying it tbh xx

I am not sure I saw any to be honest"

Flicking back through it more seemed to find it funny than anything it was the 'visual turn ons'. I think that was the second.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some may find the OP desires distasteful but the only actual thing that maybe illegal would be the graveyard dogging. If it is done during the day times while funerals could be taking place it may fall foul of public decency laws and if at night would be trespass.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ivemeyoursoulWoman
over a year ago

Easter just around the corner!

"There be back with another thread soon enough. I for one wont be reading anymore

Bet you do

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think you're fucked up.

Meet me

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Maibe some should read the rules before posting.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ootall2920Man
over a year ago

Linlithgow

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iSTARessWoman
over a year ago

London

I usually love your posts OP but you are objectifying people. These are people with feelings. It's a horrible knowing that someone's only interest in you is that you're different.

Swinging and exhibitionism is clearly your drug. Yes if its all safe, sane, consensual and legal, theres no problem but concerned that you'll drift to seedier and darker pastures when the buzz subsides.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a funny thing on here...those who choose others based on looks or height or cock size or skin colour or dozens of other things..(and we ALL do it..have things we like and influence our choice of sexual partner) soon jump down the throats of others because the things that those people would like to try are outside the norms of this site...and let's face it...the norms of this site are pretty vanilla really.

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It's a funny thing on here...those who choose others based on looks or height or cock size or skin colour or dozens of other things..(and we ALL do it..have things we like and influence our choice of sexual partner) soon jump down the throats of others because the things that those people would like to try are outside the norms of this site...and let's face it...the norms of this site are pretty vanilla really.

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times."

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ighty1969Man
over a year ago

st helens

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times."

Well said

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

it seems to me you are not looking for new people to have fun with but are looking for minorities and people who are often marginalised by society and by wanting to meet them you are somehow doing them a favour? I know I haven't expressed that very well but It just seems a bit wrong to me

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability. "

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times."

If the OP was serious I would answer your post, but going by the other threads started and how they went, I am not sure they are serious anyway which makes it even worse for me

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *otgirl32Woman
over a year ago

Ashton Under Lyne

"Hey guys , it's us again !

So as some of you will be aware , we have reached the point of seeking new and exciting scenarios to keep the buzz going .

Amputees , hermaphrodites , dwarves , nuns , priests , graveyard dogging to name a few .

Our question is this .

Is it wrong to look for this kind of thing , purely for the sake of adding a bit of spice to our swinging lifestyle ?

Please don't think we are objectifying any of the above , it would be as much fun for them as us . And we certainly won't be coercing anyone to satisfy our desires .

Thoughts ? "

Of course it's NOT wrong. Some of your choices may not agree with others but who cares. Keep it up !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive? "

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

I am sexually attracted to people with blonde hair, that is my 'type' so to speak. If this blonde person that I was attracted to happened to be an autistic person who lived with dwarfism then I would not see a problem with it.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside."

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside."

Who mentioned novelty?

It's often seen on here that folk like certain mental traits in people

how many times do you see on here folk saying they're more attracted to a mind than a body?...They like humour or intelligence or the string quiet types etc etc and that's what does it for them...

When it comes to something that's seen as negative by some people, such as a mental disability suddenly it gets jumped on and isn't ok.

It's horrible that folk should be treat so differently than others and that people think it so wrong to actually find it attractive.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Who mentioned novelty?

It's often seen on here that folk like certain mental traits in people

how many times do you see on here folk saying they're more attracted to a mind than a body?...They like humour or intelligence or the string quiet types etc etc and that's what does it for them...

When it comes to something that's seen as negative by some people, such as a mental disability suddenly it gets jumped on and isn't ok.

It's horrible that folk should be treat so differently than others and that people think it so wrong to actually find it attractive."

Who mentioned novelty? It's in the first few lines of the OP's original post.

We're looking for something 'new and exciting'.

My mother is physically disabled, but mentally she has capacity. If someone was to even THINK about trying it on with her just because it was exciting to fuck a lady in a wheelchair, I would probably end up in prison for a very long time. Now if someone wanted to meet with her because she was intelligent and kind, then that would be a different situation.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside."

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too "

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

How can you not understand that this is wrong? You say that this site is too 'vanilla' and that anything 'out there' is jumped on. Well maybe they're just trying to be different for the sake of it? And you're defending them because you don't like conforming to social norms?

And yes they are seeking the person out solely for a trait, they are looking for dwarfs and hermaphrodites... these are not two a penny and they won't be able to be picky if they want to go through with this meet, it'll just be whosoever is available.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ot so innocent nowCouple
over a year ago

Chorley

"Whys this thread still up? The general public can see the forums. Gives swingers a bad name.

I didn't realise this.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Who mentioned novelty?

It's often seen on here that folk like certain mental traits in people

how many times do you see on here folk saying they're more attracted to a mind than a body?...They like humour or intelligence or the string quiet types etc etc and that's what does it for them...

When it comes to something that's seen as negative by some people, such as a mental disability suddenly it gets jumped on and isn't ok.

It's horrible that folk should be treat so differently than others and that people think it so wrong to actually find it attractive.

Who mentioned novelty? It's in the first few lines of the OP's original post.

We're looking for something 'new and exciting'.

Just re read it three times...the word novelty definately isn't in there..you just made that up.

And who knows..she may like to be objectified...many many people have that kink.

And ok...intelligence and kindness are ok to find attractive?

Just not other things that you yourself obviously see as negative...ok...cool...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Whys this thread still up? The general public can see the forums. Gives swingers a bad name.

I didn't realise this.

Yeah...they'll see that anyone that isn't 'normal' are thought of very differently on here and their differences shouldn't be found attractive...and that's a real shame.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Who mentioned novelty?

It's often seen on here that folk like certain mental traits in people

how many times do you see on here folk saying they're more attracted to a mind than a body?...They like humour or intelligence or the string quiet types etc etc and that's what does it for them...

When it comes to something that's seen as negative by some people, such as a mental disability suddenly it gets jumped on and isn't ok.

It's horrible that folk should be treat so differently than others and that people think it so wrong to actually find it attractive.

Who mentioned novelty? It's in the first few lines of the OP's original post.

We're looking for something 'new and exciting'.

Just re read it three times...the word novelty definately isn't in there..you just made that up.

And who knows..she may like to be objectified...many many people have that kink.

And ok...intelligence and kindness are ok to find attractive?

Just not other things that you yourself obviously see as negative...ok...cool...

The word novelty is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as something 'new and unusual'. The 21st word of the OP's original post is 'new'. Clearly your three re-reads weren't overly thorough.

Ok, I feel like we need to go back to basics.

Intelligence and kindness and attributes of somebody's personality, of which people can be attracted to.

Autism is a mental disability, you are born with it. Someone cannot choose to be autistic just to be more attractive to another individual. Their capacity to consent to sexual activity at times can be impeded by this condition.

I do not see autism as a negative thing, people with the condition live well and prosper. However I cannot fathom how you can defend the position that objectifying disabled people by their disability is ok?

Let's talk dementia, would it be ok if I wanted to fuck someone living with this condition purely because of the fact that I found them attractive?

Your arguments are unfounded, you're trying to single me out as the dictator of what is right and what is wrong, maybe you're the one that needs to re-assess your moral compass.

This site is all about discussing opinions and sharing situations that more vanilla people may never have come across. But when you talk that way about people with disabilities, I lost every shred of respect for you and your opinions.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ot so innocent nowCouple
over a year ago

Chorley

"Whys this thread still up? The general public can see the forums. Gives swingers a bad name.

I didn't realise this.

Yeah...they'll see that anyone that isn't 'normal' are thought of very differently on here and their differences shouldn't be found attractive...and that's a real shame."

I just meant that I didn't realise the general public could see all of the forum posts. I'll keep in mind which photo we use as our profile pic.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

I didn't see that.

Like you didn't see them publicly turn down a chap who was an amputee...so no..They wouldn't just take any offer because pickings were slim.

And I'm saying what I see...physical and mental features are held in high regard and sought after here all the time by almost everyone..

it comes to disability though and folk are outraged..to me it seems like the outraged ones are the ones who see the disablity as something that can't be found attractive in its self where as other stuff is ok.

fine to find tall a turn on...bad to find tiny a turn on.

Good to find intelligence a turn on..bad to find mental disability a turn on etc etc..

It's wrong...

Your either allowed to find mental and physical traits attractive or your not. You can't pick and choose

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

I didn't see that.

Like you didn't see them publicly turn down a chap who was an amputee...so no..They wouldn't just take any offer because pickings were slim.

And I'm saying what I see...physical and mental features are held in high regard and sought after here all the time by almost everyone..

fine to find tall a turn on...bad to find tiny a turn on.

Good to find intelligence a turn on..bad to find mental disability a turn on etc etc..

It's wrong...

Your either allowed to find mental and physical traits attractive or your not. You can't pick and choose "

Ok, let's finish this quickly.

You say you can't only like one extreme of a trait (although I'm very reluctant to combine intelligence and a mental disability under a single umbrella) then let's talk age.

It's ok for people to find someone old attractive, how about very very young.

No, it's not ok.

There are things that are taboo and not ok for a reason, to stop people being taken advantage of.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And furthermore you mentioned that people are 'outraged' that people with disabilities could be found attractive.

I would be the first the refute those claims, my mother has a disability - physical, and my father loved her for all of his life (and yes clearly sexually as they had me).

He did not have sex with her because she was disabled, he did not find her attractive OR unattractive because of her disability, that was a moot point.

Maybe he liked the colour of her hair, maybe he liked her intelligence, or maybe he just liked her great pair of tits.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

I didn't see that.

Like you didn't see them publicly turn down a chap who was an amputee...so no..They wouldn't just take any offer because pickings were slim.

And I'm saying what I see...physical and mental features are held in high regard and sought after here all the time by almost everyone..

fine to find tall a turn on...bad to find tiny a turn on.

Good to find intelligence a turn on..bad to find mental disability a turn on etc etc..

It's wrong...

Your either allowed to find mental and physical traits attractive or your not. You can't pick and choose

Ok, let's finish this quickly.

You say you can't only like one extreme of a trait (although I'm very reluctant to combine intelligence and a mental disability under a single umbrella) then let's talk age.

It's ok for people to find someone old attractive, how about very very young.

No, it's not ok.

There are things that are taboo and not ok for a reason, to stop people being taken advantage of. "

So now all people who are different mentally and physically need protecting? As in they're incapable of making their own choices? Just...wow

Some maybe...All. ..no way.

And what's wrong with being attracted to the very old? If they can make up their own mind...go for it I say..long as it's consenting.

kids I agree with you on..They don't have the maturity to make the right decisions.

You seem to think anyone with any kind of disability can't make their own either though.

I will never agree with you on the rest though as it just serves to make sure people continue to be treat differently

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And furthermore you mentioned that people are 'outraged' that people with disabilities could be found attractive.

I would be the first the refute those claims, my mother has a disability - physical, and my father loved her for all of his life (and yes clearly sexually as they had me).

He did not have sex with her because she was disabled, he did not find her attractive OR unattractive because of her disability, that was a moot point.

Maybe he liked the colour of her hair, maybe he liked her intelligence, or maybe he just liked her great pair of tits.

Intelligence hair colour and tits ..those are ok to lkke yeah?

Cool..just making notes here as to what features are ok and what aren't seeing as your the leading authority

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

I didn't see that.

Like you didn't see them publicly turn down a chap who was an amputee...so no..They wouldn't just take any offer because pickings were slim.

And I'm saying what I see...physical and mental features are held in high regard and sought after here all the time by almost everyone..

fine to find tall a turn on...bad to find tiny a turn on.

Good to find intelligence a turn on..bad to find mental disability a turn on etc etc..

It's wrong...

Your either allowed to find mental and physical traits attractive or your not. You can't pick and choose

Ok, let's finish this quickly.

You say you can't only like one extreme of a trait (although I'm very reluctant to combine intelligence and a mental disability under a single umbrella) then let's talk age.

It's ok for people to find someone old attractive, how about very very young.

No, it's not ok.

There are things that are taboo and not ok for a reason, to stop people being taken advantage of.

So now all people who are different mentally and physically need protecting? As in they're incapable of making their own choices? Just...wow

Some maybe...All. ..no way.

And what's wrong with being attracted to the very old? If they can make up their own mind...go for it I say..long as it's consenting.

kids I agree with you on..They don't have the maturity to make the right decisions.

You seem to think anyone with any kind of disability can't make their own either though.

I will never agree with you on the rest though as it just serves to make sure people continue to be treat differently "

Have I once in this entire discussion ever said that people are not allowed to make up their own decisions?

If a person with autism or dwarfism or the many other conditions we've discussed wants to have a meet based on someone finding their disability attractive, then I'm all for it.

What I'm worried about, is the people on here who may not have disclosed any mental or physical disabilities they have, who might be upset by being objectified by one of these threads.

There's being 'treated differently' and there's safeguarding. There are plenty of crazy people out there who prey on the less able, why make it easy for them?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And furthermore you mentioned that people are 'outraged' that people with disabilities could be found attractive.

I would be the first the refute those claims, my mother has a disability - physical, and my father loved her for all of his life (and yes clearly sexually as they had me).

He did not have sex with her because she was disabled, he did not find her attractive OR unattractive because of her disability, that was a moot point.

Maybe he liked the colour of her hair, maybe he liked her intelligence, or maybe he just liked her great pair of tits.

Intelligence hair colour and tits ..those are ok to lkke yeah?

Cool..just making notes here as to what features are ok and what aren't seeing as your the leading authority "

Hahahhahahaha you are absolutely ridiculous! Your responses are so childish, picking up on random things I've said instead of the tone and content of the message.

This is the second time you've made a dig at me (not counting the one on a different thread).

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

why can't someone be attracted to features such as dwarfism when blonde is ok?

People openly state they find intelligence attractive...why not say autism? Why can't that be an attractive feature?

It can be very closed minded in here at times.

There's a pretty big difference between hair colour and a mental/physical disability.

How about finding intelligence a turn on? People do...

Give me one reason autism can't be actively attractive?

Calling someone intelligent is perceived as a compliment, promoting good feelings between the two individuals. It is singling out a trait, but not objectifying them as 'solely intelligent'.

If I went up to an autistic person and said 'Ooh you're autistic that's a turn on', I am objectifying them solely by their disability. They cease to be an individual and become a tick box.

If however, a person with dwarfism or autism etc. was sought out for the novelty of it, for bragging rights or funny photographs... well that makes me a little sick inside.

Also...nobody mentioned bragging rights or funny photographs..those are things you seem to think folk would meet for...

It says more about you I think.

And again...nobody said solely for any reason...its just a reason amongst many.

Alot of posts here single out one particular trait..

Women asking for pics on thigh Thursday or posts on big boobies or big cock appriciation never go down this badly and they single out one feature.

Treat everyone the same. Seems very double standard not too

Bragging rights and funny photos were mentioned on the previous thread about meeting a dwarf. And trying to turn that comment round to on me to make me look bad? Pathetic.

I didn't see that.

Like you didn't see them publicly turn down a chap who was an amputee...so no..They wouldn't just take any offer because pickings were slim.

And I'm saying what I see...physical and mental features are held in high regard and sought after here all the time by almost everyone..

fine to find tall a turn on...bad to find tiny a turn on.

Good to find intelligence a turn on..bad to find mental disability a turn on etc etc..

It's wrong...

Your either allowed to find mental and physical traits attractive or your not. You can't pick and choose

Ok, let's finish this quickly.

You say you can't only like one extreme of a trait (although I'm very reluctant to combine intelligence and a mental disability under a single umbrella) then let's talk age.

It's ok for people to find someone old attractive, how about very very young.

No, it's not ok.

There are things that are taboo and not ok for a reason, to stop people being taken advantage of.

So now all people who are different mentally and physically need protecting? As in they're incapable of making their own choices? Just...wow

Some maybe...All. ..no way.

And what's wrong with being attracted to the very old? If they can make up their own mind...go for it I say..long as it's consenting.

kids I agree with you on..They don't have the maturity to make the right decisions.

You seem to think anyone with any kind of disability can't make their own either though.

I will never agree with you on the rest though as it just serves to make sure people continue to be treat differently

Have I once in this entire discussion ever said that people are not allowed to make up their own decisions?

If a person with autism or dwarfism or the many other conditions we've discussed wants to have a meet based on someone finding their disability attractive, then I'm all for it.

What I'm worried about, is the people on here who may not have disclosed any mental or physical disabilities they have, who might be upset by being objectified by one of these threads.

There's being 'treated differently' and there's safeguarding. There are plenty of crazy people out there who prey on the less able, why make it easy for them?"

You said they needed protecting..that to me suggests they can't make sound decisions themselves..that's how it sounds.

I have a physical disability I haven't disclosed! Not major but I have one none the less and that's why I'm arguing with you...because your making me feel different! Not the op..you..by suggesting I need protecting or that I could be objectified. It stinks...that's why I'm having a go.

I'm sure there are plenty others too..We don't read he forums and quietly weep if there's something we don't like...We speak up too.

Nobody is talking about making things easy for predators out there either. I'm sure some do prey on the more vulnerable..but nowhere have we mentioned bedding vulnerable people. Disabled is not vulnerable!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And furthermore you mentioned that people are 'outraged' that people with disabilities could be found attractive.

I would be the first the refute those claims, my mother has a disability - physical, and my father loved her for all of his life (and yes clearly sexually as they had me).

He did not have sex with her because she was disabled, he did not find her attractive OR unattractive because of her disability, that was a moot point.

Maybe he liked the colour of her hair, maybe he liked her intelligence, or maybe he just liked her great pair of tits.

Intelligence hair colour and tits ..those are ok to lkke yeah?

Cool..just making notes here as to what features are ok and what aren't seeing as your the leading authority

Hahahhahahaha you are absolutely ridiculous! Your responses are so childish, picking up on random things I've said instead of the tone and content of the message.

This is the second time you've made a dig at me (not counting the one on a different thread)."

So it's ridiculous to pick up on the actual words you use? I have to read between the lines?

Sorry...I don't work like that..I read what people say and talk in straight lines not round the houses and between the lines.

Anyhow..you've made me pretty upset and of everyone here..your the one that's made me feel shit and incapable. Cheers. I'm out