Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " False | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " False, I could never be rude and nasty to a woman unless horrendously provoked and verbally attacked and even then I am not sure I would | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it " This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am 'rude n nasty' to lots of guys here; I reply with, "no thanks"" of course you do you don't need anymore than you've got | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " I'm not rude and nasty to men . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " No we wouldn't, cos some just got bad personality traits in them and cant be nice lol. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's down to the individual if they are rude not the gender / supply demand ratio." I said that earlier beautiful x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " . I am not certain if the radio makes any difference . Successfull people do not resort to being rude or nasty as it is an indication of failure . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's down to the individual if they are rude not the gender / supply demand ratio. I said that earlier beautiful x " So you did | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Depends what you find rude. Had plenty of single women read messages and ignore them. Or delete before reading them. If you're sensitive you could find that rude. It is a bit rude but single women get lots of messages, so they naturally become more dismissive as they become more popular. And yes if the male female ratio changed the men would become the same " Yes i think so too but one things for sure we will never know! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No,they would say yes to every woman who messaged them. I think the term is "knee deep in clunge" " We perhaps need a volunteer to test this out! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " of cause not its nothing to do with ratios, some people are rude and nasty and some not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was asked by a guy at a social meet, did I enjoy being raped - I told him to fuck right off. " That is so rude of you. You do realise that you may have hurt his feelings, don't you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it " Agreed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it Agreed " Disagree lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it Agreed Disagree lol" Why disagree? I disagree with the fact that you're lumping every woman on the site into a "rude and nasty" category. To me, that's rather rude and nasty of you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm always polite even when the other person has been abusive after a thanks but no thanks just report and block don't need rude aggressive people on here. " Just occasionally | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it Agreed Disagree lol Why disagree? I disagree with the fact that you're lumping every woman on the site into a "rude and nasty" category. To me, that's rather rude and nasty of you." Apology for the alledged lumping but hey ho | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " I'm never rude to anyone on here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont get rude messages, I get arrogant men who think they are doing me a favour by offering them to myself. Us single fems can have 10 a penny and a revolving door if we wished. I just block and move on. " On here Yes. But out of fab no sexy young men approach me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? " The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont get rude messages, I get arrogant men who think they are doing me a favour by offering them to myself. Us single fems can have 10 a penny and a revolving door if we wished. I just block and move on. On here Yes. But out of fab no sexy young men approach me " I have the same problem lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"no because being rude or ignorant to a person is about that person and ratios don't come into it " This minus the emoticons | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! " Disappearing up their own arses magic, coming back NO | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! " The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1." Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx" Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd get a fuck of a lot more meets if I lived in the Birmingham area." So would I | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd get a fuck of a lot more meets if I lived in the Birmingham area." The guys from Norwich would be after you though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd get a fuck of a lot more meets if I lived in the Birmingham area. The guys from Norwich would be after you though " The ones I fancy, (and say they fancy me), are not in Norwich, sadly | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont get rude messages, I get arrogant men who think they are doing me a favour by offering them to myself. Us single fems can have 10 a penny and a revolving door if we wished. I just block and move on. On here Yes. But out of fab no sexy young men approach me I have the same problem lol" I don't know how to deal with it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont get rude messages, I get arrogant men who think they are doing me a favour by offering them to myself. Us single fems can have 10 a penny and a revolving door if we wished. I just block and move on. On here Yes. But out of fab no sexy young men approach me I have the same problem lol I don't know how to deal with it " Well i grin and bear it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences." Single males don't have any preferences do they | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. Single males don't have any preferences do they " Er, "their" preferences refers to both the men and the women | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. Single males don't have any preferences do they Er, "their" preferences refers to both the men and the women " So how would that affect the ratios? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Single males don't have any preferences do they " Thankfully not all men are just after a random spunk dump. And to answer the OP's question: if the ratios changed, the men and women who acted like twats would still act like twats, those who are polite and happy would remain the same, but the amount of messages/meets/sex would change. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. Single males don't have any preferences do they Er, "their" preferences refers to both the men and the women So how would that affect the ratios?" Are you for real? Because to be a potential meet, for any individual, BOTH party's preferences need to be met. If the overall ratios are 10:1 but a woman won't meet smokers, that changes the ratio for possible meets for her, individually, (and alters the ratio for men who smoke vs men who don't smoke). However, if there are men that won't meet BBWs and the woman is a BBW, that also changes the ratios, for both of them. Examples 10 women, 4 won't meet smokers and 6 will. 100 men, 30 smokers and 70 non-smokers. The overall ratio is 10:1 men to women. Assuming all other preferences match, the ratio of potential meets for the women who will meet smokers (and for male smokers) is 6 women to 100 men. For the women who won't meet smokers (and for male non-smokers) the ratio is 4 women to 70 men. Taking the men's preferences into account will clearly change those ratios. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. Single males don't have any preferences do they Er, "their" preferences refers to both the men and the women So how would that affect the ratios? Are you for real? Because to be a potential meet, for any individual, BOTH party's preferences need to be met. If the overall ratios are 10:1 but a woman won't meet smokers, that changes the ratio for possible meets for her, individually, (and alters the ratio for men who smoke vs men who don't smoke). However, if there are men that won't meet BBWs and the woman is a BBW, that also changes the ratios, for both of them. Examples 10 women, 4 won't meet smokers and 6 will. 100 men, 30 smokers and 70 non-smokers. The overall ratio is 10:1 men to women. Assuming all other preferences match, the ratio of potential meets for the women who will meet smokers (and for male smokers) is 6 women to 100 men. For the women who won't meet smokers (and for male non-smokers) the ratio is 4 women to 70 men. Taking the men's preferences into account will clearly change those ratios." Am I for real? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If the ratio of women to men on fab was 3-1 men would be rude and nasty to women as women are to men now, because supply and demand would be in mans favour. Is this true or false? The ratio is actually 10/1 - I've done a few forum thread surveys over the years - more if you assume a number of female profiles are fake! If by 'rude and nasty' you mean narcissistic and overly demanding - then I'd suggest that, if many men didn't tell every woman on the site how gorgeous they are from the minute they join the site, then certain women wouldn't believe the bullshit and disappear up their own arses!! The last check I did in this area put the ratio at about 7:1. It seems to vary between about 7:1, maybe less in more remote areas, and around 15:1. Yeah you're right! I was given info for 60 areas/towns and it averaged out at 10/1 xx Of course, some of those will be cheating on partners, some smokers, some without profile pics, some black/white/asian/blue, some sub/Dom etc. So ratios of potential single male meets to any one individual woman could be dramatically different depending upon their preferences. Single males don't have any preferences do they Er, "their" preferences refers to both the men and the women So how would that affect the ratios? Are you for real? Because to be a potential meet, for any individual, BOTH party's preferences need to be met. If the overall ratios are 10:1 but a woman won't meet smokers, that changes the ratio for possible meets for her, individually, (and alters the ratio for men who smoke vs men who don't smoke). However, if there are men that won't meet BBWs and the woman is a BBW, that also changes the ratios, for both of them. Examples 10 women, 4 won't meet smokers and 6 will. 100 men, 30 smokers and 70 non-smokers. The overall ratio is 10:1 men to women. Assuming all other preferences match, the ratio of potential meets for the women who will meet smokers (and for male smokers) is 6 women to 100 men. For the women who won't meet smokers (and for male non-smokers) the ratio is 4 women to 70 men. Taking the men's preferences into account will clearly change those ratios. Am I for real? " Not sure? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |