Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap" its a frustrating place for guys couples and women try to just move on ,worse is yet to come xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap" Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The easiest course of action is to ignore or block. " or set filters...its all easily achievable.. I mostly always send a thanks back if they aren't interested..I'd say people who actually care about their profile(such as myself, dont want facing bans etc by sending abusive messages), I'll be fucked if I'm restarting my profile by calling someone a few names for rejecting me lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?" Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. " Forums good for discussions etc... not necessarily as a forms of comms | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. " If you think that the offenders actually read the forum you are sadly mistaken. You won't change the behaviour of the masses so why not change what you have control over? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really dislike it when people name people in their status and then write a negative forum post about them. It's about as close as you can get to naming and shaming without actually doing it. I'm honestly not sure it's much better than sending you the mean pm. At least they kept their shit private. -Courtney" naming N shaming on a status is already reportable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really dislike it when people name people in their status and then write a negative forum post about them. It's about as close as you can get to naming and shaming without actually doing it. I'm honestly not sure it's much better than sending you the mean pm. At least they kept their shit private. -Courtney" Oh dear, not nice at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Block all messages. Do the searches and messaging yourself. " Works for me. I am giggling a little at the fact he describes himself as respectful but ho hum, as someone else said, such drama, its just a storm in a D cup! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. If you think that the offenders actually read the forum you are sadly mistaken. You won't change the behaviour of the masses so why not change what you have control over?" I'm not one to moan about it. I just reply to who i want and ignore the rest. But the ones I ignore for almost a year still don't get the hint. So I can see why others feel the need to have a rant. Each to there own right! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not whinging just wondering, maybe Iam missing the point in "swingers chat"" But you know the answer, there are arsey people in life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not whinging just wondering, maybe Iam missing the point in "swingers chat"" And the response you are getting is also" swingers chat". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not whinging just wondering, maybe Iam missing the point in "swingers chat"" Chat about what u like. Im sick of other users moaning about what people write on forums. Freedom of fucking speech people.. like you have all just had on this thread. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see many people these days are using their message filters correctly to stop those they don't want from being able to message them, thus preventing 200 odd messages in the first place and making things much more manageable to deal with." To add I think messages you sent that aren't read should automatically be deleted within 24 hours this would also prevent so many issues unless of course you opt to save them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see many people these days are using their message filters correctly to stop those they don't want from being able to message them, thus preventing 200 odd messages in the first place and making things much more manageable to deal with. To add I think messages you sent that aren't read should automatically be deleted within 24 hours this would also prevent so many issues unless of course you opt to save them." But not everyone is on here everyday. I think they delete after around 2 weeks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just ignore & then have a bulk delete, much easier... " ^^^This is what I do as well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . " Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today.. " Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap" You are lucky that you only get abused AFTER you say "no thanks". I get 'abused in anticipation' because he knows for a fact that a "no thanks" will be off the moment he hits the send button One told me that I look like a "dog's dinner"; maybe he did not realise that the facial photographs are blurred and I don't actually look like that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today.. Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? " Nice idea However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today.. Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? Nice idea However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first" I would only ever have received one message then as that is the sum total of messages initiated by women to myself | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap" 200 a day.......every day? surely you jest | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?" Today, you are my favourite. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. " It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"200 a day.......every day? surely you jest" I get like 3-4 a day, so I'm now feeling totally inadequate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'." The amount of profiles claiming to be women who won't block is astounding | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"200 a day.......every day? surely you jest I get like 3-4 a day, so I'm now feeling totally inadequate." I'll send you one but I don't know what to say; xxx I got it: "wanna f**k?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But if you were so willing to delete the first message unread, why are you willing to open, what through experience you have gained, will be an abusive message? Can't you just report the member for multiple messaging or... ... now here's a wacky idea, control the messages you see, by (here goes...) blocking ALL single men from messaging first, and then only messaging those single guys you have decided suit your requirements, I believe once you message someone any filters you may have put in place are void for that contact.." Maybe they deleted a whole load of messages unread when they had a silly amount to deal with and couldn't get through them then maybe the second message came in when they had a pretty empty inbox so had more time to open it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'. The amount of profiles claiming to be women who won't block is astounding " I don't block unless someone messages me something offensive or they won't take no for an answer. I don't really see the point. But then I don't get 200million messages a day, so it's not exactly a problem for me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"200 a day.......every day? surely you jest I get like 3-4 a day, so I'm now feeling totally inadequate. I'll send you one but I don't know what to say; xxx I got it: "wanna f**k?" " Ooh, you are awful... but I like you! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today.. Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? Nice idea However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first" My response rate would be really really high. Doesn't change anything as my filters still stop people messaging I send messages, I don't go into the sent box afterwards I figure they'll all delete eventually but have over the years said on this forum it should be scrapped | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap" Increase filters, intermittent blocking all messages to control inbox and SPECIFIC wants for your perfect meet indicated in your profile. Next xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn't open it but the title was Your a fucking rude bitch so I got the jist" Haha, the irony of him calling you a fucking rude bitch!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have that problem anymore but used to get it on my old profile. Just report and ignore or you could always thank them for confirming your decision to not want to meet them as the correct one, that always goes down well " Lol that's what we do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |