Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
 )
So... I'm testing a method. As women infamously get a lot of messages, I've removed my message filters against single men and put a strict guideline of the type of men that I'm interested in. So, I'm going to test how many men follow a specific want or "type". After all, I might be pleasantly surprised.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on." Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're doomed.
I prefer optimistic to doomed "No, I think doomed is the best descriptor for this one. What a great idea, look forward to the results... I suspect single men won't come out of this one looking good! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? " 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc......" Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair?" Nooooo, don't do it!! Your faith in human nature will be tried to the limit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair?" No, leave it as it is. Newbies can't be blamed for their ignorance, this will show those up who should know better. IMO | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would message you as your gorgeous but I'm too young for you Haha, you need luck so here it is... Good luck "You can only see my naked body! I might have a face like a pit bull | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair? Nooooo, don't do it!! Your faith in human nature will be tried to the limit." My faith in human nature is already pushed to the limit  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair? Nooooo, don't do it!! Your faith in human nature will be tried to the limit. My faith in human nature is already pushed to the limit "Its a shame I'm away tomorrow to see the results of your experiment. I may have to use some 3G just to log in and check out this post. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Ooooh, good thinking. So, until 4pm tomorrow, it's open! Shall I remove the newbie/no public pics filters to make it totally fair? Nooooo, don't do it!! Your faith in human nature will be tried to the limit. My faith in human nature is already pushed to the limit "Restore your faith, saw your age limits and read no further | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's it going?" 7 since this post began... none fit at all | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's it going? 7 since this post began... none fit at all "You never know....how long is the experiment lol? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Us poor guys we are officially at the level of lab rats "Oh yes, you could see it like that........ Or the results might give you an insight into the crap that the ladies and couples have to deal with. It might help understand why those messages just get deleted and why you generally (though not specifically) struggle to get meets. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's it going? 7 since this post began... none fit at all
You never know....how long is the experiment lol?"24 hours! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just read your requirements and purely out of interest only how many do they need to fill. Is it 4/5 kinda thing or have to meet them all? Mr" Good question... I guess it's like a 4/5 thing, but I've started with the most important qualities. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc......"  Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream. "You are so sneaky | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream. "No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!! Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?"Entrapment!!
Oops giving my secrets away...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?"Nope, Batman reference | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?
Nope, Batman reference "Just give you an idea of what you may experience. Our profile used to be blocked to single guys, we decided that we would open it up and look for a single guy "Exceptional" with "Gravitas" as standard. 12 hours and 80 messages later; you wouldn't believe what passes for "Exceptional" on here and most haven't a clue what "Gravitas" means! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?
Nope, Batman reference
Just give you an idea of what you may experience. Our profile used to be blocked to single guys, we decided that we would open it up and look for a single guy "Exceptional" with "Gravitas" as standard. 12 hours and 80 messages later; you wouldn't believe what passes for "Exceptional" on here and most haven't a clue what "Gravitas" means!"It's wot u av on chips. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Us poor guys we are officially at the level of lab rats
Oh yes, you could see it like that........
Or the results might give you an insight into the crap that the ladies and couples have to deal with. It might help understand why those messages just get deleted and why you generally (though not specifically) struggle to get meets."I'm well aware of the crap everyone goes through on these kinds of sites and yes I agree women and couples get the lions share of that crap . My post was tongue in cheek hence the emoji but lets not kid ourselves if the ladies or couples on here where being used s part of a experiment by a guy or dare I say the dreaded Sydney institute it wouldn't go down well at all | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Us poor guys we are officially at the level of lab rats
Oh yes, you could see it like that........
Or the results might give you an insight into the crap that the ladies and couples have to deal with. It might help understand why those messages just get deleted and why you generally (though not specifically) struggle to get meets.
I'm well aware of the crap everyone goes through on these kinds of sites and yes I agree women and couples get the lions share of that crap .
My post was tongue in cheek hence the emoji but lets not kid ourselves if the ladies or couples on here where being used s part of a experiment by a guy or dare I say the dreaded Sydney institute it wouldn't go down well at all "Sorry fella, my post was also meant in jest I should have stuck some smilies on it to emphasise the fact. I thought your post was very funny by the way. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would message you as your gorgeous but I'm too young for you Haha, you need luck so here it is... Good luck
You can only see my naked body! I might have a face like a pit bull "Do you though? Really?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would message you as your gorgeous but I'm too young for you Haha, you need luck so here it is... Good luck
You can only see my naked body! I might have a face like a pit bull
Do you though? Really? "Absolutely  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would message you as your gorgeous but I'm too young for you Haha, you need luck so here it is... Good luck
You can only see my naked body! I might have a face like a pit bull
Do you though? Really?
Absolutely "Good job I like pitbulls really...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?
Nope, Batman reference
Just give you an idea of what you may experience. Our profile used to be blocked to single guys, we decided that we would open it up and look for a single guy "Exceptional" with "Gravitas" as standard. 12 hours and 80 messages later; you wouldn't believe what passes for "Exceptional" on here and most haven't a clue what "Gravitas" means!"Whats "Exceptional" though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?
Nope, Batman reference
Just give you an idea of what you may experience. Our profile used to be blocked to single guys, we decided that we would open it up and look for a single guy "Exceptional" with "Gravitas" as standard. 12 hours and 80 messages later; you wouldn't believe what passes for "Exceptional" on here and most haven't a clue what "Gravitas" means!
Whats "Exceptional" though "Judging by the responses we got anything goes! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I tried that. I even deleted my profile text and put simply I'm not meeting but im still getting. Want to meet messages "If you delete everything (e.g. men) off your 'looking for' list it takes you off those searches. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
. We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox ."Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prepare for your inbox to be flooded. I took off my filters a few days ago, genuinely looking for a single guy... 135 messages later - the majority of which were FAF... and I am considering going back to searching again, and putting the filter back on. Aha, I'm only leaving them off for say... what's better, 6 or 12ish hours? 24hrs would be reasonable, you'll hit every category that way, those sneaking about being their wives back, shift workers, lonely piss heads etc...... Needs to be 24 hours OP. I like experiments.
Put up a "leaving the site soon as I can't get any meets" status. That works like a dream.
No, that would be entrapment and would invalidate this important scientific study!!!!
Oh OP, this one really has my interest, well done.
By the way is your location linked to the name of a bar in the Nort East by chance?
Nope, Batman reference
Just give you an idea of what you may experience. Our profile used to be blocked to single guys, we decided that we would open it up and look for a single guy "Exceptional" with "Gravitas" as standard. 12 hours and 80 messages later; you wouldn't believe what passes for "Exceptional" on here and most haven't a clue what "Gravitas" means!"Of course we know what Gravitas means, Sir Issac Newton discovered it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want "Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6 "Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too."Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too.
Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? . "You get a shiny gold star | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too.
Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? .
You get a shiny gold star "Just sent and added to the ' if only he was taller pile!!' Your in box should be overflowing by now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too.
Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? .
You get a shiny gold star
Just sent and added to the ' if only he was taller pile!!'
Your in box should be overflowing by now?"79! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too.
Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? .
You get a shiny gold star "Yay.... . We look forward to the results. Will be on at 4 on the dot tomorrow . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very interesting this OP, can't wait for the final results. Our profile had a list like that for a while. Didn't make a blind bit of difference to the people messaging us . We actually found it comical at times as some of them didn't match even one thing on the list . Good luck with your massive inbox .
Thanks! I'm up to 72... NONE of them fit the description of what I want
Haha. So we count 6 preferences. We're going to say that by 4pm you will have 328 messages, possibly 10 will fit 4 or 5 out of the 6 and maybe, just maybe, you'll get one 6/6
Am I taking bets on this?!
I'm gonna leave myself online while I sleep to catch the late night stragglers too.
Could be an easy way to make a few bucks . You have to stay logged in until 4pm really, might ruin the parameters for your experiment if you don't. Do we get a prize if we're correct? .
You get a shiny gold star
Just sent and added to the ' if only he was taller pile!!'
Your in box should be overflowing by now?
79!"Not sure how that is for a lady standard, but for a bloke... Yep, overflowing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Alright... so there was a thread in the Lounge last night where a man made a comment about if women block single men from messaging them, women should be unable to message single men as they've blocked single men from messaging them first, as a single woman might miss the opportunity to talk to a man who might be right up their alley. (Bear with me. )
So... I'm testing a method. As women infamously get a lot of messages, I've removed my message filters against single men and put a strict guideline of the type of men that I'm interested in. So, I'm going to test how many men follow a specific want or "type". After all, I might be pleasantly surprised. "You are missing the point, you are female therefore you are gagging for it. The blokes that message you most won't read the profile, also the majority of the one line brigade won't get past the pictures. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just read your requirements and purely out of interest only how many do they need to fill. Is it 4/5 kinda thing or have to meet them all? Mr Good question... I guess it's like a 4/5 thing, but I've started with the most important qualities." Hmmmm...I fail on height...not by much but enough to disqualify me...and only the one tat..else I'd message | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One hundred
Think we might be a bit out then ."I think so! 104... half an hour left... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One hundred
Think we might be a bit out then .
I think so! 104... half an hour left..."Any 6/6s though? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One hundred
Think we might be a bit out then .
I think so! 104... half an hour left...
Any 6/6s though? "I'm going to tot things up at 4, I shall post the results | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right... here we go..." Drum role please........ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Mr ddc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many missed all 5 criteria? Was it just me?
Mr ddc"I'm sure you're the type to provide a face photo my lovey | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many missed all 5 criteria? Was it just me?
Mr ddc
I'm sure you're the type to provide a face photo my lovey "Sadly the pic-mods rejected it as being 'too unpleasant'. Who knew there was a rule about "no photos that put us off our dinner"
On a separate note, we used to have no filters, but found the only people who respected them were the very people we wanted to hear from! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"THE RESULTS! I shortened it down so that each single male must be 1) between 30 & 40 (no age filter) 2) they were 6 foot or over 3) had tattoos 4) had piercings 5) had a face photo Disregarding users leaving the site and repeat messages, I received contact from 90 men. Out of those 90 men... 37 weren't between the ages of 30 & 40. 45 weren't 6 foot+ 38 didn't have tattoos 53 didn't have piercings 36 didn't provide a face photo Added to this, no one did fit the full criteria, yet there was also a handful that only missed out on one or two points. "We accept and respect your findings . Fab court adjourned . Hope there are a few potential suiters that you might hit it off with. Once again, great post, loved it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"THE RESULTS! I shortened it down so that each single male must be 1) between 30 & 40 (no age filter) 2) they were 6 foot or over 3) had tattoos 4) had piercings 5) had a face photo Disregarding users leaving the site and repeat messages, I received contact from 90 men. Out of those 90 men... 37 weren't between the ages of 30 & 40. 45 weren't 6 foot+ 38 didn't have tattoos 53 didn't have piercings 36 didn't provide a face photo Added to this, no one did fit the full criteria, yet there was also a handful that only missed out on one or two points.
We accept and respect your findings . Fab court adjourned . Hope there are a few potential suiters that you might hit it off with. Once again, great post, loved it. "So what have we learnt from these results? Rarely does such an interesting thread appear, OP we salute you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OP, for tomorrow's experiment you need to go looking for suitable men and mail the ones you like. Then give a total number of mails sent vs replies. Looking in a 50 mile radius. "Are you going to do this experiment next OP? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"THE RESULTS! I shortened it down so that each single male must be 1) between 30 & 40 (no age filter) 2) they were 6 foot or over 3) had tattoos 4) had piercings 5) had a face photo Disregarding users leaving the site and repeat messages, I received contact from 90 men. Out of those 90 men... 37 weren't between the ages of 30 & 40. 45 weren't 6 foot+ 38 didn't have tattoos 53 didn't have piercings 36 didn't provide a face photo Added to this, no one did fit the full criteria, yet there was also a handful that only missed out on one or two points. "Alas I didn't fit the full criteria so didn't mail...see? some of us do read profiles lol...although I do hit several...but I know you're looking for that six guy...good luck in the search...and don't forget us mere mortal 4's from time to time lol. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
