FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS

Jump to newest
 

By *ackrose OP   Couple
over a year ago

Norwich

Can any-one explain to me,how,if any-one uses their pictures,in say,OUTER MONGOLIA (or any where,in the world),the inhibitive cost,of taking some-one to court,because,their picture has be used. Is'nt the statement,on many people's profile,a complete waste of time?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

it's all a pile of shite...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"Can any-one explain to me,how,if any-one uses their pictures,in say,OUTER MONGOLIA (or any where,in the world),the inhibitive cost,of taking some-one to court,because,their picture has be used. Is'nt the statement,on many people's profile,a complete waste of time? "
. Completely agree . These statements are meaningless . Even in the UK it would new too expensive to take someone to court , and in any event all you would do would be to generate more publicity .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes, a case of sheep following...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

A waste of server space.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"it's all a pile of shite..."

I quite often look at a profile and think people just add that in to make their profile look longer or more intelligent its a put off to me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I block people with it I would not want to meet people with su h low intelligence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I block people with it I would not want to meet people with su h low intelligence"

Same here. I wouldn't want to waste my time meeting somebody who is daft enough to think those warnings have any meanings.

Just useless clutter... especially when the warning is longer than the actual profile content!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *p4funCouple
over a year ago

Plymouth


"Can any-one explain to me,how,if any-one uses their pictures,in say,OUTER MONGOLIA (or any where,in the world),the inhibitive cost,of taking some-one to court,because,their picture has be used. Is'nt the statement,on many people's profile,a complete waste of time? . Completely agree . These statements are meaningless . Even in the UK it would new too expensive to take someone to court , and in any event all you would do would be to generate more publicity ."

totally agree x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Life's too short

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Totally agree also. Where and why did it start?

If some one was doing a real study then the results might be interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *.nottsbloke..Man
over a year ago

nottinghamshire

its just to pad out a profile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngieandMrManCouple
over a year ago

hereford

There are no legal ramifications. UK law says if you send someone an image, or make an image available to other people then you are giving it to them as a 'gift' and on that basis they own it and can do with it as they please.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"I block people with it I would not want to meet people with su h low intelligence

Same here. I wouldn't want to waste my time meeting somebody who is daft enough to think those warnings have any meanings.

Just useless clutter... especially when the warning is longer than the actual profile content!

"
. My thoughts exactly though I did not post that in case some people thought it was condescending . It displays a lack of intelligence posting such a disclaimer and fab ask you not to do it as it wastes server space .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oward1978Man
over a year ago

Rotherham


"Can any-one explain to me,how,if any-one uses their pictures,in say,OUTER MONGOLIA (or any where,in the world),the inhibitive cost,of taking some-one to court,because,their picture has be used. Is'nt the statement,on many people's profile,a complete waste of time? "

It turns out I'm quite popular in Outer Mongolia. They used a pic of my arse without my permission to advertise Coca-Cola, but hey what can you do! I don't see the connection myself, but by all accounts Coke sales are up 90%!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone who has it on their profile needs kicked off the site as they're obviously sadly deluded!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nknownCallerMan
over a year ago

Bath


"I block people with it I would not want to meet people with su h low intelligence"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lack of Internet savvy does not mean low intelligence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It just shows people have not read the profile advice from admin. The FAQs page etc.

Anyone who thinks Australian Students have nothing better to do than steal badly taken pics of Lardy arsed middle aged guys must need their heads tested.

Anyone with this bollocks on your profile please delete.

Or maybe admin could automatically do this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"it's all a pile of shite...

I quite often look at a profile and think people just add that in to make their profile look longer or more intelligent its a put off to me "

ditto

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Makes me laugh...has anyone ever tried to instruct a law firm to act for them for any form of litigation...will cost you at least 10k to get the case up and running...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I remember when I was at university we did actually do a study which was based on an internet dating site (not this one mind you!) but we obviously never used the photos. It was more a write up on the type of words on the profile. So I agree it's useless really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oward1978Man
over a year ago

Rotherham


"I block people with it I would not want to meet people with su h low intelligence"

I don't think having the disclaimer on your profile necessarily shows low intelligence. Some people obviously have it on there as a bit of a joke. Sure if they're being serious then it is little strange.

There's a million and one other things on a profile though that will turn me off someone!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its a scam type thing that started on Facebook (not Sydney University, but a similar notice)

Any university study would need fully referenced material and fully signed consent forms from everyone involved to be valid, so it sounds totally bogus to us!

It's also not just the cost / difficultly of taking someone to court, it's that the case law on copyright of this kind hasn't yet been established properly and we all ticked a terms and conditions box when signing up to here anyway, which I'm sure would have a copyright disclaimer notice of some kind! The site would need to make them comply with the law and protect themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

On your deathbed, are you really going to worry that fab will use your cock pictures? Probably not. Get over it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xoticloverMan
over a year ago

newcastle


"it's all a pile of shite...

I quite often look at a profile and think people just add that in to make their profile look longer or more intelligent its a put off to me

ditto"

Or may be to scare ignorant people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"Anyone who has it on their profile needs kicked off the site as they're obviously sadly deluded! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford


"it's all a pile of shite...

I quite often look at a profile and think people just add that in to make their profile look longer or more intelligent its a put off to me "
. A good post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lack of Internet savvy does not mean low intelligence."

Here is the voice of real intelligence. In my opinion anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Can any-one explain to me,how,if any-one uses their pictures,in say,OUTER MONGOLIA (or any where,in the world),the inhibitive cost,of taking some-one to court,because,their picture has be used. Is'nt the statement,on many people's profile,a complete waste of time? "
Absolutely, it's meaningless.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"it's all a pile of shite..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lack of Internet savvy does not mean low intelligence."

I agree although I do find it off putting xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are no legal ramifications. UK law says if you send someone an image, or make an image available to other people then you are giving it to them as a 'gift' and on that basis they own it and can do with it as they please."

I doubt that is correct. If someone sends you a personal picture which is clearly potentially embarrassing and compromising, I don't think you are entitled to publish it to the world. I don't know if this has been tested in case law yet, but I wouldn't think a jury would regard distributing a sexual picture sent to you in private as being a reasonable thing to do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are no legal ramifications. UK law says if you send someone an image, or make an image available to other people then you are giving it to them as a 'gift' and on that basis they own it and can do with it as they please.

I doubt that is correct. If someone sends you a personal picture which is clearly potentially embarrassing and compromising, I don't think you are entitled to publish it to the world. I don't know if this has been tested in case law yet, but I wouldn't think a jury would regard distributing a sexual picture sent to you in private as being a reasonable thing to do. "

Recent legislation....doing so maliciously is a specific offence.....

But NOT when the pic has been posted on a web site...which basically has public access!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are no legal ramifications. UK law says if you send someone an image, or make an image available to other people then you are giving it to them as a 'gift' and on that basis they own it and can do with it as they please.

I doubt that is correct. If someone sends you a personal picture which is clearly potentially embarrassing and compromising, I don't think you are entitled to publish it to the world. I don't know if this has been tested in case law yet, but I wouldn't think a jury would regard distributing a sexual picture sent to you in private as being a reasonable thing to do.

Recent legislation....doing so maliciously is a specific offence.....

But NOT when the pic has been posted on a web site...which basically has public access!"

Sure, if a pic is publicly accessible you are essentially broadcasting it. Not sure if someone is entitled to use it for commercial purposes though without permission.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've had my best fucks with guys who have this on their profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top