Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some, not all men. It's a sweeping generalisation to be honest. " ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" To be fair the same reason goes for ladies who can't accommodate as well. Some live in shared houses, with partners , with families, etc ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Then what would you think if a woman told you she cant accommodate?... .. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" They may not be but it is a good indication that they are Since there are so many men to choose from here, I simply avoid the headache of trying to figure out who is lying and who is not and only reply to those who can. For if I were to meet someone several times, then I would eventually want to start meeting them in their home | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() And throw out a lot of perfectly decent men along with them. And people wonder why single blokes get so frustrated on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Not necessarily, might just be too lazy to get the hoover out and clear up all the porn mags! (Ooh, did I just give away a brief glimpse of my pre-marital days ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() Like I said, a numbers game. There are plenty of perfectly decent guys that can accommodate. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine" Well spotted.../ ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine Well spotted.../ ![]() ![]() Thanks ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine" ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"could it be as simple as not wanting to have virtual strangers in your own home." That's my reason. It's fine if we get to know people well and become good friends, but until then my home is off limits | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() And there's plenty of perfectly decent men that can't.... ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() In other words, you're happy to make judgements without any evidence or any attempt to get any, because you know you can get away with it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Seems a bit odd coming from a "couple" who've been on here 9 weeks and verified by someone whose been on here 9 weeks and doesn't accommodate. Suspicions could be aimed your way? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Seems a bit odd coming from a "couple" who've been on here 9 weeks and verified by someone whose been on here 9 weeks and doesn't accommodate. Suspicions could be aimed your way? " Ooohh nice spot | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never question why a man can't accommodate,I wouldn't have strangers from a sex site in my house,why should anyone else?" This... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never question why a man can't accommodate,I wouldn't have strangers from a sex site in my house,why should anyone else? This... " quite! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is narrow minded to think folk who can't accommodate are playing away. I find most who cannot accommodate either have kids or house share ![]() This | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! " Friends probably. I wouldn't like to come face to face with a 28 yr old as I'm coming out of the bathroom half dressed, having to explain I'm just here to fuck his mate,or brother even. Although I have visited a man a few times while his brother was at work | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! " Bringing a date home, and bringing a swinger home are two different things. Her ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! Bringing a date home, and bringing a swinger home are two different things. Her ![]() I am curious; why? If a guy has met a woman from this site and they have met each other a few times, then why it it different after that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It doesn't on its own mean they are attached but if combined with daytime meets only,discreet all over profile and no pics it may do ![]() Not necessarily I split from my wife but we still live in the same house for ease of arrrangements (thanks to the recession!) hence I choose to meet in the day and not in my home!! I prefer not to shit on my doorstep hence the generally private pictures | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! Bringing a date home, and bringing a swinger home are two different things. Her ![]() Its not all one on ones though,some people meet couples too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! Bringing a date home, and bringing a swinger home are two different things. Her ![]() Well grounded logic imo.. but everyone has their own take on friends/neighbours. I think most folk on fab don't get much time for meets so want to get the most fun and relaxation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it weird when people who house share say they can't bring a date home. Who are they living with, monks?! Bringing a date home, and bringing a swinger home are two different things. Her ![]() I agree here too Her | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Again taking a regular boyfriend/ girlfriend home is one thing, the thought of your flatmates knowing you have a swinger in the house to some may not go down too well, if they dont have open minds. Her" Wasn't on about a regular bf/gf. But I don't see much of a difference in a date where we go for a drink and back to his or a meet where we go for a drink and back to his. I'm the same person and our intentions appear the same in either scenario. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Again taking a regular boyfriend/ girlfriend home is one thing, the thought of your flatmates knowing you have a swinger in the house to some may not go down too well, if they dont have open minds. Her Wasn't on about a regular bf/gf. But I don't see much of a difference in a date where we go for a drink and back to his or a meet where we go for a drink and back to his. I'm the same person and our intentions appear the same in either scenario. " Discretion on swinging, taking a potential boyfriend/ girlfriend home one thing, using the place as a shagging den quiet another. Her | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() Where have we made any judgements? I think you are confusing "married so can't accommodate" with "can't accommodate so must be married" That's a bit like saying all mothers are women so all women must be mothers. And what exactly are we getting away with? Maybe you should read what I actually wrote instead of what you think I wrote ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Not naive but maybe quick to judge. What do you think when you see a woman with the same accommodation status? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if women cannot accommodate what do you think?" Excellent point! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if women cannot accommodate what do you think? Excellent point!" Not really because the OP aren't looking to meet women so probably don't care what they do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine" Hang on a second, that you can accommodate means you are genuine? So anyone who can't, or won't, accommodate is now not genuine? ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Certainly a lot of the men (and women) that can't accommodate are cheating. However, there are a lot of reasons someone wouldn't be able to, or wouldn't want to accommodate so it's unfair to just assume they are playing away. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm separated with a kid and can only accom when he's not staying over and that goes against me believe me. I've had messages asking for his photo to prove he's real Those peeps have all been told to do one by the way as there ain't a cat in hells chance I'm ever associating him with my fab life" Wow, that's a bit much! Do they want to see his birth certificate too in case it's a photo of you with a nephew or a friend's child? ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes..." Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I've had messages asking for his photo to prove he's real " That's just creepy ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine Hang on a second, that you can accommodate means you are genuine? So anyone who can't, or won't, accommodate is now not genuine? ![]() This is exactly the point of the thread: Men who can't accomodate = not genuine as cheating. According to the OP. Hence the alternative points raised by others. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Perhaps it's a safety thing same as it is for ladies. " After a meet from elsewhere where this gorgeous, sexy, lithe bodied hottie turned into the spawn of Satan after 2 glasses of wine..... I like having windows in my house thank you! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply?" So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom?" They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom?" They aren't but the OP doesn't want to meet women. I don't expect they bother too much what people they don't want to meet do. Equally wrong, but one potentially affects them and one doesn't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Its far to simplistic to assume anything like this. We know several guys who are married that play in their home while their partner is working their profiles state they can accomodate, a d if you met them you would be entertaining meeting attached guys. There isnt a fool proof method" Ahh but if you met them in their own home you are less likely end up with a deranged bunny-boiler on your doorstep accusing you of leading their poor innocent husband astray ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away." Just look at the number of couples that receive messages suggesting the female half to play away... sometimes from other couples! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Says the couple who cant accommodate, very nieve to tar every bloke with the same brush, as it happens i can and i do, hence genuine Hang on a second, that you can accommodate means you are genuine? So anyone who can't, or won't, accommodate is now not genuine? ![]() Not genuinely single certainly but genuinely meeting. I suppose it depends on the definition of genuine which is a word chucked around too liberally on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Perhaps it's a safety thing same as it is for ladies. After a meet from elsewhere where this gorgeous, sexy, lithe bodied hottie turned into the spawn of Satan after 2 glasses of wine..... I like having windows in my house thank you!" Oh there's no pleasing you single men.... ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away." ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" You'd be wrong ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some, not all men. It's a sweeping generalisation to be honest. " ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Change 'Usually means' to 'may mean' and its a fair comment. Sorry if this has been mentioned before | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" in our experience, yes, but we have found an aweful lot of wasters ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() ![]() No, just quoted the wrong comment ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm married so can't accommodate. Even if I was single, I wouldn't invite anyone here unless I'd met them a few times " Likewise. Maybe Fab should have a simple 'Playing Away' field and it would be crystal clear to all and make filtering easier. ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Being a single parent, I don't want people turning up at my house all the time, what If my little one gets up in night etc, there are no crb checks done on here, don't really want some one I've just met to have access to my house ( extreme I know) but just because I can't all the time doesent mean I'm a time waster, that's what's so annoying about this site some people forget there is a life off here ..... Rant over ![]() The above relates to my situation like you single female parents, we single parent men do have emphasis on safety for our children so when not at work we like our home to be our home for family not just some sex den whilst the young ones are at school or in bed hence the reason why I don't accom By the way I have tomorrow off work which one of you lovely females wants to meet up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm married so can't accommodate. Even if I was single, I wouldn't invite anyone here unless I'd met them a few times Likewise. Maybe Fab should have a simple 'Playing Away' field and it would be crystal clear to all and make filtering easier. ![]() The people that would tick that box are probably honest enough to have it in their profile anyway. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"could it be as simple as not wanting to have virtual strangers in your own home." ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Perhaps it's a safety thing same as it is for ladies. After a meet from elsewhere where this gorgeous, sexy, lithe bodied hottie turned into the spawn of Satan after 2 glasses of wine..... I like having windows in my house thank you! Oh there's no pleasing you single men.... ![]() Yeh - well the difference is I could just tie you up to keep you quiet ;-P | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dont make any fuckn diffrence if ye can accomodate or not ye gotta b able to cast spells like jesus to get a meet with a woman on here" No ya don't.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dont make any fuckn diffrence if ye can accomodate or not ye gotta b able to cast spells like jesus to get a meet with a woman on here" Sounds like someone isn't getting things their own way ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I find it odd that the subject is normally about men that don't accommodate, women and couples rarely have their reasons questioned....in fact, most folk jump to the defense of a lady's right to not accommodate, they are rarely burned over it and never told they should have a note in their profiles as to why other wise it looks like they're cheating blah blah blah... Men have precisely the same rights not to be prodded and poked and made to explain why the can't accommodate, just as anyone else...yet they still get grief for it.... I don't accommodate...I don't want to, for reasons I don't have to explain...and I sure as shit ain't cheating, and the same goes for many men... Sure, some are playing away but I reckon the couples and single ladies who don't accommodate have just as high a proportion of who are cheating so why single out the males? Because we're the easiest targets to have a go at quite simply....we're the highest in number so can be treat with less reverence than the precious couples and ladies.... And that's my tuppence worth. " Wtf am I on? I'm no longer single, just don't have a couples profile....but my post still stands for single guys.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Change 'Usually means' to 'may mean' and its a fair comment. Sorry if this has been mentioned before" And change the word 'men' to the word 'people' | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"or shared accommodation " Or with relatives, or have had previous bad experience of a stranger at home, or have kids, or have nosey neighbours and want to be discreet, or just don't want to accommodate, or run a business from home, or prefer to know someone before taking them home, or a myriad of other reasons that they don't actually need to explain....why should a man pass a series of questions about his circumstances more than anyone else? Again, it's rare for a couple or a fem to be asked to explain why they don't....they aren't expected to have a little footnote explaining why.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm married so can't accommodate. Even if I was single, I wouldn't invite anyone here unless I'd met them a few times Likewise. Maybe Fab should have a simple 'Playing Away' field and it would be crystal clear to all and make filtering easier. ![]() I normally do have my marital status in my profile but think I deleted it when I deleted some text. Will go check now. I hate being mislead and don't do it myself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away." Why? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why?" Why exactly ?? What a load of shite | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" I live on a military base so not able to accom. I think the question should be asked why not just incase tho it might just be living on a base, parents or housemates x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But purely from a numbers point of _iew, if you exclude those that can't accomodate then you will be getting rid of a vast majority of the attached guys so it is a good filter. ![]() ![]() Thank you! The thing about playing the numbers games is that it's useless stats that will decrease and increase dependant on certain factors. "to assume makes an ASS of U and ME" Besides, there's plenty who cheat and accommodate. It usually happens when people work nights. Another factor for the "numbers game!" ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some, not all men. It's a sweeping generalisation to be honest. " ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why?" Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. " Another generalisation ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. " Give me strength! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. Another generalisation ![]() ![]() Of course it is, that's why I said 'generally' ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Never assume And why targeted at men" They're looking for men. They aren't looking for women so they won't see profiles to know how many say they can't accommodate and since they don't want to meet them, it probably doesn't matter to them personally if women cheat. It matters to them if men do because they don't want to meet those playing away. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Blimey this is getting heated! Our 2p: 1. There are singles and couples who cant accommodate. 2. There are singles and couples who can accommodate 3. There are singles and couples who can travel 4. There are singles and couples who can't travel 5. There are singles and couples who cheat and are honest about it 6. There are singles and couples who cheat and lie about it 7. All singles and couples have their own moral compass as to wether cheating is ok (if applicable) 8. Some singles and couples treat each situation on a case by case basis and work out if they are compatible with the other party accordingly 9. Some singles and couples don't treat each situation on a case by case basis and maybe display signs of baggage/issues/insecurities etc 10. None of the above points are mutually intwined Apologies to any scenarios or genders or situations forgotten in the above. To us (personal opinion only) we are interested in those who fall into point 8. as they are well suited to the swinging lifestyle and mindset, whereas those in 9. do not (again in our opinion) ..... " Love it! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I can't accom and to be honest even if I could I wouldn't. People can read into that whatever they wish....Personally I couldn't give a flying......." ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Living in london makes it incredibly hard to get personal space, the rents in this city are stupid and nearly everyone i know (that's single and some that aren't) live in house shares. Add to that that some of us want to keep our kinks to ourselves and i think it's pretty understandable why we don't (always) accomodate. Nothing iffy, dodgy or cynical just the sad fact of living in one of the most expensive cities in the world!" ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I won't accom, not can't. Don't care what anyone else thinks. " ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong?" Not all of us....you can come to mine but I look after me dad and Dont want to finish him off yet ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So if women cannot accommodate what do you think?" ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are we naeve, but when we see men who cannot accommodate, usually means, they are playing away, which we would not entertain...would we be right or wrong? Seems a bit odd coming from a "couple" who've been on here 9 weeks and verified by someone whose been on here 9 weeks and doesn't accommodate. Suspicions could be aimed your way? " Ooo! This just gets better and better. You've been rumbled OP! ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There is no offense meant to anyone, but when we have asked if they are attached, their profile always has, Can't accomodate.." So why can't you accommodate ? And the 9 week thing........... Hmmmm | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. " So it's ok for a woman to not be able to accommodate because she is cheating because the guy will blame her and not the people she fucked behind his back....That makes it A-ok in your book....gotcha ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"And the 9 week thing........... Hmmmm" Half a week away from an erotic film? ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. So it's ok for a woman to not be able to accommodate because she is cheating because the guy will blame her and not the people she fucked behind his back....That makes it A-ok in your book....gotcha ![]() Of course, it's between her and her conscience. In a Utopian world it wouldn't happen but we live in the real world. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. So it's ok for a woman to not be able to accommodate because she is cheating because the guy will blame her and not the people she fucked behind his back....That makes it A-ok in your book....gotcha ![]() In my real world there is no difference between a man that cheats and a woman that cheats. The original statement about double standards was in regards to the jumping to conclusions about why a man can't accommodate and why a woman can't accommodate. All too often men are accused of being married but wonen are applauded for thinking of their safety. Are men not entitled to feel safe, are women who can't accommodate not cheaters? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't accommodate and if people don't like it - tough titties. I don't need to explain myself to anyone. " What kind of selfish attitude is that! There'd be nothing on these forums if everyone started pleasing themselves! ![]() | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Some, not all men. It's a sweeping generalisation to be honest. " But in 99% of cases you are bang on. Most of the rest probably living with mummy....is that any better? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The double standards here can be quite annoying sometimes... Newsflash: Men and women are different! Why shouldn't different preferences apply? So why is a single woman that cannot accom any different to a single guy that can't accom? They're not, but a married woman playing away is a different prospect to a man playing away. Why? Because of the differences between the way men and women react to being cheated on. A man will generally blame the cheating partner, women will blame whoever he cheated with. So it's ok for a woman to not be able to accommodate because she is cheating because the guy will blame her and not the people she fucked behind his back....That makes it A-ok in your book....gotcha ![]() I'm sure that women who cheat can't accommodate in the majority of cases but as with the men, that doesn't mean that anyone that can't accommodate is cheating. What it does mean, as we said regarding men, if you don't want to meet cheaters then filtering out people that can't accommodate will get rid of a vast majority. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top | ![]() |