FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

cut or uncut

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

What do you prefer and why? From your experience, give me the pro's and cons of a circumsised or uncircumcised cock.

I'm uncut and can't imagine it any other way but note that some women prefer a cut cock.

I've read the cleanliness arguments but I think thats down to the individual and I'm OCD about keeping my little fella clean and smelling good.

Thoughts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exyLancs2Couple
over a year ago

Manchester

For us it's just a preference in terms of look and feel.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Cut, black, at least 9 inches.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think visually anyone can have a preference. But if sometime tries the hygiene, religious or peer pressure argument, they are a fool!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedscouple99Couple
over a year ago

Leeds


"For us it's just a preference in terms of look and feel. "

Uncut preferably

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Personally think this practice should be banned on anyone under 16 or without medical reason it's just as barbaric as fgm I know this comment will spark religious argument but guys should have a choice and not have this done to them at birth it boils my blood

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbytupperMan
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley

You stretch it out on this chopping board, my cleaver is really sharp and I'm a good shot normally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I guess I meant pros and cons in a sexual sense. Not really wishing to get into a religeous argument.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Pros for uncut: when giving a hand job you don't need lube.

Pros for cut: no getting the skin caught in your fly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Neither am I , but your helmet will loss a lot of sensitivity without your skin so take from thatsex won't feel the same

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke


"Pros for uncut: when giving a hand job you don't need lube.

Pros for cut: no getting the skin caught in your fly "

Just side of a bleeding helmet stuck in zip Iinstead

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ottscpl2014Couple
over a year ago

nottingham/derby

I'm cut and its a millions time better

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobsandballsMan
over a year ago

st andrews

It doesn't matter to me either way. Mr is uncut, and 8/9". It's what you do with it that counts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vgloryholebs16TV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol.

I have a very definite preference for uncut,esp for sucking....I love the feel of it in my mouth....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Pros for uncut: when giving a hand job you don't need lube.

Pros for cut: no getting the skin caught in your fly

Just side of a bleeding helmet stuck in zip Iinstead "

Is that worse? I'm cringing at the thought

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Neither am I , but your helmet will loss a lot of sensitivity without your skin so take from thatsex won't feel the same "

Does that mean you take longer to orgasm,or is it a personal thing to each man?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm cut and its a millions time better"

Then what? Only if you had a really tight/painful forskin?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oveSlutForUseCouple
over a year ago

Brighton

My 2p. I had a forskin for 41 years. It's AWESOME without it!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/12/14 18:45:04]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally think this practice should be banned on anyone under 16 or without medical reason it's just as barbaric as fgm I know this comment will spark religious argument but guys should have a choice and not have this done to them at birth it boils my blood "

Have you had complains from cut men wishing their parents left them uncut or is that another anti social call? Who are you talking for really? I am glad I had it done at an early age. Its the healthy choice in my opinion and I like to follow the tradition of Abraham and so I will teach my kids.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

And yes there was a tv program about it on a sky channel with presenter basically asking why they did this to him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Here we go again, weekly recycle of the same subject

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

No I'm out but I do like how opinion is moved around , people just move goal posts when religion is involved . Personally if you want it done go for it but choice should be yours

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Here we go again, weekly recycle of the same subject "
it's good for environment to recycle

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls "

Do you complain when Christians do it to girls too? I didn't think so. Its not an Islamic thing, Its an African thing. Some of The Christian countries do it to 95% of the girls population. Also male circumcision is nothing to be compared to those practices of girl's mitulation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No I'm out but I do like how opinion is moved around , people just move goal posts when religion is involved . Personally if you want it done go for it but choice should be yours "

If so then respect the choices of other cultures and values instead of bashing them and trying to portray them as anti human putting them under the test of your own culture and values. They could say plenty horrible things about your own style of life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

So chopping skin of new born babies isn't mutilation ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Oh and to be clear I belive in no religious bs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls "

Yes, the scientific explanation of it, you'll find it well detailed in the NHS website and they recommend it and they have no religious agenda behind it. It prevents many diseases, infections and STD'S including HIV.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Your are insane circumcision prevents hiv

Answer the question your being very good at avoiding , explain why it isn't child mutilation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Yes, the scientific explanation of it, you'll find it well detailed in the NHS website and they recommend it and they have no religious agenda behind it. It prevents many diseases, infections and STD'S including HIV. "

How does having your foreskin removed prevent you from catching HIV?

HIV transmits through open wounds. One would hope that a man would only have sex once his circumcision had actually healed, rather than putting a gaping raw wound inside someone else...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Yes, the scientific explanation of it, you'll find it well detailed in the NHS website and they recommend it and they have no religious agenda behind it. It prevents many diseases, infections and STD'S including HIV.

How does having your foreskin removed prevent you from catching HIV?

HIV transmits through open wounds. One would hope that a man would only have sex once his circumcision had actually healed, rather than putting a gaping raw wound inside someone else..."

Lol, I can't imagine any adult who is still injured from circumcision's surgery would dare to have sex before it's healed unless they want to torture themselves. lol.

How does it prevent the transmission of HIV?

The following statement is from the World's Health Organisation's website: "There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence"

For some reason the NHS page that detailed the hygenic and health advantages of male circumcision have been changed and reduced. Only statements left in it says : may reduce ... instead of reduce. Obviously even NHS is not immune from political pressure.

Another reputable Health organisation that recommends it done at an early age, is the is the American Academy of Paediatrics. Here is the link.

http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/New-Benefits-Point-to-Greater-Benefits-of-Infant-Circumcision-But-Final-Say-is-Still-Up-to-parents-Says-AAP.aspx.

The reason why a non circumcised male genital is 60% more susceptible is that the inner side of the foreskin is very thin and the blood vessels are very close to the surface. While having sex, there is always unvisual damage to the skin and makes viruses easily contaminating the blood. Also some of the fluids resulting on sex get stuck between the foreskin and the penis and stay their long enough to be absorbed by the blood vessels in that very sensitive part of the skin. In the case of circumcised genitals however, there are no areas where external fluids can get stock for such a periode of time, and the skin is much thicker and hardened due to constant exposition to the external environment and frictions. It's easier to clean too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

And my other question ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"I think visually anyone can have a preference. But if sometime tries the hygiene, religious or peer pressure argument, they are a fool! "

Indeed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

Im not against anyone having it done or any religion but I am a firm beliver it should be choice of the person , nobody has the right to decide what to do to another humans body

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm uncut and been told I'm very clean . I use something called soap and water lol .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke


"I think visually anyone can have a preference. But if sometime tries the hygiene, religious or peer pressure argument, they are a fool!

Indeed!"

If your not clean under there its your own fault it should be part of showering twice a day or at least I know I do , is no way I'm less hygienic than a guy with no skin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

And it dosnt stop hiv it "may reduce" same as paracetamol may get rid of toothache or may cause liver failure your call lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And it dosnt stop hiv it "may reduce" same as paracetamol may get rid of toothache or may cause liver failure your call lol "

It has been scientifically proven that it reduces the riscks by 60-70%. The NHS have changed that page dramatically ffrom last year but other wolrd health organisations still have their scientific articles about this fact. Not just AIDS most TDS and infant Urinal infections and some types of cancer.

What other question where you refering to?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

This is a form of child mutilation , they didn't agree to this act or even know ,

Also I'd like to have seen these tests who was stupid enough to be part of that study since 60% plus would now have hiv

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Yes, the scientific explanation of it, you'll find it well detailed in the NHS website and they recommend it and they have no religious agenda behind it. It prevents many diseases, infections and STD'S including HIV.

How does having your foreskin removed prevent you from catching HIV?

HIV transmits through open wounds. One would hope that a man would only have sex once his circumcision had actually healed, rather than putting a gaping raw wound inside someone else...

Lol, I can't imagine any adult who is still injured from circumcision's surgery would dare to have sex before it's healed unless they want to torture themselves. lol.

How does it prevent the transmission of HIV?

The following statement is from the World's Health Organisation's website: "There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence"

For some reason the NHS page that detailed the hygenic and health advantages of male circumcision have been changed and reduced. Only statements left in it says : may reduce ... instead of reduce. Obviously even NHS is not immune from political pressure.

Another reputable Health organisation that recommends it done at an early age, is the is the American Academy of Paediatrics. Here is the link.

http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/New-Benefits-Point-to-Greater-Benefits-of-Infant-Circumcision-But-Final-Say-is-Still-Up-to-parents-Says-AAP.aspx.

The reason why a non circumcised male genital is 60% more susceptible is that the inner side of the foreskin is very thin and the blood vessels are very close to the surface. While having sex, there is always unvisual damage to the skin and makes viruses easily contaminating the blood. Also some of the fluids resulting on sex get stuck between the foreskin and the penis and stay their long enough to be absorbed by the blood vessels in that very sensitive part of the skin. In the case of circumcised genitals however, there are no areas where external fluids can get stock for such a periode of time, and the skin is much thicker and hardened due to constant exposition to the external environment and frictions. It's easier to clean too. "

have you read around the subject and looked at the flaws in the WHO study?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Yes, the scientific explanation of it, you'll find it well detailed in the NHS website and they recommend it and they have no religious agenda behind it. It prevents many diseases, infections and STD'S including HIV.

How does having your foreskin removed prevent you from catching HIV?

HIV transmits through open wounds. One would hope that a man would only have sex once his circumcision had actually healed, rather than putting a gaping raw wound inside someone else...

Lol, I can't imagine any adult who is still injured from circumcision's surgery would dare to have sex before it's healed unless they want to torture themselves. lol.

How does it prevent the transmission of HIV?

The following statement is from the World's Health Organisation's website: "There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence"

For some reason the NHS page that detailed the hygenic and health advantages of male circumcision have been changed and reduced. Only statements left in it says : may reduce ... instead of reduce. Obviously even NHS is not immune from political pressure.

Another reputable Health organisation that recommends it done at an early age, is the is the American Academy of Paediatrics. Here is the link.

http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/New-Benefits-Point-to-Greater-Benefits-of-Infant-Circumcision-But-Final-Say-is-Still-Up-to-parents-Says-AAP.aspx.

The reason why a non circumcised male genital is 60% more susceptible is that the inner side of the foreskin is very thin and the blood vessels are very close to the surface. While having sex, there is always unvisual damage to the skin and makes viruses easily contaminating the blood. Also some of the fluids resulting on sex get stuck between the foreskin and the penis and stay their long enough to be absorbed by the blood vessels in that very sensitive part of the skin. In the case of circumcised genitals however, there are no areas where external fluids can get stock for such a periode of time, and the skin is much thicker and hardened due to constant exposition to the external environment and frictions. It's easier to clean too. "

I think you would be better wearing a condom rather than relying on circumcision for std & aids prevention.

I am sure I read that bit on the NHS website

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

I'm staying out this post now as it's went way off what the op was actually asking, I was going to leave it be the last time I said this un till I got basically called un hygienic , and I also notice even tho all this googling has been done to provide these facts the other questions have been side swerved you'd make a outstanding politician mate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm staying out this post now as it's went way off what the op was actually asking, I was going to leave it be the last time I said this un till I got basically called un hygienic , and I also notice even tho all this googling has been done to provide these facts the other questions have been side swerved you'd make a outstanding politician mate "

I'm too tired to go through the whole thread again for that, but I don't rekon anyone has called un-hygenic! I asked you what questions you want replied to that I missed or ignored, but you havent yet specified any.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

I have 3 times but I'm done with it no more

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


".

...

I think you would be better wearing a condom rather than relying on circumcision for std & aids prevention.

I am sure I read that bit on the NHS website"

Let's be realistic. A huge percentage of ppl who seek sex are reluctant on using condoms. I myself have recieved many invites here from ppl who made it very clear they want bareback sex. From my experience most men want bareback sex with strangers and women are not very good at resisting the temptation either. Also, how many of us use condoms while having a blow job? Even when you use a condom its not 100% effective and I'll be exagerating to estimate that 50% of ppl who have sex with strangers use it. Wouldn't be wise then to double your prevention with circumcision. Its known that at the moment of horniness most of us will be thinking with their dickheads and plenty of sex happens unplanned when ppl get d*unk ect. Practically, circumcision is the most realistically effective prevention in mu opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

In my opinion its forced on infant s as they are mutilated against there free will

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

And you say it's for religious beliefs well why does it matter if it's new born or 14 to 16 year old where they can make choices as if your religious at all shouldn't be any sex out with marriage or are we picking and choosing parts of religion we want to go by

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Your are insane circumcision prevents hiv

Answer the question your being very good at avoiding , explain why it isn't child mutilation"

It's not child mutilation because it doesn't mutilated the child and doesn't stop the person it's done to having a full and enjoyable sex life; some would even claim more enjoyable.

Unlike female circumcision, which is specifically designed to make sex less enjoyable for the woman and is a serious form of mutilation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/12/14 02:14:42]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And you say it's for religious beliefs well why does it matter if it's new born or 14 to 16 year old where they can make choices as if your religious at all shouldn't be any sex out with marriage or are we picking and choosing parts of religion we want to go by "

Nobody is bringing up the religious aspect of it apart from you! Lol. it also prevent childhood deseases such us Urinary tract infection and doctors recommend it done at an early age. The earlier the less riscky the surgery. There are religious reasons for that but thats not subject of this thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"And you say it's for religious beliefs well why does it matter if it's new born or 14 to 16 year old where they can make choices as if your religious at all shouldn't be any sex out with marriage or are we picking and choosing parts of religion we want to go by "

I absolutely do choose which parts of religion I choose to include in my life and which parts I choose to ignore. I particularly choose to ignore the parts on burning witches and stoning adulterers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Im not against anyone having it done or any religion but I am a firm beliver it should be choice of the person , nobody has the right to decide what to do to another humans body "

People have the right to bring their children up in the faith and tradition that they believe is right. That's a basis and fundamental human right. Unless real mutilation is involved, who are you to tell people how they should bring up their own children.

And if you really believe that female and male circumcision are in any way similar you clearly have not looked into what female circumcision really is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Do you complain when Christians do it to girls too? I didn't think so. Its not an Islamic thing, Its an African thing. Some of The Christian countries do it to 95% of the girls population. Also male circumcision is nothing to be compared to those practices of girl's mitulation. "

I complain and campaign against female circumcision, more properly called female genital mutilation, whether it's done by Christians, Muslims, Jews, pagans or any other group, culture or sect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Pros for uncut: when giving a hand job you don't need lube.

Pros for cut: no getting the skin caught in your fly "

I'm cut and never needed lube for a hand job. !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Oh and to be clear I belive in no religious bs "

That's probably why you have so little tolerance for beliefs other than your own.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Do you complain when Christians do it to girls too? I didn't think so. Its not an Islamic thing, Its an African thing. Some of The Christian countries do it to 95% of the girls population. Also male circumcision is nothing to be compared to those practices of girl's mitulation.

I complain and campaign against female circumcision, more properly called female genital mutilation, whether it's done by Christians, Muslims, Jews, pagans or any other group, culture or sect."

So do I but I also complain about making it as a propaganda tool to promote Islamophobia when it has nothing to do with Islam, or Christianity for that matter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes

Definition of mutilate

to cause severe damage to (the body of a person or animal)

: to ruin the beauty of (something) : to severely damage or spoil (something)

This applies to female circumcision, it does not apply to male circumcision.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Healthy choice please explain how I'm un healthy it's child mutilation end of we all complain when Muslim do it to girls

Do you complain when Christians do it to girls too? I didn't think so. Its not an Islamic thing, Its an African thing. Some of The Christian countries do it to 95% of the girls population. Also male circumcision is nothing to be compared to those practices of girl's mitulation.

I complain and campaign against female circumcision, more properly called female genital mutilation, whether it's done by Christians, Muslims, Jews, pagans or any other group, culture or sect.

So do I but I also complain about making it as a propaganda tool to promote Islamophobia when it has nothing to do with Islam, or Christianity for that matter. "

It's another stick for the ignorant but frightened to use.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

So what's different mate your chopping the skin of the end of a boys dick there for spoiling it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

I will say once more I am not religious and not against this " operation" I am however against the fact these boys have no choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

I complain when anything is done to anyone without there willing , all the way down to baby ear piercing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *az191000Man
over a year ago

Carluke

You are removing the child's rights to choose what they want to do with there body it's shocking and I know if I'd had that done to me I'd be very very angry , I was upset I was dragged through a church to be made Christian yeah 18th birthday that got taken off

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Love how a simple question gets turned into big beef. Im cut, and yes being cut is cleaner, but like people have already said, being clean should be everymans priority. So doesnt stop uncut men from being clean. If your hygienic, your hygienic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And people need to stop talkin out of their arse on this forum, female circumcision is not practised in islam, so stop bashing islam

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I complain when anything is done to anyone without there willing , all the way down to baby ear piercing "

What about vaccinations,.taking to school when you were 6 Y old, taking to the school of their choice, giving you the name of their choice, raising you in the culture and religion of their choice ect. Not many as you complain about that. It's called parental choice and parents chose what they think is best for their kids untill they are grown up enough to decide for themselves. There are billions of ppl who are circumcised and for some reason its the non circumcised who chose to advocate they have been denied a human right just as with muslim women who can speak for themselves but no, it's always non muslims who take the non solisited role to advocate that muslim women are abused and forced to cover their heads when 80% of tribunal cases here are about domestic violence! Please dont fall to the propaganda machine and bye into their hatred and war agendas. It doesn't serve the masses but the pockets of the few on top. it doesnt serve you nor me. Christian, muslim, Jews Budist, Hindo, Atheist ect we all are human beings with different cultures and perspectives we should take that as a positive cultural diversity. Accept and respect each other. Live in harmony and peace with each other. You have the right to disagree with me but when you call me barbaric, anti human ect you are forcing me to be on the defensive.

They said same things about the native Americans you know. They said they savages, barbaric, canibals, primitive to dihumanise them then eliminate them from the face of the earth,which was the most barbaric evil genocide in human history, committed by those who claim to be more civilised ect. Today history is repeating itself. They needed a purlharber to start a war with Japan and it was ok to drop Atomic bombs in Nakazaki and Hiroshima killing over half million inocent ppl within minutes then , another fake marine incident to start a war with Vietnam. A 911 to invade multiple muslim countries killing over 3 million civilians most of them kids then creating ISIS because the big plan has not been accomplished yet. These are the things you should be angry about in my opinion if you care about ppl's choice. If you care about ppl's choice you should call for stopping supporting dictators abroad and stop conspiring to overthrow governments chosen by their own ppl just cause they dont bend over to the USA or Israel. You should be Angry for the 6000 defensless ppl killed by Israelian drones and destroying their homes, schools, hospitals just cause you chose to call them muslim terrorists and dihumanise them. This is worth to be angry about my friend if you really care about human rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think people have got carried away think the op was asking do people prefire sex with a cut or uncut todger ? It is a swingers site !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edangel_2013Woman
over a year ago

southend

I come in to post about cocks and the 2nd to last post mentions ISIS.

I'm out!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *J SuffolkMan
over a year ago

Lincoln

Uncut much preferred. Jaq loves to snuggle down into my silky bollocks and chew my foreskin. Uses it as her dummy and who am I to stop her, very intimate and very sensual as I stroke her hair and face.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Uncut much preferred. Jaq loves to snuggle down into my silky bollocks and chew my foreskin. Uses it as her dummy and who am I to stop her, very intimate and very sensual as I stroke her hair and face.

"

ur lucky man she's hot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well....

...didn't this thread turn out just peachy!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally think this practice should be banned on anyone under 16 or without medical reason it's just as barbaric as fgm I know this comment will spark religious argument but guys should have a choice and not have this done to them at birth it boils my blood "

So you think it's as bad as fgm - the removal of a woman's clit! A woman's clit is integral to her sexual pleasure - a guy who's had his foreskin removed can still fully enjoy sex.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Personally think this practice should be banned on anyone under 16 or without medical reason it's just as barbaric as fgm I know this comment will spark religious argument but guys should have a choice and not have this done to them at birth it boils my blood

So you think it's as bad as fgm - the removal of a woman's clit! A woman's clit is integral to her sexual pleasure - a guy who's had his foreskin removed can still fully enjoy sex. "

I totally agree with what you say and wad tempted to respond further myself to those cliamming it's similar. But I think this thread is the wrong place for this argument. Let's leave this thread as a light hearted thread about the different pleasures offered by roundheads and cavaliers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *he WickedsCouple
over a year ago

Swingtown

I'd like to get back to brass tacks.

I have good experience of both and enjoy both but there is nothing so stimulating as a wonderful tight, hard, cut cock!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top