Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can anyone explain why these women want to be owned by these so called bulls.alot seem to be black men.do that mean the women have to ask who they meet.do the bulls play away also.seems a bit unfair.keisha" I've often wondered this.....I shall watch with interest. I always assumed it was a bit like a sub/dom type relationship but I don't really understand the mechanics of that either so I'm probably wrong. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its about dynamics and that is personal and open to interpretation of labels. Even within ownership the dynamics are individual, some M's allow their subs sexual freedom, others control their subs sexual activity. There is no hard and fast rule. " Unless the rules are infact hard and fast | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Its about dynamics and that is personal and open to interpretation of labels. Even within ownership the dynamics are individual, some M's allow their subs sexual freedom, others control their subs sexual activity. There is no hard and fast rule. Unless the rules are infact hard and fast " In my case the punishment was but that's a different thread | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent" Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish " Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish." Actually I know of many s's that are married to their Master and have signed legal documents to allow them to make decisions for them...... Define 'full control' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can anyone explain why these women want to be owned by these so called bulls.alot seem to be black men.do that mean the women have to ask who they meet.do the bulls play away also.seems a bit unfair.keisha" A woman wants a dom - he's either white or black, hes either white or black through preferences too. What has that go to do with anyone playing away???? I fail to see the connection?!??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish." I think you may be confusing a Sub with a Slave, Both are lifestyle choices but quite different..As for a Hobby most will say its a Lifestyle thats far more fulfilling than building a Model Ship out of Matchsticks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish." you can mate, and when you do, they would literally do anything. Master and Bull are two seperate things though. A Master would own and a Bull is effectively a good fertile dick | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish. I think you may be confusing a Sub with a Slave, Both are lifestyle choices but quite different..As for a Hobby most will say its a Lifestyle thats far more fulfilling than building a Model Ship out of Matchsticks" Well, I did mention I was trying to find the right word (look for the bit in brackets) and yeah I could well be confusing the two. People dont allow other people to tell them what and what they can and can't do (other than legal stuff I guess) away from the swinging/sex world. The master says 'Your mine and your not allowed to even look at another man'. 'Oh ok I won't. (Just a guessed example) Yeah right. Police that. Yeah I suppose they wouldnt have sex with others without asking for permission etc I can see how that works but even so, I still think the individual would be so differn't in other area's of life to this situation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Load of rubbish, 'owning' someone, calling yourself 'a bull'. Bull is the right name for it to some extent Just because it's not for you, does not make it rubbish Im struggling to explain myself. What I mean by rubbish is 'you cant own someone', can you? Even if you think you have full control on that person, you dont really. I certanly didnt mean to call the 'hobby' (cant find the right word) rubbish, too many people do it for it too be rubbish. Actually I know of many s's that are married to their Master and have signed legal documents to allow them to make decisions for them...... Define 'full control' " What decisions? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can anyone explain why these women want to be owned by these so called bulls.alot seem to be black men.do that mean the women have to ask who they meet.do the bulls play away also.seems a bit unfair.keisha A woman wants a dom - he's either white or black, hes either white or black through preferences too. What has that go to do with anyone playing away???? I fail to see the connection?!???" without putting words in their mouth, I think she means is a bull "exclusive" to that person.... but it is an interesting question.... is a bull relationship the same as a sub/dom one.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This has very little to do with swinging. Swing is about sex. I agree that its not possible to fully own another person be they female or male. But it is possible to enter into a relationship that has a D/s Dynamic that states that one person chooses to submit to another person. It has to be understood that this is via choice and that is always the case. No matter what is said or how it appears to the outside world. A relationship is basied on the choice to be part of that relationship. The proof of this is simple. No one can be made to do anything they dont want to do. The true dynamic in a Dom/sub relationship is that the sub has all the control. They can stop anything at any time and that is the control. Sex can be part of this but that does not have to be the case at all. Many fetish dwellers have nothing to do with swinging in any shape or form where as others enjoy the sexual element that can be brought into it. It takes a particular type of person to understand and enjoy this type of relationship and the same goes for couples who swing or who are sexually liberated. That being said swinging and Bdsm are very different but the two things can overlap and do more often that you might think. It is all about giving and receiving what is desired in your relationship. So no i dont believe that you can own another person but you certainly can guide another person if they choose to let you guide them....." Ive probably learned about it reading this than I could of hoped, thank you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This has very little to do with swinging. Swing is about sex. I agree that its not possible to fully own another person be they female or male. But it is possible to enter into a relationship that has a D/s Dynamic that states that one person chooses to submit to another person. It has to be understood that this is via choice and that is always the case. No matter what is said or how it appears to the outside world. A relationship is basied on the choice to be part of that relationship. The proof of this is simple. No one can be made to do anything they dont want to do. The true dynamic in a Dom/sub relationship is that the sub has all the control. They can stop anything at any time and that is the control. Sex can be part of this but that does not have to be the case at all. Many fetish dwellers have nothing to do with swinging in any shape or form where as others enjoy the sexual element that can be brought into it. It takes a particular type of person to understand and enjoy this type of relationship and the same goes for couples who swing or who are sexually liberated. That being said swinging and Bdsm are very different but the two things can overlap and do more often that you might think. It is all about giving and receiving what is desired in your relationship. So no i dont believe that you can own another person but you certainly can guide another person if they choose to let you guide them..... Ive probably learned about it reading this than I could of hoped, thank you" Your welcome... Fetish or Bdsm is a very complicated affair. Far more than swinging and that can be complicated enough as it is..lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This has very little to do with swinging. Swing is about sex. I agree that its not possible to fully own another person be they female or male. But it is possible to enter into a relationship that has a D/s Dynamic that states that one person chooses to submit to another person. It has to be understood that this is via choice and that is always the case. No matter what is said or how it appears to the outside world. A relationship is basied on the choice to be part of that relationship. The proof of this is simple. No one can be made to do anything they dont want to do. The true dynamic in a Dom/sub relationship is that the sub has all the control. They can stop anything at any time and that is the control. Sex can be part of this but that does not have to be the case at all. Many fetish dwellers have nothing to do with swinging in any shape or form where as others enjoy the sexual element that can be brought into it. It takes a particular type of person to understand and enjoy this type of relationship and the same goes for couples who swing or who are sexually liberated. That being said swinging and Bdsm are very different but the two things can overlap and do more often that you might think. It is all about giving and receiving what is desired in your relationship. So no i dont believe that you can own another person but you certainly can guide another person if they choose to let you guide them..... Ive probably learned about it reading this than I could of hoped, thank you Your welcome... Fetish or Bdsm is a very complicated affair. Far more than swinging and that can be complicated enough as it is..lol" And well done for working out what I was trying to say, silly fool I am, I should of read what I wrote before posting. Id left the word 'more' out. It certanly is an eye opener, I had a vison of people loosing their self respect and dignity, women mainly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ha ha.I've had a wink from a bull .want to own me.im a independent strong black woman.im in a relationship with a white man.i will never be owned.slavery done." That i would avoid at all costs. How someone can offer a dynamic to someone without getting to know them Its akin (in my opinion) to marrying someone just because they asked on the second date | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ha ha.I've had a wink from a bull .want to own me.im a independent strong black woman.im in a relationship with a white man.i will never be owned.slavery done. That i would avoid at all costs. How someone can offer a dynamic to someone without getting to know them Its akin (in my opinion) to marrying someone just because they asked on the second date " ^^ I totally agree.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" That i would avoid at all costs. How someone can offer a dynamic to someone without getting to know them Its akin (in my opinion) to marrying someone just because they asked on the second date " this... which is why the "bull" thing is an interesting issue... you get the feeling that "some" people who put on that label see it as a "one size fits all" solution... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" That i would avoid at all costs. How someone can offer a dynamic to someone without getting to know them Its akin (in my opinion) to marrying someone just because they asked on the second date this... which is why the "bull" thing is an interesting issue... you get the feeling that "some" people who put on that label see it as a "one size fits all" solution..." Labels are a double edged sword. They give an impression of you to another person which may or may not be correct. But they also can give people a general idea about what you enjoy etc.. I try to see labels as general terms that way i avoid understanding without knowing.. Well at least i try to..lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't get me wrong some women and men do give themselves up to there partners and whilst that relationship is current they may well feel like that have given there whole life over to another person. But the fact remains that they made the choice to do that and they can make the choice to stop it any time they want. Taking responsiblity for another persons pleasure, as that is what it boils down to, is a big thing and can be very demanding and hard work. Trust me it's not a thing that you go into without really knowing your partner and even more importantly knowing yourself!!! I manage it by treating it as a game. A game that can be played as and when the time is right. Neither me or my partner could live 24/7 D/s but some people choose to do that and it works for them.. Many people believe that Bdsm is all about whips, canes, ropes and chains etc but they are very wrong. Such things are toys and nothing but toys. A true Bdsm relationship is in the mind and is a very deep, powerful and meaningful thing...." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Can anyone explain why these women want to be owned by these so called bulls.alot seem to be black men.do that mean the women have to ask who they meet.do the bulls play away also.seems a bit unfair.keisha" Bulls, normally found on a farm. Subs, either an underwater vessel or a sandwich. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |