FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

BBC report of Fabswingers

Jump to newest
 

By *p4fun60 OP   Couple
7 days ago

Hampshire

Absolutely fuming, anyone else see the damning report on the BBC last night about the lifestyle & specifically this site? Which can now be viewed on YouTube!

OMFG every now & then one of these so called journalists decide to try & out us all, weather its flying a drone over the Swingathon event last year or in this case, gate crashing an organised social event in the guise of a newbie couple attending their first social!

Along with some of our friends attending the social, we actually spoke to this so called undercover reporter & her make believe partner & very quickly became suspicious of them, not just because of the amount of questions they were asking but also their general demeanor & lack of actual spark between each other, no nerves nor excitement between them & generally seeming more like work colleagues than a genuine couple wishing to start their lifestyle journey- my husband having a military background is very assute & clocked something was off & actually asked them outright if they were journalists- obviously they denied it, & continued around the venue chatting to a few other couples whom we knew really well, my husband listened in as they just weren't right & after keeping a close eye on them gave a heads up warning to to the social organiser, who in all fairness had pretty quickly come to the same conclusion. After about 30 mins of chatting to around 4 out of the 50 or so couples that had attended they left

But really was no surprise to see the female of this couple as the actual presenter of the BBC report!

So once again the witch hunt into our lifestyle choices begins again, theres quite a few people that dont mind being outted, but many more that find the thought of our lifestyle journeys being brought into the public domain horrendous & the devastating effects it would have to our vanilla lifes-

Although our lifestyle is more open & to a certain degree excepted more by the mainstream, it still has a stigma that we're all wrongens attached to it to be hunted outed & vilified- so once more be vigilant to newbies,strangers & those with no verifications both on & off this site & don't let small minded people like these spoil your fun or try & ruin your life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nake1977Man
7 days ago

Coventry

As journalists always do they found a bad example of a man coercing his ex wife into sleeping with other men. Whilst that example was awful you just have to hope that most of us are here as consenting adults

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *p4fun60 OP   Couple
7 days ago

Hampshire


"As journalists always do they found a bad example of a man coercing his ex wife into sleeping with other men. Whilst that example was awful you just have to hope that most of us are here as consenting adults "

Think you missed the point, not so much about the actual story, but their efforts to access the lifestyle to try & find something to be sensationalised, all the couples they spoke to at the social were long term married couples & not in a niche or hot wife scenario - but I suppose thats not sordid enough to warrant a prime time spot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ude Not 2Couple
7 days ago

Barry.

I’ve just posted a reply to another chat on here but it’s important to have these discussions because people who aren’t in the scene are probably more likely to attack what they don’t know or understand and of course that makes great ‘journalism’!!

We should always discuss consent and what that looks/sounds/feels like. Coercive and controlling behaviours can be difficult to spot but men in particular need to educate themselves and have limits with regards to situations they’re letting themselves in (‘the missus will pretend to be asleep’ etc).

As party hosts, we discuss this topic a lot and will do our best to spot behaviours and offer safe spaces.

V x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ogerroger69Man
7 days ago

West Yorks

Let’s hope any coercive couples are in the minority, you do see signs sometimes but let’s hope the majority on here are healthy happy relationships x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aandLoCouple
7 days ago

Southampton

Every time I see the news article, or a thread on here about this story, I feel absolute sympathy for Ruth. I understand how over time her spirit, strength and self-confidence was quashed and destroyed by her vile husband. And the article refers to her mental health crisis which I imagine contributed to the husband's ability to manipulate and control her.

At the same time I get so angry about the one sided references to Fab. It's telling when acknowledging that a significant number of women not only determine the dynamic and lead the play, but flourish in this lifestyle, is seen as not worthy of reporting.

If I thought the journalist actually had any interest in reporting the positive experiences I would contact her to put her straight....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ogerroger69Man
7 days ago

West Yorks


"Every time I see the news article, or a thread on here about this story, I feel absolute sympathy for Ruth. I understand how over time her spirit, strength and self-confidence was quashed and destroyed by her vile husband. And the article refers to her mental health crisis which I imagine contributed to the husband's ability to manipulate and control her.

At the same time I get so angry about the one sided references to Fab. It's telling when acknowledging that a significant number of women not only determine the dynamic and lead the play, but flourish in this lifestyle, is seen as not worthy of reporting.

If I thought the journalist actually had any interest in reporting the positive experiences I would contact her to put her straight...."

Well said! 👏🏽

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
7 days ago

Bedfuck

I found it hilarious, the BBC investigating Fabs. A bit lame. More apt for a Channel 4 or 5, think it has been done already years ago.

The BBC is a mix of puritanical, sexually repressed, druggy, alcoholic, misogynistic, hypocritical, sex maniac, pervs.

Perhaps they need to finnish investigating themselves first.

The reporters were crap at their job and were easily rumbled a waste of licence payers money.

Wonder if thy will win a bafta for the bad acting, ie Martin on the phone.lol.

Seriously it doesn't do women any favours who are being coerced or abused slapping it on national tv, it just pushes it deeper underground.

Plus the poor innocent Fabbers are having their discreet lifestyle put in the spotlight.

Bloody stupid BBC.

Close that fucking place down now. Bloody idiots.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allnHandsome12Man
7 days ago

Teesside

I’ve never had any response to a report I’ve submitted, no safeguarding checks or contact and I don’t know anyone that has.

It seems some people are against the site being held to any culpability or a level of responsibility and I’m not sure if that’s due to historical judgement of the lifestyle and how its presented but the site was used to organise the meets, reports of abuse made and no action taken so to not mention this in the article would be poor journalism.

I don’t see anything wrong in websites checking themselves and identifying areas they can improve.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iredhand2Man
7 days ago

Sale


"I’ve never had any response to a report I’ve submitted, no safeguarding checks or contact and I don’t know anyone that has.

It seems some people are against the site being held to any culpability or a level of responsibility and I’m not sure if that’s due to historical judgement of the lifestyle and how its presented but the site was used to organise the meets, reports of abuse made and no action taken so to not mention this in the article would be poor journalism.

I don’t see anything wrong in websites checking themselves and identifying areas they can improve."

The site only creates the opportunity for people to communicate with each other. Meeting is a mutual choice. Fab is no different than any other contact websites/apps but because it has swingers in the domain name it’s treated as being seedy. While coercion is a heinous crime, it is difficult to tell whether someone is victim to it if they appear enthusiastic. There are certain scenarios that I see described on fab that I wouldn’t go anywhere near, eg. Blindfolded, no conversation, etc. However, if they appear enthusiastic how is anyone supposed to know what their real dynamic is?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ithintemptationsCouple
7 days ago

plymouth

lets hope this site wont get banned next then... by the political knobrot brigade

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atentHeelsCouple
7 days ago

Salford

Quite surprising of the ultra left wing BBC - I thought lefties were supposed to be liberal so there's no reason the BBC should be slighting any lifestyles. Oh, that's right - hypocrisy. Yeh, that rings true....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acavityMan
7 days ago

Redditch

Mote and Beam

I’m not saying all BBC employees are fond of children, but I imagine the percentage of offenders is much higher than the percentage of fab offenders

They should be investigating situations where coercion happens. But equally, if there is nothing to report, they should not expose people unnecessarily

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uigi77Man
7 days ago

Nottingham

😂😂😂 bbc! sure!

nobody does such thing unless they will to!

bbc as always turn the thing like it’s some sort of punishment…idiots.

fully forgetting the actual reason behind this all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewMan2026Man
7 days ago

Chester and Liverpool


"Absolutely fuming, anyone else see the damning report on the BBC last night about the lifestyle & specifically this site? Which can now be viewed on YouTube!

OMFG every now & then one of these so called journalists decide to try & out us all, weather its flying a drone over the Swingathon event last year or in this case, gate crashing an organised social event in the guise of a newbie couple attending their first social!

Along with some of our friends attending the social, we actually spoke to this so called undercover reporter & her make believe partner & very quickly became suspicious of them, not just because of the amount of questions they were asking but also their general demeanor & lack of actual spark between each other, no nerves nor excitement between them & generally seeming more like work colleagues than a genuine couple wishing to start their lifestyle journey- my husband having a military background is very assute & clocked something was off & actually asked them outright if they were journalists- obviously they denied it, & continued around the venue chatting to a few other couples whom we knew really well, my husband listened in as they just weren't right & after keeping a close eye on them gave a heads up warning to to the social organiser, who in all fairness had pretty quickly come to the same conclusion. After about 30 mins of chatting to around 4 out of the 50 or so couples that had attended they left

But really was no surprise to see the female of this couple as the actual presenter of the BBC report!

So once again the witch hunt into our lifestyle choices begins again, theres quite a few people that dont mind being outted, but many more that find the thought of our lifestyle journeys being brought into the public domain horrendous & the devastating effects it would have to our vanilla lifes-

Although our lifestyle is more open & to a certain degree excepted more by the mainstream, it still has a stigma that we're all wrongens attached to it to be hunted outed & vilified- so once more be vigilant to newbies,strangers & those with no verifications both on & off this site & don't let small minded people like these spoil your fun or try & ruin your life "

All you are concerned about is your own fun. What about the poor victim here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *p4fun60 OP   Couple
7 days ago

Hampshire


"Absolutely fuming, anyone else see the damning report on the BBC last night about the lifestyle & specifically this site? Which can now be viewed on YouTube!

OMFG every now & then one of these so called journalists decide to try & out us all, weather its flying a drone over the Swingathon event last year or in this case, gate crashing an organised social event in the guise of a newbie couple attending their first social!

Along with some of our friends attending the social, we actually spoke to this so called undercover reporter & her make believe partner & very quickly became suspicious of them, not just because of the amount of questions they were asking but also their general demeanor & lack of actual spark between each other, no nerves nor excitement between them & generally seeming more like work colleagues than a genuine couple wishing to start their lifestyle journey- my husband having a military background is very assute & clocked something was off & actually asked them outright if they were journalists- obviously they denied it, & continued around the venue chatting to a few other couples whom we knew really well, my husband listened in as they just weren't right & after keeping a close eye on them gave a heads up warning to to the social organiser, who in all fairness had pretty quickly come to the same conclusion. After about 30 mins of chatting to around 4 out of the 50 or so couples that had attended they left

But really was no surprise to see the female of this couple as the actual presenter of the BBC report!

So once again the witch hunt into our lifestyle choices begins again, theres quite a few people that dont mind being outted, but many more that find the thought of our lifestyle journeys being brought into the public domain horrendous & the devastating effects it would have to our vanilla lifes-

Although our lifestyle is more open & to a certain degree excepted more by the mainstream, it still has a stigma that we're all wrongens attached to it to be hunted outed & vilified- so once more be vigilant to newbies,strangers & those with no verifications both on & off this site & don't let small minded people like these spoil your fun or try & ruin your life

All you are concerned about is your own fun. What about the poor victim here?"

Maybe if you read our post again you will realise it is targeted at the gutter press infiltrating a social event and trying to expose genuine, consenting couples and lifestylers..it is definitely not aimed at anyone else. Our concern is always for the privacy and discretion that most of us want...this journalist spoke to numerous consenting people who love the lifestyle and gave her a very positive perspective... but she failed to mention any of that in her report ...obviously it didn't fit the narrative.

You've only been on here 9 weeks so I'm sure at some point you will be targeted by fakes and dreamers along the way and then you'll maybe understand what our post is actually about. It has absolutely nothing to do with spoiling our own fun...we have plenty of it thankyou lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
7 days ago

Godalming

Having appeared on BBC news a few times in a professional capacity, I’m always disgusted at the swing and bias they apply to a news story.

They have an agenda that suits them and will twist a story to suit.

Either that, or sensationalise some elements of any story to suit their narrative.

They certainly demonstrate extreme bias.

Perhaps their perceptive and investigative nose should be turned inward.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *KMaxMan
7 days ago

Bristol


"Quite surprising of the ultra left wing BBC - I thought lefties were supposed to be liberal so there's no reason the BBC should be slighting any lifestyles. Oh, that's right - hypocrisy. Yeh, that rings true...."

The ultra left BBC? Yeh okay🤣

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
6 days ago

Bedfuck

I find the BBC doing trans programmes patronising unfunny and not entertaining at all I avoid it like the plague.

When it come anything to do with sex, investigating, probing, films, dramas, behind the scenes scandals. They are like a bull in a China shop.

It's just not them. It's an old fashioned institution and should stay that way till someone's got the balls to pull the plug.

Leave the sex stuff to Channel 4 and 5.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
6 days ago

Bedfuck

Am I suggesting anyone working for the BBC should NOT have a sex life in or out of wedlock? The answer is Hell Yeh.

Would I engage in any sexual activity with a BBC journalist or staff member? Hell No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xSirenaxxWoman
6 days ago

Gloucestershire

It is worth listening to the whole podcast series as the news reports only focus on certain parts. Not saying I agree with everything said in the reports or podcast series but it was interesting and gave more depth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilverjagMan
6 days ago

swansea

I've just posted a comment on a similar thread running in "The Lounge" nobody knows more than I do about the BBC twisting the truth. Whether you like him or not, Donald Trump has the right idea for the BBC who we as television license payers are ultimately paying their wages to listen to their false statements.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
6 days ago

Bedfuck


"I've just posted a comment on a similar thread running in "The Lounge" nobody knows more than I do about the BBC twisting the truth. Whether you like him or not, Donald Trump has the right idea for the BBC who we as television license payers are ultimately paying their wages to listen to their false statements. "

The more stories I hear that come out of them, the more I think they are a Satanic organisation.

All that moral high ground bs is a front, for their demonic activities behind the scenes and sublimely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ongJohnSilva2.0Man
6 days ago

Right up your street

Who actually cares what the BBC report on?

I for one will never take notice of an establishment that covers up noncing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oobxMan
6 days ago

Blackwood

If you had 100 fucks in the real world you going to have flash backs . The police said in statement that she was enthusiastic in her WhatsApp messages, could it be they split up as a couple and now trying to get revenge on her ex partner, now shes giving her name all her family are getting dragged into this story. Just look as if they using swinging as a headline and think its all about swapping and sex.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ot_spicedCouple
6 days ago

Queenstown

I rarely watch the BBC, they do have an obvious small minded bias on many issues, while being guilty for the monsters in its midst.

Yes, I'm sure there are couples here where one half is coerced into sharing, both male and female.

Ages ago we met one such couple, made our excuses and left.

Every group, club, lifestyle has its questionable people, but on the whole, fab is a like minded place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acktothefutureMan
6 days ago

Leeds

I can understand that there some bad apples everywhere, but my personal opinion is that the report is one sided, it mentions fabswingers but just to story is a old fashioned dog chase.

The women had a husband (this a marriage issue)

If the husband was controlling why did she not report it to the police? (why would she just refuse?) I mean I get turn down -99% time on fab yet she somehow just accepted the controlling behaviour and continued on???)

It's just just an attack on men who are in swinging branding them controlling.

I have met with lots of women on fab I have lots of respect for them as thy just don't meet anyone they do there diligence and decide if they want to meet someone.

BBC have been extremely one sided in the report and men ale controlling and bad.

One sided view of BBC, men are bad....

BBC has failed over they years to report all the pedofiles who work for BBC - 80% of reporters don't pay tax in the UK but let's just attack men.

BBC has lost me years ago as viewer.

The double standards in Policeing and now double standards in journalism.

From my perspective it's just bad reporting.

Swinging is bad.

Men are bad.

Women have more power on fab swingers as they can check if the person is verified and as them for their picture.

I still respect women that are in swinging, I wouldn't brand men bad because of 1% of men how have bad intentions.

I have a lot of respect for women on fab as they are a lot smarter then the reporter and the 1% of gorillas on fab will change their mind.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughtystaffs60Couple
6 days ago

Staffordshire

The BBC is the mouthpiece of the state and isn't it a bit of a coincidence that this report comes out when government is about to inititate another round of measures to control social media and legislate it in the way that the wokes see how it should operate.

The socialist straight jacket and how they see things is slowly, surely, quietly being placed around us and soon it will be too late to remove it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un Filthy FriendsMan
6 days ago

Maidstone, Kent

BBC no longer a worthy source of any independent, non biased reporting.

Infiltrated by ideology and their own agenda pushing. Sounding like a very judgemental piece. Carry on Fabbing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
6 days ago

Ayrshire

Is it just too uncomfortable for men when a very public mirror is held up to their behaviour?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tlanshiaWoman
6 days ago

Chatham

It isn’t a stretch though is it!?

While not fabs fault, how many forum posts have you seen that are ‘sharing wife’s pics’ ‘anyone sharing pics of wife’ or ‘talk about wife’.

How many of you have done that.

As a woman when I see those posts i often wonder if she knows.

How many posts of ‘when working in someone’s house do you go looking for dirty knickers’ or ‘I wank into wives dirty undies she doesn’t know’.

Unfortunately, bbc has held up a mirror to men’s shitty behaviour. Most men only respect boundaries and consent if it is what they were gonna do anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tlanshiaWoman
6 days ago

Chatham


"Mote and Beam

I’m not saying all BBC employees are fond of children, but I imagine the percentage of offenders is much higher than the percentage of fab offenders

They should be investigating situations where coercion happens. But equally, if there is nothing to report, they should not expose people unnecessarily "

So because worse crime is happening this one is irrelevant and should be ignored?

You can shine a light on two stories at once. They are not exposing people. They are reporting on a story, and given facts. It happened on here. I don’t understand that mentality, they’re not showing people’s profiles with their badge id number at work.

A crime happened, in the same way if a burglary happens at Tesco, they report it happened at Tesco….

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
6 days ago

Bedfuck


"Is it just too uncomfortable for men when a very public mirror is held up to their behaviour?"

If it was done by a media outlet that was free from the same abuse they are exposing fine. Unfortunately the BBC aren't a suitable media source considering their past, complete with cover ups mysterious deaths ( the tops girl)

Channel 4 and 5 would have done a better job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ieandteaseMan
6 days ago

Wiltshire


"As journalists always do they found a bad example of a man coercing his ex wife into sleeping with other men. Whilst that example was awful you just have to hope that most of us are here as consenting adults

Think you missed the point, not so much about the actual story, but their efforts to access the lifestyle to try & find something to be sensationalised, all the couples they spoke to at the social were long term married couples & not in a niche or hot wife scenario - but I suppose thats not sordid enough to warrant a prime time spot "

Oooh, that's lectured you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ny1localMan
6 days ago

READING


"It isn’t a stretch though is it!?

While not fabs fault, how many forum posts have you seen that are ‘sharing wife’s pics’ ‘anyone sharing pics of wife’ or ‘talk about wife’.

How many of you have done that.

As a woman when I see those posts i often wonder if she knows.

How many posts of ‘when working in someone’s house do you go looking for dirty knickers’ or ‘I wank into wives dirty undies she doesn’t know’.

Unfortunately, bbc has held up a mirror to men’s shitty behaviour. Most men only respect boundaries and consent if it is what they were gonna do anyway. "

as a guy I also wonder if the wife/gf knows. How on earth those blokes get a meet I don't know. I'd also suggest to the ladies that before they meet someone they check out the guys forum posts to see what sort of person they are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harmedAndInChargeMan
6 days ago

SW


"Mote and Beam

I’m not saying all BBC employees are fond of children, but I imagine the percentage of offenders is much higher than the percentage of fab offenders

They should be investigating situations where coercion happens. But equally, if there is nothing to report, they should not expose people unnecessarily

So because worse crime is happening this one is irrelevant and should be ignored?

You can shine a light on two stories at once. They are not exposing people. They are reporting on a story, and given facts. It happened on here. I don’t understand that mentality, they’re not showing people’s profiles with their badge id number at work.

A crime happened, in the same way if a burglary happens at Tesco, they report it happened at Tesco…. "

So true. If a crime occurs anywhere it should be reported. And it will hopefully lead to better awareness and hopefully encourages places like fab to look at ways to stop it.

Which is better for all of us…other than the predators!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uxuriantCouple
6 days ago

Cornwall

[Removed by poster at 18/06/26 15:06:10]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uxuriantCouple
6 days ago

Cornwall

Any crime like this should clearly be reported, but as usual the awful BBC seeks to sensationalise and generalise. If you are being forced to do anything against your will, then report it.

We’ve always been amazed at the number of messages we get that say something like “How can I get my wife interested in the scene?” .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tarlightvoyager21Man
6 days ago

London

Yeah same

Many guys message like that

It's honestly ick just to read idiots like those who can't communicate to their on partner or respect their stands even exist here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lley-CatMan
6 days ago

Folkestone

This is a status update posted on here earlier today and still live after five hours:

'Time to reclaim slut and have her serve her punishment for wanting to stop Then she will be put up for use by females.'

With posts like that and Fabswingers being mentioned in reports to several police forces, who can blame journalists for investigating the site?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aughtybynameCouple
6 days ago

aldringham

I read that as big black cock

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lpueblitoCouple
3 days ago

Liverpool

I'm speaking out here honestly and openly. I have been accused recently of 'coercing' my ex into having a 3 sum. I had been with her for a while and was always honest and open about my sex life and swinging. She always said that she would love to try it. We stayed in a hotel with the sole purpose of trying to arrange a 3 sum. Unfortunately it didn't happen. A few months later after numerous chats about swinging and again always being honest and open. I asked her if she wanted a threesome to which she agreed. We were very lucky as a male who I had known previously was quite local. So I arranged it. Everything was fine absolutely no issues and we had a great time and she was treated very respectfully.

We end up splitting up a few months later.

9 months later she has said that I coerced her into it. I absolutely deny it as over a long period of times we discussed it openly many many times and she was always on board. Not once did she ever say anything negative about the experience.

Yet here I am under investigation.

I fail to see what more I could have done and given the fact that she was always willing and not once did I ever have to convince her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *um n raisinWoman
3 days ago

taunton

sadly the only outcome from this bbc story will be that it puts more women off married or single and zillions more men will seek these sites out making the male ratio even bigger.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
3 days ago

Ayrshire


"I'm speaking out here honestly and openly. I have been accused recently of 'coercing' my ex into having a 3 sum. I had been with her for a while and was always honest and open about my sex life and swinging. She always said that she would love to try it. We stayed in a hotel with the sole purpose of trying to arrange a 3 sum. Unfortunately it didn't happen. A few months later after numerous chats about swinging and again always being honest and open. I asked her if she wanted a threesome to which she agreed. We were very lucky as a male who I had known previously was quite local. So I arranged it. Everything was fine absolutely no issues and we had a great time and she was treated very respectfully.

We end up splitting up a few months later.

9 months later she has said that I coerced her into it. I absolutely deny it as over a long period of times we discussed it openly many many times and she was always on board. Not once did she ever say anything negative about the experience.

Yet here I am under investigation.

I fail to see what more I could have done and given the fact that she was always willing and not once did I ever have to convince her.

"

Ah well, at least you've found another woman to swing with

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockwellinMan
3 days ago

Over there...

There were a couple of other threads about this, and some commented that there could be an influx of new members either guys looking to get thier wife someone to have sex with her, or possibly journalists looking for stories to print.

Strange coincidence that in the past 24hrs I had two new contacts, both single male profiles, both only joined in the last few days, both saying they were looking for someone to fuck thier wife and both saying along the lines of..."she doesnt know about this but we have talked about doing something like this."

Now my luck isnt that good to get two offers in a single day, so the suspicious part of me wonders if they are guys who read the original news article and thought they'd try thier luck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

3 days ago

East Sussex


"This is a status update posted on here earlier today and still live after five hours:

'Time to reclaim slut and have her serve her punishment for wanting to stop Then she will be put up for use by females.'

With posts like that and Fabswingers being mentioned in reports to several police forces, who can blame journalists for investigating the site?"

Did you report it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lley-CatMan
2 days ago

Folkestone


"This is a status update posted on here earlier today and still live after five hours:

'Time to reclaim slut and have her serve her punishment for wanting to stop Then she will be put up for use by females.'

With posts like that and Fabswingers being mentioned in reports to several police forces, who can blame journalists for investigating the site?

Did you report it?"

No. I have made several reports of profiles and photos in the past and nothing ever happens.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exanthemMan
21 hours ago

Nearby

Negative publicity is a publicity - it reminded me of the case that happened in France last year and husband was found guilty as he almost dr u g e d his wife, invited 40 men to fuck her. During trial their daughters were present and it was a horrible experience for them. So yes, while married you think you got a consent- but once the marriage is over - anything can happen, previously consent can now be called out as manipulation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

20 hours ago

East Sussex


"Negative publicity is a publicity - it reminded me of the case that happened in France last year and husband was found guilty as he almost dr u g e d his wife, invited 40 men to fuck her. During trial their daughters were present and it was a horrible experience for them. So yes, while married you think you got a consent- but once the marriage is over - anything can happen, previously consent can now be called out as manipulation"

He didn't 'almost' drug her he consistently and deliberately did over many years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockwellinMan
19 hours ago

Over there...


"Negative publicity is a publicity - it reminded me of the case that happened in France last year and husband was found guilty as he almost dr u g e d his wife, invited 40 men to fuck her. During trial their daughters were present and it was a horrible experience for them. So yes, while married you think you got a consent- but once the marriage is over - anything can happen, previously consent can now be called out as manipulation"

One of the accounts who contacted me said his wife was still d*unk in bed and wanted me to go over and fuck her and he'd film it, said he'd blindfold her so she wouldn't know it wasn't him (surely a woman can tell?).

Thats non-consensual sex as far as I'm concerned.

I was about to report the account but then it was no longer active

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lley-CatMan
19 hours ago

Folkestone


"...So yes, while married you think you got a consent- but once the marriage is over - anything can happen, previously consent can now be called out as manipulation"

This used to be the case but the law changed and marriage does not now automatically create consent. Which is exactly how it should be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heGreenMan555Man
18 hours ago

Chichester

The accompanying Podcast (‘Swingers’ on BBC Sounds) really seems to be having a go at Fabs. They visit a club & whilst they’re not exactly glowing with positivity, it does come over a bit more balanced. But when it comes to this site, the journo really does have a pop.

Comes down to this I guess: consent should not be assumed in any situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pankingNorfolkCouple
17 hours ago

norwich ish


"There were a couple of other threads about this, and some commented that there could be an influx of new members either guys looking to get thier wife someone to have sex with her, or possibly journalists looking for stories to print.

Strange coincidence that in the past 24hrs I had two new contacts, both single male profiles, both only joined in the last few days, both saying they were looking for someone to fuck thier wife and both saying along the lines of..."she doesnt know about this but we have talked about doing something like this."

Now my luck isnt that good to get two offers in a single day, so the suspicious part of me wonders if they are guys who read the original news article and thought they'd try thier luck. "

Hmm we got a message on weekend from a young couple based in Salford, hadn’t pit two and two together at the time. Was a strange message from a couple so we didn’t reply but now I’m wondering whether it may have been a reporter type

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ongandthick888Man
17 hours ago

UK

I receive those “seduce my wife” and “wank over my wife’s pictures” messages multiple times a week, every week.

I never respond to them because it’s always seemed weird and unethical. There’s loads, and I mean LOADS of those types of men around.

They usually keep their profile for a day or two and then delete.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

17 hours ago

East Sussex

To be very clear the blame lays entirely with the vile men who ask other men to meet their 'unaware' wife.

However the men who agree to it must bear some of the responsibility. I've seen threads where men have offered their 'help' to a single guy trying to get his partner involved and when called out accuse people of kink shaming or tell them to mind their business.

Obviously these threads get removed as they aren't allowed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top