Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It could be a case of single males making couples profiles then targeting new couples and it could also be a case of more established couples not interacting with new couples. That could explain why some are seeing much higher numbers of profiles that’s not right " I agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Totally agree with OP. When I read complaints like that, I chuckle. It's usually those couples own failure to spot the profiles "to avoid". The complainers usually get focused on the 'too good to be true' profiles and pictures and ignore the hundreds of real couples that, because they are not attractive to them, they don't matter and not counted as real. Only the sexy ones matter and only engage with those and when these turn out to be a fiasco, then they complain all couples are fake. Difficult to say what's fake or not fake, but it's easy to spot the couples that are best to approach with caution: Sketchy veris / super attractive but hardly any meets / long time in Fab but little to account for / weeks since last time they logged in / both straight but looking for single women / chat geared to photo exchange rather than meeting / etc etc TinaTitz gave a great example of how to filter in her context. We have our own way, and still finding so many real couples in Fab that i do not see the point to count the so called fake ones." that’s not what we’ve found we actually avoid couples that look to good to be true maybe we do need more experience on here to help us spot the fake couples but that’s something that will come in time | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |