Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can block a group from messaging you, but can still send them a message. That is probably what they have done, so they don't get bombarded with messages. They get to choose who they chat with. " But how does that make any sense?? TG/TV/TS is the smallest demographic, and they specifically say that we are among what they seek. Yes, I know, don't expect Fab folks to make sense... Those of us who do are in a minority... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On my couple's profile, we do have a veri from a TV even though we are not looking for TV/TS, not our regular dynamics (my partner is straight and I prefer manly men). But because we met them in a club, and we were involved in a group play that they were part of, we got a veri. So yes, OP, it is possible to meet a TV/TS even though the Fab profile states you're not looking for them. " The thing is, their profile says they ARE looking for TG/TV/TS. The tick-box part AND the bio. They also have some TG/TV/TS dooted through their veris, including 2-on-1 meets rather than groups/parties. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On my couple's profile, we do have a veri from a TV even though we are not looking for TV/TS, not our regular dynamics (my partner is straight and I prefer manly men). But because we met them in a club, and we were involved in a group play that they were part of, we got a veri. So yes, OP, it is possible to meet a TV/TS even though the Fab profile states you're not looking for them. The thing is, their profile says they ARE looking for TG/TV/TS. The tick-box part AND the bio. They also have some TG/TV/TS dooted through their veris, including 2-on-1 meets rather than groups/parties." Much like women who meet men but block incoming mail from them via filters to manage their own inbox....they're just choosing to be the one to make first contact. Simple as that. 🤷♂️ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And on the flip side, there's plenty of single guys who identify on their profile as being straight. But go on to say they are seeking TV/TS and have veris confirming they have played with them. Suppose it's all about the need for labels, isn't it. One size fits all etc. There's FabGuys for gay/bisexual men, pretty sure there's similar sites for TV/TS. Do you get similar responses from those sites as well...? It probably goes with the territory, those of us into "'recreational sex" (or whatever you want to call it) are not always looking for romance so maybe they feel they can play on peoples needs without having to justify it long term. Strange hobby we all have, isn't it...? " If a man perceives a person as a woman, then romance/sex with that person is the action of a straight man. Trans women are women (though I'm painfully aware that we're not always perceived as such), while TV/CD... well, I perceive them as women, too, so to me playing with them is lesbian. Also, it's important that you don't lose yourself in labels and start worrying about being mislabelled. Such a worry happens in many straight men who find themselves attracted to trans women / CD / anything in between. You are you, and who you like/desire is up to you, without justification, and with labels only being secondary, approximation. But don't make out you are after a certain demographic, and completely ban that very demographic from approaching you. Just how is that supposed to work? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How come there are profiles there who say in their bio that they are seeking (among others) TV/TS/TG, but when I try to wink or message them, I get the note that they have "blocked everyone of your sex"? I encountered several of such profiles. I won't name and shame anyone, not my style. But just now, yet again, I encountered a couple just like that. What's super weird is that they have mutual verifications with some TV/TG/TS people. How did they even manage to get in touch to meet them?? The couple is praised for being lovely and welcoming. I don't feel welcome. I feel othered. I'm totally baffled. Rant over..." When we haven't had the filter on we get a lot of HPWs because we have veris from meeting TVs in clubs... People use filters to manage their traffic but go looking for themselves and make approaches if they wish for a certain demographic...we have friends who we know do this... We have single men blocked but do meet them...we just go looking fir ourselves and make approaches directly to individuals who interest us... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" But don't make out you are after a certain demographic, and completely ban that very demographic from approaching you. Just how is that supposed to work?" Aside from my previous point. Fab places TV's, TS's and CD's into one category. Maybe they're not seeking all? Filters and preferences are individual. You'll never be able to dictate someone else's. If you can't contact them whether it's down to gender, sexuality, age or whatever....it's best to not dwell and move on to those you can. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On my couple's profile, we do have a veri from a TV even though we are not looking for TV/TS, not our regular dynamics (my partner is straight and I prefer manly men). But because we met them in a club, and we were involved in a group play that they were part of, we got a veri. So yes, OP, it is possible to meet a TV/TS even though the Fab profile states you're not looking for them. The thing is, their profile says they ARE looking for TG/TV/TS. The tick-box part AND the bio. They also have some TG/TV/TS dooted through their veris, including 2-on-1 meets rather than groups/parties. Much like women who meet men but block incoming mail from them via filters to manage their own inbox....they're just choosing to be the one to make first contact. Simple as that. 🤷♂️" This is what we do. Most of the messages we get from single guys are utter dross and usually full of smut or offering to be a bull etc. A complete turn off for us. Many haven't read the profile and 99% are from people we would never in a million years play with. So we block messages from single guys on here. Doesn't mean we don't occasionally play with single guys, as we do couples and single fems, but we don't want to have to deal with some of the disgusting messages we receive at times. If we want to meet a single guy we will go looking ourselves. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How come there are profiles there who say in their bio that they are seeking (among others) TV/TS/TG, but when I try to wink or message them, I get the note that they have "blocked everyone of your sex"? I encountered several of such profiles. I won't name and shame anyone, not my style. But just now, yet again, I encountered a couple just like that. What's super weird is that they have mutual verifications with some TV/TG/TS people. How did they even manage to get in touch to meet them?? The couple is praised for being lovely and welcoming. I don't feel welcome. I feel othered. I'm totally baffled. Rant over..." You won't name and shame them? What, because they aren't looking for TV/TVS? Is that something people should be ashamed of? Or have I read your post wrong? Mr F. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You won't name and shame them? What, because they aren't looking for TV/TVS? Is that something people should be ashamed of? Or have I read your post wrong? Mr F. " No, that's not something to be ashamed of. But yes, you have read it wrong. They ARE looking for TV/TS, yet they are blocking that category. That feels like taunting. But I've got my answers, there are apparently a lot of spammers in my category. I best just don't let the frustration about the situation get the better of me. I'll concentrate on those whom I CAN approach... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |