Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"Women and couples are here to enhance their sex lives, not in order to have a sex life. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"I would like to know why youre looking at all the men | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why
Women and couples are here to enhance their sex lives, not in order to have a sex life."__ 
(Two thumbs each of us, makes four) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why
Women and couples are here to enhance their sex lives, not in order to have a sex life."I think this is the case, at least for many of the men. I also think this is the reason that there's so few women. I suspect they get bombarded by messages as soon as they join and many then decide its not for them. Nita | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"It's a free site, loads of men join, alot are dreamers or timewasters. Hence us having a bad reputation, if it costs nothing to join people don't care | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You most definitely need a thick skin for fab. It often makes me wonder how some of the guys who send vulgar messages behave in normal life. I’m happy to wait to be intimate with someone when I feel that vibe is there. I don’t use fab to arrange meets anymore. But when you find those at clubs and events who you click with it’s so worth it. " Don't blame you to be honest. Clubs are the best way to meet people. No ping pong messaging for weeks or even months on end, for it To go no where. Alot of people just stick to clubs.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected." It will because hopefully they'll develop sex robots for all genders. Following on from that they'll probably develop 'social' robots and we'll all be in a hell of a pickle | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It will because hopefully they'll develop sex robots for all genders. Following on from that they'll probably develop 'social' robots and we'll all be in a hell of a pickle" It raises all sorts of existential concerns, but more immediate ones are a little more practical. Say for example a man is enjoying his Pamela Anderson in her prime sex bot, she's thrashing, moaning and loving everything he does to her - before the hidden razor blades contract JUST enough into the sides of his stem to stop him pulling out, her face expression changes, and suggests he hand over all his financial assets to the firm which created her, QUICKLY!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It will because hopefully they'll develop sex robots for all genders. Following on from that they'll probably develop 'social' robots and we'll all be in a hell of a pickle" Sex is enjoyable for many because its the mutual enjoyment. If you just want physical pleasure, just masturbate. When sex becomes a preprogrammed response by an automaton, where is the incentive to attempt to pleasure it and enjoy that mutual satisfaction of your own pleasure, and you being the source for theirs? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected." It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Frankly we’d both like it to be available now as the sort of man who wants that is exactly the sort we don’t want to meet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I first joined a few years ago and left very quickly as I was overwhelmed by the behaviour of men and couples. A few months later I rejoined and discovered the message filters so I had more control. I have been in fab off and on now. I often leave because I an sickof the way too many men treat women on here.... we are thinking feeling human beings. Yes I am here to enhance my sex life but I have standards that I will not lower and I choose carefully the very small number of people I occasionally play with.. I am not a porn star or a sex worker and I don't owe anyone anything on here least of all anyone that wants to use me as wank material or is happy to get their dick wet in any old hole. " couldn't agree more. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence." Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that." Yeah, the man who halved the value of Twitter and gave us the cybertruck. I’ll not hold my breath, but I can see why some people might be willing to believe him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I also think this is the reason that there's so few women. I suspect they get bombarded by messages as soon as they join and many then decide its not for them. Nita" When I joined, luckily I’m thick skinned & ignored my inbox for about 2 weeks, then bulk deleted, it was very overwhelming & didn’t realise there were filters, I almost deleted but just read & read & read, the forums & club reviews got me through it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I first joined a few years ago and left very quickly as I was overwhelmed by the behaviour of men and couples. A few months later I rejoined and discovered the message filters so I had more control. I have been in fab off and on now. I often leave because I an sickof the way too many men treat women on here.... we are thinking feeling human beings. Yes I am here to enhance my sex life but I have standards that I will not lower and I choose carefully the very small number of people I occasionally play with.. I am not a porn star or a sex worker and I don't owe anyone anything on here least of all anyone that wants to use me as wank material or is happy to get their dick wet in any old hole. " Well said | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"Societal expectations! Men are expected to be dogs and women struggle to break out of the weird sexist expectations blah blah. Or something like that | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because women venturing on here get pestered by guys who don't turn up when a meet is arranged." This is true. My wife and my own FWB are plagued by no-shows and men in portrayal.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that. Yeah, the man who halved the value of Twitter and gave us the cybertruck. I’ll not hold my breath, but I can see why some people might be willing to believe him. " Given it's the mainstream media Vs 'X' for control of the official narrative these days I'd take anything you read with an ocean of salt. Do you have any programming experience, or understanding of how computer code works before I engage further? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that." We don’t really have AI capable of doing those things. We have AI capable of ingesting stuff that already exists and then spitting out something that is an amalgamation of those things according to a prompt given by a human. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that. We don’t really have AI capable of doing those things. We have AI capable of ingesting stuff that already exists and then spitting out something that is an amalgamation of those things according to a prompt given by a human." That's basically how the human mind works in it's simplest terms, we ingest information from our surroundings, compare it to what we've already learned and come to conclusions based upon what we're experiencing. Some are better at doing this than others of course, and the refining process for computer programming is a lot more strict. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It will because hopefully they'll develop sex robots for all genders. Following on from that they'll probably develop 'social' robots and we'll all be in a hell of a pickle It raises all sorts of existential concerns, but more immediate ones are a little more practical. Say for example a man is enjoying his Pamela Anderson in her prime sex bot, she's thrashing, moaning and loving everything he does to her - before the hidden razor blades contract JUST enough into the sides of his stem to stop him pulling out, her face expression changes, and suggests he hand over all his financial assets to the firm which created her, QUICKLY! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"Less men doesn’t mean it’ll be any easier, the ladies and couples will still choose wisely so it’s better to up your game/profile/photos/messages/social and club attendance etc Rather than bemoan the odds, as they are what they are | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It will because hopefully they'll develop sex robots for all genders. Following on from that they'll probably develop 'social' robots and we'll all be in a hell of a pickle Sex is enjoyable for many because its the mutual enjoyment. If you just want physical pleasure, just masturbate. When sex becomes a preprogrammed response by an automaton, where is the incentive to attempt to pleasure it and enjoy that mutual satisfaction of your own pleasure, and you being the source for theirs? " I think people that genuinely want sex robots are imagining a seemingly sentient automaton. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"Sounds like the sort of research sydney university would do I care not how many guys join they have zero impact on me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once artificially intelligent sex robots become a thing (and technology is developing awfully quickly now...) it'll be fascinating to see how the power dynamics between men and women are affected. It’s the incel dream but won’t happen for a long time, no one is even close to doing work that will lead to an artificial general intelligence. Not according to Elon Musk, who's at the forefront of such technology, and concerned about it's ramifications for the world within the next decade. We already have AI capable of creating art, books, music and it's even developing into movies, it's not inconceivable that it may eventually be able to do the same with personalities, I've read plenty of articles and watched videos suggesting it may already be in the early stages of doing exactly that. We don’t really have AI capable of doing those things. We have AI capable of ingesting stuff that already exists and then spitting out something that is an amalgamation of those things according to a prompt given by a human. That's basically how the human mind works in it's simplest terms, we ingest information from our surroundings, compare it to what we've already learned and come to conclusions based upon what we're experiencing. Some are better at doing this than others of course, and the refining process for computer programming is a lot more strict." There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. AI will not be capable of that any time soon. I doubt in my lifetime, if ever. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people." How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"That is such an interesting question and I've wondered this myself. I don't know what Fab's statistics on M vs. F members for all we know there may be more women members but for sure, many more men seem to be online at any given time Speaking as a woman, I've initiated sex countless times so I guess I don't fit in the traditional male-seeking-female role BUT .....it's TRUE that men have to "compete" more than us for sex I suspect the reason is evolutionary. In ancient times, "strong" men got to shag women and produced "strong" kids so there was survival benefit. Over millennia SOCIETY adopted the idea that women didn't have to do anything as men would "fight" for them and "woo" them. So society learned that the "norm" was for women to wait for the men to compete and so fast forward to modern times - girls get sex partners with little effort so many don't have any need to be on Fab. Guys OTOH are fighting the fight and so explore all avenues including Fab. Hence number of men here is LIKELY way more than women (Fab should put out statistics LOL) Now mind you, if there were less men than women the REVERSE would be happening. I think some war-torn countries actually have more women than men so girls have to compete for a mate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'." How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance." How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't." You're both losing yourselves in convoluted b*ll*cks. Maths is not the basis for AI, at least in the traditional computing sense of algorithms. Probabilistic methodology (i.e. Best guess) is what makes AI different. It looks at a bunch of input data, sees the request and then makes the best inference. That's why genAI input can be so ropey (missing or extra fingers etc). My advice is to spend some time with someone who was using and building AI models years before ChatGPT. M. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't." I suspect we have different definitions of “new.” And art, literature, etc, is not made by maths. Perhaps that’s what people who think that AI can create works of art are missing. And I say that as someone who wrote a postgraduate thesis in this field, and someone who uses AI to create art. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't. I suspect we have different definitions of “new.” And art, literature, etc, is not made by maths. Perhaps that’s what people who think that AI can create works of art are missing. And I say that as someone who wrote a postgraduate thesis in this field, and someone who uses AI to create art." I read somewhere once that the problem with AI is that instead of doing the tedious things for artists, it’s making art for the tedious. I kind of get where they are coming from. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't. I suspect we have different definitions of “new.” And art, literature, etc, is not made by maths. Perhaps that’s what people who think that AI can create works of art are missing. And I say that as someone who wrote a postgraduate thesis in this field, and someone who uses AI to create art. I read somewhere once that the problem with AI is that instead of doing the tedious things for artists, it’s making art for the tedious. I kind of get where they are coming from." A lot of people think that AI is a magic solution to any task they don’t really understand (hence, I guess, why so many guys want to substitute AI robots for a woman). The reality is that it isn’t. It’s a tool to be used in experienced hands to assist with something. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't. I suspect we have different definitions of “new.” And art, literature, etc, is not made by maths. Perhaps that’s what people who think that AI can create works of art are missing. And I say that as someone who wrote a postgraduate thesis in this field, and someone who uses AI to create art. I read somewhere once that the problem with AI is that instead of doing the tedious things for artists, it’s making art for the tedious. I kind of get where they are coming from. A lot of people think that AI is a magic solution to any task they don’t really understand (hence, I guess, why so many guys want to substitute AI robots for a woman). The reality is that it isn’t. It’s a tool to be used in experienced hands to assist with something." That last sentence is a tautology and nothing before it adds anything of value to the discussion. You can do better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The reality is that it isn’t. It’s a tool to be used in experienced hands to assist with something. That last sentence is a tautology and nothing before it adds anything of value to the discussion. You can do better." You know someone doesn’t have anything interesting to say when they pick on your grammar rather than your point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a big difference between AI and an artist who can think critically, make value judgements, and come up with genuinely new ways to show the world to people. How so? I'm not being clever here, as this is a subject of particular personal interest to me and I'm happy to discuss it in a non-confrontational fashion with anyone else who finds it intriguing. Almost anything you can imagine as a human being, is in some way, shape or form inspired by things you've experienced which are already there around you, or once were. The very subject of mathematics which we use to measure and quantify the universe is the result of reverse engineering, Mathematician John Lennox refers to it as the 'language of God'. How so what? If you think there’s no possibility of creating something new then I genuinely feel sorry for you. I don’t know what your paragraph on maths is about or it’s relevance. How so as in, what's the difference between a human and an artificial intelligence, besides AI being newer and less refined (for now)? What you define as 'new' is a matter of perspective, you can bake a new cake recipe for example, but the ingredients won't be, and the flavour you're looking to achieve is likely inspired once more by something you've already tasted. I brought up maths because it's the basis of Artificial Intelligence and logic, the process by which we determine true from false, what is from what isn't. I suspect we have different definitions of “new.” And art, literature, etc, is not made by maths. Perhaps that’s what people who think that AI can create works of art are missing. And I say that as someone who wrote a postgraduate thesis in this field, and someone who uses AI to create art. I read somewhere once that the problem with AI is that instead of doing the tedious things for artists, it’s making art for the tedious. I kind of get where they are coming from. A lot of people think that AI is a magic solution to any task they don’t really understand (hence, I guess, why so many guys want to substitute AI robots for a woman). The reality is that it isn’t. It’s a tool to be used in experienced hands to assist with something." I’m not in any way an expert on AI or the like but that’s how I’ve always understood what I’ve read about it. The fantasy is that it’s going to take over but in reality it’s like any tool, without a skilled operator it’s useless. It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because social conditioning in society teaches women that it’s shameful to have an active, varied, and non-monogamous sex life. And lots of men, even here, uphold this ideology." Spot on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why
Women and couples are here to enhance their sex lives, not in order to have a sex life." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because social conditioning in society teaches women that it’s shameful to have an active, varied, and non-monogamous sex life. And lots of men, even here, uphold this ideology. Spot on" Even on *this thread* people are perpetuating this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So I've been on this site for about 3 years but I had my first meeting in January this year
but I have seen there seem to be a lot of men on the site
but very few ladies and couples joining this site
I would like to know why"I have had a couple's account and my then partner had a female account. I can understand why women don't stay for long after see some of the mail she had. Guys a woman is here for her enjoyment, remember that when you mail and remember it's her choice. As a couple mail has come in 'can I fuck your Mrs?' I know there are all kinds of couples on here but find out who you are chatting with, and why they are here. I think the reason there are not more single women is because there can't be bothered to put up with some guys. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve." I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...?" Men on this site are not sla*es with no power. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? Men on this site are not sla*es with no power." As evidenced by threads like this popping up a couple of times a week | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...?" As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. " I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need some more girls in here We need some more girls in here We need some more girls in here We need some more girls in here There's too many man, too many many man Too many man, too many many man Too many man, too many many man Too many man, too many many man" loool | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys "Oh dear. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear."Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear.
Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch?"Seriously, we would heartily encourage that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I think that is part of it j was first in here 8years ago and it was a good mixture of people seems like it's not as good as it was tbh" Use guys are expected to jump through hoops to impress couples and single women. They do get tons of terrible mesaages, so decent messages do get lost. I just go to clubs and skip all the ping pong mesaages and chat to people in person. Much much better these days. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear.
Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch?
Seriously, we would heartily encourage that."I really don't think you would, because in such a world? You'd be the single male  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear.
Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch?
Seriously, we would heartily encourage that.
I really don't think you would, because in such a world?
You'd be the single male "Really, we’d be fine. We see fab as somewhere to potentially find people who might enhance our sex life, not to have a sex life. We’ve nothing to fear from sex robots. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear.
Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch?
Seriously, we would heartily encourage that.
I really don't think you would, because in such a world?
You'd be the single male
Really, we’d be fine. We see fab as somewhere to potentially find people who might enhance our sex life, not to have a sex life."Love that snideyly superior tone, though you're not the first person I've seen use it on here. Does a great job of further supporting why technology is on it's current trajectory though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s quite telling how certain men are so very keen to have their own sentient sex sl@ve. I'm guessing this is levelled at me, but would it surprise you that men may be intrigued by the idea, especially on a site where we are, in all intents and purposes, sl@ves ourselves with little to no power or influence? You seem quite bothered by the thought of no longer being in demand, should such technology ever come about...? As I said, we’d welcome the technology being available now. Far easier to concentrate on the real men, if the rest are fucking their talking fleshlights. I think the 'real men' would be more interested in their personal Dua Lipas and Sydney Sweeneys
Oh dear.
Seriously, should the technology ever be available, and using this site as an example for wider society and it's attitude toward men, why would we jump through hoops to try and impress you, when we can just have what we want at the flip of a switch?
Seriously, we would heartily encourage that.
I really don't think you would, because in such a world?
You'd be the single male
Really, we’d be fine. We see fab as somewhere to potentially find people who might enhance our sex life, not to have a sex life.
Love that snideyly superior tone, though you're not the first person I've seen use it on here.
Does a great job of further supporting why technology is on it's current trajectory though."Cool, you hold out for the sex robots, we’ll keep on fucking x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
