Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " One of your veris says you are hung? Confused. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thing about 'average' is that it is what most of us are - it wouldn't be average otherwise. One of life's great realisations that with 8 billion people on the planet there is always going to be someone quicker, stronger, brighter, more good looking, and with a bigger schlong. We all just have to come to terms with that and get on with it." Unless you're Usain Bolt, Brian Shaw, Albert Einstein, Brad Pitt and John Holmes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a guy self-professes to be ‘hung’ it actually puts me off. I’ve been with some larger guys and they were painful and uncomfortable. I prefer average sized x" That is also me. I have to tell them I can’t take anything to big but it falls on deaf ears most of the time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " I can tell you now I’m 5.5” and have never had a complaint or failed to pleasure a woman. I’ve been with plenty of women who didn't find sex with anything larger than 6-7” comfortable. Average is perfect once you’re confident in yourself and know what your doing. Good sex is all about energy not dick size. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. One of your veris says you are hung? Confused. " The webcam was in front of me and slightly below so it looked bigger. I’m only 5.9 inch bone pressed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. I can tell you now I’m 5.5” and have never had a complaint or failed to pleasure a woman. I’ve been with plenty of women who didn't find sex with anything larger than 6-7” comfortable. Average is perfect once you’re confident in yourself and know what your doing. Good sex is all about energy not dick size. " Really? I’ll work on the energy and find someone like you likes my size | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a guy self-professes to be ‘hung’ it actually puts me off. I’ve been with some larger guys and they were painful and uncomfortable. I prefer average sized x" Really? good to know that not everyone thinks bigger is better. Maybe there’s hope for me yet | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " I might be above average but the number of women I've met either IRL or online who've not seen my dick before we shagged is pretty high. Women aren't really interested in it and they don't ask you your dick size over a plate of chips. They're more interested in if you're half decent, can have a chat or have one one two laughs. You only get naked once you're into each other so whether your 4 or 9 inches, they haven't got a clue, and it still doesn't mean you're quids in shag again. Here endeth the lesson (shamrock) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " OP, you appear to have remembered only those posts and profiles that affirm your expectations. If you read all the posts from men about cock size, a significant number of women don't care about it. I have honestly never chosen a lover based on the size or shape of their genitalia. You can't change what you have, you can change your attitude and approach. Nita | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. OP, you appear to have remembered only those posts and profiles that affirm your expectations. If you read all the posts from men about cock size, a significant number of women don't care about it. I have honestly never chosen a lover based on the size or shape of their genitalia. You can't change what you have, you can change your attitude and approach. Nita" Yeah you’re right. This post and the responses I got put it in a wider perspective and it’s not the be all end all You’re right. I can’t change it. Gotta realise it’s not everything when it comes to sex | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s not all fun being hung, I’m 8ins but sometimes I wish I was smaller" Yeah some comments did mention it was painful. You just gotta do the best with your size and do your best to make it work | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " One of your veris states you have a massive cock? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. One of your veris states you have a massive cock? " Yeah that was on webcam and good angle. I measured it and it’s not massive | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. One of your veris states you have a massive cock? Yeah that was on webcam and good angle. I measured it and it’s not massive " Who said the camera never lies | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m average. I’ve had a few women complain I’m too small. Makes me think that when women say size doesn’t matter they are just saying that to be nice. My cock is about 6 inches " Reality is everyone likes different things sexually / fantasy…. It’s not a one size fits all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. One of your veris states you have a massive cock? Yeah that was on webcam and good angle. I measured it and it’s not massive Who said the camera never lies " Just being honest. It’s around 5.9 inch | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One of your veris states you have a massive cock? Yeah that was on webcam and good angle. I measured it and it’s not massive Who said the camera never lies " They say the camera adds ten pounds. Now that would make a massive cock. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus?" Before even thinking about besmirching my search history's good name (ha! - like it had one), I'm not sure if it's worth going all the way to looking up distribution data and calculating all the kinds of averages to arrive at detailed numbers. Partly because I'm going to guess that the distribution is mostly symmetrical and normal-like, which would mean those numbers are quite close to each other. But mostly because I think the definition of "big" that's inportant here is relative to the "fuzzy wuzzy what people think" average, not a real one. That and I think the most important message is reassurance, not numbers. Unless those numbers happen to provide reassurance... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see alot of comments and bios on here asking for bigger dicks and i wish i was. I just didn’t win the genetic lottery. No one mentions average or small. Just hung in preferences in their bio I’m average and it feels like I’m not good enough. I read about saying just use oral but not every woman wants that. " Don't wish to be somebody else because you're not just be yourself and you'll do ok | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus? Before even thinking about besmirching my search history's good name (ha! - like it had one), I'm not sure if it's worth going all the way to looking up distribution data and calculating all the kinds of averages to arrive at detailed numbers. Partly because I'm going to guess that the distribution is mostly symmetrical and normal-like, which would mean those numbers are quite close to each other. But mostly because I think the definition of "big" that's inportant here is relative to the "fuzzy wuzzy what people think" average, not a real one. That and I think the most important message is reassurance, not numbers. Unless those numbers happen to provide reassurance..." A good observation. I don't know whether the distribution is normal or skewed, since my exposure to dicks is relatively limited. I really just posted the maths question because I'm a pretty nerdy kind of guy and couldn't resist. I could almost say that I am anal, but I guess that could be misinterpreted on Fab and potentially lead to all sorts of embarrassment given my heterosexual nature. But then again, it's pretty unlikely that many will read my nerdy stuff. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus? Before even thinking about besmirching my search history's good name (ha! - like it had one), I'm not sure if it's worth going all the way to looking up distribution data and calculating all the kinds of averages to arrive at detailed numbers. Partly because I'm going to guess that the distribution is mostly symmetrical and normal-like, which would mean those numbers are quite close to each other. But mostly because I think the definition of "big" that's inportant here is relative to the "fuzzy wuzzy what people think" average, not a real one. That and I think the most important message is reassurance, not numbers. Unless those numbers happen to provide reassurance... A good observation. I don't know whether the distribution is normal or skewed, since my exposure to dicks is relatively limited. I really just posted the maths question because I'm a pretty nerdy kind of guy and couldn't resist. I could almost say that I am anal, but I guess that could be misinterpreted on Fab and potentially lead to all sorts of embarrassment given my heterosexual nature. But then again, it's pretty unlikely that many will read my nerdy stuff." Normal distribution will give you the value 'u' which is the mean, mode and median all in one. 'u' in terms of penis size is ~5.2". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus? Before even thinking about besmirching my search history's good name (ha! - like it had one), I'm not sure if it's worth going all the way to looking up distribution data and calculating all the kinds of averages to arrive at detailed numbers. Partly because I'm going to guess that the distribution is mostly symmetrical and normal-like, which would mean those numbers are quite close to each other. But mostly because I think the definition of "big" that's inportant here is relative to the "fuzzy wuzzy what people think" average, not a real one. That and I think the most important message is reassurance, not numbers. Unless those numbers happen to provide reassurance... A good observation. I don't know whether the distribution is normal or skewed, since my exposure to dicks is relatively limited. I really just posted the maths question because I'm a pretty nerdy kind of guy and couldn't resist. I could almost say that I am anal, but I guess that could be misinterpreted on Fab and potentially lead to all sorts of embarrassment given my heterosexual nature. But then again, it's pretty unlikely that many will read my nerdy stuff. Normal distribution will give you the value 'u' which is the mean, mode and median all in one. 'u' in terms of penis size is ~5.2"." Yes I know the characteristics of a normal distribution but did not think through that penis size is a normal dickstribution (see what I did there). I wonder if the distribution of penis size of Fabbers, being a possibly biased subset of the natural population, is also normal. Also, does the range of dick sizes preferred by female Fabbers follow a normal or skewed distribution ? There must be a PhD thesis here somewhere. Possibly at Sydney University. One thing that can be stated for sure is that the deviation on this site is far from standard. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus? Before even thinking about besmirching my search history's good name (ha! - like it had one), I'm not sure if it's worth going all the way to looking up distribution data and calculating all the kinds of averages to arrive at detailed numbers. Partly because I'm going to guess that the distribution is mostly symmetrical and normal-like, which would mean those numbers are quite close to each other. But mostly because I think the definition of "big" that's inportant here is relative to the "fuzzy wuzzy what people think" average, not a real one. That and I think the most important message is reassurance, not numbers. Unless those numbers happen to provide reassurance... A good observation. I don't know whether the distribution is normal or skewed, since my exposure to dicks is relatively limited. I really just posted the maths question because I'm a pretty nerdy kind of guy and couldn't resist. I could almost say that I am anal, but I guess that could be misinterpreted on Fab and potentially lead to all sorts of embarrassment given my heterosexual nature. But then again, it's pretty unlikely that many will read my nerdy stuff. Normal distribution will give you the value 'u' which is the mean, mode and median all in one. 'u' in terms of penis size is ~5.2". Yes I know the characteristics of a normal distribution but did not think through that penis size is a normal dickstribution (see what I did there). I wonder if the distribution of penis size of Fabbers, being a possibly biased subset of the natural population, is also normal. Also, does the range of dick sizes preferred by female Fabbers follow a normal or skewed distribution ? There must be a PhD thesis here somewhere. Possibly at Sydney University. One thing that can be stated for sure is that the deviation on this site is far from standard." Maybe somebody could come up with a bell curve... I'll get my coat. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We need a little enlargement (so to speak) on what is meant by 'average'. Are we referring to the arithmetic mean, which will be comparatively heavily influenced by the extraordinarily well hung? It's probably better to use the median or 50th percentile (i.e 50% of the measured population will have members smaller than this number and 50% will have larger). One could also quote the mode or most common length. What's the consensus?" Not necessarily. You’re leaving out the micro penises. They would mitigate the humongous wang coefficient. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Are u lush Louise or do you own a lush hence the name" What has this got to do with being hung or not? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |