FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

Raceplay

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Currently into this and loving it, anyone find this intriguing or is it too extreme, definition below -

A form of role play used by 2 consenting adults that incorporates Racist, hurtful, & derogatory terms and comments regarding the others race, to fulfill and reach sexual pleasure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You do you mate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Bump

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkylipsWoman
over a year ago

Debauchery

Not for me no. I don’t mind derogatory names with the right person in the right setting, but definitely not racist ones that would be triggering

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/11/23 10:58:09]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No.

Keeping an open mind for discussion I suspect race play must happen quite a bit. It probably comes down to what the individuals consider derogatory.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hmmm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rpeggioCouple
over a year ago

Baughurst

We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.

I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.

If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.

I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.

If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc."

I disagree that it’s a manifestation of who someone is for real I’ve played with a few girls and couples into it and they are good people , and I certainly wouldn’t justify rap*play, paed*play it’s not for me. I do of course respect your opinion though, fair play

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkedKuntsCouple
over a year ago

Sheffield


"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.

I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.

If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc."

Sorry but disagree, our fetishes do not define who we are as people and the way we act. I'm a sadist and I don't go around hitting people with paddles and canes in my day to day life. I have also done this play before but it was totally at her request and the reason she asked me is she knew she could trust me to do the research, play within her limits and help her fulfil her fantasy of it. This post is just kink shaming because you don't get it. Won't even start on the r**eplay situation and basically shaming victims who use it as a way to manage and take control and ownership of their trauma and help them to deal and process it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rpeggioCouple
over a year ago

Baughurst


"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.

I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.

If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc.

Sorry but disagree, our fetishes do not define who we are as people and the way we act. I'm a sadist and I don't go around hitting people with paddles and canes in my day to day life. I have also done this play before but it was totally at her request and the reason she asked me is she knew she could trust me to do the research, play within her limits and help her fulfil her fantasy of it. This post is just kink shaming because you don't get it. Won't even start on the r**eplay situation and basically shaming victims who use it as a way to manage and take control and ownership of their trauma and help them to deal and process it. "

__

Totally respect your view and you nailed it. We do not understand it. OP is asking who finds it interesting or who finds it too extreme. We are on the latter end of the spectrum in this case.

No one is shaming victims who use this as part of managing trauma. That we can understand as motivation. Very different from two consenting adults, none of them victims of r*pe who engage in that flavour of roleplay for fun. We respect it, but we cannot understand it, and so it's also fair that we are allowed to say

that we dislike it. If were to understand it, we may change our mind.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittyndCouple
over a year ago

Oldham/Birmingham

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualMan
over a year ago

Sutton

[Removed by poster at 07/11/23 13:06:06]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualMan
over a year ago

Sutton

It is not for me, but a difficult kink does not need to be badged "therapy" to be accepted as an individual choice. In fact therapy is best dealt with by a trained therapist.

It is perfectly acceptable to say a kink is not for you. What is not acceptable is to condemn two or more consenting adults playing in private and not exposing third parties to their play.

I would argue that OP was wrong to go into detail, as he was exposing people to detail. Any contentious kink should be handled tactfully in regard to those not taking part.

I would also argue that unlike the hedonists, lifestylers, and kink tourists who only play, I would say my kinks are a part of me. But as a rationale functioning kink educated ethical human being, they are only exercised with full consent and not randomly. Many people who practice difficult kinks are the same.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some good points here and I can genuinely see both sides which is why I deleted my initial comment.

I also think people can have kinks that are not necessarily who they are. Maybe some part of them might enjoy certain aspects doesn't mean they have a desire or would engage in this outside of "play" Eg (CNC, impact etc). And that's leaving aside the number of people that use terminology or seek out bbc, bwc. One could argue a link there.

So while I might not engage in it, I'm conscious not to judge or shame or be so intolerant because even my kinks which I may find tame would be intolerable to many.

Heck a lot of people cannot understand the concept of swinging.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"It is not for me, but a difficult kink does not need to be badged "therapy" to be accepted as an individual choice. In fact therapy is best dealt with by a trained therapist.

It is perfectly acceptable to say a kink is not for you. What is not acceptable is to condemn two or more consenting adults playing in private and not exposing third parties to their play.

I would argue that OP was wrong to go into detail, as he was exposing people to detail. Any contentious kink should be handled tactfully in regard to those not taking part.

I would also argue that unlike the hedonists, lifestylers, and kink tourists who only play, I would say my kinks are a part of me. But as a rationale functioning kink educated ethical human being, they are only exercised with full consent and not randomly. Many people who practice difficult kinks are the same. "

That’s fair

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andy CanesWoman
over a year ago

candy cane lane

It’s actually a thing not for me though certainly not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ritIndianCoupleCouple
over a year ago

Midlands

We have been asked to do this but it’s not for us.

It would make me more upset than horny personally.

Mrs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"We have been asked to do this but it’s not for us.

It would make me more upset than horny personally.

Mrs "

Interesting thanks for your views

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

This was interesting, particularly enjoyed the private messages, anyone wanting to continue a chat drop me a line

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top