FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

1003 - is this a Fab record?

Jump to newest
 

By *he Silver Fux OP   Man
over a year ago

Uttoxeter

1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

Didn't think you could have more than 150 photos lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle. "

You need a microscope for David’s tackle.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Silver Fux OP   Man
over a year ago

Uttoxeter


"Didn't think you could have more than 150 photos lol"

Like you I didn’t think it technically possible

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Silver Fux OP   Man
over a year ago

Uttoxeter


"1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle.

You need a microscope for David’s tackle."

Large penises back in the day were considered crude and a modest compact penis was in keeping with the Renaissance aesthetic conventions. Size DID matter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle.

You need a microscope for David’s tackle.

Large penises back in the day were considered crude and a modest compact penis was in keeping with the Renaissance aesthetic conventions. Size DID matter "

Just like rubenesque women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Silver Fux OP   Man
over a year ago

Uttoxeter


"1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle.

You need a microscope for David’s tackle.

Large penises back in the day were considered crude and a modest compact penis was in keeping with the Renaissance aesthetic conventions. Size DID matter

Just like rubenesque women"

Don’t see the BBW ones much in Marble, maybe keeping costs down. Cheaper to paint the curvy chicks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"1003 Friends Only photos on a single profile.

Wow.

More photos of his cock than have been taken of Michelangelo’s David tackle.

You need a microscope for David’s tackle.

Large penises back in the day were considered crude and a modest compact penis was in keeping with the Renaissance aesthetic conventions. Size DID matter

Just like rubenesque women

Don’t see the BBW ones much in Marble, maybe keeping costs down. Cheaper to paint the curvy chicks "

Hahahaha a very fair and valid point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top