Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The amount of paranoia on here about pics getting out and being shared is laughable once you share any pic anywhere on the web that's it you have lost control .wonder how many remove the exif data from thier pics before sharing lots of info in there for anyone to find " whilst that may be true we can control what we can at the very least ...also the aw is not so much about your pics its about what others do with it ..the laws have tighten alot over the years anyway this subject is about photographers and trust nothing else | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The amount of paranoia on here about pics getting out and being shared is laughable once you share any pic anywhere on the web that's it you have lost control .wonder how many remove the exif data from thier pics before sharing lots of info in there for anyone to find " Almost all of the standard places you would share photos (FB, Insta and the like) strip exif data automatically, and while I haven't checked I'd be amazed if this site weren't the same. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so photographers asking for photo sessions and offering rewards ...now we know the rules have been broken with the rewards bit but thats the least of the problems here ... modern camera's dont even need cards in them anymore the simply send pics str8 to internet storage / cloud do they really think people are stupid that we dont know this you only have to look at any internet porn sites to see accounts full of these pics .. even older camera's have 2 card slots and its the same with smart phones pics can be taken and go str8 to cloud or apps l;ike drop box and others .. ask yourself why would someone want to photograph you for nothing no keeping pics or anything or if they say tou'll get the pics and they even show you the pics moving from the phone to your device does not mean they dont have copies in clouds ... if they want nothing then why not just ask to watch. ive never allowed anyone to take pics nor would i far too risky ... there are loads of accounts on the usual porn sites of people who spend there days nicking pics already lots of face pics too let alone giving some one permission. so where do you stand on this ... would like to hear from the non photographers side please ,... " I may of misunderstood this thread a little bit but just in case I haven't, this would come under the legislation of revenge porn if someone was to share images or footage of you without your consent which is a prison sentence of up to 2 years. If I remember correctly, they are coming down heavy on the People doing this in order to make an example of them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Btw, we’re looking for a photographer to film us too, a scenario similar to the above." @_lumpudding pm me if you would like. im interested in what your mentioning and wouldn't require any footage for myself. if you have any questions feel free to pm me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. " Why? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. " Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. " utter rubbish .... that like saying because a ex boyfriend took some nudes of me he owns them ?? if thats the case the the new revenge porn laws are not going to work .. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I wanted someone to take photos of me, what I’d do for what it’s worth, is provide the camera or phone for them to take them on. So many on here claim to be photographers and don’t have a single decent photo on their profile " I can point and shoot…. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. utter rubbish .... that like saying because a ex boyfriend took some nudes of me he owns them ?? if thats the case the the new revenge porn laws are not going to work .. " So I have been in the game for 20 years you don’t have to believe me I don’t really care, but confusing images swapped between partners is not the same as copyright laws the photographer has. There is not a Law in this land that would deny the copyright of an image I had taken if I could prove it was taken by me (exif data for example) a good example is street photography, I wouldn’t ask for a MRF if I was papping for a paper. By posing in private you have given implicit permission for the tog to take the picture. They key thing is how you challenge this you have to go to the small claims court and prove you didn’t pose for the photographer. Just imagine how difficult that would be. So with that in mind just be careful who takes your picture, it’s not worth my reputation to. Not explain to everyone I shoot where I am putting the pictures. I also agree never to show images which I do not. But then those people trust me becuase they know I wouldnt be that awful to share them. Also I ensure they see all images taken and I don’t shoot faces. Just never forget any image on locked sites like this or OF or Fet can always be copied and shared. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. utter rubbish .... that like saying because a ex boyfriend took some nudes of me he owns them ?? if thats the case the the new revenge porn laws are not going to work .. " In the case of an ex boyfriend he would own the copyright, they are his photos as he press the shutter, however assuming he was a boyfriend at the time the images were shot the revenge porn laws would be applicable since being the copyright holder does not necessarily mean you have the right to publish them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. utter rubbish .... that like saying because a ex boyfriend took some nudes of me he owns them ?? if thats the case the the new revenge porn laws are not going to work .. In the case of an ex boyfriend he would own the copyright, they are his photos as he press the shutter, however assuming he was a boyfriend at the time the images were shot the revenge porn laws would be applicable since being the copyright holder does not necessarily mean you have the right to publish them." Explained much better than I did | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they don’t have model release forms they are cowboys steer away. Im afraid this isnt quite true. MRFs are pointless for the models. They are only useful for the tog when he is selling to publish. In the UK ownership of the image is the person who captured it, which means the tog has full rights. Just consider whether you are willing to take someone to small claims when you have obviously posed for the image. You will lose. If you want really nice images of yourself but do not want your face in the picture, quite simply hide your face or wear a mask. utter rubbish .... that like saying because a ex boyfriend took some nudes of me he owns them ?? if thats the case the the new revenge porn laws are not going to work .. " nope you are wrong the person taking the image owns the copyright I have successfully taken the manchester evening news the daily mail and the telegraph for considerable amounts of money for lifting my urbex pictures from sites and publishing them without my permission .issued them with a takedown notice and an invoice for use of my images paid for new camera body and some lenses .copyright law is copyright law you can guarantee there will be a clause that gets around it for revenge porn cases | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |