Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bit late to ask now isnt it? You going to stick it back on if everyone says they prefer uncut?
"Haha can I watch? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm cut and. Pefur to be its cleaner and all meat and not floppy bits at the end like a saggy fanny, it's a cock and lady's seen them all its the way you use it or don't use it that counts pal but welcome to the snip club lol "Nothing saggy bout a normal uncut since when you get an erection the head is exposed - as far as floppy goes, thats cut cock territory due to the desensitizing effect of having no foreskin causing erectile dysfunction by alowing the head and rim to be rubbed constantly by clothing and the fact that the bit you cut off has lots of pleasure giving nerve endings in it. Circumcision is an unethical, pointless abuse perpetuated out of ignorance and adhereance to archaic religious doctrine. The hygene argument is baseless since an unwashed cock, cut or uncut is gross and a clean cock cut or uncut isn't. Perhaps a cut cock is dirtier tho? end all covered in trouser/boxer fluff? Its mutilation of what is a perfectly evolved part of our anatomy, just like cutting a womans clit off as practised in several cultures that also remove boys foreskins | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm cut and. Pefur to be its cleaner and all meat and not floppy bits at the end like a saggy fanny, it's a cock and lady's seen them all its the way you use it or don't use it that counts pal but welcome to the snip club lol
Nothing saggy bout a normal uncut since when you get an erection the head is exposed - as far as floppy goes, thats cut cock territory due to the desensitizing effect of having no foreskin causing erectile dysfunction by alowing the head and rim to be rubbed constantly by clothing and the fact that the bit you cut off has lots of pleasure giving nerve endings in it. Circumcision is an unethical, pointless abuse perpetuated out of ignorance and adhereance to archaic religious doctrine. The hygene argument is baseless since an unwashed cock, cut or uncut is gross and a clean cock cut or uncut isn't. Perhaps a cut cock is dirtier tho? end all covered in trouser/boxer fluff? Its mutilation of what is a perfectly evolved part of our anatomy, just like cutting a womans clit off as practised in several cultures that also remove boys foreskins"
Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from? "what did you think female circumcision it meant? Ive know about it for so long I forget the original source but from a quick google you can educate yourself here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/conditions/female_genital_mutilation.shtml | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm cut and. Pefur to be its cleaner and all meat and not floppy bits at the end like a saggy fanny, it's a cock and lady's seen them all its the way you use it or don't use it that counts pal but welcome to the snip club lol
Nothing saggy bout a normal uncut since when you get an erection the head is exposed - as far as floppy goes, thats cut cock territory due to the desensitizing effect of having no foreskin causing erectile dysfunction by alowing the head and rim to be rubbed constantly by clothing and the fact that the bit you cut off has lots of pleasure giving nerve endings in it. Circumcision is an unethical, pointless abuse perpetuated out of ignorance and adhereance to archaic religious doctrine. The hygene argument is baseless since an unwashed cock, cut or uncut is gross and a clean cock cut or uncut isn't. Perhaps a cut cock is dirtier tho? end all covered in trouser/boxer fluff? Its mutilation of what is a perfectly evolved part of our anatomy, just like cutting a womans clit off as practised in several cultures that also remove boys foreskins
Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from? "Oh dear, hard to believe that some folks still no nothing of the barbaric and illegal practice of female mutilation..... Yes the clit is cut off...often with unsterile untensils such a old used razors, and infections will often follow. The labia can be sewn together leaving only enough of a gap for urine and menstrual blood. The stitches will be ripped apart by her husbands penis on her wedding night, some men prefer the stitches to stay and will only have them removed for childbirth. This happens when the girl is young, around 6-8 years. Theres no anaesthetic involved, but she will be held down by the other women in the village. She's unlikely to have any sexual pleasure throughout her life. It really doesn't bear thinking about  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from?
what did you think female circumcision it meant?
Ive know about it for so long I forget the original source but from a quick google you can educate yourself here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/conditions/female_genital_mutilation.shtml
"Female circumcision involves mutilation of the labia not the clit! You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from?
what did you think female circumcision it meant?
Ive know about it for so long I forget the original source but from a quick google you can educate yourself here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/conditions/female_genital_mutilation.shtml
Female circumcision involves mutilation of the labia not the clit! You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons. "In many cultures they remove the clit, not just the labia. In some they insert a piece of straw (yes straw as in animal fodder/bedding) and sew up the mutilated parts around it so that is the size of the opening. Because women who arr uncut are sinful and lustful and will tempt men to sin.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from?
what did you think female circumcision it meant?
Ive know about it for so long I forget the original source but from a quick google you can educate yourself here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/conditions/female_genital_mutilation.shtml
Female circumcision involves mutilation of the labia not the clit! You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons. "Nope - the following is the defintion made by the World Health Organisation: The WHO has offered four classifications of FGM. The main three are Type I, removal of the clitoral hood, almost invariably accompanied by removal of the clitoris itself (clitoridectomy); Type II, removal of the clitoris and inner labia; and Type III (infibulation), removal of all or part of the inner and outer labia, and usually the clitoris, and the fusion of the wound, leaving a small hole for the passage of urine and menstrual blood—the fused wound is opened for intercourse and childbirth. Totally barbaric. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cutting the clit off? Where are you getting your information from?
what did you think female circumcision it meant?
Ive know about it for so long I forget the original source but from a quick google you can educate yourself here - http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/conditions/female_genital_mutilation.shtml
Female circumcision involves mutilation of the labia not the clit! You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons.
Nope - the following is the defintion made by the World Health Organisation:
The WHO has offered four classifications of FGM. The main three are Type I, removal of the clitoral hood, almost invariably accompanied by removal of the clitoris itself (clitoridectomy); Type II, removal of the clitoris and inner labia; and Type III (infibulation), removal of all or part of the inner and outer labia, and usually the clitoris, and the fusion of the wound, leaving a small hole for the passage of urine and menstrual blood—the fused wound is opened for intercourse and childbirth.
Totally barbaric."Nope...your post reveals my point, that much more is involved than clit removal, however the WHO also recognises that the most common form involves labia mutilation only. The Save the Children charity also state this. It also not true that the husband is responsible for opening the stitches...this is done by women in a pre-marriage ceremony. My point though is that you can not equate male circumcision with the much more horrific female practice, which is what the original poster was saying...he also said the female version was clit removal, which it isn't, it's far more horrific than that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Wolf
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a disgusting thing to do to a Woman's body for sure. I really don't know how they can justify doing that to another person. All I can say is god help the men when the women get electric carving knives
Wolf
" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm cut and. Pefur to be its cleaner and all meat and not floppy bits at the end like a saggy fanny, it's a cock and lady's seen them all its the way you use it or don't use it that counts pal but welcome to the snip club lol
Nothing saggy bout a normal uncut since when you get an erection the head is exposed - as far as floppy goes, thats cut cock territory due to the desensitizing effect of having no foreskin causing erectile dysfunction by alowing the head and rim to be rubbed constantly by clothing and the fact that the bit you cut off has lots of pleasure giving nerve endings in it. Circumcision is an unethical, pointless abuse perpetuated out of ignorance and adhereance to archaic religious doctrine. The hygene argument is baseless since an unwashed cock, cut or uncut is gross and a clean cock cut or uncut isn't. Perhaps a cut cock is dirtier tho? end all covered in trouser/boxer fluff? Its mutilation of what is a perfectly evolved part of our anatomy, just like cutting a womans clit off as practised in several cultures that also remove boys foreskins". love mine the way it was intended to be. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a disgusting thing to do to a Woman's body for sure. I really don't know how they can justify doing that to another person. All I can say is god help the men when the women get electric carving knives
Wolf
"The list of country where this is done is endless...From the minute it is a muslim country , all girls are subject to that. Some may not say it or admit publicly but it is done...And in all of them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons. "You need to read more and type less - I did recognise the religious motives - I said they were adhereance to archaic religious doctrine. You know youir wrong but your to proud to admit it despite several people making it glaringly obvious. If you think clit removal isn't the ultimate objective, find me ONE account of these idiots taking the labia and leaving the clit... or stfu? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a bit irritated when i added the stfu bit... sounds a bit off to me now so I apologise for that "accepted... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Doesn't really matter as long as there's a nice guy attached to it!" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a bit irritated when i added the stfu bit... sounds a bit off to me now so I apologise for that "well done | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons.
"I think, with all due respects, that Religion and Politics hide behind self-justifying motives in order to carry out such things. In the instance of religion, countless millions of people have been murdered for the sake of someone elses pride in piety, and in politics endless millions persecuted and killed because of an individual's fetish for power, or greed for that which does not belong to him. We live in modern times, people have the bodies they were given (by God, if you will, whichever God you wish to attribute that to.). I don't think that severe body alterations make us amenable in the face of religion. If someone said you had to cut your right arm off to please god to enter Heaven, would you blindly do it, or ask 'Why if he gave us two arms in the first place and made us perfect in his image do we need to be doing this'. Sorry to drag up two normally no-no topics. Wolf
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" You also fail to consider the medical reasons for male circumcision, or that many males accept this for cultural or religious reasons.
I think, with all due respects, that Religion and Politics hide behind self-justifying motives in order to carry out such things. In the instance of religion, countless millions of people have been murdered for the sake of someone elses pride in piety, and in politics endless millions persecuted and killed because of an individual's fetish for power, or greed for that which does not belong to him.
We live in modern times, people have the bodies they were given (by God, if you will, whichever God you wish to attribute that to.). I don't think that severe body alterations make us amenable in the face of religion. If someone said you had to cut your right arm off to please god to enter Heaven, would you blindly do it, or ask 'Why if he gave us two arms in the first place and made us perfect in his image do we need to be doing this'.
Sorry to drag up two normally no-no topics.
Wolf
"Good point but let's not forget that in Europe, Canada and Australasia, most circumcisions are carried out because of phymosis...I do agree with you Wolf though that this should always be something that the male chooses when he is old enough to choose. The female thing is a much more barbaric topic based on male oppression. It is also not carried out by Muslim nations as a previous poster stated though...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Good point but let's not forget that in Europe, Canada and Australasia, most circumcisions are carried out because of phymosis...I do agree with you Wolf though that this should always be something that the male chooses when he is old enough to choose. The female thing is a much more barbaric topic based on male oppression. It is also not carried out by Muslim nations as a previous poster stated though... "oh absolutely, the blokes are very capable of looking after themselves, so if they want to go slice and dice - fine!
It was the female circumcision I was sortof hinting at really...
Wolf
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a bit irritated when i added the stfu bit... sounds a bit off to me now so I apologise for that well done"Thanks  (u 2 exodus) ur lovely bum gets a fab | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Good point but let's not forget that in Europe, Canada and Australasia, most circumcisions are carried out because of phymosis...I do agree with you Wolf though that this should always be something that the male chooses when he is old enough to choose. The female thing is a much more barbaric topic based on male oppression. It is also not carried out by Muslim nations as a previous poster stated though...
oh absolutely, the blokes are very capable of looking after themselves, so if they want to go slice and dice - fine!
It was the female circumcision I was sortof hinting at really...
Wolf
"It's an awful practice, in fact what sort of sick mind thought of it...this world is fooked up sometimes... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was a bit irritated when i added the stfu bit... sounds a bit off to me now so I apologise for that "I think you misunderstood my point but best wishes and thanks | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
