Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " Nope, you may meet at a public place to check the chemistry but if I'm meeting one half of the couple then it's not a couple. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " If only the guy turned up for a social meet I would assume there is no other half. A fair few single men pretend to be a couple. They hope on the day of a meet they can say the wife is ill, the wife's mother is ill and she is looking after her, etc. They hope the meet will still go ahead. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " No way. There are too many guys pretending to be a couple. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of the comments from couples above would honestly still apply if it was the female half that wanted to meet socially with you first? " Still it would be a no | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " We have done this, it definitely works. X | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How many of the comments from couples above would honestly still apply if it was the female half that wanted to meet socially with you first? " Still no. It's rude to expect both of us to turn up while only one of the other couple does. The exception to this in my opinion is if the dynamic is that one partner chooses for the other and that's agreed between everyone | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " Please can you elaborate on why the question? For example, is there something which has prompted this situation for you two? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " If agreed before hand, why not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? Please can you elaborate on why the question? For example, is there something which has prompted this situation for you two? " It was a suggestion put forward to us, as due to shift work we can’t always be available for a social together. Although I’ve probably not worded the question exactly as it was proposed, or very well it would seem. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once one half has met us and we've passed the vetting process (whatever that is and I have a pretty good idea ) what happens if we eventually get to meet the other half and *we* don't want to go ahead?" Same as any other possible meet if not all getting on/ don’t fancy. Don’t think there was ever a plan to sign contracts binding the agreement | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once one half has met us and we've passed the vetting process (whatever that is and I have a pretty good idea ) what happens if we eventually get to meet the other half and *we* don't want to go ahead? Same as any other possible meet if not all getting on/ don’t fancy. Don’t think there was ever a plan to sign contracts binding the agreement " Ok. It would just be a bit awkward from our point of view if we'd met one half agreed to go ahead then on the day changed our mind. You said just now that due to shift work you're not available at the same time for a social. How about socials where play is an option? Could you both be available for that maybe,? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which one of you would be doing the vetting op?" Either/ or It shouldn’t matter, as a couple we both know what we’re looking for and like, as we communicate with each other before any thing happens. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once one half has met us and we've passed the vetting process (whatever that is and I have a pretty good idea ) what happens if we eventually get to meet the other half and *we* don't want to go ahead? Same as any other possible meet if not all getting on/ don’t fancy. Don’t think there was ever a plan to sign contracts binding the agreement Ok. It would just be a bit awkward from our point of view if we'd met one half agreed to go ahead then on the day changed our mind. You said just now that due to shift work you're not available at the same time for a social. How about socials where play is an option? Could you both be available for that maybe,? " Not having much experience, we’d class a social as a social evening (other times may suit) getting to know whoever in a relaxed situation. A play meet would be totally different, and something we’d only do together | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Once one half has met us and we've passed the vetting process (whatever that is and I have a pretty good idea ) what happens if we eventually get to meet the other half and *we* don't want to go ahead? Same as any other possible meet if not all getting on/ don’t fancy. Don’t think there was ever a plan to sign contracts binding the agreement Ok. It would just be a bit awkward from our point of view if we'd met one half agreed to go ahead then on the day changed our mind. You said just now that due to shift work you're not available at the same time for a social. How about socials where play is an option? Could you both be available for that maybe,? Not having much experience, we’d class a social as a social evening (other times may suit) getting to know whoever in a relaxed situation. A play meet would be totally different, and something we’d only do together " Ok. I'm a strong believer that people must do this swinging stuff in the way that suits them but how can the person/people you meet individually get to know the absent partner in a relaxed way? Or have I misunderstood and you'd do two socials, one each so to speak? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " That would very much seem to be a one way vetting process! Gbat | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If a couple wish to meet another couple or single, Is it acceptable for just one of them to meet socially first, almost like a vetting process? " No at all. We meet as both a couple and seperatly. If we where going out together as a couple or even as seperate singles to meet a couple then we expect to meet a couple not just one half. We certainly would not advertise ourselves as a couple / arrange a couples meet just for me "Mr" to show up with some bollocks story about why my wife's not there. Been on here long enough to have heard this story as well. We once arranged to meet a couple who at the last moment said only he was coming to "vett" us both. Instant red flag and told them.where to go. Assuming for a moment it wasnt a single guy pretending to be a couple, pardon my French but who the fuck did he think was? Why do we have to be vetted by one half of a couple but we don't get to vett them both? Smells of horseshit because it is horseshit. We have however certainly had meets where I (male half) have met a couple for them to meet my wife at a later time...but in those cases it was the couple looking for a single guy and I joined them in a single capacity...and then later as a couple in a couple capacity. So no...not acceptable unless the parties in question are looking to meet one half of a couple to begin with. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |