FabSwingers.com forum: Would fab be better if it was a pay only site

By *ornynwuk OP Couple
over a year ago

blackpool

Like a lot of people on here get sick of time wasters and dreamers if it was pay only would you element this we know there will be some but maybe not as much

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down

No it wouldn't be any better and it would also cause a lot of the genuine people to leave or not join in the first place. I know I wouldn't have joined of I had to pay at the start.

Fakes are easy enough to spot if you take the time to actually look for signs. But a lot don't they get carried away chatting to someone and ignore any red flags then cry when it doesn't work out the way they want about that the amount of fakes on here and how it ruins fab.

Not to mention the amount of genuine people who get labeled fake just because they said no to someone as well.I have been called it numerous times on here just because I said no to meeting some random person I have no interest in.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Honestly I don’t think it would at all…

- Some genuine people wouldn’t be able to afford it

- It would make those that have “had to pay” feel even more entitled

- It might cut down a few but not many. People will still waste your time regardless.

*You could potentially use fab in that way now and only meet or interact with site supporters. To see if that makes any difference for you… (I don’t think there is a filter for that) but you could just choose to only interact with them, if you think paid members won’t waste your time?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *heLongTongueMan
over a year ago

boston

Having money doesn't make you genuine….

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ustBoWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in Co. Down

"Honestly I don’t think it would at all…

- Some genuine people wouldn’t be able to afford it

- It would make those that have “had to pay” feel even more entitled

- It might cut down a few but not many. People will still waste your time regardless.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

As I said recently fabs USP is that it's free to use. You can filter out non site supporters from messaging you and you can choose not to contact them. The site will work the way you want it to then

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

"Honestly I don’t think it would at all…

- Some genuine people wouldn’t be able to afford it

- It would make those that have “had to pay” feel even more entitled

- It might cut down a few but not many. People will still waste your time regardless.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mMrbrightsideMan
over a year ago

wakefield

Iv thought of this a few times myself but no matter what you do they’ll always be timewasters, maybe less than now but you just have to be careful.

Dismissing non verified or site supporters is a bit unfair as we all have to start somewhere and some are genuine.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ohn KanakaMan
over a year ago

Not all that North of North London

It probably wouldn't cut down on time wasters and fakes. It would definitely increase the sense of entitlement

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"As I said recently fabs USP is that it's free to use. You can filter out non site supporters from messaging you and you can choose not to contact them. The site will work the way you want it to then

100% this

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oldfischMan
over a year ago

HARROW

totally agree! it's difficult for guys to get verified, because it's difficult to actually meet a lady or couples on here!! (it's a ratio problem, maybe 100:1 ??! more?!)

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No. It wouldn't. There will always be fantasists and dreamers on sites like this. I think at the least every profile should be green flagged and photo-verified but that's still not a be all end all solution.

Just need to be vigilant and learn to avoid profiles who aren't what you're looking for.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By * U mineMan
over a year ago

Fun

Leave alone, plenty of sites charge men, and women free, and the fakes pretending to be women enjoy taking the guys who pay down the garden path.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"Like a lot of people on here get sick of time wasters and dreamers if it was pay only would you element this we know there will be some but maybe not as much "

You’re thinking time wasters don’t have the money to pay for the site? If that’s what they get off on, they will pay. Gleefully because they know people will think that a pay site has no time wasters.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *pertureTV/TS
over a year ago

New Ferry, wirral in stockings and sussies

No it wouldn't, having a few bob doesn't make you any more genuine, just as many time waisters are site supporters.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fakes are desperate they would pay

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *aomilatteCouple
over a year ago

Midlands

There's a massive amount of fake profiles that are site supporters, many get the Gold thinking it makes them look more genuine.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *aunchy RaccoonsCouple
over a year ago

Exeter

It would be better if verification was mandatory at the point of signing up. Also having at least one public picture as well.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread