Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swingers Chat |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey. Just wondered if anyone has experience of being solo poly? Was it a positive experience? How did you handle seeing more than one person on a regular basis (not just sex but 'dating' and doing vanilla things as well)? A (female) " Its tricky as one will always want more or feel left out speaking from my experience. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How does being solo poly work if you're one half of a couple?" That would be something slightly different. Solo poly is when you have loving connections with partners but you dont do the traditional "couple" thing with any of them (move in together, share finances etc). Although you consider their wants and needs when making life decisions, you ultimately prioritise your own needs (perhaps splitting up with your partners to take up a job in a different city). If you were poly and had a partner who you did all those "couple" things with, you'd call them your "nesting" (or primary) partner. Some people call this "hierachical poly", but other people dont like that term! The basics are that you do the comittment stuff with one person but still have fulfilling relationships with people outside that relationship, but these tend to be "secondary" to the "primary" relationship. Hope that helps! Fay x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a great thread. We are both very much in love with each other but consider our relationship open. We as are free to see others but want to 'holiday' with each other.. that said we both agree sex is so much better when there is a connection, to have a connection needs some level of feeling towards each other.. Does that make us swingers, poly, ENM Labels can be confusing " Hey! I think you pose the same question I think about. Labels are confusing. The other thing I am maybe naive about is whether poly or associate labels are a sexual orientation? Or do you just use these terms to describe how you are relationship wise. Tbh I think I would find it hard to share my 'primary' partner on an emotional level with someone. The sex and connection built with people who become friends is fine but not in a romantic sense. I think the connection could only go as far as friendship. No idea what that label is! With your open relationship, do you allow 'dating'? Do you not feel threatened with a potential for your partner to want someone else emotionally? A x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The other thing I am maybe naive about is whether poly or associate labels are a sexual orientation? Or do you just use these terms to describe how you are relationship wise. Tbh I think I would find it hard to share my 'primary' partner on an emotional level with someone. The sex and connection built with people who become friends is fine but not in a romantic sense. I think the connection could only go as far as friendship. No idea what that label is! A x" Whether or not poly is a sexual orientation is an ongoing debate. Most people say "no" but a lot of poly people feel that it is a crucial part of their sexual identity. Before I found out polyamory was an option, I just didnt date because I didnt feel comfortable with the monogamous narrative. Im not sure I could cope with a tradtional monogamous relationship!! The labels arent hugely important so long as you are able to comunicate well with the people you are involved with. There are so many different boxes, but most relationships dont fit exactly into a box, and they change over time anyway! If you wanna see the plethora of labels you could choose, look up the "map of non-monogamy" However, I would describe what you are looking for as ENM or an open relationship rather than Polyamory (the "amory" bit refers to "love"). It sounds like you are comfortable with your partner having a FwB type of connection, but without the "love" bit. If you felt a deep platonic love for secondary partners you could maybe describe it as Polyamory with a primary romantic partner and secondary queer-platonic partners with sexual elements... But seriously, it all gets silly and you will just have to explain at this point anyway, so whats the point of a label at all? Best just to use ENM - its an umbrella term, so no need to be more specific! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The other thing I am maybe naive about is whether poly or associate labels are a sexual orientation? Or do you just use these terms to describe how you are relationship wise. Tbh I think I would find it hard to share my 'primary' partner on an emotional level with someone. The sex and connection built with people who become friends is fine but not in a romantic sense. I think the connection could only go as far as friendship. No idea what that label is! A x Whether or not poly is a sexual orientation is an ongoing debate. Most people say "no" but a lot of poly people feel that it is a crucial part of their sexual identity. Before I found out polyamory was an option, I just didnt date because I didnt feel comfortable with the monogamous narrative. Im not sure I could cope with a tradtional monogamous relationship!! The labels arent hugely important so long as you are able to comunicate well with the people you are involved with. There are so many different boxes, but most relationships dont fit exactly into a box, and they change over time anyway! If you wanna see the plethora of labels you could choose, look up the "map of non-monogamy" However, I would describe what you are looking for as ENM or an open relationship rather than Polyamory (the "amory" bit refers to "love"). It sounds like you are comfortable with your partner having a FwB type of connection, but without the "love" bit. If you felt a deep platonic love for secondary partners you could maybe describe it as Polyamory with a primary romantic partner and secondary queer-platonic partners with sexual elements... But seriously, it all gets silly and you will just have to explain at this point anyway, so whats the point of a label at all? Best just to use ENM - its an umbrella term, so no need to be more specific! " As someone who is solo, I really appreciate it when people who aren’t open to romance use the label “open.” It’s a useful shorthand to warn people like me not to fall in love with them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is solo poly just fucking around? " Not for me. Fucking around is fucking around. My current relationship has a deep emotional connection. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Labels to me feel more limiting than confusing. For me personally over time sex for its own sake has less appeal for me. I'm currently kind of a solo-poly with the freedom to meet others. However I am increasingly selective and find myself shying away from meeting people if their priority is one off adventures." So multiple FWB? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is solo poly just fucking around? Not for me. Fucking around is fucking around. My current relationship has a deep emotional connection. " My current relationships have deep emotional connections. It is the plurals which define 'poly'amory. Fucking around is not out of the question for many of us but it does not imply 'amory'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Labels to me feel more limiting than confusing. For me personally over time sex for its own sake has less appeal for me. I'm currently kind of a solo-poly with the freedom to meet others. However I am increasingly selective and find myself shying away from meeting people if their priority is one off adventures. So multiple FWB? " Potentially yes but ideally no more than one or two if they live locally and are able to meet reasonably frequently. I like to be able to adapt based on circumstances. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can't even find one person, let alone multiple. Must be really tough these days as everyone seems "too busy" " The journey never ends does it lol. So I suppose all we can do is try to enjoy the trip whenever possible. Not that it doesn't get frustrating at times. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |