FabSwingers.com forum: 600+ Verifications

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

How do you feel about meeting a single person or couple with over 600 verifications from sex meets, not socials?

Would you meet a person who had recently met them?

Would like others input or views. We are of the belief that you live and let live, it's none of our business what others get up to...until it involves us when they ask to meet us...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unx2019Couple
over a year ago

Moray

Truthfully don't think would meet, 600 is an awful lot and no matter how many precautions take still more chance of something being passed on. Well that's our thoughts.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Truthfully don't think would meet, 600 is an awful lot and no matter how many precautions take still more chance of something being passed on. Well that's our thoughts. "

We are thinking the same, on several occasions they've met 10 to 15 guys in one night.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unx2019Couple
over a year ago

Moray

Unless it was a club meet or on cam. Doing cam can get lots or replies in one night even if no actual physical meet!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

wow talk about assuming more meet more likely to have std ?? if like us you've been swinging 28 years (many more on here longer) then you had a lot of meets but we are tested every 6 weeks we are cleaner than most who have a meet here or there that dont test .....wow this post proves how shallow people can be

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

As above, you have no idea of the time period that those veris cover.

Plus, you don't actually know they were all for sex.

And even if they were, there may be EVEN MoRE from off-site...PLUS who cares, isn't this supposed to be non-judgemental?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

Do you only meet virgins, OP?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oeofsussexMan
over a year ago

Eastbourne

The more the merrier!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ooking for SubmissivesMan
over a year ago

Close by

Honestly I would probably be pretty impressed by that number if it was just solely on sex verifications and not inc socials

Although again may be harder to jusdhe with couples as it won’t differentiate between male and female half only meets and meets as a couple

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It wouldn't put me off lol x i think it's a lot but it would be a bonus to get a meet with girls or couples who have a good few hundred verifications xx i would be right up for it lol xxx good thread x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

"Truthfully don't think would meet, 600 is an awful lot and no matter how many precautions take still more chance of something being passed on. Well that's our thoughts.

We are thinking the same, on several occasions they've met 10 to 15 guys in one night. "
I've not got many on this profile... mostly as its only a few years old.

.I've often met 20 or more guys in one night . Sometimes several times a week... however, I can assure you most of those guys aren't on fab, so won't verify me.

I also don't subscribe to the no matter how safe you are, your going to catch something.

I've been swinging and partaking in gangbangs for over 20 years... when I'm active, I'm tested every month .. I use condoms for full sex and don't allow guys to finish inside me even in a condom. I prefer it on my face. Yes I suck cock without but rarely take cum in mouth..

I've never tested positive for anything

If someone being active bothers you then don't meet them... however I have a friend on here that only ever shows 10 verifications give or take. She often has multiple guys and couples... but you wouldn't know it.

I also have a vanilla friend whose grand total of sexual partners is 4, she has had 2 sexually transmitted infections in the last 10 years.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

also most swinger have there meets away from fab 99% of our meets are not done via fab so dont assume that because a lady or couple has a couple veris that they've not done alot more fab is just one tiny part of the scene

also people who do practice safe sex can still get std i volunteer for a safe sex charity there are quite a few safe sex people who come in and get tested and have a std its not safe sex its safer sex

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *xplorer666Man
over a year ago

Bolton

I would still meet her probably but I would put on a extra condom just for good luck

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would still meet her probably but I would put on a extra condom just for good luck"

i would think that someone will tell you to f**k off ....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would still meet her probably but I would put on a extra condom just for good luck"

No party without party hat m8

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

"I would still meet her probably but I would put on a extra condom just for good luck

i would think that someone will tell you to f**k off ...."
I agree not to mention that two condoms is unsafe

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *AYENCouple
over a year ago

Lincolnshire

If you're looking for no strings sex, then surely a high veri count can only be seen as a good thing.

If you're looking for something regular, then it might suggest they aren't for you.

Horses for courses.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"If you're looking for no strings sex, then surely a high veri count can only be seen as a good thing.

If you're looking for something regular, then it might suggest they aren't for you.

Horses for courses."

why cant it be both ?? we have regular guys we got to know over the years and still look for others ??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *host63Man
over a year ago

Bedfont Feltham

"How do you feel about meeting a single person or couple with over 600 verifications from sex meets, not socials?

Would you meet a person who had recently met them?

Would like others input or views. We are of the belief that you live and let live, it's none of our business what others get up to...until it involves us when they ask to meet us... "

Thus is a site for the sexually liberated so isn't that a sign of someone who genuinely loves this lifestyle?

Why would it bother none? It's why we are here to explore.the sexual without judgement.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would say statistically speaking the more people you have met the more chance they have of having some form of sexually transmitted infection.

So not meeting people with lots of veris would be a layer of protection.

It is statically based though so even though it puts the odds more in your favour it is not a guarantee and there are loads of other factors.

It is of course hou personal preference who you decide to meet or not.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *vgloryholebs16TV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol.

My own feeling is it's not necessarily about how many, it's what you do in terms of risk...600 plus partners practising safer sex ( condoms) for fucking is probably less risky than 2 who have barebacked ..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would say statistically speaking the more people you have met the more chance they have of having some form of sexually transmitted infection.

So not meeting people with lots of veris would be a layer of protection.

It is statically based though so even though it puts the odds more in your favour it is not a guarantee and there are loads of other factors.

It is of course hou personal preference who you decide to meet or not.

so getting tested every 6 weeks is a total waste of time then ???... sorry but its those that play often are those most likely to get regular testing so that means your more than likely to get a std from those who dont meet often and think there ok as they cant catch a std if they dont meet often ....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ot Wife BeckyCouple
over a year ago

Near Bergerac

"wow talk about assuming more meet more likely to have std ?? if like us you've been swinging 28 years (many more on here longer) then you had a lot of meets but we are tested every 6 weeks we are cleaner than most who have a meet here or there that dont test .....wow this post proves how shallow people can be"

Yep...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Getting tested doesn’t stop you getting anything, but just gives you a view at a point in time.

If the people with lots of veris you were meeting got tested lots that would reduce the statically chance, however it only covers the periods straight after.

If you fucked an infinite number of people you would die in every conceivable way doing it and catch every conceivable infection. If you don’t fuck anyone nothing happen. It’s just how things work statistically.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inx.x3Woman
over a year ago

Bath

No I wouldn’t meet them.

I’d also be less likely to meet people on their verification list but it would depend on other factors too.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ornywelsh2sumCouple
over a year ago

Neath valley.

[Removed by poster at 09/06/22 11:04:40]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ornywelsh2sumCouple
over a year ago

Neath valley.

Such a judgemental post. We are all here for friendships along with great sex. I can hear the block button being pressed for the op of this post. Anyway whats to say you met soneone off a dating sire for a fuck. You would not know the truth about their sexual history. They could have shagged thousands at least here swingers are open and honest about their sexual history. I suggest you look elsewhere for sex as its obvioysly to risky on here for the judgemental brigade!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ornywelsh2sumCouple
over a year ago

Neath valley.

"My own feeling is it's not necessarily about how many, it's what you do in terms of risk...600 plus partners practising safer sex ( condoms) for fucking is probably less risky than 2 who have barebacked .."

Exactly this^^^^

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

"How do you feel about meeting a single person or couple with over 600 verifications from sex meets, not socials?

Would you meet a person who had recently met them?

Would like others input or views. We are of the belief that you live and let live, it's none of our business what others get up to...until it involves us when they ask to meet us... "

You're assuming here that someone who displays 20 veris has had 20 meets then?

Or that someone with 1 has only ever had sex once?

That people don't have sex via other means than Fab?

That people don't have bareback gangbangs weekly but don't do it via here so that people aren't aware?

That everyone who asks to meet you will have a fully visible history of everyone they've been with, a list of every activity they've ever done, a full testing record........you get the picture?

Sure. Make a judgement on someone who displays 600 veris.

But someone else who displays two may be a far greater risk to you and your health.

Such is life.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ornywelsh2sumCouple
over a year ago

Neath valley.

"Getting tested doesn’t stop you getting anything, but just gives you a view at a point in time.

If the people with lots of veris you were meeting got tested lots that would reduce the statically chance, however it only covers the periods straight after.

And you can die quicker crossing the road

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’d say some of the replies are judgemental too. If someone with a lot of verifications makes you uncomfortable or concerned, you can choose that it’s your preference not to meet.

From the original past I am guessing the number of veris is a cause for concern so they thought they’d get other peoples opinions. It’s not their fault it causes them concern, it’s just how it makes them feel.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 09/06/22 11:17:15]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Getting tested doesn’t stop you getting anything, but just gives you a view at a point in time.

If the people with lots of veris you were meeting got tested lots that would reduce the statically chance, however it only covers the periods straight after.

And you can die quicker crossing the road

Yes that is correct, the more things we do the likely we are to die. That doesn’t stop us doing things, but we naturally risk assess everything. Swinging has a risk of getting sexually related ailments so you need to assess the risks and decide what risks you are willing to take.

If you fuck an infinite number of people a car will run you over killing you.

My comments are based on actual facts that cannot be changed.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

"but we naturally risk assess everything. Swinging has a risk of getting sexually related ailments so you need to assess the risks and decide what risks you are willing to take.

My comments are based on actual facts that cannot be changed."

No. Having sex has a risk of getting 'sexually related ailments'.

Do you not think, given that the majority of the population aren't swingers that it's statistically as likely that the majority of STD's are transmitted between non-swinging individuals?

Casual sex happens. One night stands happen. Affairs happen. STD's happen.

Having been on here for 14 years and swinging for a few more than that I can pretty much guarantee you that those seriously involved are far more likely to get tested regularly than those in vanilla life, who will generally only do so once symptoms appear - which is often too late.

And yes. People can make their own assessments based on whatever they want, including veris. But the idea that you can assume that anything you see on here reflects a true picture of someone's sexual activity is hilarious.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"but we naturally risk assess everything. Swinging has a risk of getting sexually related ailments so you need to assess the risks and decide what risks you are willing to take.

My comments are based on actual facts that cannot be changed.

No. Having sex has a risk of getting 'sexually related ailments'.

Do you not think, given that the majority of the population aren't swingers that it's statistically as likely that the majority of STD's are transmitted between non-swinging individuals?

Casual sex happens. One night stands happen. Affairs happen. STD's happen.

You can’t disagree that the more people you have sex with increases the chance of you catching something, no matter how safe you are? That is a fact.

If I like swinging, but want to be safe I use what information I have to make an informed decision.

If I see a profile with someone having unprotected sex with lots of different people then I can use that information to make a choice. If I see they have a significant amount of meets I can use that I formation to make a choice.

These are just facts and the way of the world!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

You can’t disagree that the more people you have sex with increases the chance of you catching something, no matter how safe you are? That is a fact.

If I like swinging, but want to be safe I use what information I have to make an informed decision.

These are just facts and the way of the world!!!"

You can call anything you want a 'fact' but it doesn't make it one.

And I can disagree with your assertion that the more people you have sex with the more likely you are to catch something. That's bullshit.

If you have protected sex with 100 people who all also have protected sex 100% of the time then your risk is lower than if you have unprotected sex with 5 people who always have unprotected sex.

Seeing someone who has lots of meets only gives you a partial picture. It doesn't always tell you what happened - protected or not, anal, oral, exchange of bodily fluids......few veris go into that much detail. Just because you don't see something on a profile or in a veri doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Swing how you choose.

But don't start claiming 'facts are facts' because they're not.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eano78Man
over a year ago

Worthing

I've had the chance to meet people with a lot of verifications and yes it put me off tbh and I didn't because of it. I've come to learn that I'm looking for something more than that.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You can’t disagree that the more people you have sex with increases the chance of you catching something, no matter how safe you are? That is a fact.

If I like swinging, but want to be safe I use what information I have to make an informed decision.

These are just facts and the way of the world!!!

You can call anything you want a 'fact' but it doesn't make it one.

And I can disagree with your assertion that the more people you have sex with the more likely you are to catch something. That's bullshit.

If you have protected sex with 100 people who all also have protected sex 100% of the time then your risk is lower than if you have unprotected sex with 5 people who always have unprotected sex.

Swing how you choose.

But don't start claiming 'facts are facts' because they're not.

Yes you are right, and we are moving into multi variable analysis there. However this discussion is based on one factor, number of meets.

If I have sex with 100 people versus 1 person I am statistically more likely to have sex with someone who has an STI.

If I have sex with 100 people versus 1 persons with a condom the condom is more likely to break.

Therefore if I have sex with 100 people versus 1 then I am more likely to catch an stop via condom breakage. It’s a statistical fact. Go on a statists course and you will understand.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eano78Man
over a year ago

Worthing

You are also assuming a condom is some kind of magic protection device. Bodily contact passes viruses, simple.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *AYENCouple
over a year ago

Lincolnshire

"If you're looking for no strings sex, then surely a high veri count can only be seen as a good thing.

If you're looking for something regular, then it might suggest they aren't for you.

Horses for courses.

why cant it be both ?? we have regular guys we got to know over the years and still look for others ??"

Of course it can be both, that's why I said "it might suggest"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ackandtheunicornCouple
over a year ago

liverpool

Wouldn't bother me. I'm far more interested in wether they take good precautions, get tested regularly and are generally sensible.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittleMissCaliWoman
over a year ago

all loved up

"You are also assuming a condom is some kind of magic protection device. Bodily contact passes viruses, simple."
it must help..I've met thousands ,use condoms and regular testing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"How do you feel about meeting a single person or couple with over 600 verifications from sex meets, not socials?

Would you meet a person who had recently met them?

Would like others input or views. We are of the belief that you live and let live, it's none of our business what others get up to...until it involves us when they ask to meet us... "

That is one hell of a lot of meets...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley

What about those who don’t display verifications? How do you know without reading them all that they are from meets where they had sex?

They could’ve been at a party and played with one person but received verifications from everyone at the party!

I’ve received verifications from people who have seen me as part of a demonstration in a dungeon at a club. I didn’t play with any of them.

Nearly all my verifications are from social meets as I organise several social meet ups.

Everyone makes their own choices on here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

You can’t disagree that the more people you have sex with increases the chance of you catching something, no matter how safe you are? That is a fact.

If I like swinging, but want to be safe I use what information I have to make an informed decision.

These are just facts and the way of the world!!!

You can call anything you want a 'fact' but it doesn't make it one.

And I can disagree with your assertion that the more people you have sex with the more likely you are to catch something. That's bullshit.

If you have protected sex with 100 people who all also have protected sex 100% of the time then your risk is lower than if you have unprotected sex with 5 people who always have unprotected sex.

Swing how you choose.

But don't start claiming 'facts are facts' because they're not.

Yes you are right, and we are moving into multi variable analysis there. However this discussion is based on one factor, number of meets.

If I have sex with 100 people versus 1 person I am statistically more likely to have sex with someone who has an STI.

If I have sex with 100 people versus 1 persons with a condom the condom is more likely to break.

Therefore if I have sex with 100 people versus 1 then I am more likely to catch an stop via condom breakage. It’s a statistical fact. Go on a statists course and you will understand.

But you can prove anything with statistics. Always been the case, and theory isn't always accurate in reality.

Take 100 couples. They get marries and for the first two years after marriage all of them live in monogamous relationships. So no sex with anyone else at all. So no transmission of any STD's.

Two years after marriage all 100 couples become swingers and start fucking each other daily, but nobody outside that group of 200 people. Now bearing in mind they all started STD free.....what's the risk of any of them catching anything?

Now take one couple. They get married and from day one start swinging every week, fucking singles, couples and groups. People from anywhere that they don't know.

Who is more likely to catch something? Those fucking daily or weekly?

Because, well.....one is having more meets than the other.

This discussion wasn't just based on number of meets was it, even though at first glance it may have seemed to be.

As you say. Multi variable analysis is important. And unavoidable no matter how you try......