FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swingers Chat

A favour involving my wife’s tits

Jump to newest
 

By *egabristols OP   Couple
over a year ago

penarth

It’d really turn me on if a load of people had a photo of my wife’s boobs on their phones!

Would you do me a solid by saving the photo to your phone and then send it to me in a message?

I’ll reply with more photos.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebedy_XMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Messaged you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opsy RogersWoman
over a year ago

London


"It’d really turn me on if a load of people had a photo of my wife’s boobs on their phones!

Would you do me a solid by saving the photo to your phone and then send it to me in a message?

I’ll reply with more photos. "

Has she consented to this and can you prove it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opsy RogersWoman
over a year ago

London


"Messaged you "

Have you asked for his wife for her consent?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *egabristols OP   Couple
over a year ago

penarth

Yes and No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes and No. "

What does that mean?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *egabristols OP   Couple
over a year ago

penarth

Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opsy RogersWoman
over a year ago

London


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it. "

So no then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

"

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opsy RogersWoman
over a year ago

London


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass."

I call people out on acts that violate another person.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass."

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

I call people out on acts that violate another person."

I'm not sure why you feel entitled to proof from anyone on here.

I'm not sure how important you feel you are.

When we are meeting and we send private pics to someone we don't ever feel the need to somehow prove that we both give consent..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

I call people out on acts that violate another person."

You did nothing of the sort.

What you did there was call the OP a liar simply because he chose not to prove to you that he has obtained sufficient consent from his wife.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume. "

What was deliberately opaque about the sentence:

Yes my wife consents.

I would say that was a fairly clear attestation.

However it wasn't sufficient for him not to be then called a liar, based on a judgement made simply because he chose not to provide sufficient evidence to a complete stranger.

I wouldn't assume anything about me, in the same way that I don't assume anything about you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume.

What was deliberately opaque about the sentence:

Yes my wife consents.

I would say that was a fairly clear attestation.

However it wasn't sufficient for him not to be then called a liar, based on a judgement made simply because he chose not to provide sufficient evidence to a complete stranger.

I wouldn't assume anything about me, in the same way that I don't assume anything about you."

I’m not calling anyone a liar. Just unclear, based on what’s been said. If there is consent then there’s no issue no one needs to see that in here but I would suggest if sending pics to strangers from the internet having something to demonstrate that consent. Not least when uou have no idea who you’re sending it to and how they might use a (perceived or assumed) lack of consent. Cover your ass I guess is what I’m saying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume.

What was deliberately opaque about the sentence:

Yes my wife consents.

I would say that was a fairly clear attestation.

However it wasn't sufficient for him not to be then called a liar, based on a judgement made simply because he chose not to provide sufficient evidence to a complete stranger.

I wouldn't assume anything about me, in the same way that I don't assume anything about you.

I’m not calling anyone a liar. Just unclear, based on what’s been said. If there is consent then there’s no issue no one needs to see that in here but I would suggest if sending pics to strangers from the internet having something to demonstrate that consent. Not least when uou have no idea who you’re sending it to and how they might use a (perceived or assumed) lack of consent. Cover your ass I guess is what I’m saying. "

Please re-read my last reply to you. It did not say that you called anyone a liar. It said that someone else on here called him a liar because he did not deign to give her the evidence she sought.

I hope that is now clear.

Onto your second point and the scary evil consequences they can be put to, I don't see why you would have any pictures on your profile given that anybody can download them and effectively do what they wish with them. The moment you post them they are public domain, and you don't get to effectively control what happens next. That is before we get to the hundreds of pictures that will be exchanged on here every day.

What method of consent evidencing would you suggest? I am genuinely interested. I don't believe there is a workable solution out there cutrently which wouldn't ruin this site and many others overnight.

What I would suggest however is that proving it to a complete stranger who asks for evidence on a thread which isn't aimed at her, given her response, is probably not the solution you should be throwing your weight behind.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
over a year ago

Ayrshire

These kind of posts might be questioned less if it was the woman making the request.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"

Would you do me a solid "

A poo ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester

[Removed by poster at 07/04/22 07:50:08]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"

Would you do me a solid

A poo ?"

That's a request for a different type of website, or at least I hope it is

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustforfun1759Couple
over a year ago

IRVINE

As a woman,does ur wife know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"As a woman,does ur wife know "

If the suspense gets too much, just read down the thread where the OP has kindly answered that question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
over a year ago

Ayrshire


"As a woman,does ur wife know

If the suspense gets too much, just read down the thread where the OP has kindly answered that question."

Should we not all take some personal responsibility for checking the finer details of things like this, rather than just going on decidedly dubious sounding say so?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

The tit pic is already on the profile so it is already on our phones

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a woman,does ur wife know

If the suspense gets too much, just read down the thread where the OP has kindly answered that question.

Should we not all take some personal responsibility for checking the finer details of things like this, rather than just going on decidedly dubious sounding say so?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illingdon_ladMan
over a year ago

Bicester


"The tit pic is already on the profile so it is already on our phones"

I was just about to say that. As the op I a couples profile I'd say it's more than likely he has consent. I'd certainly be concerned if it was a single male profile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As a woman,does ur wife know

If the suspense gets too much, just read down the thread where the OP has kindly answered that question.

Should we not all take some personal responsibility for checking the finer details of things like this, rather than just going on decidedly dubious sounding say so?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illingdon_ladMan
over a year ago

Bicester


"The tit pic is already on the profile so it is already on our phones

I was just about to say that. As the op I a couples profile I'd say it's more than likely he has consent. I'd certainly be concerned if it was a single male profile "

A photo verified couple too

Btw OP they are a fantastic pair.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mashingPumpkinMan
over a year ago

Carmarthen

Jees

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

WTAF?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That is wayyy too much drama for some tittiesss

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ak4uMan
over a year ago

chelmsford


"As a woman,does ur wife know

If the suspense gets too much, just read down the thread where the OP has kindly answered that question.

Should we not all take some personal responsibility for checking the finer details of things like this, rather than just going on decidedly dubious sounding say so?

"

You don't need to be a couple to have a couples profile.

Sometimes a "couple" fits the narrative better.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ak4uMan
over a year ago

chelmsford

"Has she consented to this and can you prove it?"

This question could be asked of many pic posters on this site......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Has she consented to this and can you prove it?"

This question could be asked of many pic posters on this site......"

Sadly, that is very very true. I shudder to think how many people don’t know that they are featured in profile pictures

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ak4uMan
over a year ago

chelmsford


""Has she consented to this and can you prove it?"

This question could be asked of many pic posters on this site......

Sadly, that is very very true. I shudder to think how many people don’t know that they are featured in profile pictures "

And not just this site, there are dozens similar, and thousands upon thousands of photos posted everyday.

Anybody would think it's almost acceptable to post pics of unaware women.......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzz And WoodyCouple
over a year ago

Maidstone

So, in short, the OP has made the mistake of posting as the male half of the couple. He should have pretended to be the female half, like so many other people on here.

How do we know the female only profiles on here are actually those females and not a male or other female pretending to be the one in the photos?

And how would the OP ‘prove’ he has consent? Would you trust the proof?

Sometimes we just have to trust or ignore.

Lou x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *egabristols OP   Couple
over a year ago

penarth

Thank you very much to all of you!

To the egocentric ones, and especially to those of you that served up a spoonful of common sense and reality.

We’ve had so many messages!

Peace Out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouplefunukCouple
over a year ago

North Bristol

Don't forget the site T's & C's state:

10.12 You must not send or publish Content depicting anyone else unless you first:

a) ensure they are aware of your Fabswingers username and that they give you their specific written and signed consent to being included in the Content as well as to that Content being shown publicly on Fabswingers and potentially downloaded by other Users

Assuming he's following the site rules (yeah, I know...) the images would have been posted with her consent. Any user could have downloaded them already.

All he has done here is draw our attention to them and ask for images showing that we have.

*Him*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
over a year ago

Ayrshire


"Thank you very much to all of you!

To the egocentric ones, and especially to those of you that served up a spoonful of common sense and reality.

We’ve had so many messages!

Peace Out. "

I'm not sure you know what egocentric means

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume.

What was deliberately opaque about the sentence:

Yes my wife consents.

I would say that was a fairly clear attestation.

However it wasn't sufficient for him not to be then called a liar, based on a judgement made simply because he chose not to provide sufficient evidence to a complete stranger.

I wouldn't assume anything about me, in the same way that I don't assume anything about you.

I’m not calling anyone a liar. Just unclear, based on what’s been said. If there is consent then there’s no issue no one needs to see that in here but I would suggest if sending pics to strangers from the internet having something to demonstrate that consent. Not least when uou have no idea who you’re sending it to and how they might use a (perceived or assumed) lack of consent. Cover your ass I guess is what I’m saying.

Please re-read my last reply to you. It did not say that you called anyone a liar. It said that someone else on here called him a liar because he did not deign to give her the evidence she sought.

I hope that is now clear.

Onto your second point and the scary evil consequences they can be put to, I don't see why you would have any pictures on your profile given that anybody can download them and effectively do what they wish with them. The moment you post them they are public domain, and you don't get to effectively control what happens next. That is before we get to the hundreds of pictures that will be exchanged on here every day.

What method of consent evidencing would you suggest? I am genuinely interested. I don't believe there is a workable solution out there cutrently which wouldn't ruin this site and many others overnight.

What I would suggest however is that proving it to a complete stranger who asks for evidence on a thread which isn't aimed at her, given her response, is probably not the solution you should be throwing your weight behind."

Just because an image is posted online 'in the public domain' doesn't mean that anyone can do what they want with it. Copyright of the image and it's use belongs to the person that took the photo (not the person in it, unless copyright is assigned) and they maintain the legal right to determine where it can be posted and who can use it. So whilst anybody can download it and as you say 'do what they wish' they'd be in breach of the law and depending on what they did with an image be liable for a fine of up to £50k and/or 5 years in prison, or could be prosecuted under revenge porn laws if it was deemed that their actions broke those rules.

On the subject of what sites like this can do? I'd suggest reading the site rules. Someone has already copied and pasted the relevant rule above to make it easier.

If you think that proof of consent isn't required from both a moral and legal standpoint then you're wrong.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliette500Woman
over a year ago

Hull


"It’d really turn me on if a load of people had a photo of my wife’s boobs on their phones!

Would you do me a solid by saving the photo to your phone and then send it to me in a message?

I’ll reply with more photos.

Has she consented to this and can you prove it?"

Since they are already on public view on their couples profile I'd say its a mute point. Anyone could copy the pic to their phone if they wanted to with consent or not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ominantDogMan
over a year ago

Docklands, Exmoor, Manchester


"Yes my wife consents.

No I won’t prove it.

So no then.

Or perhaps he just doesn't feel he has to prove it to you either way?

Consent is key to a lot of what I do in both my personal and professional life, but evidencing consent to complete strangers who choose to insert themselves into the conversation? Unless you have got yourself a nice shiny sheriff's badge, I think I will pass.

Don’t need a sheriff badge to be a moral person. This is an open forum so no one is “inserting themselves” into the conversation. The OP wants to send pics of his wife to strangers from the internet and is being deliberately opaque about consent.

If that was your daughter or your wife you wouldnt be so neutral I’d assume.

What was deliberately opaque about the sentence:

Yes my wife consents.

I would say that was a fairly clear attestation.

However it wasn't sufficient for him not to be then called a liar, based on a judgement made simply because he chose not to provide sufficient evidence to a complete stranger.

I wouldn't assume anything about me, in the same way that I don't assume anything about you.

I’m not calling anyone a liar. Just unclear, based on what’s been said. If there is consent then there’s no issue no one needs to see that in here but I would suggest if sending pics to strangers from the internet having something to demonstrate that consent. Not least when uou have no idea who you’re sending it to and how they might use a (perceived or assumed) lack of consent. Cover your ass I guess is what I’m saying.

Please re-read my last reply to you. It did not say that you called anyone a liar. It said that someone else on here called him a liar because he did not deign to give her the evidence she sought.

I hope that is now clear.

Onto your second point and the scary evil consequences they can be put to, I don't see why you would have any pictures on your profile given that anybody can download them and effectively do what they wish with them. The moment you post them they are public domain, and you don't get to effectively control what happens next. That is before we get to the hundreds of pictures that will be exchanged on here every day.

What method of consent evidencing would you suggest? I am genuinely interested. I don't believe there is a workable solution out there cutrently which wouldn't ruin this site and many others overnight.

What I would suggest however is that proving it to a complete stranger who asks for evidence on a thread which isn't aimed at her, given her response, is probably not the solution you should be throwing your weight behind.

Just because an image is posted online 'in the public domain' doesn't mean that anyone can do what they want with it. Copyright of the image and it's use belongs to the person that took the photo (not the person in it, unless copyright is assigned) and they maintain the legal right to determine where it can be posted and who can use it. So whilst anybody can download it and as you say 'do what they wish' they'd be in breach of the law and depending on what they did with an image be liable for a fine of up to £50k and/or 5 years in prison, or could be prosecuted under revenge porn laws if it was deemed that their actions broke those rules.

On the subject of what sites like this can do? I'd suggest reading the site rules. Someone has already copied and pasted the relevant rule above to make it easier.

If you think that proof of consent isn't required from both a moral and legal standpoint then you're wrong.

A

"

Thanks for the lecture.

My point was entirely about who that proof of consent needs to be provided to. I don't think it's to anybody who appoints themselves as the judge then declares their judgement when the OP declines to comply to their satisfaction.

Your selective quoting of my message omits the rather crucial word "effectively". It matters here.

I understand both the letter and the spirit of the law. I also would suggest that whilst the comprehensive terms and conditions of this site are written beautifully they are intended to do nothing more than comply with legal obligations required to continue operating. I am happy to be proved wrong on this point. I just see a disconnect between the rules and the ability to enforce them.

As a result, these site rules are, unfortunately, in all likelihood broken without consequence repeatedly here on a daily basis. Hence, individuals can do what they like with images with very little fear of consequence or retribution. It's not right, but that is the reality of the internet.

That said, I would hope that on this occasion the OP was sincere when he attested that his wife was fully aware.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top