Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Swingers Chat |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1 question. WHY?" Why what? Why should they have it deleted you mean? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1 question. WHY? Why what? Why should they have it deleted you mean?" Yes. Why?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile" Exactly! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts?" How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that? " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile" Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts?" Got distracted earlier and couldn't finish my point. There are PLENTY of people on here who NEVER meet - for all sorts of reasons. One of those may be that they are disabled (although there are disabled swingers on here who DO meet) and the whole process of working towards a meet - let alone actually having one - is, to say the least, difficult. Wonder what it is about a profile with no veris after a year that bothers you? Been caught by a picture collector maybe...??? Only you know the answer to that one.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified?" Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that? "Hahahaha! Oh I see what you did there. Well you better get me deleted then! Nice dig! Good one, like your style. 
Oh by the way all, I'm just asking the question as it was put to me by a friend last night i'm neither for or against so no need to go on the attack. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that?
Hahahaha! Oh I see what you did there. Well you better get me deleted then! Nice dig! Good one, like your style.
Oh by the way all, I'm just asking the question as it was put to me by a friend last night i'm neither for or against so no need to go on the attack. "it's not abouta dig, it's about where you set the limits! Wolf
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that?
Hahahaha! Oh I see what you did there. Well you better get me deleted then! Nice dig! Good one, like your style.
Oh by the way all, I'm just asking the question as it was put to me by a friend last night i'm neither for or against so no need to go on the attack. "\ Wasn't an attack! You'd know if it was!! You posed a question about an arbitrary method of disposing of profiles. So my suggest method was just as arbitrary. Now, had you given a bit more info in your OP I could have provided something a little more relevant to your 'friends' question.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though. "Why are you assuming it urks me? All I did was ask a question to see what peoples thoughts are. I never once said I was for or against it and yet you're trying to nail me to the wall on it. Lets relax and take a breath. Jeez all I did was ask a question. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though.
Why are you assuming it urks me? All I did was ask a question to see what peoples thoughts are. I never once said I was for or against it and yet you're trying to nail me to the wall on it. Lets relax and take a breath. Jeez all I did was ask a question."\ As I am sure you are aware, behind every question lies a reason for posing it..... and as the layers are peeled back you slowly get at the reason behind it. So what was your friend's concern about un-accessed or unverified profiles? I do take the point that their presence just means there is more guff to wade through and sift out when trying to find the right people, but it's not something I would get hung up about. All sites do it (keep old profiles on) as it makes their figures look good. One I was on claimed 65k members in the UK, but at any one time no more than 900 were online.... so the conclusion to be drawn from that is...? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though.
Why are you assuming it urks me? All I did was ask a question to see what peoples thoughts are. I never once said I was for or against it and yet you're trying to nail me to the wall on it. Lets relax and take a breath. Jeez all I did was ask a question.\
As I am sure you are aware, behind every question lies a reason for posing it..... and as the layers are peeled back you slowly get at the reason behind it. So what was your friend's concern about un-accessed or unverified profiles? I do take the point that their presence just means there is more guff to wade through and sift out when trying to find the right people, but it's not something I would get hung up about. All sites do it (keep old profiles on) as it makes their figures look good. One I was on claimed 65k members in the UK, but at any one time no more than 900 were online.... so the conclusion to be drawn from that is...? "But then when you search for someone aren't the more recent ones that have been on line at the front? I know when we do a search by about the 4th page we get fed up  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that?
Hahahaha! Oh I see what you did there. Well you better get me deleted then! Nice dig! Good one, like your style.
Oh by the way all, I'm just asking the question as it was put to me by a friend last night i'm neither for or against so no need to go on the attack. \
Wasn't an attack! You'd know if it was!! You posed a question about an arbitrary method of disposing of profiles. So my suggest method was just as arbitrary. Now, had you given a bit more info in your OP I could have provided something a little more relevant to your 'friends' question.... "Oh I don't need this!! I only asked a sodding question that I was being very neutral about. This is the last time I'm going to use these forums. Goodbye!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If somebody has had a profile on the site for over a year but has no verification of any shape or form should they have their profile deleted by the website owners? What are your thoughts? How about if we said anyone who's most recent verification is more than six months old should be deleted, how would you feel about that?
Hahahaha! Oh I see what you did there. Well you better get me deleted then! Nice dig! Good one, like your style.
Oh by the way all, I'm just asking the question as it was put to me by a friend last night i'm neither for or against so no need to go on the attack. \
Wasn't an attack! You'd know if it was!! You posed a question about an arbitrary method of disposing of profiles. So my suggest method was just as arbitrary. Now, had you given a bit more info in your OP I could have provided something a little more relevant to your 'friends' question.... "Oh I don't need this!! I only asked a sodding question that I was being very neutral about. This is the last time I'm going to use these forums. Goodbye!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though.
Why are you assuming it urks me? All I did was ask a question to see what peoples thoughts are. I never once said I was for or against it and yet you're trying to nail me to the wall on it. Lets relax and take a breath. Jeez all I did was ask a question.\
As I am sure you are aware, behind every question lies a reason for posing it..... and as the layers are peeled back you slowly get at the reason behind it. So what was your friend's concern about un-accessed or unverified profiles? I do take the point that their presence just means there is more guff to wade through and sift out when trying to find the right people, but it's not something I would get hung up about. All sites do it (keep old profiles on) as it makes their figures look good. One I was on claimed 65k members in the UK, but at any one time no more than 900 were online.... so the conclusion to be drawn from that is...?
But then when you search for someone aren't the more recent ones that have been on line at the front?
I know when we do a search by about the 4th page we get fed up "\ Exactly Champers, which puzzles me all the more about the original question..?\ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Wolf
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified? Ah! So it's not just the lack of veris that irks you - it's the not logging on for long periods? And, again, why does that bother you? As for the lack of veris, there are myriad reasons as to why someone has not logged on for sometime - doesn't mean they have to delete their account though.
Why are you assuming it urks me? All I did was ask a question to see what peoples thoughts are. I never once said I was for or against it and yet you're trying to nail me to the wall on it. Lets relax and take a breath. Jeez all I did was ask a question.\
As I am sure you are aware, behind every question lies a reason for posing it..... and as the layers are peeled back you slowly get at the reason behind it. So what was your friend's concern about un-accessed or unverified profiles? I do take the point that their presence just means there is more guff to wade through and sift out when trying to find the right people, but it's not something I would get hung up about. All sites do it (keep old profiles on) as it makes their figures look good. One I was on claimed 65k members in the UK, but at any one time no more than 900 were online.... so the conclusion to be drawn from that is...? "I didnt start this post because there are any hidden layers to my question! I do not need to be pshyco-analyzed and I had more than enough toys and friends as a child. Does that answer your modern pshyc theory about why I first asked the question? Tata people. Enjoy your forum. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well some of US go and have kids so dont meet for 18 months, so no!" \ Love your 'Legal Warning'!! \
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree why? All we have to do is ignore that profile Well I guess 2 reasons are it cuts down on the amount of fakes and also if you go to FAQ it says they tend to remove emails from peoples accounts if they've not logged in for a while cause it slows down the site. Perhaps deleting said profiles would help too. But then of course there is the other, completely valid, side of the argument where some people are just here to browse or chat. This is their right so why should they have to get verified?" it would not cut down on fakes at all, think about it you got profiles that happy being on here a year without any verifications and say they a timewaster like you hope to cut out, but at the moment you can look at the account and make the assumption they never meet anyone as they arnt verified. now after 12 months of time wasting, the site deletes the account, so now you have the same person sign back up again and carry on timewasting but it says they been on here less than a month. so now you cant look at the account and see how long they have really been on here and make up your mind if there are a timewaster. new account or old a timewaster is still going to waste peoples time. but current verification system at least gives you the tools to make assumptions about certain memebers, that forcing people to delete their accounts would take away much easier to use a verification only filter | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hope not I like it here! 
BYEEEEEEEEEEEE  "Wind your neck in! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
