FabSwingers.com forum: Uncut vs Cut

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Do ladies prefer cut or uncut?! x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uenevereWoman
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

Not for sex.

Hand job is easier with uncut though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uenevereWoman
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "

Sadly, circumcision is still legal

I think it should be in the same category as FGM and only allowed for medical reasons. My dad was circumcised as a baby for medical reasons and quite rightly my gran absolutely hated the idea, but accepted it was necessary.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Agree

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rownskinmaleMan
over a year ago

Essex

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *lwenWoman
over a year ago

De12 area

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "

My brother had his circumcised on Monday.. Due to medical reasons and he's in his 50s..

So yes men are still getting it done..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria

"Do ladies prefer cut or uncut?! x"

Op is this a look I've to go less sink than you post.

No one under the age of 18 should have bits of themself removed to fit into a box.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture "

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ickedwillyCouple
over a year ago

Bangor

Cut every time for my wife

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LiamMan
over a year ago

Midlands

I've not had forskin since I was about 3, never had anyone turn me down because of it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Generally prefer uncut but I’ve had amazing cut dicks !!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

Sadly, circumcision is still legal

Agree 100%, for medical purposes only otherwise it is mutilation. There is a foreskin there for a reason

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It should be banned with the exception of medical circumstances.

Uncut for me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *henightstagMan
over a year ago

London

"Generally prefer uncut but I’ve had amazing cut dicks !!

Can see that from your amazing videos!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP. "

It’s adults mutilating children just the same as FGM in Africa. The children don’t a choice , it’s wrong. The fact that it’s legal in the uk in certain cultures using “medical reasons” to get around the law and thier own doctors is a disgrace

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't mind xx

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP. "

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *DGF20Man
over a year ago

Dublin

Cut are always number one

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fully retractable here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ojjerMan
over a year ago

boston

Retractable best of both worlds....retractable sounds like a tool multifunctional maybe lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hope they don’t mind either .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mine was done as a child for medical reasons. Never had any negative experience because of it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Not for sex.

Hand job is easier with uncut though."

I'd advise more lube in that case

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Not for sex.

Hand job is easier with uncut though."

I'm imagining your style of hand job, please don't take offense as what works for me won't be for everyone, wanting loose skin does jack shit for me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was spoiled for 15 years of a 21 Yr marriage as ex hubby was circumcised - loved him being cut.

If I had a preference, I would say cut but at the end of the day, it's the fella I'm more attracted to rather than his missing or intact foreskin

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was cut in my 30s. I much prefer the look now.

How about you ?.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m uncut, been married a couple of times, had numerous lovers, got four kids and it’s served me well and given loads of pleasure but foreskin is tight and painful to retract. So getting it removed soon and looking forward to feeling a mouth around the exposed head.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nimaginativeUsernameMan
over a year ago

Rochester, Kent

I’ve never had any complaints being cut. In fact, women often say they prefer it, esp for sucking

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Mine was done as a child for medical reasons. Never had any negative experience because of it."

Same for me too. We both prefer the look of a cut cock tho

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong "

"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."

-----------------------

That's just your opinion though.

There is no law which says it is wrong.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong "

That's just your 'opinion'.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *etro1940sCouple
over a year ago

Kingston upon Thames

Skilled - regardless of cut versus uncut x Anne

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ieandteaseMan
over a year ago

Wiltshire

"Cut are always number one

Yeah they are preferable but not so common these days. Personal choice I guess but I do find them impressive.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uitednbooted2Man
over a year ago

Berkshire

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

That's just your 'opinion'."

Why are you sending me unsolicited DMs to me about this ????

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don’t mind but if uncut the foreskin has to retract fully

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *urora1912Woman
over a year ago

Norfolk East anglia

Not bothered either way

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *d StrakerMan
over a year ago

Basildon

Just my opinion, but definitely uncut. Really don't like the look of cut, to me a lot of them just look like they've been beaten up.

And just an observation, but during my time on here I've had quite a few messages from cut guys wanting to play with my uncut cock just to find out what it's like

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Plenty of foreskin, and easily fully retractable. Tends to retract like that during sex anyway

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tickler2000Man
over a year ago

St Agnes

I'm uncut but I keep it retracted 24/7 which has lead to confusion for some.

It's like having the best of both

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip

Uncut is our preference. That's how I am and I hope it never has to change. Luke

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."

-----------------------

That's just your opinion though.

There is no law which says it is wrong. "

So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.

How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *otts72Man
over a year ago

London

I was cut when i was 2 for medical reasons. Not had any complaints and dont know any different but its interesting to see peoples opinions and preferences.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."

-----------------------

That's just your opinion though.

There is no law which says it is wrong.

So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.

How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?"

".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."

---------------------------

Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Was supposed to go yesterday morning for mine to be cut looks like I have to go anougher week, not much fun in this heat.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittyndCouple
over a year ago

Oldham/Birmingham

I prefer cut but I have had sex with uncut x for me girth matters x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *d StrakerMan
over a year ago

Basildon

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."

-----------------------

That's just your opinion though.

There is no law which says it is wrong.

So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.

How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?

".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."

---------------------------

Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart."

Yeah it pretty much is if there is no medical requirement to do so, on a person who has no say in the matter.

If you want to chop the end of your knob when you're 18, then go crazy, but there really is no justification for this to still be carried out on babies/boys unless it's causing a physical problem

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was circumcised 3 years ago and wouldn’t look back. I had a very tight foreskin! Hence the breaking of my banjo!!

Jeez my eyes still water. However wish I had it done years ago!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like the fact that I can pull it right back and cover it up when needed

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?

I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture

Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it

It’s not illegal.

So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.

Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.

I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong

"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."

-----------------------

That's just your opinion though.

There is no law which says it is wrong.

So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.

How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?

".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."

---------------------------

Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart.

Yeah it pretty much is if there is no medical requirement to do so, on a person who has no say in the matter.

If you want to chop the end of your knob when you're 18, then go crazy, but there really is no justification for this to still be carried out on babies/boys unless it's causing a physical problem"

Maybe you first need to check the meaning of mutilation, as that's the the issue I was responding to.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *d StrakerMan
over a year ago

Basildon

Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia

So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.

I think that pretty much describes circumcision

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ogging-funMan
over a year ago

stone

Uncut or I like to call it my little winter hat

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia

So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.

I think that pretty much describes circumcision"

And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.

It describes mutilation as:

to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.

1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.

2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.

As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.

Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'

Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'

So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *d StrakerMan
over a year ago

Basildon

So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.

I think that pretty much describes circumcision

And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.

It describes mutilation as:

to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.

1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.

2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.

As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.

Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'

Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'

So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.

Well we'll just have to agree to disagree

I'm just very grateful my parents didn't mutilate me without my consent

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *D835Man
over a year ago

London

So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.

I think that pretty much describes circumcision

And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.

It describes mutilation as:

to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.

1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.

2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.

As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.

Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'

Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'

So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.

Well we'll just have to agree to disagree

I'm just very grateful my parents didn't mutilate me without my consent

Yes we have to agree to disagree.

That's why I said from the onset, that there is no right or wrong answer to this issue.

It's down to opinion, - which obviously varies from one person to another.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *anadacockMan
over a year ago

Victoria

I'm uncut and can retract my foreskin easily. The foreskin sliding back and forth over the head feels amazing. A few lady friends on Skype like to watch me move my foreskin over the head and pull it back for them

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?

However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "

I was circumsised at a very young age for medical reasons.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

uncut

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread